Received: (at 31920) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jul 2019 14:33:39 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 01 10:33:39 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48850 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1hhxNC-0006Fm-1h
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 10:33:39 -0400
Received: from spensertruex.com ([66.70.189.182]:57144)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <web@HIDDEN>) id 1hhpTf-000083-DP
for 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 02:07:50 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=spensertruex.com;
s=myselector; t=1561961261;
bh=zv9n7PpmyRMixWI4YsAqRlQ/kRIUDV7UmqRX4vbqDu0=;
h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date;
b=PKxV2yuxOC99XjJozPjIDRmBMe+ZENkqdH3hIJcr2Ugov+ncAk/kfgmyJ2K9IQqvZ
uBFOydUQFvHGkEFKqGShq9nTRUFUv7+uGPZcR1iZFbwgbOJGGy9WC4mH3zW2QQqyMY
+CZI+qzKTk3Ua80X3eDw7HODUJMcBcNgCWunowyLv7uP+hhF+VTuGhF7B/DvLRqVjn
vyXZLnAmOCr0dm15wA71Wu04YoCzs8EYgFZ/zhBo/aDzvAKH/kFHT4HUH6/+Imj0RM
LuQEN1tOaF0hA9o/yoCvyN1JxFgNifDEqKUdKjdLl4yPe0aXQuxWeV61vV51CVG1Vc
2xYadcULocCCw==
From: Spenser Truex <web@HIDDEN>
To: Robert Pluim <rpluim@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#31920: 26.1;
frame appears in wrong part of desktop after restoring frameset from
fullscreen
In-Reply-To: <87zhzn0w1y.fsf@HIDDEN> (Robert Pluim's message of "Fri, 22
Jun 2018 15:50:49 +0200")
References: <CAAnK0TaS+mm3TwFp=dTz-6gSDkdzpSiX+xpZZDn3rHMFEpix=A@HIDDEN>
<5B2B50C8.2090600@HIDDEN> <87zhzo3083.fsf@HIDDEN>
<5B2CB996.4060606@HIDDEN> <877emr2hmf.fsf@HIDDEN>
<5B2CE8F0.8070702@HIDDEN> <87zhzn0w1y.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 23:08:40 -0700
Message-ID: <87imsm1e3b.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Robert Pluim <rpluim@HIDDEN> writes: > diff --git
i/lisp/frame.el
w/lisp/frame.el > index 29c31f41cb..a58fad6481 100644 > --- i/lisp/frame.el
> +++ w/lisp/frame.el > @@ -2413,7 +2413,7 @@ toggle-frame-maximized > (t
> (set-frame-paramete [...]
Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
2.5 URIBL_DBL_SPAM Contains a spam URL listed in the Spamhaus DBL
blocklist [URIs: spensertruex.com]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information. [URIs: spensertruex.com]
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31920
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 01 Jul 2019 10:33:34 -0400
Cc: 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Jonathan Kyle Mitchell <kyle@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Robert Pluim <rpluim@HIDDEN> writes: > diff --git i/lisp/frame.el
w/lisp/frame.el > index 29c31f41cb..a58fad6481 100644 > --- i/lisp/frame.el
> +++ w/lisp/frame.el > @@ -2413,7 +2413,7 @@ toggle-frame-maximized > (t
> (set-frame-paramete [...]
Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
2.5 URIBL_DBL_SPAM Contains a spam URL listed in the Spamhaus DBL
blocklist
[URIs: spensertruex.com]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information.
[URIs: spensertruex.com]
-1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
manager
Robert Pluim <rpluim@HIDDEN> writes:
> diff --git i/lisp/frame.el w/lisp/frame.el
> index 29c31f41cb..a58fad6481 100644
> --- i/lisp/frame.el
> +++ w/lisp/frame.el
> @@ -2413,7 +2413,7 @@ toggle-frame-maximized
> (t
> (set-frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen 'maximized)))))
>
> -(defun toggle-frame-fullscreen ()
> +(defun toggle-frame-fullscreen (&optional frame)
> "Toggle fullscreen state of selected frame.
> Make selected frame fullscreen or restore its previous size if it
> is already fullscreen.
> @@ -2431,14 +2431,14 @@ toggle-frame-fullscreen
>
> See also `toggle-frame-maximized'."
> (interactive)
> - (let ((fullscreen (frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen)))
> + (let ((fullscreen (frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen)))
> (if (memq fullscreen '(fullscreen fullboth))
> - (let ((fullscreen-restore (frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen-restore)))
> + (let ((fullscreen-restore (frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen-restore)))
> (if (memq fullscreen-restore '(maximized fullheight fullwidth))
> - (set-frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen fullscreen-restore)
> - (set-frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen nil)))
> + (set-frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen fullscreen-restore)
> + (set-frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen nil)))
> (modify-frame-parameters
> - nil `((fullscreen . fullboth) (fullscreen-restore . ,fullscreen))))
> + frame `((fullscreen . fullboth) (fullscreen-restore . ,fullscreen))))
> ;; Manipulating a frame without waiting for the fullscreen
> ;; animation to complete can cause a crash, or other unexpected
> ;; behavior, on macOS (bug#28496).
> diff --git i/lisp/frameset.el w/lisp/frameset.el
> index 0e3363d7ae..ffbf6722a7 100644
> --- i/lisp/frameset.el
> +++ w/lisp/frameset.el
> @@ -1085,6 +1085,11 @@ frameset--restore-frame
> (when (frame-live-p parent-frame)
> (set-frame-parameter frame 'parent-frame parent-frame)))
>
> + (let ((old-fullscreen (frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen)))
> + (and (not (eq old-fullscreen fullscreen))
> + (memq old-fullscreen '(fullscreen fullboth))
> + (not fullscreen)
> + (toggle-frame-fullscreen frame)))
> (modify-frame-parameters frame
> (if (eq (frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen) fullscreen)
> ;; Workaround for bug#14949
>
>
>
>
I've just discovered this bug for myself, without any register
manipulation. Here is the recipe (almost the same as the original):
1) Make a window and use the WM to make it 1/2 the screen size. I
usually grab the window with the mouse and hit it against the right side
of the screen.
2) F11 to toggle fullscreen.
3) do #2 again.
Now the window isn't perfectly 1/2 the window.
Checking the value of (frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen) produces the
symbol fullheight, which indicates the problem: the emacs restore
procedure (fullscreen-restore) only stores *some* information about the
previous window configuration. The following diff shows the workaround I
was using so I could happily use f11 with my emacs:
--- lisp/frame.el 2019-06-30 21:42:29.257939995 -0700
+++ lisp/frame.el 2019-06-30 21:41:34.239940756 -0700
@@ -2621,21 +2621,21 @@
`frame-resize-pixelwise' to non-nil in order to make a frame
appear truly fullscreen. In addition, you may have to set
`x-frame-normalize-before-maximize' in order to enable
transitions from one fullscreen state to another.
See also `toggle-frame-maximized'."
(interactive)
(let ((fullscreen (frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen)))
(if (memq fullscreen '(fullscreen fullboth))
(let ((fullscreen-restore (frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen-restore)))
- (if (memq fullscreen-restore '(maximized fullheight fullwidth))
+ (if (memq fullscreen-restore '(maximized))
(set-frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen fullscreen-restore)
(set-frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen nil)))
(modify-frame-parameters
frame `((fullscreen . fullboth) (fullscreen-restore . ,fullscreen))))
;; Manipulating a frame without waiting for the fullscreen
;; animation to complete can cause a crash, or other unexpected
;; behavior, on macOS (bug#28496).
(when (featurep 'cocoa) (sleep-for 0.5))))
So I just threw out all width and height information. To do a proper
fix, I think Emacs needs to keep track of sufficient information about
the window. Window height, width, and location must be stored. The
current one only stores height or width.
This way the window manager seems to be able to make all the decisions
about window size, though I actually have no idea what is going on.
For toggle-frame-maximized the problem still exists though, and I have
not found any workaround.
