"Raghav Gururajan" <raghavgururajan@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available."Raghav Gururajan" <raghavgururajan@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Received: (at 35586) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Nov 2019 05:45:23 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 13 00:45:23 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58741 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iUlT1-0001y6-BK for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:45:23 -0500 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:52368) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <raghavgururajan@HIDDEN>) id 1iUlSz-0001xx-NR for 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:45:22 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E233F25EE1 for <35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 06:45:19 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YzCyCSP15Yov for <35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 06:45:18 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <f6371e3c247eaec529f975aac5d699cde37620d5.camel@HIDDEN> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1573623918; bh=/nyg5y270KXnNhNZrrLFY2kGHJBqjcdv5iSfaeuLo7g=; h=Subject:From:To:Date; b=ZfFcOVpTbgArpmlQ/y7AHVV17NF0mTXXHG1ZC52VFrlbWFccnYGmyBsuDlV8+XGvV Tte1RM1Sz+z2IlX+eprC/h52ow1dxtrZoBWKdFz40OwnwVwDgMJiInnUMXMlDaLL4G I8/jju43mqmMKVKoI6qMLY7lhjC7VYrbE8N62aECSKu7lYUGO6DEjEcLHCTqihv8WI Dsjh2egupEZ7IJQKeiSGmx3/A0zagAiAdf3E8skOcuSs14DFilgkKUkU9TJ5BbxUpY pq3O0Ty3o4x0IsnprA7/bt5tlnxxS0UC48b7Au2Um2VRPbiRoVOAiv1KOEC8886ZS9 YpuAh3HmYB49Q== Subject: GNOME Core Applications From: Raghav Gururajan <raghavgururajan@HIDDEN> To: 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Priority: 1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Mc7o38ocgIX0kOLCuKtq" Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:44:53 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35586 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-Mc7o38ocgIX0kOLCuKtq Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Guix! Based on information from [1], [2], [3] and [4]; I have formulated a chart to keep track of things easily. :-) CHART: https://calc.disroot.org/2nu6mpf88ynq.html As a start, I will be working on packaging gnome-contacts, gnome-music and gnome-weather. If anyone performed anything from chart, please let me know and I will update the chart accordingly. [1] https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git [2]=20 https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2017/08/13/gnome-3-26-core-applications/ [3] https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2016/09/21/gnome-3-22-core-apps/ [4] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/35586 Regards, RG. --=-Mc7o38ocgIX0kOLCuKtq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEamFiplxUWgy2NgJiorDiYAVcMdsFAl3LmFUACgkQorDiYAVc Mdusbwf+I1t6oxkrXECe1aHATTOA94FDPXk/elFr75VFriaTB80xUexhLY4wRxAC AtATwV2Lhr49bQwa/Hysj5FoglxNj8uDu7eEJ5HWBVKcT599kPzRQnWVIAX7Sh/W vxpEAZEizk2CoV2tizfRuhuKIuW9r3LL19j5bOcb3rNQ/38tQ2wnq28wgNTEP9Ok UQOk1bHwfJpgBNan4IyiSdZAVJD0Etkuj/5T1OPcZyc9G2a6qE6ghQX++sRoYg83 ZVTxOri8Unlz4Izsolc7iXbzbcFtX/uoyMsA+mofFNRQZw4TLR4AIJiEy2WwMKV9 D94R56k748MRW3lu69qfbQBKioAO6g== =xJEJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Mc7o38ocgIX0kOLCuKtq--
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#35586; Package guix.
Full text available.
Received: (at 35586) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2019 23:21:54 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 02 19:21:54 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48155 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1hiS5x-000853-K7
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 19:21:53 -0400
Received: from [178.21.23.139] (port=37404 helo=knopi.disroot.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <rvgn@HIDDEN>) id 1hiS5v-00084v-UI
for 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 19:21:52 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A8235E92
for <35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 01:21:50 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org
Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id xz-CE1lrFxSM for <35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>;
Wed, 3 Jul 2019 01:21:49 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <c47d6c811fb699741786d831f573bdfde7f5af3f.camel@HIDDEN>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail;
t=1562109709; bh=kudwAOSItkDqcEVG6p87iQ0LsIMu8+DzZ73Y0tkNM58=;
h=Subject:From:To:Date;
b=XbQZdxZWgNy0Y5/G7Jtpo6nS6NTvnp6/IBEJMmzNw954bMEwlHvORHUMcmHYT2Yjb
3OvzjbMzNhnTB+h0ZGe5dBElKJNBWWWtFz795sIjiaEjootddVXDqONjpvivRmVaYn
LP1pKrCBi2JQkRwwwqDp2E4gfVFMkW004lsnwi++waqs/W5RRDat63U4cmrUGIMKLi
oGn+iwhpBQJMBm8llCIZmbMj9GRVd4mQ7GpwomrdSbPm69s+XnRzuBlPkgNV3XVwMS
C+e4OZbB0q064lopTB+tDgQQg3WNmVW3deLjXpt9g+2BR4ar56Bms5Zn+eCE3CPhH/
KjRK8AeV1zgFA==
Subject: SUMMARY (Re-Write)
From: Raghav Gururajan <rvgn@HIDDEN>
To: 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 19:21:34 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: **SUMMARY** *ISSUES:* When comparing to GNOME's Official
Guidelines (https://wiki.gnome.org/D esign/Apps), the package "gnome" that
is used by service "gnome- desktop-service-type" has the following issues.
Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information. [URIs: gnome.org]
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [178.21.23.139 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35586
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
**SUMMARY**
*ISSUES:*
When comparing to GNOME's Official Guidelines (https://wiki.gnome.org/D
esign/Apps), the package "gnome" that is used by service "gnome-
desktop-service-type" has the following issues.
1) The package names that belong to package "gnome" are not all
generic.
2) The package "gnome" does not contain all GNOME Core Applications.
Some are already packaged and some are not.
These causes the package "gnome" not to reflect its own package
description and thus affecting the user experience.
*TO-DOs:*
1) Change the package and application names of exsisting (already
packaged) GNOME Core Applications, to their generic names; according to
guidelines.
2) Re-compile the "gnome" package to include exsisting GNOME Core
Applications and remove unnecessary apps; according to guidelines.
3) Package missing GNOME Core Applications (using their generic names);
according to guidelines.
4) Re-compile the "gnome" package to include newly packaged GNOME Core
Applications; according to guidelines.
Therefore, final "gnome" package should contain all
packages/applications (with their respective names) according to GNOME
Core (https://download.gnome.org/core/).
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#35586; Package guix.
Full text available.
Received: (at 35586) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2019 22:45:01 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 02 18:45:01 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48127 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1hiRWG-000514-Vj
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 18:45:01 -0400
Received: from [178.21.23.139] (port=44050 helo=knopi.disroot.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <rvgn@HIDDEN>) id 1hiRWF-00050v-Bx
for 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 18:45:00 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C693235E92
for <35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 00:44:57 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org
Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 6ANMHOHdG9vQ for <35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>;
Wed, 3 Jul 2019 00:44:56 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4b2dc44253ba50bef6370e8942b822d6ec5340c3.camel@HIDDEN>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail;
t=1562107496; bh=V2KsKzGiiCP1+/juK79rlBNXIFZopstb2pywuO9iSAc=;
h=Subject:From:To:Date;
b=d3BBLj7t3xku6+3m4gCpXF/QteUoSzZfdS29b2shR7/pMqhm2wqKt2ucVE0TQHBNP
Rdpi+eomJyPYpANq/5YIHxfuf8/sTFsL1eEOCMR5Cbx48UQytFHyCgtoFURrLWiMFZ
byqot6H24lvg/B8UT85P9ZSUhTPYi1jgMozo3c8bxVFSOJeVBx3HSEEM+R726nAZ+Z
yr7OhgZebvHmnxuwl5SMPdx+OU7MXYyZOAUjUEQXO3Fj+YaagEMpuM4YCByT8vjjk9
q3zUg9xrAlkXwrPG19YPZwgmKBdI0pfj95pZR0csOgT5YPk5FCGqVnAaPFs1lDsJxU
nkQCFaieaSNkg==
Subject:
From: Raghav Gururajan <rvgn@HIDDEN>
To: 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 18:44:49 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: 3.3 (+++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: When I re-visited this bug thread, I thought it needed summarising,
so that folks who are or will be working on this, will find it easier. ☺
**SUMMARY** *ISSUES:*
Content analysis details: (3.3 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information.
[URIs: gnome.org]
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust
[178.21.23.139 listed in list.dnswl.org]
2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty
1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35586
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: When I re-visited this bug thread, I thought it needed summarising,
so that folks who are or will be working on this, will find it easier. ☺
**SUMMARY** *ISSUES:*
Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information.
[URIs: gnome.org]
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust
[178.21.23.139 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty
1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
-1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
manager
When I re-visited this bug thread, I thought it needed summarising, so
that folks who are or will be working on this, will find it easier. ☺
**SUMMARY**
*ISSUES:*
When comparing to GNOME's Official Guidelines (https://wiki.gnome.org/D
esign/Apps), the package "gnome" that is used by service "gnome-
desktop-service-type" has the following issues.
1) The package "gnome" does not contain all GNOME Core Applications.
Some are already packaged and some are not.
2) The package names and application (.desktop files etc.) names are
not generic.
*ESSENTIAL TO-DOs:*
1) Change the package and application names of exsisting (already
packaged) GNOME Core Applications, to their generic names; according to
guidelines.
2) Re-compile the "gnome" package to include exsisting GNOME Core
Applications and remove unnecessary apps; according to guidelines.
3) Package missing GNOME Core Applications (using their generic names);
according to guidelines.
4) Re-compile the "gnome" package to include newly packaged GNOME Core
Applications; according to guidelines.
Therefore, final "gnome" package should contain Base Components and ALL
Core Applications.
*ADDITIONAL TO-DOs:*
1) Create new package called "gnome-minimal" and include GNOME Core
Applications ONLY of types "Essential System" and "System Tools";
according to guidelines.
2) Modify the service "gnome-desktop-service-type" in such a way where
package "gnome-minimal" can be used as a value (alternative to the
default value "gnome").
Therefore, final "gnome-minimal" package should contain Base Components
and Core Applications ONLY of types essential system and system tools.
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#35586; Package guix.
Full text available.Raghav Gururajan <rvgn@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Received: (at 35586) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2019 10:30:17 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 11 06:30:17 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39950 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hPPGj-0000VJ-5y for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2019 06:30:17 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:34772) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rvgn@HIDDEN>) id 1hPPGg-0000VA-S2 for 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2019 06:30:15 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6062130E79; Sat, 11 May 2019 12:30:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fYUnE6TIoqLg; Sat, 11 May 2019 12:30:10 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1557570610; bh=xwEX7ZAO9t1jFMbK9dvM+7/fmCSGtjgnwgN0kMlAhlY=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=iAMsd+iAiTc1ZL42azRSfb0ic4i6RsQXqjOFCwNUrcdrCIZfQ4sS4YwZpJuGATlxz jMX4xFaRFdU/9sItfj7YnteegLrHIZAoG8kgP1IMAkopgGYEEEFqxHWXgDn97iIaUu ZHi2uHJRW5cxUmdyJcsb6x4opXVV+N/OAGgMAz6LPuz0gbD8Tgq+KEq9iaxDAXD+Gr ZrRqgfOZOdSG1o5+290aUi1nl+2XUovaDjeKblvVnB2DqwB7IdUxJnIZ55Jj3tkwi0 G4Qcc4812RN0vJdyWSViwngwH5p6cCmRsYdcXjEnXuK8QosrNdvDHuj62ujk71h78q Qancf4w8WN9dg== Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 10:30:10 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Raghav Gururajan" <rvgn@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <a5f6915581905833151fb147d04170f6@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#35586: GNOME To: "Ricardo Wurmus" <rekado@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <875zqhs3ps.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <875zqhs3ps.fsf@HIDDEN> <7a8b3492f9882d4179cb114136de7e92@HIDDEN> <e2d35da2991336f8723ebbbeb92d5e57@HIDDEN> <87zhnzfkz6.fsf@nckx> <c99df64bf65aed4210c059cc2ff5628129be9abc.camel@HIDDEN> <c48e755ec403a6f00925597bfb6247ec@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35586 Cc: 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, me@HIDDEN, clement@HIDDEN X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) > not all of the GNOME applications have been packaged. Would you like to= =0A> try to package some of the missing applications?=0A=0ASure, I will g= ive it a try :)=0A=0A> This bug has a lower priority to me than others, s= o I=E2=80=99m unlikely to work=0A> on this soon.=0A=0AI see.=0A=0ARegards= ,=0ARG.
