Received: (at 22137-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2025 23:50:28 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 12 19:50:28 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52314 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tsVqG-0001ie-8o for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 19:50:28 -0400 Received: from fout-b1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([202.12.124.144]:34181) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1tsVqC-0001iM-S9 for 22137-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 19:50:25 -0400 Received: from phl-compute-07.internal (phl-compute-07.phl.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1671140193; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 19:50:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-07.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 12 Mar 2025 19:50:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s= mesmtp; t=1741823418; x=1741909818; bh=5UfG1SRLbs7ZH5TAHYymXKkyC kWOKfgnSQuRKvGo93o=; b=wP+z7j2eKhHOSa7mqgfO04eDOq+UMx0dMVq7ZE6TJ PpAucATtfeJ+nAy1vo/JlpIi8bvOAms4nQ0w/BN/vcaxBbaNqgrk36BJztk58sne Sk2NaKsQnLVnn/k7ECV2id2Aer1Elyg6dUbzzT0p9z2iRT2O2dzKCbHEqdPvoV7r BE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1741823418; x= 1741909818; bh=5UfG1SRLbs7ZH5TAHYymXKkyCkWOKfgnSQuRKvGo93o=; b=6 rTHJ60JK41KhLv1Jwrwtju/p7wECFawp1W73faxbjiwjvaFD3x72IIYGLu1wWOs2 UCGCitkfdVldbWyWC3gu6nrfUvgLGZ10ALnxqN1iVYsxm0vt9+6cVEDfsHKYST8P 0UR2gpZTj7hwxn51HVPBhcuQHhD/HP7mO9dl6AuUvmXEL0Wc6HCXX5gKcNy5uvl7 YNwJb9Tpt2TR0uio10XgyJw0S64Tyb/dprg7JOonN/0XYYDQ6twyoZeizFzHW1r2 3+MYHRQE32m4nwrh2ZQRxzVeYqjpBt/Kj93TBU9pXuQA/RiHTHZS7o9TmfUpLIFG aLk6q1yZaKjlDdzZZtA5A== X-ME-Sender: <xms:uR3SZwY7A9vLk7Ew0rBV5BexXdeKxwoet5IbX8ca2pDMgrjg7t96Ug> <xme:uR3SZ7ah5QyhHqn9_GvN3s1Z18KuohKdBOJzy2T_ptc0ISTfAjClMUPKnZSUnEfYK WOV74NXWNORBDN0PA> X-ME-Received: <xmr:uR3SZ6-2N6z4629DMku61OHuoCie7U9nKbf7u1Jg3tpQQS6FqOPVXS2bxnIb_bSnz0R021_EOmWtAJkqmJP9KoWV> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgdduvdeigeefucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggv pdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhf fvuffkgggtugesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceo lhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffehtdeffe dtvdeuieefudeujedvkeehffeuieejgfdvteelgeehgeefheehuddunecuvehluhhsthgv rhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrh hirdhnrghmvgdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghp thhtohepvddvudefjedqughonhgvseguvggssghughhsrdhgnhhurdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:uR3SZ6puEdIMqpJ71VwSdmx0jSejxgJF9dCy6UEwDEXAI88UAUQoZg> <xmx:uR3SZ7qe1Mdj3Y31KtIvpYYwRvU4-JWkR2zttOFpzbUchdjyrpIi4g> <xmx:uR3SZ4RNgTyr_DxeZbVz81gHzOdyNTJbfQae15kK0EJiem8EYI31GA> <xmx:uR3SZ7oqAE-Q8p7sfqN-2kugnwH9DUyy6QriU25jdey0_tYV2IpWcw> <xmx:uh3SZ0Dl45cz0KPcnAihZgDAoS7iuvjRTPzTs7ho4cF9JxM-SA4S8Ro1> Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <22137-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 19:50:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 19:50:16 -0400 From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> To: 22137-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: A test of bug #44996 Message-ID: <Z9IduLnONo4t7fez@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22137-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) And now I'll re-close and archive this bug.
Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>:Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>:Received: (at 22137) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2025 23:25:21 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 12 19:25:21 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52271 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tsVRw-0005vi-Qi for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 19:25:21 -0400 Received: from fhigh-b1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([202.12.124.152]:47239) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1tsVRt-0005vU-HX for 22137 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 19:25:18 -0400 Received: from phl-compute-07.internal (phl-compute-07.phl.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B5D32540187; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 19:25:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-07.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 12 Mar 2025 19:25:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s= mesmtp; t=1741821911; x=1741908311; bh=CYIFm8LKVZtvU+G14QAwQ6hNG kKVg0okyoXk1c9ZI34=; b=09092f8zRne2JUUsLBQ/RN4yA/TfiSYkyedLNd96v z6NT3aTX7VqJw96HAFkdRD/0nczNqQZXom77Plg7lYX6IADEphTYWMC/h0WNZb5n DB+lpZ6LqtpqQ74lCEJ+rW7IK6YbtTDzcV6dY6fOGwGt7XuID5F1qXKHc6oJo443 dk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1741821911; x= 1741908311; bh=CYIFm8LKVZtvU+G14QAwQ6hNGkKVg0okyoXk1c9ZI34=; b=c v6V0YTpOaDFf8ydZtlPJVqoAeB4YXyDC9xJdWVLl1E3L5wV8045pZvXYr5tynWjP Oxbm9bszPecA0iAyYLUbtynQVEhMMIK2bM0VMQiPCXoVmUEfwVIgCUOpy31SfoB9 OHVi+k0VsGcnccI3SaPf2v+iwe3T0CDTX0zYi6pfhbZ97LmhcuLdezE01WhH3CFN iOjY/P74KXAInWOLHq+Jq6/6lkv2856fl4hXEA6bm5gGr84IWZ1WxjkBMlAtcMKF h1T63rvPz+3NGEjkeTN8lyGrunm0X/D4Tk5Hf6QxjBlprT8OSZAwImMGRruXkuMS +GMEYfJzX+HajuUOcup5Q== X-ME-Sender: <xms:1xfSZ2pNyKjcA3cldPsCRlLbyUOoQu-mYGCoELRyiyvGSoicgGVYrA> <xme:1xfSZ0pOhGQNgXvvkVwRZkeJ554yePBlrs-XuPKH_tDlTbKep1yxRcrGsjeS_HWhJ QD9lws4bpwt04gyzg> X-ME-Received: <xmr:1xfSZ7MpRPrOjsyL-TR-nBUC4BpDPgZRs6eE0c2y_BKxFY_mIN4qmwyrQ72L7i3qcovXJvKa9BI3WpMXZ9wJ1A6a> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgdduvdeifeekucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggv pdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhf fvuffkgggtugesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceo lhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepueeiudeije duffdvhfejvdegvdehgffgjedvveekfeefleefkeeuieejudevtedunecuffhomhgrihhn pehgnhhurdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilh hfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddp mhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepvddvudefjeesuggvsggsuhhgshdrgh hnuhdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:1xfSZ17_Y7yHUPFVrYgc8NFx8lQnDrgSUDTqfRQyasu3TUHzQHmQyg> <xmx:1xfSZ17z7ThD9oGJLKLAuEgjUpUM7By5FS-WnkQlyVahH6cErT9QkA> <xmx:1xfSZ1ivhWVszU2OaZ8sG0uze1tbYba8LKl0zSu6sI4r1QMLQzi0ZA> <xmx:1xfSZ_5JMr0U9iryObNLo5UAcd8lAWDw48cHo0ShflzHwv-nKfn18Q> <xmx:1xfSZ3RYbMrSebl16ghGygcVvXow90LdEXRmTAyX_U014kQCxKDdwt9s> Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <22137 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 19:25:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 19:25:10 -0400 From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> To: 22137 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: A test of bug #44996 Message-ID: <Z9IX1i3iYOGfLsWx@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22137 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) I've unarchived and reopened this bug in order to test another bug in our issues tracker: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/44996 Sorry for the noise...
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#22137; Package guix.
Full text available.Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs@HIDDEN>
to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs@HIDDEN>
to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Received: (at 22137-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jun 2018 12:54:48 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 12 08:54:48 2018 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44213 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fSiox-0005rZ-VP for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 08:54:48 -0400 Received: from rezeros.cc ([45.76.207.221]:34338) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <iyzsong@HIDDEN>) id 1fSiou-0005rO-Kw for 22137-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 08:54:45 -0400 Received: from localhost (117.174.29.138 [117.174.29.138]) by rezeros.cc (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id a39a932a (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for <22137-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 12:54:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gift (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 46e7edf3 for <22137-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 12:54:08 +0000 (UTC) From: iyzsong@HIDDEN (=?utf-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?=) To: bug#22137 <22137-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Re: bug#22137: Status: python-urwid on x86_64: AsyncEventLoopTest References: <20151210070556.GA26454@jasmine> <87fuc7yig6.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 20:54:08 +0800 In-Reply-To: <87fuc7yig6.fsf@HIDDEN> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Thu, 31 Aug 2017 09:28:57 -0400") Message-ID: <87lgbkrwr3.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN> writes: > This bug was supposedly fixed upstream [0] but there is no new release > yet. To be revisited after urwid 1.3.2 is released. > > [0]: https://github.com/urwid/urwid/issues/164 [...] Content analysis details: (1.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.1 FROM_EXCESS_BASE64 From: base64 encoded unnecessarily X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22137-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN> writes: > This bug was supposedly fixed upstream [0] but there is no new release > yet. To be revisited after urwid 1.3.2 is released. > > [0]: https://github.com/urwid/urwid/issues/164 Hello, I update our urwid to version 2.0.1. Closing now, thanks!
Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>:iyzsong@HIDDEN (宋文武):Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Received: (at 22137) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Aug 2017 13:29:05 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 31 09:29:05 2017 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36549 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dnPWr-0000xZ-Cj for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 09:29:05 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f176.google.com ([209.85.223.176]:36550) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>) id 1dnPWq-0000x4-DO for 22137 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 09:29:04 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f176.google.com with SMTP id f99so14772940ioi.3 for <22137 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 06:29:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=5tlvkFDX8Qgu67CJteksaMo0x3/DsYUUuw7AdPdM7iI=; b=TfaqRqDp/dtvOUaVVhqktzxCfMZM5Iw/fihWF+dZNoMWS79+m4VOtu0uZvlb9yppnk tyGHPreOB6Ky0D1KpujqhnW3h09qFyDWJZgac4pFS3lZlGLdgrBsyxCWlyDWNlv6T2qX qFh8wwAoFG4b25vESIs5alXLXwUOxZz+VGrM4DEczEPsarQ4mbdPNSQK64CaUhwoL6sr 5RqQ9Lp1GK6d95Cv7tsFSDBPolrQirKCuwDzf9UTAqMf0nzUjmsZUJ1Z7QLHMvTcCuYm SbbCTiOInscCSB9CEjhH0zSTG8i7lFSHexlsQOEeZRCKmS5L5/N6WSsTXAkjpz1QCN4G HuOw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=5tlvkFDX8Qgu67CJteksaMo0x3/DsYUUuw7AdPdM7iI=; b=SB5+2W46if4Di39O375njmiBX78IpaeaIDRB3SaJYg6HxL8uirJsppZHPaaFXiGx3F RaCHRvXMDjScw5nSDi2FqxSb68vEckMP2nR+NCROoZOYFhP7Ks7sxUOOWzq9GQaQ6Uw/ CeUFz5osvJGYwk5nM0O0bczr1Fy+dqDJvMijWR5JJ1BSwRpsTeDLjHKye0KYq/wdl1Pi G8PXdJusuK7oqwTAmfyGldHr0+1t4vAmYC+lpLm3P+re6+Ved+3gpwaUU/xSK3sjUbz8 5k/FWaTO5TqlXlta56P+7995WgpkQsRfYCbl17r3WYYpzV6EJ8ThKfUpBGaynRU3d0sB VFAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjwrsbJjkpivh3BIgTzlp//QIaH2sQfbqzzLTRo+2I2l1QQduXB HPp7ETrPkAtbMPvV X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb5JxtO7V1STQw6DMvKA1sfvmDGJPJdmiwWmJDD9eEvqmoNSpl1gYv8J3drv97eWRqTRqGh+aQ== X-Received: by 10.36.73.223 with SMTP id e92mr707861itd.116.1504186138750; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 06:28:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apteryx (104-222-117-55.cpe.teksavvy.com. [104.222.117.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u3sm69042itf.20.2017.08.31.06.28.58 for <22137 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 31 Aug 2017 06:28:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN> To: bug#22137 <22137 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Re: Status: python-urwid on x86_64: AsyncEventLoopTest Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 09:28:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: bug's message of "Thu\, 31 Aug 2017 13\:21\:49 +0000" Message-ID: <87fuc7yig6.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22137 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) This bug was supposedly fixed upstream [0] but there is no new release yet. To be revisited after urwid 1.3.2 is released. [0]: https://github.com/urwid/urwid/issues/164
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#22137; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 22137) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2016 23:02:24 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 03 18:02:24 2016 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36965 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1aFrfM-0000NH-5j for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 18:02:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42524) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1aFrfK-0000N3-2I for 22137 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 18:02:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1aFrfA-0002Jx-L9 for 22137 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 18:02:16 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50327) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1aFrfA-0002Js-Hs; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 18:02:12 -0500 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:38492 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1aFrf9-0005Mk-TZ; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 18:02:12 -0500 From: ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#22137: python-urwid on x86_64: AsyncEventLoopTest References: <20151210070556.GA26454@jasmine> <20160101225026.GA14770@jasmine> <8760zavj9s.fsf@HIDDEN> <20160103184207.GA29254@jasmine> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 15 =?utf-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 224 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x3D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 00:02:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20160103184207.GA29254@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:42:07 -0500") Message-ID: <878u46qnbi.