--
Spenser Truex
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#31920; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 31920) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2018 08:03:22 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 28 04:03:22 2018 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38144 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fYRtg-0006Ij-BC for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 04:03:22 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:57439) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rudalics@HIDDEN>) id 1fYRtf-0006IQ-41 for 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 04:03:19 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.5.19]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Ma2Lr-1fs2oh0JKh-00Lk1T; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:03:12 +0200 Message-ID: <5B349636.2000309@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:03:02 +0200 From: martin rudalics <rudalics@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Pluim <rpluim@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#31920: 26.1; frame appears in wrong part of desktop after restoring frameset from fullscreen References: <CAAnK0TaS+mm3TwFp=dTz-6gSDkdzpSiX+xpZZDn3rHMFEpix=A@HIDDEN> <5B2B50C8.2090600@HIDDEN> <87zhzo3083.fsf@HIDDEN> <5B2CB996.4060606@HIDDEN> <877emr2hmf.fsf@HIDDEN> <5B2CE8F0.8070702@HIDDEN> <87zhzn0w1y.fsf@HIDDEN> <5B2E0779.4080201@HIDDEN> <87woukpph3.fsf@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <87woukpph3.fsf@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:GYL+EcOjS//PmQLZRFW1r/cPzLjqDXzAsS07rdichELkY9JpONL leQQrPWxi61zoa56BK3hMlzXbViBNrKwqMiQyiAXm3J73JDBA4khizWA8qZUMmWre//8KGO VC+MTSVXSWj79kIXS4OF9FZ0JiX4wI30jqb61Le6f5NMk/UsuereUyhr6upEZIZAEPjGuJh /KzhPYSdu8KN9z6jnn2bw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:oIRdHwJhNuQ=:tPczDK/yyRGajt6o9Ir6UH v1+BBzSJEva2Su/VNx0lrSz28n5sKEkGROd/rkLaPzg/YobDV4f4PP9cRd0SvikrsPDLK6VEx KbGevfJPVTw+g6M6oWDBDyefV3Gato6IE2vdLu4eWw503rBL2Hx3YpAFyDtXpEUHQFRJN0QF+ sY3lZXTED0ZfI8l6XVJB4ReJ0mXcwkvbwTwcjeyfq4kB2uJTixSSmgZWvcH05ESm2fYiBQFIh XawjDHhZRko3PfwJIuwv/RXVyXzeSHZqPF0/90Nn+0h8Oe66E9ogjcJcFbGG/Gr1g65ztKkDO kVsJHySyemTjX9uJm/YJoDk5jraQuE/qMdrg7lyriualGFS9vv6ZXlr+GehPyO6t+VKurmDyo Gvez0IdOA58mFmK/hKyVRGEQkUBUNtgtwDCKwtQH8F/6ekFI+6I/9zAclu91Coy945sbqKIpA WkVtRTArWwkR76UhfDPtM93yGvk09ptIZJQS0zIehQnxJoeOiAw50r7G/ejx2lQjpATlAMcua D8YrKkaj0tI8r5cNo5t4cqSqJ830xHvFP8lxOFZzKBxfWcb1krFNbnCbmV5c9MbPk8Pi/52Rr y4mYXVwUIX0z+cagENi7iST53+KlzWgKJ31zT/LvhzjjUQNZhRdPpFPDUAIEqCxm36G52nOrA 2G/lI1kvktXnANvUonTUDiqH8MIww4BZrdEXgoPOKKV0LIuXhFOdY5MAaB1v9sVPjIw1/CVdU Yp4NErKBip0TDMFPreTMsSeIyTQZexHAhEpouYAA2ImG0E0/FJXvR7No1uPwoGZziT0UWSJHU dHlcQUQ X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31920 Cc: 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Jonathan Kyle Mitchell <kyle@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) > That looks like it. The patch I sent earlier fixes it for me, but I=CA= =BCm > not sure it=CA=BCs the right solution, it feels very heavyweight. I think so too (note that we already have 'x-frame-normalize-before-maximize' to achieve a similar effect). The fix should be probably in 'frameset-restore' but so far I'm still too silly to even debug that function. martin
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#31920; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 31920) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2018 09:07:30 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 27 05:07:30 2018 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36847 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fY6QE-00055b-0O for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 05:07:30 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f175.google.com ([209.85.128.175]:42141) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rpluim@HIDDEN>) id 1fY6QC-00055O-5Z for 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 05:07:28 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f175.google.com with SMTP id p1-v6so1211367wrs.9 for <31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 02:07:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list :date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=B1i0AGxpS0xk2Wkpy9xsw2RRwpQI4Ahy7RmqB5FzLcQ=; b=irIL5jMBmVI9sTb7b5C0H/WZoaR6VAey8XIu4X6zmX2LWe5CUIJ7LYGo2hJhZu+f8C wOv78BG4zsrRszCMpad4693izZbp5OhiJ+pixt9i8in+qYeEdtSsf6An6ZI3dpSmODEw AjJKJB5F/4lAOdgIzdmw4sZb9z3tQCmHurF3YzZVX/mDbs9INBgP6Tn/ySWVAbZ5NeGb nBPEZ63V/QBARyBXtygBd5OksrpKJx4b4Unmd+iPTSVT1vvsK7CzZ2FW9vhNbfGx4vHN bZOAzGfuqaXAy56+7QJvu0cuSeaknwdrUIV/4tijqUhWKHRY764NMzJdoxcHYQ/gvJmv 14fw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=B1i0AGxpS0xk2Wkpy9xsw2RRwpQI4Ahy7RmqB5FzLcQ=; b=smQdAQBsE6Ox9eFU3X9zIlfNXpLeZOR4SQY891wU+d7mGX1ePKsee2+vJucLNzCZsC 5mBSL9HXv6djkS1bHvCT41nm+imta7IbvSr+/qqiD6A22HD9SkFLRZbwnb49YZRU5Zj1 V9S8wGqh7I3NwyPZ0Nb2r5Eke391oez5YcB4sf22MGRIWf0YijAsva4qZWWhTtHX9WSn QmD4jy3aq+8jiC67vrDTItRH3BMEG9+djq4wvX32MAkV+wmLWqGLe6QPLzaEe+ILAFXl 2CghxTvH6iNjgwYvnDqePnBwtWUQnGauTthDSMffi8UlCbvuEHDgpvI9EZFu8cRMZlg1 Ng8w== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E0x6IAT7gqzbgJ33HD09pqYzkRBIamVB+3VYEzU9EBtU8cFsdn1 Bm0mXvfp7kmU43bW8P4elIs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpc80lPZRm/65e0Qz0PdoSR0UIxyHVeM1PZ5/pe1XDuYpaVUf9OEKmUGFLJBRL00gl23dZlXzw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ca13:: with SMTP id o19-v6mr4348787wrh.148.1530090442476; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 02:07:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rpluim-ubuntu (36.28.158.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.158.28.36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k7-v6sm2720576wrq.82.2018.06.27.02.07.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Jun 2018 02:07:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@HIDDEN> To: martin rudalics <rudalics@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#31920: 26.1; frame appears in wrong part of desktop after restoring frameset from fullscreen References: <CAAnK0TaS+mm3TwFp=dTz-6gSDkdzpSiX+xpZZDn3rHMFEpix=A@HIDDEN> <5B2B50C8.2090600@HIDDEN> <87zhzo3083.fsf@HIDDEN> <5B2CB996.4060606@HIDDEN> <877emr2hmf.fsf@HIDDEN> <5B2CE8F0.8070702@HIDDEN> <87zhzn0w1y.fsf@HIDDEN> <5B2E0779.4080201@HIDDEN> X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 11:07:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5B2E0779.4080201@HIDDEN> (martin rudalics's message of "Sat, 23 Jun 2018 10:40:25 +0200") Message-ID: <87woukpph3.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31920 Cc: 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Jonathan Kyle Mitchell <kyle@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) martin rudalics <rudalics@HIDDEN> writes: > I found a simpler scenario: With emacs -Q do C-x r f a, drag the frame > somewhere else on your screen and do C-x r j a. Here the registered > position is restored. Now do C-x r f a, drag the frame somewhere > else, do F11 and C-x r j a. Here the frame is restored to the > position it had before F11 and not to the one registered by C-x r f a. > I confirm this exact behaviour under GTK. > So this time it seems that I have the right explanation: We first > position the frame according to the position from the register and > then demaximize it. But we should first demaximize and then > reposition it. Can you confirm? That looks like it. The patch I sent earlier fixes it for me, but I=CA=BCm not sure it=CA=BCs the right solution, it feels very heavyweight. Robert