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#35586; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 35586) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2019 10:24:11 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 11 06:24:10 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39939 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hPPAo-0000F4-NZ for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2019 06:24:10 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21283) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rekado@HIDDEN>) id 1hPPAm-0000Ew-S3 for 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2019 06:24:09 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557570236; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; b=hwhdrlgsgEYnCmKvpNC5AjmmadJWciMEjwvNAOdPbtdRbFjNiDie0oz1lfs3YIhPDwu5NS3Kis8W7OEy/tB3Sm4UzzTejzSmbpQ0WhTMxVjXMZWPlOOaZwRp2ivNw3s5DrqZf6OxDibScYbR+f2fWpCyq1fSc18gC+8XGJscjMs= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; t=1557570236; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results; bh=xkICCzhAfGpa4z9jWMmlkdBdAReAYt3n+Nkh05PhW/s=; b=e3L5+1uCli16snYqLxm09Ofl+1TMtmg0qxeb+wTNNXDBrulq56mUk16+pMGQAM25ZGEcY1qpRmexjzNN4j/2+GxH0yWbq9r7XCjkSfY1aLgQh91KLz4srD7ovU3z0GVCfaXutaMK2mdAbuVwtxZ1vrYPbb8mKlgmEJr5gJajyJc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@HIDDEN; dmarc=pass header.from=<rekado@HIDDEN> header.from=<rekado@HIDDEN> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1557570236; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@HIDDEN; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; l=295; bh=xkICCzhAfGpa4z9jWMmlkdBdAReAYt3n+Nkh05PhW/s=; b=fF1F1So2f/MHZEYezyxWmCkgv6Vfjlo4Zdn7EYn6IaGiDzZF+4TtOC/ij59PTH93 LuGEtK17DXBP++eC3rTZMcxrxt7xcxFCHD2JOxontS6S0uj3ZKLOZz0T3TdkIERw1OU 3Ou4ED1zEq1F+t2PkgxvIEo0vP2V18u9h+PHsLUQ= Received: from localhost (p4FD5AA8F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.213.170.143]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 155756933240932.72062063504154; Sat, 11 May 2019 03:08:52 -0700 (PDT) References: <7a8b3492f9882d4179cb114136de7e92@HIDDEN> <e2d35da2991336f8723ebbbeb92d5e57@HIDDEN> <87zhnzfkz6.fsf@nckx> <c99df64bf65aed4210c059cc2ff5628129be9abc.camel@HIDDEN> <c48e755ec403a6f00925597bfb6247ec@HIDDEN> User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.2 From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN> To: Raghav Gururajan <rvgn@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#35586: GNOME In-reply-to: <c48e755ec403a6f00925597bfb6247ec@HIDDEN> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 12:08:47 +0200 Message-ID: <875zqhs3ps.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35586 Cc: 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, me@HIDDEN, clement@HIDDEN X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Raghav, > Any update on this bug please? not all of the GNOME applications have been packaged. Would you like to try to package some of the missing applications? This bug has a lower priority to me than others, so I=E2=80=99m unlikely to= work on this soon. --=20 Ricardo
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#35586; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 35586) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2019 09:48:49 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 11 05:48:49 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39897 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hPOcb-0007ng-6Z for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2019 05:48:49 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:33964) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rvgn@HIDDEN>) id 1hPOcY-0007nW-GY for 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2019 05:48:47 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BEA30E67; Sat, 11 May 2019 11:48:45 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mTW5nWuX0Obq; Sat, 11 May 2019 11:48:44 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1557568124; bh=u/geKx2MUNzeJtVslGhxuls9sX+o+kn0BGvwTFrFXkQ=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=GFyYv8T905Ntwjm24Yrskd1lhzSomiwcSLU3Sf18i7HHfQkoZ5KwZll9HE2XFRMdP LVPVBIBxjkR2vBylbfngHqeLIMA/xEU5enbgNbdr/LKgs4hwATCNjJtTIYI+fbuB1t w2EdY5CGtkkmSYGDcIznQlvDvGPD6oKJJjA9kwhYDMKWdKiNKhJeuF7cJHhyekbvJU 20YnGEqEtEAffV93GtjeMto1/tVikzBmKlM6foyK2+9iLfpzKoqaWTRIL5sDNSkoFC 1UMvWkQRB+9Vcul8kqQoJFfjH7eaXcQw7UtB+S/Me2y87e8/OTgFcvG4hE86bZqUUs 6pqzsh2LS4iyA== Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 09:48:44 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Raghav Gururajan" <rvgn@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <c48e755ec403a6f00925597bfb6247ec@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#35586: GNOME To: rekado@HIDDEN, clement@HIDDEN, me@HIDDEN In-Reply-To: <7a8b3492f9882d4179cb114136de7e92@HIDDEN> References: <7a8b3492f9882d4179cb114136de7e92@HIDDEN> <e2d35da2991336f8723ebbbeb92d5e57@HIDDEN> <87zhnzfkz6.fsf@nckx> <c99df64bf65aed4210c059cc2ff5628129be9abc.camel@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35586 Cc: 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello Guix Folks!=0A=0AAny update on this bug please?=0A=0ARegards,=0ARG.
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#35586; Package guix.
Full text available.Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Received: (at 35586) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 May 2019 06:29:27 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 07 02:29:26 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58109 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hNtbS-00070O-GC for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2019 02:29:26 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:41986) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rvgn@HIDDEN>) id 1hNtbM-00070A-0S for 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2019 02:29:24 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4390B309AD; Tue, 7 May 2019 08:29:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08ztYAqszxTR; Tue, 7 May 2019 08:29:16 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1557210556; bh=/DrhuuQl0eqxuoC0b7MuOCdMGzeCduaq6R1+Gy7RP8c=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=aGDD8AYh3ggIkxvqYAU3Z99x4n+UxiflrSxa+IcaZM6CgYsi6dhmt82I+HpxUC+ap SLoSFNo9VGgDr8sRv+PBc99kWyJzeieNSfD6HIOfeh5SgPBg6vBi3OLeSvyMJkkdPZ amdGbMmEKr0r1cBrsv4U60cUTUpaUQAjkSOAtYZgwwSO5V/AEymSp/dC33kE52A28g AZIafa6lmIUogA5NIDsUhMemIhEqzh+pH1CfSAUMtURBBLauHgJ543JxdwC/flqwcz 1woEcouywwBFgTIkqC81Ehh5ANPT6x/mSf+yHGdIrtX8I3CyPe51W34cVDT0RsIOvq NlWzBI9kYeT0Q== Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 06:29:16 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Raghav Gururajan" <rvgn@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <7a8b3492f9882d4179cb114136de7e92@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#35586: GNOME To: rekado@HIDDEN, clement@HIDDEN, me@HIDDEN In-Reply-To: <e2d35da2991336f8723ebbbeb92d5e57@HIDDEN> References: <e2d35da2991336f8723ebbbeb92d5e57@HIDDEN> <87zhnzfkz6.fsf@nckx> <c99df64bf65aed4210c059cc2ff5628129be9abc.camel@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35586 Cc: 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello!=0A=0ARecently, I have been given this link (https://wiki.gnome.org= /Design/Apps) which lists all GNOME Core Applications that are to be adde= d to guix's gnome package.=0A=0AWhether or not to do this, I think the pa= ckage with the name "gnome" in any distribution should always reflect the= vanilla gnome suite released by GNOME Project. Any modification to it, I= think, should be packaged under different name like "gnome-minimal" or g= nome-extras" etc. This can be a good standard.=0A=0AMy suggestion is,=0Ag= nome --> With All Core Apps=0Agnome-minimal --> Without Any Core Apps (Pr= ovides only xorg/wayland, dm, wm, menus, drivers, services etc.)=0A=0A** = INFO: Core Apps can be found at https://wiki.gnome.org/Design/Apps. **=0A= =0AAlso, based on the above, I think we also need to create/enable new va= lue "gnome-minimal" for the data type "gnome-desktop-configuration" of th= e variable "gnome-desktop-service-type". Value "gnome" can still be defau= lt though. Power users can change the value to "gnome-minimal".=0A=0AThis= can provide good modularity and thus provides choices to users. For exam= ple, 1) If a user needs full-blown GNOME, "gnome" can be chosen, 2) If a = user needs only minimal GNOME, "gnome-minimal" can be chosen, 3) If a use= r needs minimal GNOME with select core apps, "gnome-minimal" can be chose= n under service and individual needed core apps can be added under system= packages.=0A=0AAlso, it would be a good standard to use generic names fo= r packaging as recommended at https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2016/09/= 21/gnome-3-22-core-apps. Other alias-names/project names can be included = in package's description. =0A=0AThank you!=0A=0ARegards,=0ARG.=0A=0AMay 6= , 2019 7:30 PM, "Raghav Gururajan" <rvgn@HIDDEN> wrote:=0A=0A> T-G-R= !=0A> =0A> Thanks for your email. I understand what you mentioned. I came= across this link=0A> (https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2016/09/21/gnom= e-3-22-core-apps), where the dev(s) recommend to=0A> use generic names wh= ile packaging GNOME Core Apps. :)=0A> =0A> I think it is better to use ge= neric names for package names and include other aliases/project-names=0A>= in the package tagline and/or package description.=0A> =0A> May 6, 2019 = 7:20 PM, "Tobias Geerinckx-Rice" <me@HIDDEN> wrote:=0A> =0A>> Raghav,= =0A>> =0A>> Thanks for taking a look at this. I'm sure there's plenty to = be=0A>> improved in how we package a large collection of software like=0A= >> GNOME in an intuitive way.