X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#13551: 24.3.50; epa-mail-encrypt chooses wrong key Resent-From: Richard Stallman <rms@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.13551.B.135914957713021 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: report 13551 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13551 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Reply-To: rms@HIDDEN Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.135914957713021 (code B ref -1); Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:33:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jan 2013 21:32:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49620 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1TyqtM-0003Ny-LU for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:32:57 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58579) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <rms@HIDDEN>) id 1TyqtJ-0003Nr-Fw for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:32:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rms@HIDDEN>) id 1Tyqt4-00008g-L4 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:32:43 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:34915) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rms@HIDDEN>) id 1Tyqt4-00008X-HY for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:32:38 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41667) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rms@HIDDEN>) id 1Tyqt1-0000Eh-BC for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:32:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rms@HIDDEN>) id 1Tyqsy-00006k-JA for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:32:35 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:51426) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rms@HIDDEN>) id 1Tyqsy-00006e-G0 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:32:32 -0500 Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rms@HIDDEN>) id 1Tyqsx-0005dB-R9; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:32:31 -0500 Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:32:31 -0500 Message-Id: <E1Tyqsx-0005dB-R9@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 From: Richard Stallman <rms@HIDDEN> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) I have a public key for martin@HIDDEN and a key for another martin at another host. When I encrypt a message to `martin' -- which means, in my case, `martin@HIDDEN' -- epa-mail-encrypt picks the other martin. epa needs to know the default mail hostname so as to pick the correct Martin. It can get that from the value of user-mail-address, and maybe have other ways to specify it. In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (mips64el-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.12.12) of 2013-01-03 on chiefs-gnewsense Bzr revision: 111408 rgm@HIDDEN System Description: Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.6 (squeeze) Configured using: `configure CFLAGS=-O0 -g --with-gif=no --with-tiff=no --no-create --no-recursion' Important settings: value of $LANG: en_US.UTF-8 locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix default enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: Mail Minor modes in effect: gpm-mouse-mode: t tooltip-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t abbrev-mode: t Recent input: C-x b o u t g TAB RET g e ESC x e p a d RET y C-n C-n C-n C-p C-e @ g n u . o r g ESC x e p a SPC m a i l SPC e n c TAB RET y y y C-x C-s C-c C-s y C-x b o u t g TAB RET g C-p e C-x b o u t - 2 9 RET C-_ ESC DEL ESC DEL DEL ESC x e p a SPC m a i l SPC e n TAB RET y y C-x 4 b RET C-x o C-x k RET y e s RET ESC x r e p o r t SPC e m a c s SPC b u g RET Recent messages: Saving file /home/rms/outgoing/out-29... Wrote /home/rms/outgoing/out-29 Send buffer contents as mail message? (y or n) y Sending... Wrote /home/rms/outgoing/out-30 Sending...done Undo! No public key for rms-response-1w@HIDDEN; skip it? (y or n) y No public key for rms-outgoing@HIDDEN; skip it? (y or n) y Encrypting...done Load-path shadows: None found. Features: (shadow emacsbug mailalias epa-mail epa derived epg epg-config rmailmm message sendmail format-spec rfc822 mml easymenu mml-sec mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader mail-parse rfc2231 dired t-mouse time-date rmailedit rmail rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mm-util mail-prsvr mail-utils paren cus-start cus-load nadvice advice help-fns tooltip ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel x-win x-dnd tool-bar dnd fontset image regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list newcomment lisp-mode register page menu-bar rfn-eshadow timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core frame cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev minibuffer loaddefs button faces cus-face macroexp files text-properties overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote make-network-process dbusbind dynamic-setting system-font-setting font-render-setting move-toolbar gtk x-toolkit x multi-tty emacs) -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation 51 Franklin St Boston MA 02110 USA www.fsf.org www.gnu.org Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software. Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.428 (Entity 5.428) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System) To: rms@HIDDEN Subject: bug#13551: Acknowledgement (24.3.50; epa-mail-encrypt chooses wrong key) Message-ID: <handler.13551.B.135914957713021.