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#31920; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 31920) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jun 2018 08:40:38 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 23 04:40:38 2018 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60768 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fWe62-0002ur-MX for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jun 2018 04:40:38 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:45515) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rudalics@HIDDEN>) id 1fWe61-0002uf-Bo for 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jun 2018 04:40:38 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([46.125.250.81]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M1AIu-1gLSQW1GMy-00tFBh; Sat, 23 Jun 2018 10:40:28 +0200 Message-ID: <5B2E0779.4080201@HIDDEN> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 10:40:25 +0200 From: martin rudalics <rudalics@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Pluim <rpluim@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#31920: 26.1; frame appears in wrong part of desktop after restoring frameset from fullscreen References: <CAAnK0TaS+mm3TwFp=dTz-6gSDkdzpSiX+xpZZDn3rHMFEpix=A@HIDDEN> <5B2B50C8.2090600@HIDDEN> <87zhzo3083.fsf@HIDDEN> <5B2CB996.4060606@HIDDEN> <877emr2hmf.fsf@HIDDEN> <5B2CE8F0.8070702@HIDDEN> <87zhzn0w1y.fsf@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <87zhzn0w1y.fsf@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:GG6wJN/32r57Hcuoz7dp+glWqZ5Ap1En+ExjqvptIYWAgPHzw+E h6tpETWzQYbtWNtE2x2yQa/uY8Id50aUsM8Gg8suNptorIHT59HzdgvzSlAIV3kmKvSZWiG MEHaz/RA4AcTE5+9NW+aoeeg4pI/2PFAaVR9EOkAa2NMGpobpqvGrJahp2yIK/2B6K1Qmn7 yqzRZmZuPGckOF0GpECRg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:eURghgg7m5I=:pOOOUSq5xKdlwM6J/TZD1g 2bfkbViw09+4oNDuAEF66PUGV4baP2ZvK93MfO9TNK0/mDcEvvAA33CaNFdxAZOmaoz1eBRZE uRrtpLDBDJqVz8DYlVjZXFev/7CCQVgisijC97sZprABuYJM1wMoJepBXhO9MDKYl7eskOTQu mL9lI0T1Am70bzXWU9Mm7gPMYZ+jrXa3aVQJV3ys7J87Llyaz3I/R3Rpjxr6seIhfIix8mRMw kkO7dyaqsnxBdjB/Hr5WchgiWPWsBxtnOSB3rDnMbtAFKTiZkX3MoOcZHu2CRElIenSaXHr2e glA+wJlM1mEiqchJcH7K+YSTYEP26tdmfi9Fbvs22NW9ije5W1/VeVDUk1cxk+n8jAJlTtCPm 38Tg3clDvyiPadE5iqpwReR1Bb8LqpqaZo8qdHI3xZNGV0xmGgE3RZ3rdVs3n8iQjzKdcnMhI 4360Wu+yAQpQhCoZ2xwh6ojB+Q+zY6iXI6Z0WiB4wqoGuWB/yBHRqVLPXhOXX0rccXXrMOGH6 OW5qMxzTTJwWd2apHVJe8k2KSeYtNo7MYwQs2HpWCNU1LIF8ExKlaEgkNl3jdAcVoh0BUs/vy 1d8mZYbPbdz6msNW2BaFp1q2y+pN3H/Xg57mNiX43KsqTx3TKXDqiBsJqiaStXHPFA53PBEAb llFMK3RXaw6lN05gsLs3hToynjdq8T6PEH2LseDxVGxi8xRD9wvTvUq5IxUrbYSPW1Q8vQZ6X 1H7wNd2LpFoDs6USpN8N+/UYCAZPmL9bJ2ZNEorh1g4PIORpKJ2DfU12TtEM0ljuhiPCYC5b9 JMi0PBM X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31920 Cc: 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Jonathan Kyle Mitchell <kyle@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) I found a simpler scenario: With emacs -Q do C-x r f a, drag the frame somewhere else on your screen and do C-x r j a. Here the registered position is restored. Now do C-x r f a, drag the frame somewhere else, do F11 and C-x r j a. Here the frame is restored to the position it had before F11 and not to the one registered by C-x r f a. So this time it seems that I have the right explanation: We first position the frame according to the position from the register and then demaximize it. But we should first demaximize and then reposition it. Can you confirm? martin
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#31920; Package emacs.
Full text available.
Received: (at 31920) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2018 13:51:00 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 22 09:51:00 2018
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59779 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1fWMSp-0001qx-Nr
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:51:00 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]:54840)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <rpluim@HIDDEN>) id 1fWMSn-0001qj-6U
for 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:50:57 -0400
Received: by mail-wm0-f43.google.com with SMTP id o13-v6so2323001wmf.4
for <31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 06:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list
:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=/61i1/Ulr7nZJMlurp0GWfY/tZRjSzwKES0nvMBo61g=;
b=hSMmWzk3g03QKORSLca5UFn0Fvr84aIVz/Z7sxlGC5wxWXvBQLbxJl4Y6sJr0aH4lD
flp/mc9w3O2bI7+Uec3D/c+M1x4xHb4sOXlbNnxZTX/mMLmxIzUasuF2jYhOM0v/W8bv
dhBau/qp0nlCr5dOsjXhzZtUCW7f+uGZm/GHSTuM+2d5VOVmE9TIoKvC7gwv2KjUjATC
VIUBE9pMxscZtUVffWTtoaoSQqm6eOiZ9bPGkzmrMRfDJLAQwoPugq7RaQI6dM+qtd6k
qNNl/XZu1MGU3arhssdUkY2pVVR3HPnJLjmF7dThpATEPytBGZEyEf2UMywKMT+IAlE1
tTvA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-copies-to
:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=/61i1/Ulr7nZJMlurp0GWfY/tZRjSzwKES0nvMBo61g=;
b=UGqlvi+2yfVw95WHeED4pYiToMcrkTwaozsUfRyDH8yCC2bEA6TVrPVVLa/RyXE80D
Hr6F7OPyVRXf7yEVwNENwcXM0cnlKqiOkuMbwzqD54UARtsVI1g97mTS2GOgTa5hQRqU
ttDNMELGWOftBop0UzjqlPf55JDIq1k77NjpJKCK72K0k1JPFlCZpXNNLKMs2qlr3v0Y
PN1k9A89r59AvAvkjjwsEvGcIAv/lQK6nHQGW0lyJY1mg7ML2iS22x6RWDcgxZRYmMg3
ZvAfSao4BuNWMzJHglMJ1D34CDdVCOQRXEO1Puf9HmmAvn9/VIl9RN2MKxqD+T22flVR
2sNQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E3IsZ1EApni67c3Z32qECvh/qbfhzi2U7hJqafVG9n+Q/rItmj9
JIgmcGA0MzsAEXtEH4oR3Bk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJe927s7ZK9P7L/LDL72lF33KLX+smaO6JHEc7X0rT1gybjlmnZ9cN6UMlr6vKnblxTalYSNg==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:387:: with SMTP id 129-v6mr1826242wmd.53.1529675451131;
Fri, 22 Jun 2018 06:50:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rpluim-ubuntu ([149.5.228.1])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 11-v6sm1770090wmd.35.2018.06.22.06.50.49
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Fri, 22 Jun 2018 06:50:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@HIDDEN>
To: martin rudalics <rudalics@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#31920: 26.1;
frame appears in wrong part of desktop after restoring frameset from
fullscreen
References: <CAAnK0TaS+mm3TwFp=dTz-6gSDkdzpSiX+xpZZDn3rHMFEpix=A@HIDDEN>
<5B2B50C8.2090600@HIDDEN> <87zhzo3083.fsf@HIDDEN>
<5B2CB996.4060606@HIDDEN> <877emr2hmf.fsf@HIDDEN>
<5B2CE8F0.8070702@HIDDEN>
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes
Mail-Copies-To: never
Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:50:49 +0200
In-Reply-To: <5B2CE8F0.8070702@HIDDEN> (martin rudalics's message of "Fri, 22
Jun 2018 14:17:52 +0200")
Message-ID: <87zhzn0w1y.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31920
Cc: 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Jonathan Kyle Mitchell <kyle@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
martin rudalics <rudalics@HIDDEN> writes:
>> Which ends up calling frameset--restore-frame, so the problem is elsewhe=
re.