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22137 Cc: 22137 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> skribis: > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 03:18:23PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> skribis: >>=20 >> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 02:05:56AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: >> >> python-urwid-1.3.0 fails to build on x86_64 during the >> >> "AsyncioEventLoopTest" test with the error "KeyError: '5 is not >> >> registered'". It has failed repeatedly for some time now. It fails in >> >> the same way when updated to python-urwid-1.3.1. >> >>=20 >> >> I looked for interesting changes made between the last successful bui= ld >> >> and the first failing build. Notably, this range includes the upgrade >> >> from python-3.3.5 to python-3.4.3 (08c04509). Asyncio was integrated >> >> into the Python standard library in 3.4 =E2=80=94 previously it had b= een an >> >> external library. [0] Our python-3.4.3 package passes its 'test_async= io' >> >> test, FWIW. >> >>=20 >> >> I entered the failed build tree and successfully ran the tests using = the >> >> python-3.4.3-7 [1] installed by Debian Stretch. That only tells us so >> >> much, but I think it does indicate either a bug in our python-3.4.3, = or >> >> some problem with python-urwid caused by the unfamiliar Guix build >> >> environment. >> >>=20 >> >> Here's the hydra.gnu.org page: >> >> http://hydra.gnu.org/build/861615 >> > >> > BTW, I filed a bug upstream: >> > https://github.com/urwid/urwid/issues/164 >> > >> > No response yet, although I should add some more information to the bug >> > report. >> > >> > In the meantime, what about downgrading python-urwid to 1.2.2 and >> > leaving python2-urwid at 1.3.0? >>=20 >> I think it=E2=80=99s best to avoid introducing version differences. >>=20 >> What about disabling tests in python2-urwid in the meantime, with a >> comment pointing to the above bug report? > > I assume you mean "disabling tests in python-urwid"? Yes, sorry. > In that case, how about just disabling that test by changing the failing > procedure's name, as done in python-pyopenssl? Sure, that=E2=80=99s even better. Ludo=E2=80=99.
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#22137; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 22137) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2016 18:42:10 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 03 13:42:10 2016 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36868 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1aFnbW-0002i0-BS for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:42:10 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:50538) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1aFnbU-0002hs-AC for 22137 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:42:09 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0371A2089B; Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:42:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:42:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=LFeN/k8slWjc6drwL7JGT16GaYc=; b=NieLuA BmI8BVYJ14OIZg1IkJvLWa/pMSheVXk2i4L7ZPs3OVDaBm+vUiiob/+Xf61//kJw XlgU2tWwDuu85O1RFtskMw8rW6APtuqf2cFeyku85l8bf5I6QuL0XBBUAKIeOBV2 aCLoRd7CD0aVKtK/5R0Z2w+/+uuWGKAPvBlyM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=LFeN/k8slWjc6dr wL7JGT16GaYc=; b=AXDzcoz+yrc6eoDKw1YS/n+EWZJwpppCJy7AnafdEaIAsbi HY37ZaMPiVBpwdc4RHqcq7OhPtzrTDrP3vcK3et3tHToDbZG0spX52TcNDg7FQc1 XQfeK49MHk2kUfxRM/HfFXGHjXhB8UP3c/JIO6pDv8mxwuP2N/RtfhJNWcuc= X-Sasl-enc: Lq1osI54MG3ezCQD8eh6RRb1ngzufkhn0o3u2hvGSjxA 1451846527 Received: from localhost (c-69-249-5-231.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [69.249.5.231]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B168EC016D5; Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:42:07 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:42:07 -0500 From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#22137: python-urwid on x86_64: AsyncEventLoopTest Message-ID: <20160103184207.GA29254@jasmine> References: <20151210070556.GA26454@jasmine> <20160101225026.GA14770@jasmine> <8760zavj9s.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <8760zavj9s.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22137 Cc: 22137 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 03:18:23PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> skribis: > > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 02:05:56AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > >> python-urwid-1.3.0 fails to build on x86_64 during the > >> "AsyncioEventLoopTest" test with the error "KeyError: '5 is not > >> registered'". It has failed repeatedly for some time now. It fails in > >> the same way when updated to python-urwid-1.3.1. > >> > >> I looked for interesting changes made between the last successful build > >> and the first failing build. Notably, this range includes the upgrade > >> from python-3.3.5 to python-3.4.3 (08c04509). Asyncio was integrated > >> into the Python standard library in 3.4 — previously it had been an > >> external library. [0] Our python-3.4.3 package passes its 'test_asyncio' > >> test, FWIW. > >> > >> I entered the failed build tree and successfully ran the tests using the > >> python-3.4.3-7 [1] installed by Debian Stretch. That only tells us so > >> much, but I think it does indicate either a bug in our python-3.4.3, or > >> some problem with python-urwid caused by the unfamiliar Guix build > >> environment. > >> > >> Here's the hydra.gnu.org page: > >> http://hydra.gnu.org/build/861615 > > > > BTW, I filed a bug upstream: > > https://github.com/urwid/urwid/issues/164 > > > > No response yet, although I should add some more information to the bug > > report. > > > > In the meantime, what about downgrading python-urwid to 1.2.2 and > > leaving python2-urwid at 1.3.0? > > I think it’s best to avoid introducing version differences. > > What about disabling tests in python2-urwid in the meantime, with a > comment pointing to the above bug report? I assume you mean "disabling tests in python-urwid"? In that case, how about just disabling that test by changing the failing procedure's name, as done in python-pyopenssl? > > Thanks, > Ludo’.