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> References: <E1Tyqsx-0005dB-R9@HIDDEN> X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 13551 X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs Reply-To: 13551 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:33:02 +0000 Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 13551 <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 13551: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D13551 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#13551: 24.3.50; epa-mail-encrypt chooses wrong key Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.13551.B13551.156925685512675 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13551 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Richard Stallman <rms@HIDDEN> Cc: 13551 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13551-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B13551.156925685512675 (code B ref 13551); Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:41:02 +0000 Received: (at 13551) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2019 16:40:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36923 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iCROQ-0003IN-Vv for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:40:55 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:40206) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1iCROP-0003IE-PN for 13551 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:40:54 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1iCROL-0000tR-Vs; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:40:52 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> References: <E1Tyqsx-0005dB-R9@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:40:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <E1Tyqsx-0005dB-R9@HIDDEN> (Richard Stallman's message of "Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:32:31 -0500") Message-ID: <87lfuf0xv2.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Richard Stallman <rms@HIDDEN> writes: > I have a public key for martin@HIDDEN and a key for another martin at > another host. When I encrypt a message to `martin' -- which means, in > my case, `martin@HIDDEN' -- epa-mail-encrypt picks t [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Richard Stallman <rms@HIDDEN> writes: > I have a public key for martin@HIDDEN and a key for another martin at > another host. When I encrypt a message to `martin' -- which means, in > my case, `martin@HIDDEN' -- epa-mail-encrypt picks the other martin. > > epa needs to know the default mail hostname so as to pick the correct > Martin. It can get that from the value of user-mail-address, and > maybe have other ways to specify it. I don't think any security-related software should be guessing based on incomplete email addresses. As far as I can tell, it requires a complete match, which I guess means you have a key for "martin" (without a domain name) in your key ring. Choosing this is the right thing to do, I think, so I'm closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2019 16:41:05 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 23 12:41:05 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36927 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iCROb-0003JP-7h for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:41:05 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:40220) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1iCROX-0003Ih-DX for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:41:01 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1iCROU-0000tb-Lv for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:41:00 +0200 Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:40:58 +0200 Message-Id: <87k19z0xut.fsf@HIDDEN> To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> Subject: control message for bug #13551 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 13551 notabug close 13551 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 13551 notabug close 13551 quit
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2019 16:41:05 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 23 12:41:05 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36927 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iCROb-0003JP-7h for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:41:05 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:40220) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1iCROX-0003Ih-DX for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:41:01 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1iCROU-0000tb-Lv for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:41:00 +0200 Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:40:58 +0200 Message-Id: <87k19z0xut.fsf@HIDDEN> To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> Subject: control message for bug #13551 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 13551 notabug close 13551 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 13551 notabug close 13551 quit