>
> Aha. I have no idea how to debug these cl-forms so I usually end up
> in some sort of nirvana. On Windows I call WM_EMACS_SETWINDOWPOS (in
> my_set_window_pos) with
>
> x =3D 902,
> y =3D 18,
> cx =3D 0,
> cy =3D 0,
>
> and Windows gets back to me with a WM_MOVE for (0, 0) - the values
> offered by GetWindowRect being
>
> left =3D 0,
> top =3D 0,
> right =3D 680,
> bottom =3D 658
>
> I have no idea what to learn from this: (902, 18) is the correct
> request and I see no intervening action from there until Windows
> returns (0, 0).
>
That=CA=BCs similar to what I=CA=BCm seeing. gtk_window_move is called with=
the
right parameters, but the frame ends up in the wrong place.
>> The code that causes the frame to be restored in the wrong place is
>> this:
>>
>> (modify-frame-parameters frame
>> (if (eq (frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen) fullscreen)
>> ;; Workaround for bug#14949
>> (assq-delete-all 'fullscreen filtered-cfg)
>> filtered-cfg))
>>
>> in framset--restore-frame, which means I=CA=BCm going to have to break o=
ut
>> gdb and/or printf.
>
> And removing the special fullsreen handling doesn't change anything?
> Maybe we _should_ do something special when a fullscreen frame is
> restored to a non-fullscreen one.
If I understand that code, it says "if the old and new fullscreen
states are the same, don=CA=BCt pass fullscreen to modify-frame-parameters"
(it=CA=BCs Friday afternoon, I may be wrong, and the fullscreen variable
there has an unhelpful name :-) )
> Basically, Emacs has been doing something inherently wrong all the
> time: It asks to resize a frame while that frame is in fullscreen (or
> maximized) state. The correct interpretation on behalf of the window
> manager would be to store the new sizes and apply them when the frame
> is returned to its normal (non-fullscreen/non-maximized) state, IMHO.
> For some reason, the approach chosen by Emacs has worked so I never
> tried to fiddle with it. But maybe it bites us this time.
So you=CA=BCre saying we should un-maximize, and then set the frame size
afterwards? The patch below tries that, it works for me, although it
does of course cause the frame to resize and then move in two steps.
>>(I=CA=BCm surprised Eli is seeing this on MS-Windows
>> though, I thought the low-level frame implementation was completely
>> separate)
>
> I see this on Windows too. Normally, buggy behavior consistent across
> platforms is an asset. For some reason, this doesn't apply here yet.
It turns our that most of the code is common, only the implementations
of things like x_set_offset and x_calc_absolute_position are
platform-specific. I=CA=BCm still surprised they share the same bugs.
Robert
diff --git i/lisp/frame.el w/lisp/frame.el
index 29c31f41cb..a58fad6481 100644
--- i/lisp/frame.el
+++ w/lisp/frame.el
@@ -2413,7 +2413,7 @@ toggle-frame-maximized
(t
(set-frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen 'maximized)))))
=20
-(defun toggle-frame-fullscreen ()
+(defun toggle-frame-fullscreen (&optional frame)
"Toggle fullscreen state of selected frame.
Make selected frame fullscreen or restore its previous size if it
is already fullscreen.
@@ -2431,14 +2431,14 @@ toggle-frame-fullscreen
=20
See also `toggle-frame-maximized'."
(interactive)
- (let ((fullscreen (frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen)))
+ (let ((fullscreen (frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen)))
(if (memq fullscreen '(fullscreen fullboth))
- (let ((fullscreen-restore (frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen-restore)))
+ (let ((fullscreen-restore (frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen-restore)))
(if (memq fullscreen-restore '(maximized fullheight fullwidth))
- (set-frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen fullscreen-restore)
- (set-frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen nil)))
+ (set-frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen fullscreen-restore)
+ (set-frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen nil)))
(modify-frame-parameters
- nil `((fullscreen . fullboth) (fullscreen-restore . ,fullscreen))))
+ frame `((fullscreen . fullboth) (fullscreen-restore . ,fullscreen))=
))
;; Manipulating a frame without waiting for the fullscreen
;; animation to complete can cause a crash, or other unexpected
;; behavior, on macOS (bug#28496).
diff --git i/lisp/frameset.el w/lisp/frameset.el
index 0e3363d7ae..ffbf6722a7 100644
--- i/lisp/frameset.el
+++ w/lisp/frameset.el
@@ -1085,6 +1085,11 @@ frameset--restore-frame
(when (frame-live-p parent-frame)
(set-frame-parameter frame 'parent-frame parent-frame)))
=20
+ (let ((old-fullscreen (frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen)))
+ (and (not (eq old-fullscreen fullscreen))
+ (memq old-fullscreen '(fullscreen fullboth))
+ (not fullscreen)
+ (toggle-frame-fullscreen frame)))
(modify-frame-parameters frame
(if (eq (frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen) fullscreen)
;; Workaround for bug#14949
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#31920; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 31920) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2018 12:18:03 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 22 08:18:03 2018 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59729 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fWL0s-00089W-SG for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 08:18:03 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:41767) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rudalics@HIDDEN>) id 1fWL0q-000891-Jc for 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 08:18:01 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([213.162.73.105]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MK0bZ-1fVWCK1wTV-001UZv; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 14:17:53 +0200 Message-ID: <5B2CE8F0.8070702@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 14:17:52 +0200 From: martin rudalics <rudalics@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Pluim <rpluim@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#31920: 26.1; frame appears in wrong part of desktop after restoring frameset from fullscreen References: <CAAnK0TaS+mm3TwFp=dTz-6gSDkdzpSiX+xpZZDn3rHMFEpix=A@HIDDEN> <5B2B50C8.2090600@HIDDEN> <87zhzo3083.fsf@HIDDEN> <5B2CB996.4060606@HIDDEN> <877emr2hmf.fsf@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <877emr2hmf.fsf@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:eKNr9maAcMdugQXYCTqCWZ6U8h+kFjeT4DTgqHU25E8c2K4DX5w Yj3HhIKNIm2SToCdSiESaAp1GY1LA2jvHpE/elsB2bV1lLblM19qz+j+HAC0iq45+DfmgQY MxWQCNo5pP9EG4uL9NHZMgezpNF/Yb9irT1ncQpIhI8l5XsFZe19XebvOOejPg5Jxf2+1If xENp5gOMGDhMpqRpzsnOw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:0gIgwbWBRqc=:30un0jEqWWSYu7yp/P/lBb /GesE6Lp66hFnElXVtd2ZyU+wta7hZe7/H0MyMltImgdBUJrgMs6z91FwXKJ3gfPSCVao2SAq 1ALrIgE9MP310XYVW3DiJ0UJIN3dXu1lGzroTMEOpb0ogTZkVTWKNHDFJsARLn5RTqvnJcqw2 kYTkm7MS+C9lduWxnBgjBlNEkvdsTN/whV5huv3ZoWomY11YiPdymJrO/pkY85L3Mx9QMhEGp efmGyfZAProtC9ijAQxhkavQKeCxnOFBCQDZ+jC22s1hK2FC+tPmJSgdJw9UwByi74TMyQvib y9x6H5vlJfNyicJuR7iMj9Kdm1TLu4XcKlXallROqm2BgUgJA5ljLAIubi5ceuTklQojqRnX7 XgzJypt+6qXvCFMvmbh/lk1mZKfO/WX4vbGmOAOMe7e2bocLfJJEqgBv6rCTCqJTqwjpD7xy6 UEwQfgjstQa+Be0+YdmSVl7n/vD0VOYy8YPHeAQxTFBtIKNvQZu1tpAzYDFUDOKPCLmZPYupG ru17x8ZLQhRWqtBBv5FaDyM95wiW79hbX4gPzdlpZXHnRYZPZI/oBfQS3wPtQCuaOm69bukD2 RNxyoqOPe8UbonJUqQ/ptjS59virVJclreROd6D5jIZNGcmbhGw2IvLzNmKMJYRqnNOhAVYt8 qBh7Cnw9zRvTT2qzkKfJGFvVOXwRcHFDaKh7q+fDN67gz6ox70vW9Ai9ft6cDy7b5AETYNcse