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#22137; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 22137) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2016 14:18:36 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 03 09:18:36 2016 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35924 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1aFjUS-0002xM-Jw for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 09:18:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45257) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1aFjUR-0002x7-0A for 22137 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 09:18:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1aFjUI-0004bA-Dt for 22137 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 09:18:29 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41437) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1aFjUI-0004b5-Ab; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 09:18:26 -0500 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:35542 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1aFjUH-0007rk-QA; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 09:18:26 -0500 From: ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#22137: python-urwid on x86_64: AsyncEventLoopTest References: <20151210070556.GA26454@jasmine> <20160101225026.GA14770@jasmine> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 14 =?utf-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 224 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x3D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 15:18:23 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20160101225026.GA14770@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Fri, 1 Jan 2016 17:50:26 -0500") Message-ID: <8760zavj9s.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22137 Cc: 22137 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> skribis: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 02:05:56AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: >> python-urwid-1.3.0 fails to build on x86_64 during the >> "AsyncioEventLoopTest" test with the error "KeyError: '5 is not >> registered'". It has failed repeatedly for some time now. It fails in >> the same way when updated to python-urwid-1.3.1. >>=20 >> I looked for interesting changes made between the last successful build >> and the first failing build. Notably, this range includes the upgrade >> from python-3.3.5 to python-3.4.3 (08c04509). Asyncio was integrated >> into the Python standard library in 3.4 =E2=80=94 previously it had been= an >> external library. [0] Our python-3.4.3 package passes its 'test_asyncio' >> test, FWIW. >>=20 >> I entered the failed build tree and successfully ran the tests using the >> python-3.4.3-7 [1] installed by Debian Stretch. That only tells us so >> much, but I think it does indicate either a bug in our python-3.4.3, or >> some problem with python-urwid caused by the unfamiliar Guix build >> environment. >>=20 >> Here's the hydra.gnu.org page: >> http://hydra.gnu.org/build/861615 > > BTW, I filed a bug upstream: > https://github.com/urwid/urwid/issues/164 > > No response yet, although I should add some more information to the bug > report. > > In the meantime, what about downgrading python-urwid to 1.2.2 and > leaving python2-urwid at 1.3.0? I think it=E2=80=99s best to avoid introducing version differences. What about disabling tests in python2-urwid in the meantime, with a comment pointing to the above bug report? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#22137; Package guix.
Full text available.
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2016 01:40:10 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 01 20:40:10 2016
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34043 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1aFBAp-00069U-Jd
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2016 20:40:10 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33965)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84)
(envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1aFBAl-00068D-16
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2016 20:40:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1aF8Wn-0003pr-59
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2016 17:50:34 -0500
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,TRACKER_ID,
T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:58242)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1aF8Wn-0003pf-1s
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2016 17:50:33 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53803)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1aF8Wl-0007SG-NR
for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Fri, 01 Jan 2016 17:50:32 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1aF8Wi-0003p8-G7
for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Fri, 01 Jan 2016 17:50:31 -0500
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:59293)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1aF8Wi-0003p4-9P
for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Fri, 01 Jan 2016 17:50:28 -0500
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43])
by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98CD220235;
Fri, 1 Jan 2016 17:50:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161])
by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 01 Jan 2016 17:50:27 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=
content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc
:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=HqtrY/PBnuInYqppR+Q7mlwhAdk=; b=P+kKi4
iTYheT/WZZVZXFcRAieCx1mRe6ymRvQH64hCvQg7Bwnak/mA6cix0M5nxVX3MqM6
JH20Ct9oYs3W+mONXuEDcMU+9KxEFVmkZIo6W2Yz7ytvYxHeBfnd0mBbJ+SyAeXY
UWnsshUHj3uwAFql9GfE8paxaxeRDRPt2LcUk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type
:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=HqtrY/PBnuInYqp
pR+Q7mlwhAdk=; b=cYAyIWXJ6KBFlqFOmmwoocWQmhG6OVVVS7ywOe5q/kGv2v7
DgHH1zUY1fpl8q3Gjj3fAB+7IqIJrhLi64F1LNSbJMiqeDgcOkx36uZfvjoc4J4/
qYi7hGStsqWiG6bWwQXpq2BShSF5o12MyFaeSKDt9et8C+wUndyqdf5Fy1Tc=
X-Sasl-enc: VcE/TLz1KlX/hkWkr64IqtHZ2BQeek8fhnl/aBzz9158 1451688627
Received: from localhost (c-69-249-5-231.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [69.249.5.231])
by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 503E6680128
for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Fri, 1 Jan 2016 17:50:27 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 17:50:26 -0500
From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Subject: Re: python-urwid on x86_64: AsyncEventLoopTest
Message-ID: <20160101225026.GA14770@jasmine>
References: <20151210070556.GA26454@jasmine>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20151210070556.GA26454@jasmine>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11
X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---)
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 02:05:56AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> python-urwid-1.3.0 fails to build on x86_64 during the
> "AsyncioEventLoopTest" test with the error "KeyError: '5 is not
> registered'". It has failed repeatedly for some time now. It fails in
> the same way when updated to python-urwid-1.3.1.