=0A>> =0A>> Raghav Gururajan wrote:=0A>> =0A= >>> The following gnome core applications have already been included=0A>>= > in=0A>>> guix's gnome package but requires correct renaming?=0A>>> =0A>= >> epiphany --> gnome-web=0A>> =0A>> Using =E2=80=98correct=E2=80=99 here= is a bit strong.=0A>> =0A>> ~ =CE=BB guix install epiphany=0A>> ~ =CE=BB= gnome-web=0A>> bash: gnome-web: command not found=0A>> ~ =CE=BB epiphany= =0A>> # browsin' time=0A>> =0A>> While we don't blindly name packages aft= er the binaries they=0A>> provide, of course, a look at the project's own= publications=0A>> doesn't reduce the confusion. Ironic.=0A>> =0A>> =E2= =80=9CWeb is the web browser for the GNOME desktop and for elementary=0A>= > OS,=0A>> based on the popular WebKit engine. It offers a simple, clean,= =0A>> beautiful view of the web featuring first-class GNOME and=0A>> Pant= heon=0A>> desktop integration. Its code name is Epiphany.=0A>> =0A>> You = may install Web from the software repositories of most=0A>> Linux=0A>> op= erating systems, where it is normally packaged as=0A>> "epiphany-browser"= or "epiphany". =E2=80=9D[0]=0A>> =0A>> The README[1] mainly, but not exc= lusively, talks about =E2=80=98Epiphany=E2=80=99.=0A>> Even the two URLs = balance each other out. I don't think there's=0A>> enough here to justify= gross renaming, and in the name of all=0A>> that's holy let's avoid anot= her mass renaming incident.=0A>> =0A>> Personally, I think adding =E2=80= =98GNOME Foo=E2=80=99 to the synopses of all=0A>> these packages is suffi= cient (epiphany does this by coincidence,=0A>> calling itself the =E2=80= =98GNOME web browser=E2=80=99). Eventually, this could=0A>> be another us= e for the separate (G)UI display name field as=0A>> suggested in the game= s thread. :-)=0A>> =0A>> Package names aren't opaque identifiers, but the= y can be a little=0A>> technical IMO.=0A>> =0A>> Kind regards,=0A>> =0A>>= T G-R=0A>> =0A>> [0]: https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Web=0A>> [1]: https://= github.com/GNOME/epiphany
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#35586; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 35586) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2019 19:31:00 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 06 15:31:00 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57458 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hNjKG-00081X-9o for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 15:31:00 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:34934) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rvgn@HIDDEN>) id 1hNjKF-00081O-2E for 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 15:30:59 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5122330942; Mon, 6 May 2019 21:30:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yU16849NdhQY; Mon, 6 May 2019 21:30:56 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1557171056; bh=RBNS00mtZi0hDnKkygBlaCapRZ0kNDabjVQisUuQ53Y=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=URDzmq2z2NX+cY12KAqOMqBGcVC7Hl69WMk1FzySbDsG9Wo6YrNEdyJ4N/WM6xEKX eneEdSrqq6ARs2zLOjm8x9WO/oR0I6n3wrCuLK1P9aZsg2iBJarAbcyqE1Iv+1hjdI A1huhoUqJEuq2GGJlo9OuqCftzSPSZ7lyLr2ImGgzc2JmkuCQTX9xmgHbrGY1rrgzP FA6uMBZul3R0QPRjU0xHp3I6CiDwSocf8fuVK46JP934KsH2vG7yHmgwN48m23oNbK InoJ7KrtVQUGBvTLPhmz81GkOh+xMXWiO9LyKfgRpGrO5KEyujSeUcrWquZHuQmZwA ZnO2aDXDHBcOw== Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 19:30:56 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Raghav Gururajan" <rvgn@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <e2d35da2991336f8723ebbbeb92d5e57@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#35586: GNOME To: "Tobias Geerinckx-Rice" <me@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <87zhnzfkz6.fsf@nckx> References: <87zhnzfkz6.fsf@nckx> <c99df64bf65aed4210c059cc2ff5628129be9abc.camel@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35586 Cc: 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) T-G-R!=0A=0AThanks for your email. I understand what you mentioned. I cam= e across this link (https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2016/09/21/gnome-3= -22-core-apps/), where the dev(s) recommend to use generic names while pa= ckaging GNOME Core Apps. :)=0A=0AI think it is better to use generic name= s for package names and include other aliases/project-names in the packag= e tagline and/or package description.=0A=0AMay 6, 2019 7:20 PM, "Tobias G= eerinckx-Rice" <me@HIDDEN> wrote:=0A=0A> Raghav,=0A> =0A> Thanks for t= aking a look at this. I'm sure there's plenty to be =0A> improved in how = we package a large collection of software like =0A> GNOME in an intuitive= way.=0A> =0A> Raghav Gururajan wrote:=0A> =0A>> The following gnome core= applications have already been included=0A>> in=0A>> guix's gnome packag= e but requires correct renaming?=0A>> =0A>> epiphany --> gnome-web=0A> = =0A> Using =E2=80=98correct=E2=80=99 here is a bit strong.=0A> =0A> ~ =CE= =BB guix install epiphany=0A> ~ =CE=BB gnome-web=0A> bash: gnome-web: com= mand not found=0A> ~ =CE=BB epiphany=0A> # browsin' time=0A> =0A> While w= e don't blindly name packages after the binaries they=0A> provide, of cou= rse, a look at the project's own publications=0A> doesn't reduce the conf= usion. Ironic.=0A> =0A> =E2=80=9CWeb is the web browser for the GNOME des= ktop and for elementary=0A> OS,=0A> based on the popular WebKit engine. I= t offers a simple, clean,=0A> beautiful view of the web featuring first-c= lass GNOME and=0A> Pantheon=0A> desktop integration. Its code name is Epi= phany.=0A> =0A> You may install Web from the software repositories of mos= t=0A> Linux=0A> operating systems, where it is normally packaged as=0A> "= epiphany-browser" or "epiphany". =E2=80=9D[0]=0A> =0A> The README[1] main= ly, but not exclusively, talks about =E2=80=98Epiphany=E2=80=99.=0A> Even= the two URLs balance each other out. I don't think there's=0A> enough he= re to justify gross renaming, and in the name of all=0A> that's holy let'= s avoid another mass renaming incident.=0A> =0A> Personally, I think addi= ng =E2=80=98GNOME Foo=E2=80=99 to the synopses of all=0A> these packages = is sufficient (epiphany does this by coincidence,=0A> calling itself the = =E2=80=98GNOME web browser=E2=80=99). Eventually, this could=0A> be anoth= er use for the separate (G)UI display name field as=0A> suggested in the = games thread. :-)=0A> =0A> Package names aren't opaque identifiers, but t= hey can be a little=0A> technical IMO.=0A> =0A> Kind regards,=0A> =0A> T = G-R=0A> =0A> [0]: https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Web=0A> [1]: https://github= .com/GNOME/epiphany
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#35586; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 35586) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2019 19:20:55 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 06 15:20:55 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57440 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hNjAV-0007in-93 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 15:20:55 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:47440) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1hNjAP-0007iR-6T for 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 15:20:53 -0400 Received: by tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 13b863eb; Mon, 6 May 2019 19:20:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=tobias.gr; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=2018; i=me@HIDDEN; bh=D0ttq8/uUseHn7K5F5mQqD 8IcRT7tdsyLgi0Z5lu8G4=; b=CXKH53gWI8TZidtlsMnfKQ4apa49WdfnuRwb9h gKgOP0anjV/Q+2HHEwAk5RACrUWpyQztwsqtmegf+mz8+ZLH/ltSiqSUoTPpslnE tFZEe7e+JC29Y2HVqm5fE/Lp5LTHBWRgJlyE/Oh74QuY+h4YQCC5BMzU6Xlisgdb Z1Mxc03p5+z3lhvDFX9Aas6XfCojD4cjPUCW/iFxeDtkrLDfXM7Ml+BsmQZv4V0p 9XbRQXRzxWbAjrtQz8GbLm/IEKKb4h7plJF5SAMEEbiYWfUMhB9qJqsa7oztt0oF E26wxeSj3laAHUjIPvl/oPnEg4wdE8naLCwZe+kpLzA5cAPg== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 44b9ef05 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 6 May 2019 19:20:46 +0000 (UTC) From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN> To: Raghav Gururajan <rvgn@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#35586: GNOME References: <c99df64bf65aed4210c059cc2ff5628129be9abc.camel@HIDDEN> In-reply-to: <c99df64bf65aed4210c059cc2ff5628129be9abc.camel@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 21:20:45 +0200 Message-ID: <87zhnzfkz6.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35586 Cc: 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Raghav, Thanks for taking a look at this. I'm sure there's plenty to be=20 improved in how we package a large collection of software like=20 GNOME in an intuitive way. Raghav Gururajan wrote: > The following gnome core applications have already been included=20 > in > guix's gnome package but requires correct renaming? > > epiphany --> gnome-web Using =E2=80=98correct=E2=80=99 here is a bit strong. ~ =CE=BB guix install epiphany ~ =CE=BB gnome-web bash: gnome-web: command not found ~ =CE=BB epiphany # browsin' time While we don't blindly name packages after the binaries they=20 provide, of course, a look at the project's own publications=20 doesn't reduce the confusion. Ironic. =E2=80=9CWeb is the web browser for the GNOME desktop and for elementary= =20 OS, based on the popular WebKit engine. It offers a simple, clean, beautiful view of the web featuring first-class GNOME and=20 Pantheon desktop integration. Its code name is Epiphany. You may install Web from the software repositories of most=20 Linux operating systems, where it is normally packaged as "epiphany-browser" or "epiphany". =E2=80=9D[0] The README[1] mainly, but not exclusively, talks about =E2=80=98Epiphany=E2= =80=99.