LGmEgbEIPGghPoMPsEKCQ0+jj091MJqzRss7a+2SD+h/5Hm8Qm37+gyo/extPSrnvdT8xOnQj BuBcbRd X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31920 Cc: 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Jonathan Kyle Mitchell <kyle@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >> IIUC C-x r f runs the command 'frameset-to-register' which stores a >> "framset" in a register. C-x r j runs the command 'jump-to-register'= >> which does _not_ restore a frame's state via 'frameset--restore-frame= ' >> but goes to 'set-frame-configuration' instead. Apparently, framesets= >> and frame configurations differ in a couple of minor aspects and the >> fullscreen state is one of them. > > They do, but when edebugging jump-to-register, I end up in this branch= > of the cond: > > ((registerv-p val) > (cl-assert (registerv-jump-func val) nil > "Don't know how to jump to register %s" > (single-key-description register)) > (funcall (registerv-jump-func val) (registerv-data val))) > > Which ends up calling frameset--restore-frame, so the problem is elsew= here. Aha. I have no idea how to debug these cl-forms so I usually end up in some sort of nirvana. On Windows I call WM_EMACS_SETWINDOWPOS (in my_set_window_pos) with x =3D 902, y =3D 18, cx =3D 0, cy =3D 0, and Windows gets back to me with a WM_MOVE for (0, 0) - the values offered by GetWindowRect being left =3D 0, top =3D 0, right =3D 680, bottom =3D 658 I have no idea what to learn from this: (902, 18) is the correct request and I see no intervening action from there until Windows returns (0, 0). > The code that causes the frame to be restored in the wrong place is > this: > > (modify-frame-parameters frame > (if (eq (frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen) fullscreen) > ;; Workaround for bug#14949 > (assq-delete-all 'fullscreen filtered-cfg) > filtered-cfg)) > > in framset--restore-frame, which means I=CA=BCm going to have to break= out > gdb and/or printf. And removing the special fullsreen handling doesn't change anything? Maybe we _should_ do something special when a fullscreen frame is restored to a non-fullscreen one. Basically, Emacs has been doing something inherently wrong all the time: It asks to resize a frame while that frame is in fullscreen (or maximized) state. The correct interpretation on behalf of the window manager would be to store the new sizes and apply them when the frame is returned to its normal (non-fullscreen/non-maximized) state, IMHO. For some reason, the approach chosen by Emacs has worked so I never tried to fiddle with it. But maybe it bites us this time. >(I=CA=BCm surprised Eli is seeing this on MS-Windows > though, I thought the low-level frame implementation was completely > separate) I see this on Windows too. Normally, buggy behavior consistent across platforms is an asset. For some reason, this doesn't apply here yet. martin
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#31920; Package emacs.
Full text available.
Received: (at 31920) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2018 11:19:46 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 22 07:19:45 2018
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59701 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1fWK6T-0002pX-NM
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 07:19:45 -0400
Received: from mail-wr0-f172.google.com ([209.85.128.172]:39755)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <rpluim@HIDDEN>) id 1fWK6S-0002pF-Lw
for 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 07:19:45 -0400
Received: by mail-wr0-f172.google.com with SMTP id b8-v6so902386wro.6
for <31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 04:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list
:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=WvKQwi+aNsQjGM98bDyW5VTqHyhL+L8ZtPF4IAZg0CM=;
b=ZtPBMq4VRT7tLrC4wgEPkMO1APLz+4MfZINLUdxXC7et/Hu8GEaPcrki/sAruBczmJ
uIGOUhj5O2kmdLXv8E74oxhCb52z7Yn4eoyr+Tpkfv375NH+fTELSFtbHgamCREvkkHT
+tZwE0Vbws4aisSBAoUuAClzBJo80TRKT0XtO5GIL86Rmvz3gh+qvVbIbTb/fOFycu4+
xcV+I1vpSL59C1Ml2BaWpViJJm+GYhM3U73ckaBIrd1o03Q1ImTldWHmImT5esz7EwFZ
5gepFn5wGQm+R6t5mJMUXO6qDMF2NoEAfF2hUICs0v7kJ+L0DS3JxCQrL2qD6/h5VuCl
XuTg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-copies-to
:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=WvKQwi+aNsQjGM98bDyW5VTqHyhL+L8ZtPF4IAZg0CM=;
b=Rd0NJu7C7YcPpRCowFkQhVD5xU+1qpzRSNPjt3Q108mY77tpqi6Z1oXCYKWrYBFFbe
bG7wKq84AeAbAT/jv4kG0SfXBz6Mj2nOgxIDMUTo9c18OSSASBG4HhdmgiQYhD7rzYKf
vLUIlQpmBOXeQ8ECKJpjnsfMQ+ZMuBbZObmkwtQgkaC1gJLIrPEdQL0tuIb4YLkpi6I6
f/Vw0NuIzX+/vTKfagPp5i9pZsW5blrNXtO0BkKArBlRlnwvBpXgs2FxRiAg/tk88RjI
DLqwzkL8LzSc6oPIwgun59KZbBXLWEhP4JOi1lyRRgiqmDOB1jGeAjG08wNBeHGH5YtL
lENw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E3abHho3QVFmGKHyJTGyzLfZiq0ZBf9SwatLl+D2asrFK+FajWx
yjvulV3qWTdntmRIktL6Gpw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpc6Z6C3AcCKiUI0vjh2ZZk/FyX2/fc0Ou3cbdzGVwqGixQmZg2kspr1XuUw3GImfcpNeDeafw==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:ca03:: with SMTP id
o3-v6mr1261643wrh.148.1529666378747;
Fri, 22 Jun 2018 04:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rpluim-ubuntu ([149.5.228.1])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 11-v6sm1381011wmd.35.2018.06.22.04.19.37
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Fri, 22 Jun 2018 04:19:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@HIDDEN>
To: martin rudalics <rudalics@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#31920: 26.1;
frame appears in wrong part of desktop after restoring frameset from
fullscreen
References: <CAAnK0TaS+mm3TwFp=dTz-6gSDkdzpSiX+xpZZDn3rHMFEpix=A@HIDDEN>
<5B2B50C8.2090600@HIDDEN> <87zhzo3083.fsf@HIDDEN>
<5B2CB996.4060606@HIDDEN>
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes
Mail-Copies-To: never
Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:19:36 +0200
In-Reply-To: <5B2CB996.4060606@HIDDEN> (martin rudalics's message of "Fri, 22
Jun 2018 10:55:50 +0200")
Message-ID: <877emr2hmf.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31920
Cc: 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Jonathan Kyle Mitchell <kyle@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
martin rudalics <rudalics@HIDDEN> writes:
>> I see this on my Ubuntu 16.04 box, also running KDE, but only if I go
>> through the restore cycle twice. Also, if I restore frameset a again,
>> the frame ends up in the right place, ie:
>>
>> restore a -> OK
>> restore b -> OK
>> restore a -> NOK
>> restore a -> OK
>
> Confirmed. The transition from b to a via C-x r j a always moves the
> frame to the top/left corner of the screen here.
>
> IIUC C-x r f runs the command 'frameset-to-register' which stores a
> "framset" in a register. C-x r j runs the command 'jump-to-register'
> which does _not_ restore a frame's state via 'frameset--restore-frame'
> but goes to 'set-frame-configuration' instead. Apparently, framesets
> and frame configurations differ in a couple of minor aspects and the
> fullscreen state is one of them.
They do, but when edebugging jump-to-register, I end up in this branch
of the cond:
((registerv-p val)
(cl-assert (registerv-jump-func val) nil
"Don't know how to jump to register %s"
(single-key-description register))
(funcall (registerv-jump-func val) (registerv-data val)))
Which ends up calling frameset--restore-frame, so the problem is elsewhere.
>> Neither of those make any difference for me, nor does using
>> toggle-frame-maximized.
>
> Obviously so because 'frameset--restore-frame' does not get called in
> the first place.
I think I tested the wrong thing, probably because I forgot an
'eval-defun' somewhere.