>
> I looked for interesting changes made between the last successful build
> and the first failing build. Notably, this range includes the upgrade
> from python-3.3.5 to python-3.4.3 (08c04509). Asyncio was integrated
> into the Python standard library in 3.4 — previously it had been an
> external library. [0] Our python-3.4.3 package passes its 'test_asyncio'
> test, FWIW.
>
> I entered the failed build tree and successfully ran the tests using the
> python-3.4.3-7 [1] installed by Debian Stretch. That only tells us so
> much, but I think it does indicate either a bug in our python-3.4.3, or
> some problem with python-urwid caused by the unfamiliar Guix build
> environment.
>
> Here's the hydra.gnu.org page:
> http://hydra.gnu.org/build/861615
BTW, I filed a bug upstream:
https://github.com/urwid/urwid/issues/164
No response yet, although I should add some more information to the bug
report.
In the meantime, what about downgrading python-urwid to 1.2.2 and
leaving python2-urwid at 1.3.0?
1.2.2 works for the software I am trying to package, and currently there
are no users of python-urwid.
>
> Here's the failing part of the build log:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: test_remove_watch_file (urwid.tests.test_event_loops.AsyncioEventLoopTest)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/gnu/store/13n8xbi9wv9pigfyhir007qadr81jq46-python-3.4.3/lib/python3.4/asyncio/selector_events.py", line 234, in add_reader
> key = self._selector.get_key(fd)
> File "/gnu/store/13n8xbi9wv9pigfyhir007qadr81jq46-python-3.4.3/lib/python3.4/selectors.py", line 182, in get_key
> raise KeyError("{!r} is not registered".format(fileobj)) from None
> KeyError: '5 is not registered'
>
> During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/tmp/nix-build-python-urwid-1.3.0.drv-0/urwid-1.3.0/build/lib.linux-x86_64-3.4/urwid/tests/test_event_loops.py", line 33, in test_remove_watch_file
> handle = evl.watch_file(5, lambda: None)
> File "/tmp/nix-build-python-urwid-1.3.0.drv-0/urwid-1.3.0/build/lib.linux-x86_64-3.4/urwid/main_loop.py", line 1263, in watch_file
> self._loop.add_reader(fd, callback)
> File "/gnu/store/13n8xbi9wv9pigfyhir007qadr81jq46-python-3.4.3/lib/python3.4/asyncio/selector_events.py", line 237, in add_reader
> (handle, None))
> File "/gnu/store/13n8xbi9wv9pigfyhir007qadr81jq46-python-3.4.3/lib/python3.4/selectors.py", line 402, in register
> self._epoll.register(key.fd, epoll_events)
> PermissionError: [Errno 1] Operation not permitted
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ran 284 tests in 0.384s
>
> FAILED (errors=1)
> phase `check' failed after 4.6 seconds
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> [0]
> https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio.html
>
> [1] Reported by `apt-cache show python3`, this python-3.4.3-7's .deb has
> a SHA256 hash of:
> 53fa197ee35501152b1897bf84ab6123f7f65201efdddc2e4aa882de494f3870
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#22137; Package guix.
Full text available.