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#13551: acknowledged by developer (control message for bug #13551) Resent-From: Richard Stallman <rms@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.13551.B13551.156958913115474 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13551 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug To: 13551 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: rms@HIDDEN Received: via spool by 13551-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B13551.156958913115474 (code B ref 13551); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:59:01 +0000 Received: (at 13551) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2019 12:58:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45962 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iDppj-00041W-9h for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 08:58:51 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45260) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rms@HIDDEN>) id 1iDppb-00040x-6s for 13551 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 08:58:44 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36083) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rms@HIDDEN>) id 1iDppU-0002cQ-O5 for 13551 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 08:58:36 -0400 Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <rms@HIDDEN>) id 1iDo3e-000599-Os; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 07:05:07 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 From: Richard Stallman <rms@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <handler.13551.C.156925686512740.notifdonectrl.0 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> (help-debbugs@HIDDEN) References: <87k19z0xut.fsf@HIDDEN> <E1Tyqsx-0005dB-R9@HIDDEN> <handler.13551.C.156925686512740.notifdonectrl.0 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Message-Id: <E1iDo3e-000599-Os@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 07:05:06 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > I don't think any security-related software should be guessing based on > incomplete email addresses. As far as I can tell, it requires a > complete match, which I guess means you have a key for "martin" (without > a domain name) in your key ring. That is totally unpredictable _for the user sending a reply_. There are various possible ok things to do, but not that. Please make this case do something predictable. -- Dr Richard Stallman Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#13551: acknowledged by developer (control message for bug #13551) Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.13551.B13551.156960074910894 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13551 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug To: Richard Stallman <rms@HIDDEN> Cc: 13551 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13551-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B13551.156960074910894 (code B ref 13551); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:13:01 +0000 Received: (at 13551) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2019 16:12:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48533 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iDsr6-0002pc-Pt for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:12:29 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:34832) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1iDsr5-0002pQ-6b for 13551 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:12:27 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1iDsr0-0003f9-TS; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:12:25 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> References: <87k19z0xut.fsf@HIDDEN> <E1Tyqsx-0005dB-R9@HIDDEN> <handler.13551.C.156925686512740.notifdonectrl.0 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> <E1iDo3e-000599-Os@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:12:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <E1iDo3e-000599-Os@HIDDEN> (Richard Stallman's message of "Fri, 27 Sep 2019 07:05:06 -0400") Message-ID: <87pnjliuqh.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Richard Stallman <rms@HIDDEN> writes: > [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] > [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] > [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's e [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Richard Stallman <rms@HIDDEN> writes: > [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] > [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] > [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > > I don't think any security-related software should be guessing based on > > incomplete email addresses. As far as I can tell, it requires a > > complete match, which I guess means you have a key for "martin" (without > > a domain name) in your key ring. > > That is totally unpredictable _for the user sending a reply_. > There are various possible ok things to do, but not that. > > Please make this case do something predictable. I'm not sure I understand. I think it does do something completely predictable -- choose the key ring entry that matches what's in your "From" header. No guessing involved. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#13551: acknowledged by developer (control message for bug #13551) Resent-From: Richard Stallman <rms@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 01:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.13551.B13551.156963435615318 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13551 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> Cc: 13551 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: rms@HIDDEN Received: via spool by 13551-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B13551.156963435615318 (code B ref 13551); Sat, 28 Sep 2019 01:33:01 +0000 Received: (at 13551) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Sep 2019 01:32:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48867 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iE1b6-0003yp-Pk for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:32:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51176) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rms@HIDDEN>) id 1iE1b4-0003yR-EL for 13551 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:32:31 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54174) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rms@HIDDEN>) id 1iE1ax-00086Q-PI; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:32:23 -0400 Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <rms@HIDDEN>) id 1iE1av-0002jt-HP; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:32:21 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 From: Richard Stallman <rms@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <87pnjliuqh.