The code that causes the frame to be restored in the wrong place is
this:
(modify-frame-parameters frame
(if (eq (frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen) fullscreen)
;; Workaround for bug#14949
(assq-delete-all 'fullscreen filtered-cfg)
filtered-cfg))
in framset--restore-frame, which means I=CA=BCm going to have to break out
gdb and/or printf. (I=CA=BCm surprised Eli is seeing this on MS-Windows
though, I thought the low-level frame implementation was completely
separate)
Robert
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#31920; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 31920) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2018 08:56:09 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 22 04:56:09 2018 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59657 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fWHrU-0005nx-TM for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 04:56:09 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:48693) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rudalics@HIDDEN>) id 1fWHrT-0005nP-ER for 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 04:56:07 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([213.162.73.105]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LfSeH-1fyxdh2GhV-00p4h2; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 10:56:00 +0200 Message-ID: <5B2CB99F.4070405@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 10:55:59 +0200 From: martin rudalics <rudalics@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#31920: 26.1; frame appears in wrong part of desktop after restoring frameset from fullscreen References: <CAAnK0TaS+mm3TwFp=dTz-6gSDkdzpSiX+xpZZDn3rHMFEpix=A@HIDDEN> <5B2B50C8.2090600@HIDDEN> <83muvoqgo1.fsf@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <83muvoqgo1.fsf@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:UFUMd9Q24dColkbbnCurqmblaw1XYU3kitO2m1tS0UEr2B4UdWv EZCQ74tgsOLQiblITzwy09EESoN8hl+ScPC67IZlyPhQPWGPFKjooVROAvnG6iaH/ktWdQz WP7dthnUsXiXFv4nylXHs2IRwqfhzGgJ5Kfd+9Oto6qVFYS+YygcgNEnZtqxZ4xADvZHTnJ aaYk2NY4ftpPC2HpzmTQg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:H7aWiiCrJpw=:ETzFk8nCUhoX8EybsHs2Jp bnF3oDy3Gy60VXeY0a5Q+3hSx1MCcIp5plWaHzYa+YH47oq27L9saHtEUHqZ9XJ8GBjnsotsu WFprWMDaBlWbDQMHkveo1+01b9VlBS0ehNNVoLcBGG968URt2puDS+/JmYR1HLCQiFOcHoAXS IPDHXXwMp+nmvfi2Yi9D/nQJxJ84LJo9J9SB1SARPUL+fC+F2/5csCaaWwJqaszm+qIiwSmdV 9bt8+qi1Q3yS0+m17LRROA6IVuOt8LEyCxnE2lpjNg5acMiMs1lUcksaGA+3iV4ajfaQMBbiB PKi6SHvRCHbFCUcE/0jI7wx9PhJ9+K1WaBbct51Cz9m7zZM3mj5zA/CyATXc4OdyAwwcIDYx7 fHdezxW06tyWQWp4GwWPknA6pTD1oI8TJZtptyI82gbj3YwODrYKIeXgpowSdC4XRoaPe0jwx hR1AcwFMoqSaHiemMsgf99ZIVkl+rzMEurx0IHztA4KMa0x0tJfTklNl2djdyTDr+e2FJLK1u Qo7e8oU5JWEXRbVwaJsF7VDTbyP92EY7bKPEUYdhTmmxEkHDAKdJLcwTbWYEccJ08QKq1tYEo CguA6u1ZdLO7aNK527YsPhlTiEjvBCRHOjuo2gsFPKx1ZLNhZTYRHrpCfxrW3cxGwG09XRQ0+ ZrwXO5z1/SOwDAqM49pwoUM0t83Oj1YTWk+CS4ioIq+UvvUqf75NnsipK0KCv4HtQW12Y2OEn DZ6E2y9zHEYS7NTfsx/LvG4AaVczbsSpCkTlhbGXG0R3c014EJWx7jGeU4V0SxNQnEvIGHz+L K9VYQFh X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31920 Cc: 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, kyle@HIDDEN X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) > I can reproduce here if I do "C-x r j a" then "C-x r j b", then "C-x r > j a" again. The second time the frame split into two windows appears > at the left side of the desktop. Indeed. Splitting the window is not needed, BTW. martin
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#31920; Package emacs.
Full text available.
Received: (at 31920) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2018 08:56:03 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 22 04:56:03 2018
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59654 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1fWHrO-0005nS-7g
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 04:56:03 -0400
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:59791)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <rudalics@HIDDEN>) id 1fWHrM-0005n2-FW
for 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 04:56:00 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([213.162.73.105]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001
[212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M7Xi3-1gR7y30T9r-00xHYa; Fri, 22
Jun 2018 10:55:52 +0200
Message-ID: <5B2CB996.4060606@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 10:55:50 +0200
From: martin rudalics <rudalics@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Pluim <rpluim@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#31920: 26.1; frame appears in wrong part of desktop after
restoring frameset from fullscreen
References: <CAAnK0TaS+mm3TwFp=dTz-6gSDkdzpSiX+xpZZDn3rHMFEpix=A@HIDDEN> <5B2B50C8.2090600@HIDDEN>
<87zhzo3083.fsf@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87zhzo3083.fsf@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:cJsOGslsT9Oq7JpGSjCClYRj15KwPdT9KvDAd1mzippOBWd1BrT
VlwHPWYQpew7YatU8lDvPh6KUwTu/6elwIYbsAMGYAi5qSpZ+y2eO1PyudFLaCguTqWo+pa
P0a64ULXgViSnNiSgY+VlKUqaX+mOOrsRh95LG4XliDViL5DW5wP7JOoXWe1MBtpDNTBWR8
7vIZLhL5/6YMXHE4geL0g==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:PsM/7h3o7Rc=:uacmhY2R33tux4WHCM/pYh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X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31920
Cc: 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Jonathan Kyle Mitchell <kyle@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
> I see this on my Ubuntu 16.04 box, also running KDE, but only if I go
> through the restore cycle twice. Also, if I restore frameset a again,
> the frame ends up in the right place, ie:
>
> restore a -> OK
> restore b -> OK
> restore a -> NOK
> restore a -> OK
Confirmed. The transition from b to a via C-x r j a always moves the
frame to the top/left corner of the screen here.
IIUC C-x r f runs the command 'frameset-to-register' which stores a
"framset" in a register. C-x r j runs the command 'jump-to-register'
which does _not_ restore a frame's state via 'frameset--restore-frame'
but goes to 'set-frame-configuration' instead. Apparently, framesets
and frame configurations differ in a couple of minor aspects and the
fullscreen state is one of them.
We probably should replace
(set-frame-configuration (car val) (not delete))
by something like
(frameset-restore (car val))
but my knowledge of constructs like 'cl-defmethod' and 'cl-defun' is
too limited to play around with such a change. Maybe someone wants to
give it at try, it should be a rather low-hanging fruit.
> Neither of those make any difference for me, nor does using
> toggle-frame-maximized.
Obviously so because 'frameset--restore-frame' does not get called in
the first place.
Thanks for investigating, martin
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#31920; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 31920) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jun 2018 15:54:10 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 21 11:54:10 2018 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59306 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fW1uU-0003Pv-BV for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 11:54:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40235) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1fW1uS-0003Pi-Lg for 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 11:54:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1fW1uK-0005ue-Do for 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 11:54:03 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50183) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1fW1uK-0005uX-A3; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 11:54:00 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1678 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1fW1uJ-0000Sz-Ic; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 11:53:59 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 18:54:06 +0300 Message-Id: <83muvoqgo1.fsf@HIDDEN> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> To: martin rudalics <rudalics@HIDDEN> In-reply-to: <5B2B50C8.2090600@HIDDEN> (message from martin rudalics on Thu, 21 Jun 2018 09:16:24 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#31920: 26.1; frame appears in wrong part of desktop after restoring frameset from fullscreen References: <CAAnK0TaS+mm3TwFp=dTz-6gSDkdzpSiX+xpZZDn3rHMFEpix=A@HIDDEN> <5B2B50C8.2090600@HIDDEN> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31920 Cc: 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, kyle@HIDDEN X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) > Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 09:16:24 +0200 > From: martin rudalics <rudalics@HIDDEN> > > > 1. save a frameset with an unmaximized frame > > start from emacs -Q > > create a second window with `C-x 2' > > use the mouse to move the frame to the right side of the desktop > > save the split window frame with `C-x r f a' > > > > 2. save a frameset with a maximized/fullscreen frame > > delete one of the windows with `C-x 1' > > press `f11' to make the frame fullscreen > > save the fullscreen frame with `C-x r f b' > > > > 3. restore the unmaximized frameset with `C-x r j a' > > After jumping between framesets from register b to register a, the > > non-fullscreen frame appears on the opposite (left) side of the desktop > > than it was originally. Typing `C-x r j a' a second time moves the frame > > to its original location. > > > > I've reproduced this using Emacs 26.1 in both Windows 10 and Fedora 28 > > KDE desktop environments. > > > > In GNU Emacs 26.1 (build 1, x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.30) > > of 2018-06-04 built on buildvm-10.phx2.fedoraproject.org > > Thanks for the report. Here I can't reproduce the behavior you > observe on Windows XP even if I modify your recipe in various ways. > Maybe someone else can give it a try. I can reproduce here if I do "C-x r j a" then "C-x r j b", then "C-x r j a" again. The second time the frame split into two windows appears at the left side of the desktop.