Received: (at 22137) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2015 07:10:53 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 10 02:10:53 2015
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38559 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1a6vNJ-0001BU-Jh
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:10:53 -0500
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:50499)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84)
(envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1a6vNH-0001BM-Nz
for 22137 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:10:48 -0500
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45])
by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A650020975;
Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:10:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160])
by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:10:46 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=
content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc
:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=222b79toVDa8Tl+SLbvqluxVQt8=; b=P9vbFt
nm+abuHlXwOZkSo3evzW1my8TID6EMvxbtYOFZ8sy6Cg8CKalZDIDKDu78VKZG+2
6UtwjI5YFbWj0EXMwnM8IHd0+uemvhNhQt1opVPS8C8muo6mJKUB9tNeVAx0zYwx
WMcYpUwaPPda8fC+qXEfl7XTTPtre3TfgDbu8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type
:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=222b79toVDa8Tl+
SLbvqluxVQt8=; b=gswtq6kjnD0btPYmajB+31bByjxspiyJe8WotHHDqzsQXVr
Ui9ePiMKzGM9igFrbMgjgQsglUcYRshNR2rUjMwXZh92OcaCSoMMk6lTPgrvSQoo
sNJupkZF2qyntWz7jJf9Do/+9WVzPZD8BhQkUVz/F+dY7/O0BvA4XfCq3208=
X-Sasl-enc: dheJaInzPg8w+zEUGTchdqAlajGooaJzXRSh2VBNdkYx 1449731446
Received: from localhost (c-69-249-5-231.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [69.249.5.231])
by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 63F50C013FE
for <22137 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:10:46 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:10:49 -0500
From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
To: 22137 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#22137: python-urwid on x86_64: AsyncEventLoopTest
Message-ID: <20151210071049.GA26786@jasmine>
References: <20151210070556.GA26454@jasmine>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20151210070556.GA26454@jasmine>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22137
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 02:05:56AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> python-urwid-1.3.0 fails to build on x86_64 during the
> "AsyncioEventLoopTest" test with the error "KeyError: '5 is not
> registered'". It has failed repeatedly for some time now. It fails in
> the same way when updated to python-urwid-1.3.1.
>
> I looked for interesting changes made between the last successful build
> and the first failing build. Notably, this range includes the upgrade
> from python-3.3.5 to python-3.4.3 (08c04509). Asyncio was integrated
> into the Python standard library in 3.4 — previously it had been an
> external library. [0] Our python-3.4.3 package passes its 'test_asyncio'
> test, FWIW.
>
> I entered the failed build tree and successfully ran the tests using the
> python-3.4.3-7 [1] installed by Debian Stretch. That only tells us so
> much, but I think it does indicate either a bug in our python-3.4.3, or
> some problem with python-urwid caused by the unfamiliar Guix build
> environment.
Regarding the build environment, I meant add to Nix disables the tests
for their equivalent package.
>
> Here's the hydra.gnu.org page:
> http://hydra.gnu.org/build/861615
>
> Here's the failing part of the build log:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: test_remove_watch_file (urwid.tests.test_event_loops.AsyncioEventLoopTest)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/gnu/store/13n8xbi9wv9pigfyhir007qadr81jq46-python-3.4.3/lib/python3.4/asyncio/selector_events.py", line 234, in add_reader
> key = self._selector.get_key(fd)
> File "/gnu/store/13n8xbi9wv9pigfyhir007qadr81jq46-python-3.4.3/lib/python3.4/selectors.py", line 182, in get_key
> raise KeyError("{!r} is not registered".format(fileobj)) from None
> KeyError: '5 is not registered'
>
> During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/tmp/nix-build-python-urwid-1.3.0.drv-0/urwid-1.3.0/build/lib.linux-x86_64-3.4/urwid/tests/test_event_loops.py", line 33, in test_remove_watch_file
> handle = evl.watch_file(5, lambda: None)
> File "/tmp/nix-build-python-urwid-1.3.0.drv-0/urwid-1.3.0/build/lib.linux-x86_64-3.4/urwid/main_loop.py", line 1263, in watch_file
> self._loop.add_reader(fd, callback)
> File "/gnu/store/13n8xbi9wv9pigfyhir007qadr81jq46-python-3.4.3/lib/python3.4/asyncio/selector_events.py", line 237, in add_reader
> (handle, None))
> File "/gnu/store/13n8xbi9wv9pigfyhir007qadr81jq46-python-3.4.3/lib/python3.4/selectors.py", line 402, in register
> self._epoll.register(key.fd, epoll_events)
> PermissionError: [Errno 1] Operation not permitted
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ran 284 tests in 0.384s
>
> FAILED (errors=1)
> phase `check' failed after 4.6 seconds
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> [0]
> https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio.html
>
> [1] Reported by `apt-cache show python3`, this python-3.4.3-7's .deb has
> a SHA256 hash of:
> 53fa197ee35501152b1897bf84ab6123f7f65201efdddc2e4aa882de494f3870
>
>
>
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#22137; Package guix.
Full text available.