=20 Even the two URLs balance each other out. I don't think there's=20 enough here to justify gross renaming, and in the name of all=20 that's holy let's avoid another mass renaming incident. Personally, I think adding =E2=80=98GNOME Foo=E2=80=99 to the synopses of a= ll=20 these packages is sufficient (epiphany does this by coincidence,=20 calling itself the =E2=80=98GNOME web browser=E2=80=99). Eventually, this = could=20 be another use for the separate (G)UI display name field as=20 suggested in the games thread. :-) Package names aren't opaque identifiers, but they can be a little=20 technical IMO. Kind regards, T G-R [0]: https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Web [1]: https://github.com/GNOME/epiphany --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCXNCJDQAKCRANsP+IT1Vt eY9uAP4295Sw4iYvtpN3guUfLbLWr50KtX0/J57gCZ+3VsY2PwEA55KKMWsL/HNZ Nja6Ua3Zs3/HG4WPpyTqCE2uLyLksQw= =DDJo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#35586; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 35586) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2019 14:05:48 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 06 10:05:48 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57148 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hNeFY-0007iP-9S for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 10:05:48 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:51234) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rvgn@HIDDEN>) id 1hNeFW-0007iG-Jv for 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 10:05:47 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268C73091D; Mon, 6 May 2019 16:05:46 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RueSyePIsf5t; Mon, 6 May 2019 16:05:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <36a6a5df18d9730e9a05e360c54edb75517ca479.camel@HIDDEN> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1557151544; bh=MgQLh3CQCKK3Y9tCCo5b/YMeRU4ClwHmc6+1IaRBe+M=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=Sc4LVPPbBOgThStBViR0TvHdQwBxxVa10aZM6sh2Yjnz3nwniFQg7eGJo76T42InH u6JEyk2VjsSVWizPkTtMBHeNEUAyh0i4EUMCN2r06umkpu6EhiozJ62B2Q6+SqnYKh dVcVxz/JWSQPZLkC38YF4AHOCF40MDohQ1a+ARYgD5hGSyLX4SdB9j3l0mzdCn2OW6 qDjCncL/Vc1Mj5BMmDqkleKAFpD1z25L+oaRgYjg1F6mBV7SIx0+9O06veWN07wnVS CLR3OgaJB32MnwnaZZr2zXXkNvHkgY1mkmBsrpmKfKR0qxZRNGomYUEKpxvLPCoBIp FWvaWmQT7hbFA== Subject: Re: bug#35586: GNOME From: Raghav Gururajan <rvgn@HIDDEN> To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 10:05:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20190506091454.2trvy3tbe7pac7qc@HIDDEN> References: <20190506075752.95172308D9@HIDDEN> <20190506091454.2trvy3tbe7pac7qc@HIDDEN> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-LmjONxx2s8trU6OGQ2W4" Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35586 Cc: 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-LmjONxx2s8trU6OGQ2W4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Ah, I see. ☺ On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 11:14 +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 03:57:48AM -0400, Raghav Gururajan wrote: > Also, I think it should be okay to include apps mentioned in > "incubator" section as well. In Guix, users can roll back to older > versions of newer ones are unstable. > > Well, incubator apps have not enough polish. Then again, what back > in2016 was an incubator app maybe works fine now — I see the > bloglinking to https://wiki.gnome.org/Design/Apps which lists Notes > ascore now. Dictionary is listed as inactive/retired on the other > hand. > Regards,Florian --=-LmjONxx2s8trU6OGQ2W4 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html><head></head><body bgcolor=3D"#ffffff" text=3D"#2e3436" link=3D"#7373= 73" vlink=3D"#2e3436"><div>Ah, I see. =E2=98=BA</div><div><br></div><div>On= Mon, 2019-05-06 at 11:14 +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:</div><bl= ockquote type=3D"cite" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf = solid;padding-left:1ex"><pre>On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 03:57:48AM -0400, Ragh= av Gururajan wrote:</pre><pre><blockquote type=3D"cite" style=3D"margin:0 0= 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"></blockquote></pre= ><pre>Also, I think it should be okay to include apps mentioned in "incubat= or" section as well. In Guix, users can roll back to older versions of newe= r ones are unstable.</pre><pre><br></pre><pre></pre><pre><br></pre><pre>Wel= l, incubator apps have not enough polish. Then again, what back in</pre><p= re>2016 was an incubator app maybe works fine now =E2=80=94 I see the blog<= /pre><pre>linking to <a href=3D"https://wiki.gnome.org/Design/Apps">https:/= /wiki.gnome.org/Design/Apps</a> which lists Notes as</pre><pre>core now. D= ictionary is listed as inactive/retired on the other hand.</pre><pre><br></= pre><pre>Regards,</pre><pre>Florian</pre><pre><br></pre></blockquote></body= ></html> --=-LmjONxx2s8trU6OGQ2W4--
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#35586; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 35586) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2019 14:02:24 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 06 10:02:24 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57143 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hNeCF-0007d1-Mn for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 10:02:23 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:32812) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rvgn@HIDDEN>) id 1hNeCB-0007cp-0l for 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 10:02:21 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F40307D7; Mon, 6 May 2019 16:02:16 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vWOS20GfrzFT; Mon, 6 May 2019 16:02:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <e698b4f061d4f607200724be69a26adb559f02aa.camel@HIDDEN> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1557151325; bh=z6R+zjqDBsvXoQrx6wsgYtsSLReXT1O93MonCVZjZs4=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=dTozSfMq89ds6TqanyymUPl/xrQ9AWvera8K8gHpbgEgzU7Ufsuue+Sykoiwf+0xG QWIrT6wbBJV+SZJdSxb0YSrYguEWH4r2ctxbxACH7QHT/5FWsJ60CGYamxP10QTT4U oIbjbXtYwwc/07IaSkbTiF39J7g8S0RpETK5Tq/ylijG5ZlnPtQJhx8Nk+i3i9rz6k ZP/YI+FCNMJlkK33w5FwiQ4SbapcojKCP0NLjytC2Y6MSKKGlmxzqaknwL1VZxey8a ZfV6tKt+tXdPaYjvlV+KgXpdA0hrEHp2TbkNT8fk1FV+cperL2QFs1qTbRZr6t5A+s qGqOGV7v1EkNQ== Subject: Re: bug#35586: GNOME From: Raghav Gururajan <rvgn@HIDDEN> To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 10:02:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20190506090534.c3xzmapsdrqtc7ww@HIDDEN> References: <20190506075159.12C59308D7@HIDDEN> <20190506090534.c3xzmapsdrqtc7ww@HIDDEN> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-pZKrZPmqVlcf8JUER8MU" Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35586 Cc: 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-pZKrZPmqVlcf8JUER8MU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Yeah! You could be right. On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 11:05 +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 03:51:54AM -0400, Raghav Gururajan wrote: > On 5 May 2019 16:48, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@pelzfl > orian.de> wrote: > You can also type both Epiphany and (your language’s translation of) > Web in the GNOME Activities search bar to find Epiphany. The same > goes for Nautilus. The terminal command is also still epiphany or > nautilus. > I do not know if it is possible to give a package two names; I > believe it is not. > I understand what you are saying. It appears epiphany is the old name > (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Web). Dev must have used > epiphany now a days as a habit. > Also, the previous blog link you sent me, recommends to use generic > names. > > Maybe gnome-web could be the real package’s name and there could be > apackage called epiphany that propagates gnome-web, like the > gnomemeta-package does? Same for nautilus etc. > Regards,Florian > --=-pZKrZPmqVlcf8JUER8MU Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html><head></head><body bgcolor=3D"#ffffff" text=3D"#2e3436" link=3D"#7373= 73" vlink=3D"#2e3436"><div>Yeah! You could be right.</div><div><br></div><d= iv>On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 11:05 +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:</di= v><blockquote type=3D"cite" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #72= 9fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><pre>On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 03:51:54AM -0400,= Raghav Gururajan wrote:</pre><pre><blockquote type=3D"cite" style=3D"margi= n:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"></blockquote>= </pre><pre>On 5 May 2019 16:48, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <<a href=3D= "mailto:pelzflorian@HIDDEN">pelzflorian@HIDDEN</a>> wrot= e:</pre><pre><blockquote type=3D"cite" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-l= eft:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"></blockquote></pre><pre>You can als= o type both Epiphany and (your language=E2=80=99s translation of) </pre><pr= e>Web in the GNOME Activities search bar to find Epiphany. The same <= /pre><pre>goes for Nautilus. The terminal command is also still epiph= any or </pre><pre>nautilus. </pre><pre><br></pre><pre>I do not know if it i= s possible to give a package two names; I believe </pre><pre>it is not. </p= re><pre></pre><pre><br></pre><pre>I understand what you are saying. It appe= ars epiphany is the old name (<a href=3D"https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GN= OME_Web">https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Web</a>). Dev must have used= epiphany now a days as a habit.</pre><pre><br></pre><pre>Also, the previou= s blog link you sent me, recommends to use generic names.</pre><pre><br></p= re><pre></pre><pre><br></pre><pre>Maybe gnome-web could be the real package= =E2=80=99s name and there could be a</pre><pre>package called epiphany that= propagates gnome-web, like the gnome</pre><pre>meta-package does? Same fo= r nautilus etc.</pre><pre><br></pre><pre>Regards,</pre><pre>Florian</pre><p= re><br></pre></blockquote></body></html> --=-pZKrZPmqVlcf8JUER8MU--