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#31920; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 31920) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jun 2018 10:25:44 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 21 06:25:44 2018 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58249 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fVwmd-0000NM-T7 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 06:25:44 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:54426) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rpluim@HIDDEN>) id 1fVwmb-0000N7-25 for 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 06:25:42 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id o13-v6so4232182wmf.4 for <31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 03:25:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list :date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=79cd0+HqdJRkDvKOERRvPFn06XsJdautfH1eu8riXTQ=; b=AXmJYFNy1+khSfIp2hTalcJ83B0MpMjthz2HL8JcbFBtFUYc25w8fBb9/4u+hO63FK DXrqCZ3/WBl6PrYodEdFMh6inHj+PTAx3bbtbCguJPSSTHbxBNd4IyI/10Pmytgs/tHi s/dtuyUgL6C+zhviNR9E5Iw3QqEM4pp9GK/EarBc+8bKoWBF3a8f82vGVvBe4VIVTQuB axXD3uXslEBgfgalx7n3fM4b5Sy4+oVt1nnbNP3uT776lajWNzzuyyq+sbBlMdy3et0m qfIF2KpHWalq713RLo5hOgcMtEujHnKoHKCJ2YmrWisd567aNmq/L9zOmvdfiUly6Avg xYQw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=79cd0+HqdJRkDvKOERRvPFn06XsJdautfH1eu8riXTQ=; b=FRsZXTyRFFkg2XR5eBOaVNVcJYchgHqoCugOFIIe+zGxWWcQsWB6xiEmK8QfyORR7s LlnFk0jFcr9o2WP84QqcV3Hk1vF0JTcVZiBCDgVxijTxuywXruzGg7ZucvTkqLqKKUAW MkproPDoP4a2ghR7AFYo2MsI1ymjHBZpIA2ORAi3VC/tN56LKdjQRo7pOO4B5HeNp8Zp c2dWAvgLResCHtI99Ms+fODBfSD9fQ6A4si7AAgjEK3JQPNwwaMU3PrJ6FpP6BvsuC9T lx4qRfOYI0zYkFiAEJubXuFnCdEay6yOIwJyWhE7y1qVn4Tt9nAfMvrTY1TQANS/o3+K SCNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E0G5PmgkPfrQYq8ZsloimHd3AY/KXuQyExrXvf3SA6O0vYT79Sq s7sqjcRo/cwng3bJhJmdutTZ0luB38U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKIC9cIABwgxed869QAVPPgwzML0caU2bIClL4qBUp18jRm36coETAOuVsaHGj0bFFjk48DK1Q== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:b745:: with SMTP id h66-v6mr4528078wmf.151.1529576734756; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 03:25:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rpluim-ubuntu ([149.5.228.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m58-v6sm8331538wrf.61.2018.06.21.03.25.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Jun 2018 03:25:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@HIDDEN> To: martin rudalics <rudalics@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#31920: 26.1; frame appears in wrong part of desktop after restoring frameset from fullscreen References: <CAAnK0TaS+mm3TwFp=dTz-6gSDkdzpSiX+xpZZDn3rHMFEpix=A@HIDDEN> <5B2B50C8.2090600@HIDDEN> X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 12:25:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5B2B50C8.2090600@HIDDEN> (martin rudalics's message of "Thu, 21 Jun 2018 09:16:24 +0200") Message-ID: <87zhzo3083.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31920 Cc: 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Jonathan Kyle Mitchell <kyle@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) martin rudalics <rudalics@HIDDEN> writes: >> In GNU Emacs 26.1 (build 1, x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.3= 0) >> of 2018-06-04 built on buildvm-10.phx2.fedoraproject.org > > Thanks for the report. Here I can't reproduce the behavior you > observe on Windows XP even if I modify your recipe in various ways. > Maybe someone else can give it a try. > I see this on my Ubuntu 16.04 box, also running KDE, but only if I go through the restore cycle twice. Also, if I restore frameset a again, the frame ends up in the right place, ie: restore a -> OK restore b -> OK restore a -> NOK restore a -> OK > Do you really have to split the window in step 1 and delete a window > in step 2 to produce the bug? These actions appear unrelated to the > behavior you observe since window managers pretty much ignore Emacs > windows. I don=CA=BCt need to split the window. > Also what happens if, in step 2, you maximize the window instead of > making it fullscreen? frameset.el has > > (modify-frame-parameters frame > (if (eq (frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen) fullscreen) > ;; Workaround for bug#14949 > (assq-delete-all 'fullscreen filtered-cfg) > filtered-cfg)) > > which might affect the behavior on your system. Can you take out this > form, reevaluate 'frameset--restore-frame' and see whether anything > changes? > > And maybe you could also try with > > (when (and force-onscreen > ;; FIXME: iconified frames should be checked too, > ;; but it is impossible without deiconifying them. > (not (eq (frame-parameter frame 'visibility) 'icon))) > (frameset-move-onscreen frame force-onscreen)) > > removed from 'frameset--restore-frame'. Neither of those make any difference for me, nor does using toggle-frame-maximized. Regards Robert
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#31920; Package emacs.
Full text available.
Received: (at 31920) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jun 2018 07:16:42 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 21 03:16:41 2018
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58175 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1fVtph-0004Re-MZ
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 03:16:41 -0400
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:39687)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <rudalics@HIDDEN>) id 1fVtpg-0004RS-Cj
for 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 03:16:40 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.5.219]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103
[212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MGzwE-1fQy9b2Pn0-00DqYD; Thu, 21
Jun 2018 09:16:33 +0200
Message-ID: <5B2B50C8.2090600@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 09:16:24 +0200
From: martin rudalics <rudalics@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jonathan Kyle Mitchell <kyle@HIDDEN>, 31920 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#31920: 26.1; frame appears in wrong part of desktop after
restoring frameset from fullscreen
References: <CAAnK0TaS+mm3TwFp=dTz-6gSDkdzpSiX+xpZZDn3rHMFEpix=A@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <CAAnK0TaS+mm3TwFp=dTz-6gSDkdzpSiX+xpZZDn3rHMFEpix=A@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:58HPXsM03jzefx8q0cFKwe7pVLda6cNASxHDSKhwU+2yD/rvqSb
efjVeAoHdFpKCg7x3iiotD5DHvT+Do6AD5jO4g6B+9AXk/iC0tx/0+FAsCubGvRoOAg2cgo
fgQDtPEgUVlvQlNv92+RaRQX3cpd8xuGf/Uy2XdR1D2q2GrNTMW4NDOEwJf5uVonKgpJKtX
XvyQRSyXkxBl3PpKvPytQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:ndjURKgqj5M=:k+z2DBLSCq0Tb2h2kHPbEz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X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31920
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)
> 1. save a frameset with an unmaximized frame
> start from emacs -Q
> create a second window with `C-x 2'
> use the mouse to move the frame to the right side of the desktop
> save the split window frame with `C-x r f a'
>
> 2. save a frameset with a maximized/fullscreen frame
> delete one of the windows with `C-x 1'
> press `f11' to make the frame fullscreen
> save the fullscreen frame with `C-x r f b'
>
> 3. restore the unmaximized frameset with `C-x r j a'
> After jumping between framesets from register b to register a, the
> non-fullscreen frame appears on the opposite (left) side of the desktop
> than it was originally. Typing `C-x r j a' a second time moves the frame
> to its original location.