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2015 07:06:15 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 10 02:06:15 2015
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38550 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1a6vIm-00014t-M5
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:06:15 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45496)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84)
(envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1a6vIl-00014c-Mv
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:06:08 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1a6vIf-0006u5-Er
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:06:02 -0500
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,T_DKIM_INVALID
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:54162)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1a6vIf-0006tv-Cl
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:06:01 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55476)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1a6vId-0001dk-Ha
for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:06:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1a6vIa-0006tM-90
for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:05:59 -0500
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:45743)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1a6vIa-0006tF-4f
for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:05:56 -0500
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44])
by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9A7201B4;
Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:05:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160])
by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:05:53 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=
content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id
:mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=dPj
gckMM9HaVH2BmRIWNIXA90kQ=; b=ic+yvhE4DGGUPWEKiQ86yJpkq3dQG9+Rhs0
kSuSD2OTY2xrRqI1/w4MqyKLKpoVVu0/y/U5217BvWL+kxs5ZuiflAlI5eBKDO/g
xJrs7nAHLU64kl03vg1/7WH5d3YsF65sntFO/uPn2H3A1YXFpL9pwNvmk+cVvRs2
yiJ41o4U=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type
:date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc
:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=dPjgckMM9HaVH2BmRIWNIXA90kQ=; b=h4ML0
DPPdRHbLa0s4ZJr3j1nfZI8r9I2TcQE7YV/3kMaevoIzyvtU7sIryoc3GGPPdxcT
v3OiTr+HUDqOp8bFECGDDlXFrFh+kgtV3rpIXFCtW5+FfxtLg2k+WkuCkvwt5cUb
u0cPqCMfiBGOrPq63ZtrpESsMcrUAANKXk6m9k=
X-Sasl-enc: N3DduEzbNCwSjJ3AUG43uWc0AsKQfANL8yxTC3UQBTJ6 1449731152
Received: from localhost (c-69-249-5-231.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [69.249.5.231])
by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C3910C016D5
for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:05:52 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:05:56 -0500
From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Subject: python-urwid on x86_64: AsyncEventLoopTest
Message-ID: <20151210070556.GA26454@jasmine>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=eml
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11
X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/)
python-urwid-1.3.0 fails to build on x86_64 during the
"AsyncioEventLoopTest" test with the error "KeyError: '5 is not
registered'". It has failed repeatedly for some time now. It fails in
the same way when updated to python-urwid-1.3.1.
I looked for interesting changes made between the last successful build
and the first failing build. Notably, this range includes the upgrade
from python-3.3.5 to python-3.4.3 (08c04509). Asyncio was integrated
into the Python standard library in 3.4 — previously it had been an
external library. [0] Our python-3.4.3 package passes its 'test_asyncio'
test, FWIW.
I entered the failed build tree and successfully ran the tests using the
python-3.4.3-7 [1] installed by Debian Stretch. That only tells us so
much, but I think it does indicate either a bug in our python-3.4.3, or
some problem with python-urwid caused by the unfamiliar Guix build
environment.
Here's the hydra.gnu.org page:
http://hydra.gnu.org/build/861615
Here's the failing part of the build log:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
======================================================================
ERROR: test_remove_watch_file (urwid.tests.test_event_loops.AsyncioEventLoopTest)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/gnu/store/13n8xbi9wv9pigfyhir007qadr81jq46-python-3.4.3/lib/python3.4/asyncio/selector_events.py", line 234, in add_reader
key = self._selector.get_key(fd)
File "/gnu/store/13n8xbi9wv9pigfyhir007qadr81jq46-python-3.4.3/lib/python3.4/selectors.py", line 182, in get_key
raise KeyError("{!r} is not registered".format(fileobj)) from None
KeyError: '5 is not registered'
During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/nix-build-python-urwid-1.3.0.drv-0/urwid-1.3.0/build/lib.linux-x86_64-3.4/urwid/tests/test_event_loops.py", line 33, in test_remove_watch_file
handle = evl.watch_file(5, lambda: None)
File "/tmp/nix-build-python-urwid-1.3.0.drv-0/urwid-1.3.0/build/lib.linux-x86_64-3.4/urwid/main_loop.py", line 1263, in watch_file
self._loop.add_reader(fd, callback)
File "/gnu/store/13n8xbi9wv9pigfyhir007qadr81jq46-python-3.4.3/lib/python3.4/asyncio/selector_events.py", line 237, in add_reader
(handle, None))
File "/gnu/store/13n8xbi9wv9pigfyhir007qadr81jq46-python-3.4.3/lib/python3.4/selectors.py", line 402, in register
self._epoll.register(key.fd, epoll_events)
PermissionError: [Errno 1] Operation not permitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 284 tests in 0.384s
FAILED (errors=1)
phase `check' failed after 4.6 seconds
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
[0]
https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio.html
[1] Reported by `apt-cache show python3`, this python-3.4.3-7's .deb has
a SHA256 hash of:
53fa197ee35501152b1897bf84ab6123f7f65201efdddc2e4aa882de494f3870
Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>:bug-guix@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#22137; Package guix.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.