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#35586; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 35586) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2019 09:15:09 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 06 05:15:09 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55714 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hNZiH-000653-Ev for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 05:15:09 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.de ([5.45.111.108]:43146 helo=mail.pelzflorian.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <pelzflorian@HIDDEN>) id 1hNZiF-00064p-Q1 for 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 05:15:08 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.localdomain (unknown [5.45.111.108]) by mail.pelzflorian.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6F6F360038; Mon, 6 May 2019 11:14:54 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pelzflorian.de; s=mail; t=1557134095; bh=D9PzEkZR+88at/gab00WRVB359C1se+tQhuYXq01bqo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=GOZITz0Fzo+rfemS8KABMi5/vFlY839s2iIgVOWIqlk1QU0EXmXs5BX385q2UtH65 wbo93E+E6NpgEEU7ySg3txI6UKmD2cFG4EUkcER039lXaYVtB0TiIkgPPQEP7s6eA0 B2avxph1VyHVQ6tFUxJdico7cdVsE9/IqoPF0ZCE= Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 11:14:54 +0200 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@HIDDEN> To: Raghav Gururajan <rvgn@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#35586: GNOME Message-ID: <20190506091454.2trvy3tbe7pac7qc@HIDDEN> References: <20190506075752.95172308D9@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20190506075752.95172308D9@HIDDEN> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35586 Cc: 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 03:57:48AM -0400, Raghav Gururajan wrote: > Also, I think it should be okay to include apps mentioned in "incubator" section as well. In Guix, users can roll back to older versions of newer ones are unstable. > Well, incubator apps have not enough polish. Then again, what back in 2016 was an incubator app maybe works fine now — I see the blog linking to https://wiki.gnome.org/Design/Apps which lists Notes as core now. Dictionary is listed as inactive/retired on the other hand. Regards, Florian
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#35586; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 35586) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2019 09:05:51 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 06 05:05:51 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55692 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hNZZG-0005ol-LE for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 05:05:50 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.de ([5.45.111.108]:43132 helo=mail.pelzflorian.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <pelzflorian@HIDDEN>) id 1hNZZE-0005oW-4x for 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 05:05:49 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.localdomain (unknown [5.45.111.108]) by mail.pelzflorian.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97AD8360038; Mon, 6 May 2019 11:05:34 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pelzflorian.de; s=mail; t=1557133534; bh=u2V0oOh0/Tfk4RdQ4ym3UdoSJeOb5wkFCUK+bUwTYlE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Th0A3X/FMBGZjQLNkw7oraAxrvlZiJrOSmcN/ywyw7Gq1Wq3gRwWduIbJKiPtN6uo YrtWl1fs9fK4gS32WDqLUECn/tDQEGGGMQZKKDb1DUwAF3KWVu3J3xRk9GlN8rxUHb acePzxsx613MKZFRVDndNJ1YSDgF/MFV1Q4fuDQg= Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 11:05:34 +0200 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@HIDDEN> To: Raghav Gururajan <rvgn@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#35586: GNOME Message-ID: <20190506090534.c3xzmapsdrqtc7ww@HIDDEN> References: <20190506075159.12C59308D7@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20190506075159.12C59308D7@HIDDEN> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35586 Cc: 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 03:51:54AM -0400, Raghav Gururajan wrote: > On 5 May 2019 16:48, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@HIDDEN> wrote: > > You can also type both Epiphany and (your language’s translation of) > > Web in the GNOME Activities search bar to find Epiphany. The same > > goes for Nautilus. The terminal command is also still epiphany or > > nautilus. > > > > I do not know if it is possible to give a package two names; I believe > > it is not. > > I understand what you are saying. It appears epiphany is the old name (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Web). Dev must have used epiphany now a days as a habit. > > Also, the previous blog link you sent me, recommends to use generic names. > Maybe gnome-web could be the real package’s name and there could be a package called epiphany that propagates gnome-web, like the gnome meta-package does? Same for nautilus etc. Regards, Florian
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#35586; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 35586) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2019 07:57:54 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 06 03:57:54 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55625 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hNYVW-00040b-Hb for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 03:57:54 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:42818) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rvgn@HIDDEN>) id 1hNYVV-00040U-Al for 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 03:57:53 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95172308D9; Mon, 6 May 2019 09:57:52 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ym9cdvNOHxL6; Mon, 6 May 2019 09:57:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 03:57:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1557129471; bh=obPUndskyyv6p5hcruo+71nGJjIMoPp3zu9i+lxuGAM=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Cc; b=K6a0J2jFvtffb7MLo4izkaEGrWdf3shkdsY4tUHJRyRWoGrQIpYHDsjOoBQATI2BP IE58DK+chdKwr+u7/2GWmTkuy/my0G5UkIIzRv4bBmZRpKcCM6HXWJihVBKM7VEsc6 NjQ/BV3JqzVth0tJHSb7haC+ndYkSgRTNcQFn6ktR7PMZKSFuW3T4Hhkouakw5NKm2 LpuUYutPamX2ZUwsGvl9e6aD4l6Wkx5SMrqAKeJRey6HQ+vpOZGFA+Sg+NWp3yCZaE Pxab9d3yZoIdOVA0q/4cFY23tdDcZjvPYxz4ggXm/f0iCoo0LacLfqlY8fIn1D8aX6 F2i044fgGsxaQ== Subject: Re: bug#35586: GNOME From: Raghav Gururajan <rvgn@HIDDEN> To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@HIDDEN> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Message-Id: <20190506075752.95172308D9@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35586 Cc: 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Ck9uIDUgTWF5IDIwMTkgMTY6NTAsICJwZWx6ZmxvcmlhbiAoRmxvcmlhbiBQZWx6KSIgPHBlbHpm bG9yaWFuQHBlbHpmbG9yaWFuLmRlPiB3cm90ZToKPgo+IE9uIFN1biwgTWF5IDA1LCAyMDE5IGF0 IDAzOjM2OjUxUE0gLTA0MDAsIFJhZ2hhdiBHdXJ1cmFqYW4gd3JvdGU6IAo+ID4gRmxvcmlhbiEg VGhlIGxpbmsgeW91IHByb3ZpZGVkIGlzIGF3ZXNvbWUuIAo+ID4gCj4gPiBJIHN0cm9uZ2x5IHJl cXVlc3QgdGhlIGRldnMgdG8gdXNlIHRoYXQgbGluayAoaHR0cHM6Ly9ibG9ncy5nbm9tZS5vcmcv bWNhdGFuemFyby8yMDE2LzA5LzIxL2dub21lLTMtMjItY29yZS1hcHBzLykgdG8gZml4IHRoaXMg YnVnLiAKPgo+IFRoZXJlIGFjdHVhbGx5IGFsc28gaXM6IAo+IGh0dHBzOi8vYmxvZ3MuZ25vbWUu b3JnL21jYXRhbnphcm8vMjAxNy8wOC8xMy9nbm9tZS0zLTI2LWNvcmUtYXBwbGljYXRpb25zLyAK Pgo+IFRoaXMgaXMgbGVzcyBkZXRhaWxlZCB0aGFuIHRoZSBsaW5rIGJlZm9yZSwgYnV0IGl0IGlz IG1vcmUgcmVjZW50LsKgIEkgCj4gZG8gbm90IHJlbWVtYmVyIHJlYWRpbmcgYSBtb3JlIHJlY2Vu dCBwb3N0IG9uIEdOT01FIGNvcmUgYXBwbGljYXRpb25zIAo+IG9uIFBsYW5ldCBHTk9NRSwgYnV0 IEkgbWF5IGhhdmUgZm9yZ290dGVuLiAKClRoYW5rcyBGbG9yaWFuIQoKSSBzZWUuIAoKQWxzbywg SSB0aGluayBpdCBzaG91bGQgYmUgb2theSB0byBpbmNsdWRlIGFwcHMgbWVudGlvbmVkIGluICJp bmN1YmF0b3IiIHNlY3Rpb24gYXMgd2VsbC4gSW4gR3VpeCwgdXNlcnMgY2FuIHJvbGwgYmFjayB0 byBvbGRlciB2ZXJzaW9ucyBvZiBuZXdlciBvbmVzIGFyZSB1bnN0YWJsZS4KCj4KPiBSZWdhcmRz LCAKPiBGbG9yaWFuIAo=
