Received: (at 21623) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Aug 2019 19:44:32 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 01 15:44:32 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55336 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1htH03-0002sI-UP for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 15:44:32 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:45126) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1htH02-0002sA-9m for 21623 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 15:44:30 -0400 Received: from 77.18.62.220.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.18.62.220] helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1htGzz-0003LH-6L; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 21:44:29 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> To: Dima Kogan <dima@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#21623: 25.0.50; Another font memory leak References: <874mi516kg.fsf@HIDDEN> <87zhksg13o.fsf@HIDDEN> <87d0ho4qz3.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 21:44:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87d0ho4qz3.fsf@HIDDEN> (Dima Kogan's message of "Thu, 01 Aug 2019 12:37:20 -0700") Message-ID: <874l30fz6t.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Dima Kogan <dima@HIDDEN> writes: > I'm not using the lucid terminal anymore, so I'm not seeing this, but > I'm certain it's still an issue. The fix to 18403 WAS the workaround > that leaks memory (without the workaround emacs was cra [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21623 Cc: 21623 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Dima Kogan <dima@HIDDEN> writes: > I'm not using the lucid terminal anymore, so I'm not seeing this, but > I'm certain it's still an issue. The fix to 18403 WAS the workaround > that leaks memory (without the workaround emacs was crashing). I tried grepping the sources for the proposed patch and it didn't look like it had been applied. But I must have done something wrong, because I can find it now. Sorry for the confusion. > When I was looking at this I wrote some tools to aid in debugging. The > blog post that describes these tools talks about this memory leak: > > http://notes.secretsauce.net/notes/2015/10/05_memory-leak-debugging-tools.html Hm, interesting... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#21623; Package emacs.
Full text available.
Received: (at 21623) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Aug 2019 19:37:31 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 01 15:37:30 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55322 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1htGtG-0002fn-KW
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 15:37:30 -0400
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.19]:37333)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <dima@HIDDEN>) id 1htGtE-0002fa-IB
for 21623 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 15:37:29 -0400
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5570380;
Thu, 1 Aug 2019 15:37:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 01 Aug 2019 15:37:22 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secretsauce.net;
h=references:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id
:mime-version:content-type; s=fm3; bh=32AD7NKnSeflC0WRrh0s35UxS2
PW5V2KGmgxBjGjWxI=; b=dUXu5ADL18p3ndRgnPkfNBcLQYOAbhiGzW/5dME77o
66qS3A6ZUrRvTExI4L2L/SJM2AC0hKdo5vUbupW7Nhtxy2yHOQtnZFf0dM1isVls
MXdAsra/SxVFcyA068dbBL6mLIzjNcBIWtlMJnSOf3LzadbUmz5silgZL7F+5Tzo
8BkX9AR50vqynCYZNdCt9m0v4mDtKmDWFUSrFMnxtF+tujSVUTGcpBCyxBjkTTne
bcatS8U7d83rqZ12JMGTrJH7r+eUUQHi+L0sIpxRqe7v57FEC0yCayJc0McM0P9W
ech87RWYCYJPbZuqxzsY/6EyZy1BciDLVHB+18We/5xg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy
:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=32AD7N
KnSeflC0WRrh0s35UxS2PW5V2KGmgxBjGjWxI=; b=bcqICkc72ahGJ24Sgd9/Ou
aJrQUY9YLumXhJB8AvsXpOahCbxE0Yiv5LBxmAVTJ58Tf3C1yfyw4LyY73qonT7K
YGTBs1g0G38xdDfKxz1QISdrWuaQQOsHQpZ6G+ZAO/Y2z2dAciYFQ3F1R4OoLNhh
hvG/0BABfmXjgjBYffeXpq9o8pdxcb9SZBErfQtWuxGl3SdTN8FpwAEi06oEK/QM
7NygHVxO53lWXXRtw4v6BRo0iwRJK07G+ACdMDV+AEN8SJjVwTth7qgPNAT1vjRK
gUmMOHHUuX0qRtHmN8R9vJP2QX5VWW7uyU79PvVo1c5m0s0vCU2Darcfu8sim09A
==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:cT9DXQhIQdYdpWGq-GoT6csdSBmnroAtvNTl7ESSrfAYeKHxH9uWcQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrleejgddufeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne
cujfgurhepfhgfhffvufgjfffkgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpeffihhmrgcu
mfhoghgrnhcuoeguihhmrgesshgvtghrvghtshgruhgtvgdrnhgvtheqnecuffhomhgrih
hnpehsvggtrhgvthhsrghutggvrdhnvghtnecukfhppedvtdejrdduhedurddvvdefrddu
keelnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeguihhmrgesshgvtghrvghtshgruhgtvg
drnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:cT9DXUMZ4gcvYym-uiFxErYh_w4oj-ejj6ps6G-21-YfwRUX4DSMyg>
<xmx:cT9DXb5x8x0uBD74_v28u_JSbOd_rebEtPRYe73b8Gl45npaxv3L4w>
<xmx:cT9DXbknrfa5xuWYn8Q1ZXgeBzhalPNyqiD8ulNpgteR7MdFGihjaA>
<xmx:cj9DXe-yHrPdQvMnmun9Bn9_HvqJWTYKE32vR-1pes-ApulME_ysTQ>
Received: from shorty.local (nat-guest-189.vonkarman.net [207.151.223.189])
by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8D57780062;
Thu, 1 Aug 2019 15:37:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dima by shorty.local with local (Exim 4.92)
(envelope-from <dima@HIDDEN>)
id 1htGt6-0007x0-3B; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 12:37:20 -0700
References: <874mi516kg.fsf@HIDDEN> <87zhksg13o.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 27.0.50
From: Dima Kogan <dima@HIDDEN>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#21623: 25.0.50; Another font memory leak
In-reply-to: <87zhksg13o.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 12:37:20 -0700
Message-ID: <87d0ho4qz3.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21623
Cc: 21623 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> writes:
> (I'm going through old bug reports that have unfortunately not gotten
> any responses.)