>
> I've reproduced this using Emacs 26.1 in both Windows 10 and Fedora 28
> KDE desktop environments.
>
> In GNU Emacs 26.1 (build 1, x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.30)
> of 2018-06-04 built on buildvm-10.phx2.fedoraproject.org
Thanks for the report. Here I can't reproduce the behavior you
observe on Windows XP even if I modify your recipe in various ways.
Maybe someone else can give it a try.
Do you really have to split the window in step 1 and delete a window
in step 2 to produce the bug? These actions appear unrelated to the
behavior you observe since window managers pretty much ignore Emacs
windows.
Also what happens if, in step 2, you maximize the window instead of
making it fullscreen? frameset.el has
(modify-frame-parameters frame
(if (eq (frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen) fullscreen)
;; Workaround for bug#14949
(assq-delete-all 'fullscreen filtered-cfg)
filtered-cfg))
which might affect the behavior on your system. Can you take out this
form, reevaluate 'frameset--restore-frame' and see whether anything
changes?
And maybe you could also try with
(when (and force-onscreen
;; FIXME: iconified frames should be checked too,
;; but it is impossible without deiconifying them.
(not (eq (frame-parameter frame 'visibility) 'icon)))
(frameset-move-onscreen frame force-onscreen))
removed from 'frameset--restore-frame'.
martin
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#31920; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jun 2018 03:12:45 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 20 23:12:45 2018 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58131 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fVq1d-00010U-GJ for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 23:12:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60621) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mitchell.jkyle@HIDDEN>) id 1fVq1c-00010J-Ri for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 23:12:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mitchell.jkyle@HIDDEN>) id 1fVq1W-0006NK-Fi for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 23:12:39 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:43141) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mitchell.jkyle@HIDDEN>) id 1fVq1W-0006NF-CU for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 23:12:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51590) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mitchell.jkyle@HIDDEN>) id 1fVq1U-00040M-SK for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 23:12:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mitchell.jkyle@HIDDEN>) id 1fVq1Q-0006Kq-Qe for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 23:12:36 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:55301) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mitchell.jkyle@HIDDEN>) id 1fVq1Q-0006Ke-Hb for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 23:12:32 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id v16-v6so2566623wmh.5 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 20:12:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2FcTX0uf2YWp5ZmsTQ26TW7Ij6mVkyuMTmIbXxQXF3U=; b=HeoUqb5Eva73LLlQ00cA80qWSi6hYhZ2K3Td05hOSNBit0qXngaaaTFPb9PDrDGSaA gICcYTmffbcfRGi/4FO6YyjhvT8vmN3Oa7z4qtuCiEy9v9w0LiCBRc2l8NaKxKI+R5tY g1usNB7BzyDU1tRPUpxkABXX7Zw2PbCE5zQuc4m6EU9nc+W5L7ECxK8KfT43xTxqc4Fi +8jKDKuhUCEsM2PpTrg7PYDLpn8jZSh9eiKm0413nkQ5A6sqmCvJ3w7A1hEV96OjORpZ u7nw8wyO7GxnWvbBlRMsyA5z66vYm9xD5C5AmZIibHpq81XcFGH5ItiH31eq9MLrFsq7 6GYw== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2eyMvvW+uojChTIM878Yte/QhqPlq7zo/U0bIV6Dsq/gfAMOqg Aec/UNs8O6MSgBE7KrCry6PCM6q4 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKpJ/e4R3GzCGm4dLpckLk8BFWu0dw1vle3mwFOX3CF0mUUGLBiL2YVNny5Piev2k+5Gh5UAg== X-Received: by 2002:a50:a624:: with SMTP id d33-v6mr20053147edc.8.1529550750913; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 20:12:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com (mail-wm0-f42.google.com. [74.125.82.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x11-v6sm2254428edb.39.2018.06.20.20.12.30 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Jun 2018 20:12:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id r15-v6so2607660wmc.1 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 20:12:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a1c:a54e:: with SMTP id o75-v6mr3579251wme.157.1529550750242; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 20:12:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Jonathan Kyle Mitchell <kyle@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 22:12:18 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAAnK0TaS+mm3TwFp=dTz-6gSDkdzpSiX+xpZZDn3rHMFEpix=A@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <CAAnK0TaS+mm3TwFp=dTz-6gSDkdzpSiX+xpZZDn3rHMFEpix=A@HIDDEN> Subject: 26.1; frame appears in wrong part of desktop after restoring frameset from fullscreen To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -4.5 (----) 1. save a frameset with an unmaximized frame start from emacs -Q create a second window with `C-x 2' use the mouse to move the frame to the right side of the desktop save the split window frame with `C-x r f a' 2. save a frameset with a maximized/fullscreen frame delete one of the windows with `C-x 1' press `f11' to make the frame fullscreen save the fullscreen frame with `C-x r f b' 3. restore the unmaximized frameset with `C-x r j a' After jumping between framesets from register b to register a, the non-fullscreen frame appears on the opposite (left) side of the desktop than it was originally. Typing `C-x r j a' a second time moves the frame to its original location. I've reproduced this using Emacs 26.1 in both Windows 10 and Fedora 28 KDE desktop environments. In GNU Emacs 26.1 (build 1, x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.30) of 2018-06-04 built on buildvm-10.phx2.fedoraproject.org Windowing system distributor 'Fedora Project', version 11.0.11906000 Recent messages: For information about GNU Emacs and the GNU system, type C-h C-a. C-x C-g is undefined Quit funcall-interactively: End of buffer Configured using: 'configure --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --disable-dependency-tracking --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/var/lib --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --with-dbus --with-gif --with-jpeg --with-png --with-rsvg --with-tiff --with-xft --with-xpm --with-x-toolkit=gtk3 --with-gpm=no --with-xwidgets --with-modules build_alias=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu host_alias=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu 'CFLAGS=-DMAIL_USE_LOCKF -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong -grecord-gcc-switches -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection' LDFLAGS=-Wl,-z,relro PKG_CONFIG_PATH=:/usr/lib64/pkgconfig:/usr/share/pkgconfig' Configured features: XPM JPEG TIFF GIF PNG RSVG IMAGEMAGICK SOUND DBUS GSETTINGS NOTIFY ACL LIBSELINUX GNUTLS LIBXML2 FREETYPE M17N_FLT LIBOTF XFT ZLIB TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS GTK3 X11 MODULES THREADS XWIDGETS LCMS2 Important settings: value of $LANG: en_US.UTF-8 locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix Major mode: Lisp Interaction Minor modes in effect: tooltip-mode: t global-eldoc-mode: t eldoc-mode: t electric-indent-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t Load-path shadows: None found. Features: (shadow sort mail-extr emacsbug message rmc puny seq byte-opt gv bytecomp byte-compile cconv dired dired-loaddefs format-spec rfc822 mml mml-sec password-cache epa derived epg epg-config gnus-util rmail rmail-loaddefs mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mail-parse rfc2231 mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader sendmail rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mm-util mail-prsvr mail-utils cl-extra help-mode easymenu cl-seq frameset cl-loaddefs cl-lib elec-pair time-date mule-util tooltip eldoc electric uniquify ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel term/x-win x-win term/common-win x-dnd tool-bar dnd fontset image regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list replace newcomment text-mode elisp-mode lisp-mode prog-mode register page menu-bar rfn-eshadow isearch timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core term/tty-colors frame cl-generic cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese eucjp-ms cp51932 hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese composite charscript charprop case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev obarray minibuffer cl-preloaded nadvice loaddefs button faces cus-face macroexp files text-properties overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote dbusbind inotify lcms2 dynamic-setting system-font-setting font-render-setting xwidget-internal move-toolbar gtk x-toolkit x multi-tty make-network-process emacs) Memory information: ((conses 16 98781 10240) (symbols 48 20607 1) (miscs 40 49 104) (strings 32 28810 1074) (string-bytes 1 760814) (vectors 16 15071) (vector-slots 8 500054 6618) (floats 8 56 318) (intervals 56 275 0) (buffers 992 11))
Jonathan Kyle Mitchell <kyle@HIDDEN>:bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#31920; Package emacs.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.