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#35586; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 35586) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2019 07:52:05 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 06 03:52:05 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55620 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hNYPs-0003rQ-N8 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 03:52:05 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:59798) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rvgn@HIDDEN>) id 1hNYPo-0003qx-Il for 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 03:52:01 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C59308D7; Mon, 6 May 2019 09:51:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a-exNxbxTcC9; Mon, 6 May 2019 09:51:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 03:51:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1557129117; bh=Lh2L/TN4x+b534Qzprha5pNnKLa7IVlecvl5L+cWSL0=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Cc; b=I09hI+YFA105vl1x8Fu2SrsAa8lHQH5QYykCAxgXcfU3UU2f9R3KXFpKBZqJPlbuI xqfERkmFTT23kU+pYAeiooPbSWhjD3ubX4ZMjYjJnfUl53UrP4ZOgBmW77ExlPYrAw BMt7MQg1ypIAHJnFKJlCsSZ3MfofvK3BgGUQH/NUe0AiWLqPvWg8ZVPNFbHzfF21hQ uYZIcmbbeHaJmlx+klHyAwqdLBEBZNuVjgglgwmEMNXTICRuNeaGqt/hSl8x29odYo iB4PzXb+0R+a3EMeIZP3qNtXd7cKIgfYdiYzJhG9UrxvImFtXUzlnG89mFowZznXQs 7A05FrEYWbRJw== Subject: Re: bug#35586: GNOME From: Raghav Gururajan <rvgn@HIDDEN> To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@HIDDEN> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Message-Id: <20190506075159.12C59308D7@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35586 Cc: 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Ck9uIDUgTWF5IDIwMTkgMTY6NDgsICJwZWx6ZmxvcmlhbiAoRmxvcmlhbiBQZWx6KSIgPHBlbHpm bG9yaWFuQHBlbHpmbG9yaWFuLmRlPiB3cm90ZToKPgo+IE9uIFN1biwgTWF5IDA1LCAyMDE5IGF0 IDAzOjIzOjI3UE0gLTA0MDAsIFJhZ2hhdiBHdXJ1cmFqYW4gd3JvdGU6IAo+ID4gT24gNSBNYXkg MjAxOSAxNDo1MiwgInBlbHpmbG9yaWFuIChGbG9yaWFuIFBlbHopIiA8cGVsemZsb3JpYW5AcGVs emZsb3JpYW4uZGU+IHdyb3RlOiAKPiA+ID4gV2VsbCwgdGhleSBoYXZlIHR3byBuYW1lcyBhbmQg b3RoZXJzIGZyZXF1ZW50bHkgcmVmZXIgdG8gdGhlbSBieSAKPiA+ID4gZS5nLiBFcGlwaGFueSBh bmQgbm90IEdOT01FIFdlYiwgaW5jbHVkaW5nIEVwaXBoYW55IGRldmVsb3BlcnMuIAo+ID4gPiAK PiA+ID4gCj4gPiAKPiA+IEhtbSwgYnV0IHRoZSBhcHAgc2hvd3MgdXAgYXMgV2ViIGluIEdOT01F LiAKPiA+IAo+Cgo+IE9uZSBleGFtcGxlIG9mIEdOT01FIFdlYiBiZWluZyBjYWxsZWQgRXBpcGhh bnkgYnkgR05PTUUgZGV2ZWxvcGVycyBpcyAKPiB0aGUgc2FtZSBibG9nOiAKPgo+IGh0dHBzOi8v YmxvZ3MuZ25vbWUub3JnL21jYXRhbnphcm8vMjAxOS8wMy8xOS9lcGlwaGFueS10ZWNobm9sb2d5 LXByZXZpZXctdXBncmFkZS1yZXF1aXJlcy1tYW51YWwtaW50ZXJ2ZW50aW9uLyAKPgo+IFlvdSBj YW4gYWxzbyB0eXBlIGJvdGggRXBpcGhhbnkgYW5kICh5b3VyIGxhbmd1YWdl4oCZcyB0cmFuc2xh dGlvbiBvZikgCj4gV2ViIGluIHRoZSBHTk9NRSBBY3Rpdml0aWVzIHNlYXJjaCBiYXIgdG8gZmlu ZCBFcGlwaGFueS7CoCBUaGUgc2FtZSAKPiBnb2VzIGZvciBOYXV0aWx1cy7CoCBUaGUgdGVybWlu YWwgY29tbWFuZCBpcyBhbHNvIHN0aWxsIGVwaXBoYW55IG9yIAo+IG5hdXRpbHVzLiAKPgo+IEkg ZG8gbm90IGtub3cgaWYgaXQgaXMgcG9zc2libGUgdG8gZ2l2ZSBhIHBhY2thZ2UgdHdvIG5hbWVz OyBJIGJlbGlldmUgCj4gaXQgaXMgbm90LiAKCkkgdW5kZXJzdGFuZCB3aGF0IHlvdSBhcmUgc2F5 aW5nLiBJdCBhcHBlYXJzIGVwaXBoYW55IGlzIHRoZSBvbGQgbmFtZSAoaHR0cHM6Ly9lbi5tLndp a2lwZWRpYS5vcmcvd2lraS9HTk9NRV9XZWIpLiBEZXYgbXVzdCBoYXZlIHVzZWQgZXBpcGhhbnkg bm93IGEgZGF5cyBhcyBhIGhhYml0LgoKQWxzbywgdGhlIHByZXZpb3VzIGJsb2cgbGluayB5b3Ug c2VudCBtZSwgcmVjb21tZW5kcyB0byB1c2UgZ2VuZXJpYyBuYW1lcy4KCj4KPgo+Cj4gPiA+IE9m IGNvdXJzZSwgdGhlcmUgYXJlIG1vcmUgbm9uLXBhY2thZ2VkIGFwcGxpY2F0aW9ucy4gCj4gPiA+ IAo+ID4gPiBJIGFsc28gcmVtZW1iZXIgCj4gPiA+IGh0dHBzOi8vYmxvZ3MuZ25vbWUub3JnL21j YXRhbnphcm8vMjAxNi8wOS8yMS9nbm9tZS0zLTIyLWNvcmUtYXBwcy8gCj4gPiA+IHdobyBzYXlz LCBmb3IgZXhhbXBsZSwgdGhhdCBnbm9tZS10d2Vha3MgaXMgKm5vdCogY29yZS4gCj4gPiA+IAo+ ID4gCj4gPiBXaGF0Pz8gSG93IGVsc2UgdG8gZW5hYmxlL2Rpc2FibGUgcGx1Z2lucy9leHRlbnNp b25zIGluIEdOT01FPyAKPiA+IAo+Cj4gV2VsbOKApsKgIEdOT01FIGhhcyByZXBlYXRlZGx5IHRy aWVkIHRvIG1ha2Ugc2ltcGxlciBhbHRlcm5hdGl2ZXMgZm9yIAo+IGluc3RhbGxpbmcgZXh0ZW5z aW9ucy7CoCBJIGJlbGlldmUgdGhlIGN1cnJlbnQgbWV0aG9kIGlzIEdOT01FIAo+IFNvZnR3YXJl LCBidXQgSSBhbSBub3Qgc3VyZS4gCj4KPiBSZWdhcmRzLCAKPiBGbG9yaWFuIAo=
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#35586; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 35586) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2019 20:50:28 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 05 16:50:28 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55025 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hNO5c-0005Cw-BR for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 16:50:28 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.de ([5.45.111.108]:42488 helo=mail.pelzflorian.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <pelzflorian@HIDDEN>) id 1hNO5Z-0005Cm-Of for 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 16:50:27 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.localdomain (unknown [5.45.111.108]) by mail.pelzflorian.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 683CC360038; Sun, 5 May 2019 22:50:14 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pelzflorian.de; s=mail; t=1557089414; bh=ahsWyfUuQtlWGjpLRdmjhJmxCpIDMs/jAvFiZa2vOcM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=qrpbyXZdb+wX1JgaZG+Ciod1SYBN5GZPRMAGFgzuTlQm0alae5gpLfLcMxH3qU/vU XKks9k7fIIRHBKmzQvcQdx0Hru84nzp5Giy78pTgXQMwmEl2CC/f7rCTMe06EqiVCc cVu9T34J4uYIJOlfTqlAmUbzMxcvODXH+WusdLVU= Date: Sun, 5 May 2019 22:50:14 +0200 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@HIDDEN> To: Raghav Gururajan <rvgn@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#35586: GNOME Message-ID: <20190505205014.rlasyz64r44viqyh@HIDDEN> References: <20190505193653.9B62A30856@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190505193653.9B62A30856@HIDDEN> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35586 Cc: 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 03:36:51PM -0400, Raghav Gururajan wrote: > Florian! The link you provided is awesome. > > I strongly request the devs to use that link (https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2016/09/21/gnome-3-22-core-apps/) to fix this bug. There actually also is: https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2017/08/13/gnome-3-26-core-applications/ This is less detailed than the link before, but it is more recent. I do not remember reading a more recent post on GNOME core applications on Planet GNOME, but I may have forgotten. Regards, Florian
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#35586; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 35586) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2019 20:48:28 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 05 16:48:28 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55021 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hNO3f-000597-U4 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 16:48:28 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.de ([5.45.111.108]:42478 helo=mail.pelzflorian.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <pelzflorian@HIDDEN>) id 1hNO3e-00058y-8T for 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 16:48:27 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.localdomain (unknown [5.45.111.108]) by mail.pelzflorian.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A4E2360038; Sun, 5 May 2019 22:48:14 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pelzflorian.de; s=mail; t=1557089294; bh=2tzDTZSBfNomBnr3+tHnzS+ewN1w0ipQea4uXFi4XFI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=L4kUTNtupyHk0pPmuZaJpb6yFuZk80uVL2LFQNpH/VyQJiUek9+ydm69ldAHcLBsa NX/+iIq7VeWhREQeSSK+rxv2ZdoKpjOWi96H0g6hPRclcvhpmjj/7zNm3xEp6pCnA0 kRYNqzKcQ070KMPRHe4W3TRUCQHG6/ILRnBExzpM= Date: Sun, 5 May 2019 22:48:14 +0200 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@HIDDEN> To: Raghav Gururajan <rvgn@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#35586: GNOME Message-ID: <20190505204813.vog2hub3z5mhlcd7@HIDDEN> References: <20190505192330.6E5F430863@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20190505192330.6E5F430863@HIDDEN> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35586 Cc: 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 03:23:27PM -0400, Raghav Gururajan wrote: > On 5 May 2019 14:52, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@HIDDEN> wrote: > > Well, they have two names and others frequently refer to them by > > e.g. Epiphany and not GNOME Web, including Epiphany developers. > > > > > > Hmm, but the app shows up as Web in GNOME. > One example of GNOME Web being called Epiphany by GNOME developers is the same blog: https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2019/03/19/epiphany-technology-preview-upgrade-requires-manual-intervention/ You can also type both Epiphany and (your language’s translation of) Web in the GNOME Activities search bar to find Epiphany. The same goes for Nautilus. The terminal command is also still epiphany or nautilus. I do not know if it is possible to give a package two names; I believe it is not. > > Of course, there are more non-packaged applications. > > > > I also remember > > https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2016/09/21/gnome-3-22-core-apps/ > > who says, for example, that gnome-tweaks is *not* core. > > > > What?? How else to enable/disable plugins/extensions in GNOME? > Well… GNOME has repeatedly tried to make simpler alternatives for installing extensions. I believe the current method is GNOME Software, but I am not sure. Regards, Florian