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:12:22 +0200) References: <87k19z0xut.fsf@HIDDEN> <E1Tyqsx-0005dB-R9@HIDDEN> <handler.13551.C.156925686512740.notifdonectrl.0 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> <E1iDo3e-000599-Os@HIDDEN> <87pnjliuqh.fsf@HIDDEN> Message-Id: <E1iE1av-0002jt-HP@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:32:21 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > I'm not sure I understand. I think it does do something completely > predictable -- choose the key ring entry that matches what's in your > "From" header. We seem to be failing to commnuicate. My From header always says "rms@HIDDEN", but we're talking about the address I am sending to -- in the To field. Is that what you mean? The behavior that you describe is totally unpredictable for me because it depends on data I don't know, and have no other reason to know. When foo@HIDDEN sends me a key, I don't notice what other addresses that key covers. There is no reason to. And those alternate short addresses are not listed by epa-list-keys. If I have a key for 'arthur@HIDDEN' and another for 'arthur@HIDDEN', it is a nuisice for me to check which one, if either, lists just 'arthur' as an address. Especially since when I send mail to 'arthur@HIDDEN' I may not even remember I know 'arthur@HIDDEN'. When I send mail to just 'arthur', that is equivalent by default to 'arthur@HIDDEN'. I often omit '@gnu.org' knowing this. Encryption should do the same thing: treat 'arthur' as short for 'arthur@HIDDEN'. That way it will always encrypt for the person that the mail is going to. -- Dr Richard Stallman Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#13551: acknowledged by developer (control message for bug #13551) Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 19:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.13551.B13551.156970004123920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13551 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug To: Richard Stallman <rms@HIDDEN> Cc: 13551 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13551-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B13551.156970004123920 (code B ref 13551); Sat, 28 Sep 2019 19:48:02 +0000 Received: (at 13551) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Sep 2019 19:47:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51300 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iEIgb-0006Dj-4K for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 15:47:21 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:35550) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1iEIgX-0006DR-7M for 13551 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 15:47:17 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1iEIgT-0006JD-Es; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 21:47:16 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> References: <87k19z0xut.fsf@HIDDEN> <E1Tyqsx-0005dB-R9@HIDDEN> <handler.13551.C.156925686512740.notifdonectrl.0 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> <E1iDo3e-000599-Os@HIDDEN> <87pnjliuqh.fsf@HIDDEN> <E1iE1av-0002jt-HP@HIDDEN> Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 21:47:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <E1iE1av-0002jt-HP@HIDDEN> (Richard Stallman's message of "Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:32:21 -0400") Message-ID: <87d0fkursu.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Richard Stallman <rms@HIDDEN> writes: > > I'm not sure I understand. I think it does do something completely > > predictable -- choose the key ring entry that matches what's in your > > "From" header. > > We seem to be failing to commnuic [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Richard Stallman <rms@HIDDEN> writes: > > I'm not sure I understand. I think it does do something completely > > predictable -- choose the key ring entry that matches what's in your > > "From" header. > > We seem to be failing to commnuicate. My From header always says > "rms@HIDDEN", but we're talking about the address I am sending to -- > in the To field. Is that what you mean? Yes; sorry. > When I send mail to just 'arthur', that is equivalent by default to > 'arthur@HIDDEN'. I often omit '@gnu.org' knowing this. > > Encryption should do the same thing: treat 'arthur' as short for > 'arthur@HIDDEN'. That way it will always encrypt for the person that > the mail is going to. Emacs cannot possibly know that when you send to "arthur", that that email will eventually end up going to "arthur@HIDDEN". It could guess, but guessing in an security context is a no go. So if you want to send somebody secure messages, you have to tell Emacs what address the mail is going to: You can't just say "arthur". -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#13551: acknowledged by developer (control message for bug #13551) Resent-From: Richard Stallman <rms@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2019 13:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.13551.B13551.157028153414945 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13551 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> Cc: 13551 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: rms@HIDDEN Received: via spool by 