Thank you very much for doing that
> That bug was fixed, I think, so the workaround wasn't necessary any
> more? Are you still seeing memory leaks in this area?
I'm not using the lucid terminal anymore, so I'm not seeing this, but
I'm certain it's still an issue. The fix to 18403 WAS the workaround
that leaks memory (without the workaround emacs was crashing).
The commit that fixes 18403 by introducing a memory leak:
commit 80465f41d7fc67d40f0a233504e295b127ad2c6b
Author: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue Sep 9 07:22:36 2014 +0400
* xterm.c (x_term_init): Consolidate duplicated code.
[USE_LUCID]: Revert 2014-04-02 change (Bug#18403). Add comment.
(x_delete_terminal): Do not close X connection fd (Bug#18403).
Add eassert and mark dpyinfo as dead only if it was alive.
When I was looking at this I wrote some tools to aid in debugging. The
blog post that describes these tools talks about this memory leak:
http://notes.secretsauce.net/notes/2015/10/05_memory-leak-debugging-tools.html
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#21623; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 21623) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Aug 2019 19:03:14 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 01 15:03:14 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55250 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1htGM5-0005tM-Rg for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 15:03:14 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:44408) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1htGM4-0005tE-2G for 21623 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 15:03:12 -0400 Received: from 77.18.62.220.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.18.62.220] helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1htGM0-00032F-9b; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 21:03:10 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> To: Dima Kogan <lists@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#21623: 25.0.50; Another font memory leak References: <874mi516kg.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 21:03:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: <874mi516kg.fsf@HIDDEN> (Dima Kogan's message of "Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:03:27 -0700") Message-ID: <87zhksg13o.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Dima Kogan <lists@HIDDEN> writes: > I'm continuing to hunt for memory leaks. The next largest one is caused > by a workaround in > > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18403 > > In that report issues were observed when deall [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21623 Cc: 21623 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Dima Kogan <lists@HIDDEN> writes: > I'm continuing to hunt for memory leaks. The next largest one is caused > by a workaround in > > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18403 > > In that report issues were observed when deallocating a font, and a > workaround was to leak the memory. This is not an insignificant leak > (3kB at a time), and a better solution is desired. (I'm going through old bug reports that have unfortunately not gotten any responses.) That bug was fixed, I think, so the workaround wasn't necessary any more? Are you still seeing memory leaks in this area? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#21623; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Oct 2015 19:03:37 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 05 15:03:37 2015 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55444 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ZjB2v-0006cB-2E for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:03:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41410) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <lists@HIDDEN>) id 1ZjB2t-0006c4-30 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:03:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <lists@HIDDEN>) id 1ZjB2r-0003vN-W6 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:03:34 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:54104) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <lists@HIDDEN>) id 1ZjB2r-0003vJ-T6 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:03:33 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51396) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <lists@HIDDEN>) id 1ZjB2q-0001QA-Uc for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:03:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <lists@HIDDEN>) id 1ZjB2n-0003qw-OG for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:03:32 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:54292) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <lists@HIDDEN>) id 1ZjB2n-0003qm-Hj for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:03:29 -0400 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5AC620A75 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 15:03:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:03:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secretsauce.net; h=content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to :x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=wzKSnHwHhd+uPVg/LjR828w7cvk =; b=n9PhirBK2n65jI8SmVDE/dEM76ed8hxT622PlcgA2Zl2c80A7IJaJFXxPSo GPsyOuUvX0LvkGFcZhpe3lhFPs2cEw0tm7F4Cr1VzslcSqT3zgC5NZ7K4MjeMM1I 5QgO0OM/UtTYHE3yPVH+iPOTphWbWgLJLj6Y+OAblPWglRYc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=wz KSnHwHhd+uPVg/LjR828w7cvk=; b=isr+FyAAP8h9ZuoZiBAPoF1gQxjTAgzd0G /BbghNJRxQ2jNsjopP21dP7VbpDlW6iz/I/A2YzRaCpqU4IrB84HqmE029lOdqUA ceA2xo4Jck89QzNt9VHx6X++rKuDLOdX6aNFlWZdQTwpjrAJJeKlPhdUXNcJYlon kJ0Fih9Ng= X-Sasl-enc: a7IjmwmQYkEpXYunam22NsAjAO2FrV7YY+dOEFM4euPG 1444071808 Received: from shorty.local (50-1-153-216.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.153.216]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9D5E9C00025 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 15:03:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=shorty) by shorty.local with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <lists@HIDDEN>) id 1ZjB2l-0001d0-EG for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:03:27 -0700 From: Dima Kogan <lists@HIDDEN> To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Subject: 25.0.50; Another font memory leak Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:03:27 -0700 Message-ID: <874mi516kg.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) I'm continuing to hunt for memory leaks. The next largest one is caused by a workaround in http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18403 In that report issues were observed when deallocating a font, and a workaround was to leak the memory. This is not an insignificant leak (3kB at a time), and a better solution is desired.
Dima Kogan <lists@HIDDEN>:bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#21623; Package emacs.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.