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#35586; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 35586) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2019 19:36:58 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 05 15:36:58 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54917 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hNMwT-00030v-SV for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 15:36:58 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:50080) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rvgn@HIDDEN>) id 1hNMwR-00030l-TK for 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 15:36:56 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B62A30856; Sun, 5 May 2019 21:36:53 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TRxoUG-p3Gnh; Sun, 5 May 2019 21:36:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 05 May 2019 15:36:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1557085011; bh=wlfAJu8AA1ONRqaYiX/9oHNjr6+MlH9wMErf85rpCiI=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Cc; b=BYe/ozHnGtAcdojgNwEU4Xs0BkBHrhbtvk2nyxQHRKjbyHRTPZ5lijsHzmIbecLyE PKXCGXsCT+KMAfu6pyyimd9Ma0HVJS418kNoOnMojs6sudWgpdq7v7PVUA4He6UuI3 hP/OUwPMkF2NWPDu4DYAXHE2N6U6Y+s/F6oa/2ueIobviv5gtmhMMkYzwhOy2k6z5U U1HONUndPQ/DNp0LuU6K/U397TYhdeFXQmCUmgV5uyj4lre9vznpPnL+XfVPWPka9N uR+XIekJ84MQwvI6171aLySBjBGBOmTDUXXc9YhyYbRAxdbpN8/wdLgObA2amq7QF2 xf7Lrc8ji/DAw== Subject: Re: bug#35586: GNOME From: Raghav Gururajan <rvgn@HIDDEN> To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@HIDDEN> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Message-Id: <20190505193653.9B62A30856@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35586 Cc: 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) RmxvcmlhbiEgVGhlIGxpbmsgeW91IHByb3ZpZGVkIGlzIGF3ZXNvbWUuCgpJIHN0cm9uZ2x5IHJl cXVlc3QgdGhlIGRldnMgdG8gdXNlIHRoYXQgbGluayAoaHR0cHM6Ly9ibG9ncy5nbm9tZS5vcmcv bWNhdGFuemFyby8yMDE2LzA5LzIxL2dub21lLTMtMjItY29yZS1hcHBzLykgdG8gZml4IHRoaXMg YnVnLk9uIDUgTWF5IDIwMTkgMTU6MjMsIFJhZ2hhdiBHdXJ1cmFqYW4gPHJ2Z25AZGlzcm9vdC5v cmc+IHdyb3RlOgo+Cj4KPiBPbiA1IE1heSAyMDE5IDE0OjUyLCAicGVsemZsb3JpYW4gKEZsb3Jp YW4gUGVseikiIDxwZWx6ZmxvcmlhbkBwZWx6Zmxvcmlhbi5kZT4gd3JvdGU6Cj4gPgo+ID4gT24g U3VuLCBNYXkgMDUsIDIwMTkgYXQgMDI6MjA6MzlQTSAtMDQwMCwgUmFnaGF2IEd1cnVyYWphbiB3 cm90ZTogCj4gPiA+IEhlbGxvIEd1aXghIAo+ID4gPiAKPiA+ID4gQmFzZWQgb24gdGhlIG1haWwt bGlzdCB0aHJlYWQgImh0dHBzOi8vbGlzdHMuZ251Lm9yZy9hcmNoaXZlL2h0bWwvaGVscC0gCj4g PiA+IGd1aXgvMjAxOS0wNS9tc2cwMDEyNC5odG1sIiwgaXQgYXBwZWFycyB0aGF0IHRoZXJlIGlz IGEgYnVnLCB3aGVyZSBzb21lIAo+ID4gPiBHTk9NRSBDb3JlIEFwcGxpY2F0aW9ucyBhcmUgYWN0 dWFsbHkgcGFja2FnZWQgaW4gZ3VpeCBidXQgaGF2ZSBub3QgYmVlbiAKPiA+ID4gaW5jbHVkZWQg aW4gZ3VpeCdzICJnbm9tZSIgcGFja2FnZS4gCj4gPiA+IAo+ID4KPgo+ID4gVGhhbmsgeW91IGZv ciBkb2luZyBzb21ldGhpbmcgYWJvdXQgdGhpcyEKPgo+IE5vIHByb2JsZW0gOikKPgo+ID4KPiA+ Cj4gPiA+IGZvdW5kIG91dCB0aGF0IHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgZ25vbWUgY29yZSBhcHBsaWNhdGlv biBwYWNrYWdlcyBhcmUgaW5kZWVkIAo+ID4gPiBwYWNrYWdlZCBpbiBndWl4LCBidXQgaGF2ZSBu b3QgYmVlbiBpbmNsdWRlZCBpbiBndWl4J3MgZ25vbWUgcGFja2FnZS4gCj4gPiA+IAo+ID4gPiBn bm9tZS1jYWxlbmRhciAKPiA+ID4gZ25vbWUtY2xvY2tzIAo+ID4gPiBnbm9tZS1jb21tb24gCj4g PiA+IGdub21lLWRlc2t0b3AgCj4gPgo+Cj4gPiBnbm9tZS1jb21tb24gYW5kIGdub21lLWRlc2t0 b3AgYXJlIGxpYnJhcmllcywgbm90IGNvcmUgYXBwbGljYXRpb25zLgo+Cj4gQWdyZWVkLiBBcmUg dGhleSBzdGlsbCByZWxldmFudCB0byBiZSBpbmNsdWRlZD8KPgo+ID4KPiA+ID4gZ25vbWUtZGlj dGlvbmFyeSAKPiA+ID4gZ25vbWUtZG9jLXV0aWxzIAo+ID4KPgo+ID4gZ25vbWUtZG9jLXV0aWxz IGlzIG5vdCBhIGNvcmUgYXBwbGljYXRpb24uCj4KPiBBZ3JlZWQuCj4KPiA+Cj4gPiA+IGdub21l LWljb24tdGhlbWUgCj4gPiA+IGdub21lLWtsb3Rza2kgCj4gPiA+IGdub21lLW1hcHMgCj4gPiA+ IGdub21lLW1pbWUtZGF0YSAKPiA+ID4gZ25vbWUtbWluZXMgCj4gPiA+IGdub21lLW1wdiAKPiA+ Cj4KPiA+IGdub21lLW1wdiBpcyBub3QgY29yZS4KPgo+IEFncmVlZC4KPgo+ID4KPiA+ID4gZ25v bWUtcGxhbm5lciAKPiA+ID4gZ25vbWUtc2NyZWVuc2hvdCAKPiA+ID4gZ25vbWUtc2hlbGwtZXh0 ZW5zaW9ucyAKPiA+ID4gZ25vbWUtc3Vkb2t1IAo+ID4gPiBnbm9tZS10b2RvIAo+ID4gPiBnbm9t ZS10d2Vhay10b29sIAo+ID4gPiBnbm9tZS12ZnMgCj4gPgo+Cj4gPiBJIGRvbuKAmXQgcXVpdGUg a25vdywgaXMgZ25vbWUtdmZzIHRoZSBzYW1lIGFzIGd2ZnM/Cj4KPiBJIGRvbid0IHRoaW5rIHNv LiBNYXkgYmUgdGhpcyBpcyB0aGUgcmVhc29uIHdoeSBXZWJEQVYgZmlsZXMgYWRkZWQgaW4gZ25v bWUtb25saW5lLWFjY291bnRzIG5vdCBzaG93aW5nIHVwIGluIGdub21lLWZpbGVzLgo+Cj4gPgo+ ID4gPiBnbm9tZS12aWRlby1lZmZlY3RzIAo+ID4gPiAKPiA+Cj4KPiA+IFRoaXMgYXBwZWFycyB0 byBiZSBhIGNvZGVjIHBhY2sgb3Igc29tZXRoaW5nICg/KSwgbm90IGFuIGFwcGxpY2F0aW9uLgo+ Cj4gTm90IGV4YWN0bHkuIFByb3ZpZGVzIGFwcHMgZm9yIHdlYiBjYW0gZXRjLgo+Cj4gPgo+ID4K PiA+ID4gVGhlIGZvbGxvd2luZyBnbm9tZSBjb3JlIGFwcGxpY2F0aW9ucyBhcmUgYWxzbyBhbHJl YWR5IHBhY2thZ2VkIGluIGd1aXggCj4gPiA+IGJ1dCByZXF1aXJlcyBjb3JyZWN0IHJlbmFtaW5n IGJlZm9yZSBhZGRpbmcgdG8gZ3VpeCdzIGdub21lIHBhY2thZ2U/IAo+ID4gPiAKPiA+ID4gcmh5 dGhtYm94IC0tPiBnbm9tZS1tdXNpYyAKPiA+ID4gc2hvdHdlbGwgLS0+IGdub21lLXBob3RvcyAK PiA+ID4gCj4gPgo+Cj4gPiBQYXJhYm9sYSBHTlUvTGludXgtbGlicmUgcGFja2FnaW5nIHNob3dz IHRoYXQgdGhlc2UgYXJlIG5vdCB0aGUgc2FtZSAKPiA+IGFwcCBhbmQgc2hvdWxkIG5vdCBiZSBy ZW5hbWVkLiAKPiA+Cj4gPiBbZmxvcmlhbkBwZWx6ZmxvcmlhbiB+XSQgcGFjbWFuIC1TcyBzaG90 d2VsbCAKPiA+IGNvbW11bml0eS9zaG90d2VsbCAyOjAuMzAuNC0xIAo+ID4gwqDCoMKgIEEgZGln aXRhbCBwaG90byBvcmdhbml6ZXIgZGVzaWduZWQgZm9yIHRoZSBHTk9NRSBkZXNrdG9wIGVudmly b25tZW50IAo+ID4gW2Zsb3JpYW5AcGVsemZsb3JpYW4gfl0kIHBhY21hbiAtU3MgZ25vbWUtcGhv dG9zIAo+ID4gZXh0cmEvZ25vbWUtcGhvdG9zIDMuMzIuMC0xIChnbm9tZSkgCj4gPiDCoMKgwqAg QWNjZXNzLCBvcmdhbml6ZSwgYW5kIHNoYXJlIHlvdXIgcGhvdG9zIG9uIEdOT01FIAo+ID4gW2Zs b3JpYW5AcGVsemZsb3JpYW4gfl0kIHBhY21hbiAtU3Mgcmh5dGhtYm94IAo+ID4gZXh0cmEvcmh5 dGhtYm94IDMuNC4zLTEgCj4gPiDCoMKgwqAgTXVzaWMgcGxheWJhY2sgYW5kIG1hbmFnZW1lbnQg YXBwbGljYXRpb24gCj4gPiBjb21tdW5pdHkvYXJpbyAxLjYtMSAKPiA+IMKgwqDCoCBBIEdUSyBj bGllbnQgZm9yIE1QRCBpbnNwaXJlZCBieSBSaHl0aG1ib3ggYnV0IG11Y2ggbGlnaHRlciBhbmQg ZmFzdGVyIAo+ID4gW2Zsb3JpYW5AcGVsemZsb3JpYW4gfl0kIHBhY21hbiAtU3MgZ25vbWUtbXVz aWMgCj4gPiBleHRyYS9nbm9tZS1tdXNpYyAxOjMuMzIuMS0xIChnbm9tZSkgCj4gPiDCoMKgwqAg TXVzaWMgcGxheWVyIGFuZCBtYW5hZ2VtZW50IGFwcGxpY2F0aW9uIAo+ID4KPiA+Cj4KPiBBZ3Jl ZWQuIFNvIHRoZXkgbmVlZCB0byBwYWNrYWdlZCBhbmQgaW5jbHVkZWQgc2VwYXJhdGVseS4KPgo+ ID4gPiBUaGUgZm9sbG93aW5nIGdub21lIGNvcmUgYXBwbGljYXRpb25zIGhhdmUgYWxyZWFkeSBi ZWVuIGluY2x1ZGVkIGluIAo+ID4gPiBndWl4J3MgZ25vbWUgcGFja2FnZSBidXQgcmVxdWlyZXMg Y29ycmVjdCByZW5hbWluZz8gCj4gPiA+IAo+ID4gPiBlcGlwaGFueSAtLT4gZ25vbWUtd2ViIAo+ ID4gPiBlbnZpY2UgLS0+IGdub21lLWRvY3VtZW50cyAKPiA+ID4gZW9nIC0tPiBnbm9tZS1pbWFn ZXMgCj4gPiA+IGZpbGUtcm9sbGVyIC0tPiBnbm9tZS1hdXRvYXIgCj4gPiA+IGdlZGl0IC0tPiBn bm9tZS10ZXh0IAo+ID4gPiBuYXV0aWx1cyAtLT4gZ25vbWUtZmlsZXMgCj4gPiA+Cj4KPiA+Cj4g PiBXZWxsLCB0aGV5IGhhdmUgdHdvIG5hbWVzIGFuZCBvdGhlcnMgZnJlcXVlbnRseSByZWZlciB0 byB0aGVtIGJ5IAo+ID4gZS5nLiBFcGlwaGFueSBhbmQgbm90IEdOT01FIFdlYiwgaW5jbHVkaW5n IEVwaXBoYW55IGRldmVsb3BlcnMuIAo+ID4KPiA+Cj4KPiBIbW0sIGJ1dCB0aGUgYXBwIHNob3dz IHVwIGFzIFdlYiBpbiBHTk9NRS4KPgo+ID4gT2YgY291cnNlLCB0aGVyZSBhcmUgbW9yZSBub24t cGFja2FnZWQgYXBwbGljYXRpb25zLiAKPiA+Cj4gPiBJIGFsc28gcmVtZW1iZXIgCj4gPiBodHRw czovL2Jsb2dzLmdub21lLm9yZy9tY2F0YW56YXJvLzIwMTYvMDkvMjEvZ25vbWUtMy0yMi1jb3Jl LWFwcHMvIAo+ID4gd2hvIHNheXMsIGZvciBleGFtcGxlLCB0aGF0IGdub21lLXR3ZWFrcyBpcyAq bm90KiBjb3JlLiAKPiA+Cj4KPiBXaGF0Pz8gSG93IGVsc2UgdG8gZW5hYmxlL2Rpc2FibGUgcGx1 Z2lucy9leHRlbnNpb25zIGluIEdOT01FPwo+Cj4gPiA+IEkgcmVhbGx5IGhvcGUgaWYgdGhlIGFi b3ZlIG1vZGlmaWNhdGlvbnMgYXJlIG1hZGUsIGl0IHdpbGwgZnVsZmlsbCB0aGUgCj4gPiA+IGFj dHVhbCBkZXNjcmlwdGlvbiBvZiBndWl4J3MgZ25vbWUgcGFja2FnZSAoaHR0cDovL2d1aXguZ251 Lm9yZy9wYWNrYWdlIAo+ID4gPiBzL2dub21lLTMuMjguMi8pLiDimLogCj4gPiA+IAo+ID4KPiA+ IFllcywgSSBhZ3JlZSwgdGhhdCBzaG91bGQgYmUgdGhlIGdvYWwuIAo+ID4KPiA+IFJlZ2FyZHMs IAo+ID4gRmxvcmlhbiAK
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#35586; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 35586) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2019 19:23:35 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 05 15:23:35 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54886 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hNMjX-0000Yg-81 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 15:23:35 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:47456) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rvgn@HIDDEN>) id 1hNMjU-0000YV-Te for 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 15:23:34 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5F430863; Sun, 5 May 2019 21:23:30 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jDQU05zAqYwn; Sun, 5 May 2019 21:23:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 05 May 2019 15:23:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1557084208; bh=1YcZvqaHaxZ00QbMzpAMi1IRJjxsEWwhnoUHOFHJlWw=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Cc; b=FhksBRR5g3ZI/FDPykCIwuWw4lmaNFn9a3YM/kHzdR9eb/mDw2l3Io/V/zlbFrVyE ZP1zYc+9vQXLh2Bp6flETuF96pciNAIENlglmkuzssV9W9H1XrAYHJCsIX+ZXVMXTH S1ENwrkPgDSd5F2mbBMdTFsVEPEcGELCjTu2DPDZCPt+I+0a+QZz0LAQtw1Wxd+jjs DBCYlX/xmO2AOIWxHcesrEuOp/hRUbfbDC/wygEu6a+8dZVAWLXYzcxFSS5j4Fqe3X bRWMxD3NKysODgxK8ddVgRYOLv0NJBuAWIYyudTh7lH9F+fz84zxKwDAQKNAW9AuO4 8V3fSLQXlpo2Q== Subject: Re: bug#35586: GNOME From: Raghav Gururajan <rvgn@HIDDEN> To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@HIDDEN> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Message-Id: <20190505192330.6E5F430863@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35586 Cc: 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Ck9uIDUgTWF5IDIwMTkgMTQ6NTIsICJwZWx6ZmxvcmlhbiAoRmxvcmlhbiBQZWx6KSIgPHBlbHpm bG9yaWFuQHBlbHpmbG9yaWFuLmRlPiB3cm90ZToKPgo+IE9uIFN1biwgTWF5IDA1LCAyMDE5IGF0 IDAyOjIwOjM5UE0gLTA0MDAsIFJhZ2hhdiBHdXJ1cmFqYW4gd3JvdGU6IAo+ID4gSGVsbG8gR3Vp eCEgCj4gPiAKPiA+IEJhc2VkIG9uIHRoZSBtYWlsLWxpc3QgdGhyZWFkICJodHRwczovL2xpc3Rz LmdudS5vcmcvYXJjaGl2ZS9odG1sL2hlbHAtIAo+ID4gZ3VpeC8yMDE5LTA1L21zZzAwMTI0Lmh0 bWwiLCBpdCBhcHBlYXJzIHRoYXQgdGhlcmUgaXMgYSBidWcsIHdoZXJlIHNvbWUgCj4gPiBHTk9N RSBDb3JlIEFwcGxpY2F0aW9ucyBhcmUgYWN0dWFsbHkgcGFja2FnZWQgaW4gZ3VpeCBidXQgaGF2 ZSBub3QgYmVlbiAKPiA+IGluY2x1ZGVkIGluIGd1aXgncyAiZ25vbWUiIHBhY2thZ2UuIAo+ID4g Cj4KCj4gVGhhbmsgeW91IGZvciBkb2luZyBzb21ldGhpbmcgYWJvdXQgdGhpcyEgCgpObyBwcm9i bGVtIDopCgo+Cj4KPiA+IGZvdW5kIG91dCB0aGF0IHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgZ25vbWUgY29yZSBh cHBsaWNhdGlvbiBwYWNrYWdlcyBhcmUgaW5kZWVkIAo+ID4gcGFja2FnZWQgaW4gZ3VpeCwgYnV0 IGhhdmUgbm90IGJlZW4gaW5jbHVkZWQgaW4gZ3VpeCdzIGdub21lIHBhY2thZ2UuIAo+ID4gCj4g PiBnbm9tZS1jYWxlbmRhciAKPiA+IGdub21lLWNsb2NrcyAKPiA+IGdub21lLWNvbW1vbiAKPiA+ IGdub21lLWRlc2t0b3AgCj4KCj4gZ25vbWUtY29tbW9uIGFuZCBnbm9tZS1kZXNrdG9wIGFyZSBs aWJyYXJpZXMsIG5vdCBjb3JlIGFwcGxpY2F0aW9ucy4gCgpBZ3JlZWQuIEFyZSB0aGV5IHN0aWxs IHJlbGV2YW50IHRvIGJlIGluY2x1ZGVkPwoKPgo+ID4gZ25vbWUtZGljdGlvbmFyeSAKPiA+IGdu b21lLWRvYy11dGlscyAKPgoKPiBnbm9tZS1kb2MtdXRpbHMgaXMgbm90IGEgY29yZSBhcHBsaWNh dGlvbi4gCgpBZ3JlZWQuCgo+Cj4gPiBnbm9tZS1pY29uLXRoZW1lIAo+ID4gZ25vbWUta2xvdHNr