13551-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B13551.157028153414945 (code B ref 13551); Sat, 05 Oct 2019 13:19:02 +0000 Received: (at 13551) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Oct 2019 13:18:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43916 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iGjxW-0003sz-Hc for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2019 09:18:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48597) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rms@HIDDEN>) id 1iGjxU-0003sl-PZ for 13551 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2019 09:18:53 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39381) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rms@HIDDEN>) id 1iGjxP-00051E-LN; Sat, 05 Oct 2019 09:18:47 -0400 Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <rms@HIDDEN>) id 1iGjxG-0004Xi-NI; Sat, 05 Oct 2019 09:18:40 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 From: Richard Stallman <rms@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <87d0fkursu.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sat, 28 Sep 2019 21:47:13 +0200) References: <87k19z0xut.fsf@HIDDEN> <E1Tyqsx-0005dB-R9@HIDDEN> <handler.13551.C.156925686512740.notifdonectrl.0 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> <E1iDo3e-000599-Os@HIDDEN> <87pnjliuqh.fsf@HIDDEN> <E1iE1av-0002jt-HP@HIDDEN> <87d0fkursu.fsf@HIDDEN> Message-Id: <E1iGjxG-0004Xi-NI@HIDDEN> Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2019 09:18:38 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > Emacs cannot possibly know that when you send to "arthur", that that > email will eventually end up going to "arthur@HIDDEN". Sure it can. It could get the domain from mail-host-address. We could also create another variable specifically to control this. The current behavior, as you described it, is not much better security. It is unpredictable in practice for the user. However, I am not sure how much security issue there is in sending A a message encrypted for B. Nobody can decrypt that message. I have seen reason to think that the current behavior doesn't match what you described. I entered "To: rms" and encrypted the message. It recognized that was me, rms@HIDDEN, and encrypted with my key. It did this even though my key does not list 'rms' with no host name as an address (as far as I can tell). gpg --edit-key rms@HIDDEN gave me this: pub 4096R/2C6464AF2A8E4C02 created: 2013-07-20 expires: never usage: SC ... sub ... [ultimate] (1). Richard Stallman <rms@HIDDEN> If the key had another address, wouldn't it be listed there? In addition, after I run the encryption command, plain 'rms' has been edited into 'rms@HIDDEN'. How does it know to make that change? -- Dr Richard Stallman Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs@HIDDEN> Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: Did not alter fixed versions and reopened. Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 17:46:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # Did not alter fixed versions and reopened. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Sep 2023 10:53:44 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 03 06:53:44 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39733 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1qckjf-0003eM-Pg for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 06:53:43 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]:53690) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <stefankangas@HIDDEN>) id 1qckja-0003e4-Pp for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 06:53:42 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-50091b91a83so945322e87.3 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 03:53:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1693738402; x=1694343202; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zAsjvwGDkeSDb6aeAnNxI4rhsCKCxLjG4Cjaqu5I8vk=; b=IzUfqRdriF143VWpnapImPt30WKYRfluqwmTC/DqgDcuBwjJCM7tQYqhwiCPehr9io NKuot6Xo1ISUnbkyaYvi95DihKBsiWUke0VroQGlWQKhCnxb3Q/B6zEhv+99SFZxiK8a Bpo1U90fIDXKQ7jh8DTO82zTerWD2dqxfY9wl4abIH8rEOP7aHSZ2Yu5/ut5NZD7zzmM +uDhjYvrnDKniShdSMZWcEteBVKB3mrjnYw/ixyuzaPswydwnIN/DEQv1uNL2/1XryLP gwC06cQSGx7UJzy7aVKF4F8Fb/Lq4TWf+Ji6eeoh7SWSzBeQZIpvMvAsSenjLaCg6e2K YUPQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1693738402; x=1694343202; h=to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zAsjvwGDkeSDb6aeAnNxI4rhsCKCxLjG4Cjaqu5I8vk=; b=B9GxSNKGvFDgmj3jT8ZtnE8Dfur4G56cG9JN7TrJMpSq7qCZuicdwNukzv30ThciLV z0hqkFWFVsG7yKR1ihUlL827ptWeVfpBNZyQ/AvUSBvfHc34TzHHhxY4BGX4crvTDydx NbFvxJQK14g+vyt37FSxLolJwpxD8zTMoO0e8WPr+nVfy6rk+fJax6R0inGnfXu1kEHf 3fjywN3LBWuZAxP0KgaorFo8XREXR8hjla3vSvDMUi3AjW8IXQ7eCMoBktIiys/Zg/qi 8Ny2RAUX7c9GKSoiaPXYICaxi+Tw9bkQBhR1NB5UZRUg8MFohdhSjNyAj/r0BJB2tppr PrEw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwKRZllrJTzlUSVTTecY8AJHADjX5mIIwHYf1d/H2bs6ffpnUAq VZm6AdJswbET1G/P3LGcuQya5hOH//TLaEoS6GLCtE+CN0I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEi4N44at065uh9KOHTfoSgRFJNxkqBA1vdR7oEe5mWizCchZJm6ZYsxL9lKbhGdSPLmd82+ny2cAhJi1jMgZc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:b86:b0:500:c936:f38a with SMTP id b6-20020a0565120b8600b00500c936f38amr5741590lfv.50.1693738402232; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 03:53:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sun, 3 Sep 2023 03:53:21 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2023 03:53:21 -0700 Message-ID: <CADwFkmnhRZ+bkYi9Jro-GmnCED86B6C_mKSaK-WLCBXSfsuWEQ@HIDDEN> Subject: control message for bug #13551 To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) severity 13551 wishlist quit
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.