aSAKPiA+IGdub21lLW1hcHMgCj4gPiBnbm9tZS1taW1lLWRhdGEgCj4gPiBnbm9tZS1taW5lcyAK PiA+IGdub21lLW1wdiAKPgoKPiBnbm9tZS1tcHYgaXMgbm90IGNvcmUuCgpBZ3JlZWQuCgo+Cj4g PiBnbm9tZS1wbGFubmVyIAo+ID4gZ25vbWUtc2NyZWVuc2hvdCAKPiA+IGdub21lLXNoZWxsLWV4 dGVuc2lvbnMgCj4gPiBnbm9tZS1zdWRva3UgCj4gPiBnbm9tZS10b2RvIAo+ID4gZ25vbWUtdHdl YWstdG9vbCAKPiA+IGdub21lLXZmcyAKPgoKPiBJIGRvbuKAmXQgcXVpdGUga25vdywgaXMgZ25v bWUtdmZzIHRoZSBzYW1lIGFzIGd2ZnM/IAoKSSBkb24ndCB0aGluayBzby4gTWF5IGJlIHRoaXMg aXMgdGhlIHJlYXNvbiB3aHkgV2ViREFWIGZpbGVzIGFkZGVkIGluIGdub21lLW9ubGluZS1hY2Nv dW50cyBub3Qgc2hvd2luZyB1cCBpbiBnbm9tZS1maWxlcy4KCj4KPiA+IGdub21lLXZpZGVvLWVm ZmVjdHMgCj4gPiAKPgoKPiBUaGlzIGFwcGVhcnMgdG8gYmUgYSBjb2RlYyBwYWNrIG9yIHNvbWV0 aGluZyAoPyksIG5vdCBhbiBhcHBsaWNhdGlvbi4gCgpOb3QgZXhhY3RseS4gUHJvdmlkZXMgYXBw cyBmb3Igd2ViIGNhbSBldGMuCgo+Cj4KPiA+IFRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgZ25vbWUgY29yZSBhcHBs aWNhdGlvbnMgYXJlIGFsc28gYWxyZWFkeSBwYWNrYWdlZCBpbiBndWl4IAo+ID4gYnV0IHJlcXVp cmVzIGNvcnJlY3QgcmVuYW1pbmcgYmVmb3JlIGFkZGluZyB0byBndWl4J3MgZ25vbWUgcGFja2Fn ZT8gCj4gPiAKPiA+IHJoeXRobWJveCAtLT4gZ25vbWUtbXVzaWMgCj4gPiBzaG90d2VsbCAtLT4g Z25vbWUtcGhvdG9zIAo+ID4gCj4KCj4gUGFyYWJvbGEgR05VL0xpbnV4LWxpYnJlIHBhY2thZ2lu ZyBzaG93cyB0aGF0IHRoZXNlIGFyZSBub3QgdGhlIHNhbWUgCj4gYXBwIGFuZCBzaG91bGQgbm90 IGJlIHJlbmFtZWQuIAo+Cj4gW2Zsb3JpYW5AcGVsemZsb3JpYW4gfl0kIHBhY21hbiAtU3Mgc2hv dHdlbGwgCj4gY29tbXVuaXR5L3Nob3R3ZWxsIDI6MC4zMC40LTEgCj4gwqDCoMKgIEEgZGlnaXRh bCBwaG90byBvcmdhbml6ZXIgZGVzaWduZWQgZm9yIHRoZSBHTk9NRSBkZXNrdG9wIGVudmlyb25t ZW50IAo+IFtmbG9yaWFuQHBlbHpmbG9yaWFuIH5dJCBwYWNtYW4gLVNzIGdub21lLXBob3RvcyAK PiBleHRyYS9nbm9tZS1waG90b3MgMy4zMi4wLTEgKGdub21lKSAKPiDCoMKgwqAgQWNjZXNzLCBv cmdhbml6ZSwgYW5kIHNoYXJlIHlvdXIgcGhvdG9zIG9uIEdOT01FIAo+IFtmbG9yaWFuQHBlbHpm bG9yaWFuIH5dJCBwYWNtYW4gLVNzIHJoeXRobWJveCAKPiBleHRyYS9yaHl0aG1ib3ggMy40LjMt MSAKPiDCoMKgwqAgTXVzaWMgcGxheWJhY2sgYW5kIG1hbmFnZW1lbnQgYXBwbGljYXRpb24gCj4g Y29tbXVuaXR5L2FyaW8gMS42LTEgCj4gwqDCoMKgIEEgR1RLIGNsaWVudCBmb3IgTVBEIGluc3Bp cmVkIGJ5IFJoeXRobWJveCBidXQgbXVjaCBsaWdodGVyIGFuZCBmYXN0ZXIgCj4gW2Zsb3JpYW5A cGVsemZsb3JpYW4gfl0kIHBhY21hbiAtU3MgZ25vbWUtbXVzaWMgCj4gZXh0cmEvZ25vbWUtbXVz aWMgMTozLjMyLjEtMSAoZ25vbWUpIAo+IMKgwqDCoCBNdXNpYyBwbGF5ZXIgYW5kIG1hbmFnZW1l bnQgYXBwbGljYXRpb24gCj4KPgoKQWdyZWVkLiBTbyB0aGV5IG5lZWQgdG8gcGFja2FnZWQgYW5k IGluY2x1ZGVkIHNlcGFyYXRlbHkuCgo+ID4gVGhlIGZvbGxvd2luZyBnbm9tZSBjb3JlIGFwcGxp Y2F0aW9ucyBoYXZlIGFscmVhZHkgYmVlbiBpbmNsdWRlZCBpbiAKPiA+IGd1aXgncyBnbm9tZSBw YWNrYWdlIGJ1dCByZXF1aXJlcyBjb3JyZWN0IHJlbmFtaW5nPyAKPiA+IAo+ID4gZXBpcGhhbnkg LS0+IGdub21lLXdlYiAKPiA+IGVudmljZSAtLT4gZ25vbWUtZG9jdW1lbnRzIAo+ID4gZW9nIC0t PiBnbm9tZS1pbWFnZXMgCj4gPiBmaWxlLXJvbGxlciAtLT4gZ25vbWUtYXV0b2FyIAo+ID4gZ2Vk aXQgLS0+IGdub21lLXRleHQgCj4gPiBuYXV0aWx1cyAtLT4gZ25vbWUtZmlsZXMgCj4gPiAKCj4K PiBXZWxsLCB0aGV5IGhhdmUgdHdvIG5hbWVzIGFuZCBvdGhlcnMgZnJlcXVlbnRseSByZWZlciB0 byB0aGVtIGJ5IAo+IGUuZy4gRXBpcGhhbnkgYW5kIG5vdCBHTk9NRSBXZWIsIGluY2x1ZGluZyBF cGlwaGFueSBkZXZlbG9wZXJzLiAKPgo+CgpIbW0sIGJ1dCB0aGUgYXBwIHNob3dzIHVwIGFzIFdl YiBpbiBHTk9NRS4KCj4gT2YgY291cnNlLCB0aGVyZSBhcmUgbW9yZSBub24tcGFja2FnZWQgYXBw bGljYXRpb25zLiAKPgo+IEkgYWxzbyByZW1lbWJlciAKPiBodHRwczovL2Jsb2dzLmdub21lLm9y Zy9tY2F0YW56YXJvLzIwMTYvMDkvMjEvZ25vbWUtMy0yMi1jb3JlLWFwcHMvIAo+IHdobyBzYXlz LCBmb3IgZXhhbXBsZSwgdGhhdCBnbm9tZS10d2Vha3MgaXMgKm5vdCogY29yZS4gCj4KCldoYXQ/ PyBIb3cgZWxzZSB0byBlbmFibGUvZGlzYWJsZSBwbHVnaW5zL2V4dGVuc2lvbnMgaW4gR05PTUU/ Cgo+ID4gSSByZWFsbHkgaG9wZSBpZiB0aGUgYWJvdmUgbW9kaWZpY2F0aW9ucyBhcmUgbWFkZSwg aXQgd2lsbCBmdWxmaWxsIHRoZSAKPiA+IGFjdHVhbCBkZXNjcmlwdGlvbiBvZiBndWl4J3MgZ25v bWUgcGFja2FnZSAoaHR0cDovL2d1aXguZ251Lm9yZy9wYWNrYWdlIAo+ID4gcy9nbm9tZS0zLjI4 LjIvKS4g4pi6IAo+ID4gCj4KPiBZZXMsIEkgYWdyZWUsIHRoYXQgc2hvdWxkIGJlIHRoZSBnb2Fs LiAKPgo+IFJlZ2FyZHMsIAo+IEZsb3JpYW4gCg==
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#35586; Package guix.
Full text available.
Received: (at 35586) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2019 18:52:45 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 05 14:52:45 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54844 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1hNMFh-0008FW-8l
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 14:52:45 -0400
Received: from pelzflorian.de ([5.45.111.108]:42370 helo=mail.pelzflorian.de)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <pelzflorian@HIDDEN>) id 1hNMFe-0008FN-BO
for 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 14:52:43 -0400
Received: from pelzflorian.localdomain (unknown [5.45.111.108])
by mail.pelzflorian.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD15E360038;
Sun, 5 May 2019 20:52:30 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pelzflorian.de;
s=mail; t=1557082350;
bh=Pl2zvj/CBsr2rpM9yTWZQZpS0hxir/1J6saEx24B80w=;
h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To;
b=zm5YRDWVEcAGNMbGU1KaB815w5M1T84COuYYu3ZZZQ8xEGDoJWyI/MhbgwY3Fmmyf
QBNgs/jyGQLgK1eW02IU/l8Z34CQa9R8COyxg+OW92R7yK0FXhB2krj+W1PtwImk8K
0SQOwV9UszIPHOZBaRaEA9DyXJ43OMGKkBTO/bJ8=
Date: Sun, 5 May 2019 20:52:30 +0200
From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@HIDDEN>
To: Raghav Gururajan <rvgn@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#35586: GNOME
Message-ID: <20190505185230.bofz6ewln5gs7vde@HIDDEN>
References: <c99df64bf65aed4210c059cc2ff5628129be9abc.camel@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <c99df64bf65aed4210c059cc2ff5628129be9abc.camel@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35586
Cc: 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 02:20:39PM -0400, Raghav Gururajan wrote:
> Hello Guix!
>
> Based on the mail-list thread "https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-
> guix/2019-05/msg00124.html", it appears that there is a bug, where some
> GNOME Core Applications are actually packaged in guix but have not been
> included in guix's "gnome" package.
>
Thank you for doing something about this!
> found out that the following gnome core application packages are indeed
> packaged in guix, but have not been included in guix's gnome package.
>
> gnome-calendar
> gnome-clocks
> gnome-common
> gnome-desktop
gnome-common and gnome-desktop are libraries, not core applications.
> gnome-dictionary
> gnome-doc-utils
gnome-doc-utils is not a core application.
> gnome-icon-theme
> gnome-klotski
> gnome-maps
> gnome-mime-data
> gnome-mines
> gnome-mpv
gnome-mpv is not core.
> gnome-planner
> gnome-screenshot
> gnome-shell-extensions
> gnome-sudoku
> gnome-todo
> gnome-tweak-tool
> gnome-vfs
I don’t quite know, is gnome-vfs the same as gvfs?
> gnome-video-effects
>
This appears to be a codec pack or something (?), not an application.
> The following gnome core applications are also already packaged in guix
> but requires correct renaming before adding to guix's gnome package?
>
> rhythmbox --> gnome-music
> shotwell --> gnome-photos
>
Parabola GNU/Linux-libre packaging shows that these are not the same
app and should not be renamed.
[florian@pelzflorian ~]$ pacman -Ss shotwell
community/shotwell 2:0.30.4-1
A digital photo organizer designed for the GNOME desktop environment
[florian@pelzflorian ~]$ pacman -Ss gnome-photos
extra/gnome-photos 3.32.0-1 (gnome)
Access, organize, and share your photos on GNOME
[florian@pelzflorian ~]$ pacman -Ss rhythmbox
extra/rhythmbox 3.4.3-1
Music playback and management application
community/ario 1.6-1
A GTK client for MPD inspired by Rhythmbox but much lighter and faster
[florian@pelzflorian ~]$ pacman -Ss gnome-music
extra/gnome-music 1:3.32.1-1 (gnome)
Music player and management application
> The following gnome core applications have already been included in
> guix's gnome package but requires correct renaming?
>
> epiphany --> gnome-web
> envice --> gnome-documents
> eog --> gnome-images
> file-roller --> gnome-autoar
> gedit --> gnome-text
> nautilus --> gnome-files
>
Well, they have two names and others frequently refer to them by
e.g. Epiphany and not GNOME Web, including Epiphany developers.
Of course, there are more non-packaged applications.
I also remember
https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2016/09/21/gnome-3-22-core-apps/
who says, for example, that gnome-tweaks is *not* core.
> I really hope if the above modifications are made, it will fulfill the
> actual description of guix's gnome package (http://guix.gnu.org/package
> s/gnome-3.28.2/). ☺
>
Yes, I agree, that should be the goal.
Regards,
Florian
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#35586; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2019 18:20:56 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 05 14:20:56 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54815 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hNLku-0007Q0-EB for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 14:20:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:32776) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rvgn@HIDDEN>) id 1hNLks-0007Po-VR for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 14:20:55 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:47101) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rvgn@HIDDEN>) id 1hNLkn-0001q5-KO for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 14:20:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47156) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rvgn@HIDDEN>) id 1hNLkm-0000Z4-HI for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sun, 05 May 2019 14:20:49 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rvgn@HIDDEN>) id 1hNLkk-0001iQ-NE for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sun, 05 May 2019 14:20:48 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:56984) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rvgn@HIDDEN>) id 1hNLkk-0001cI-HM for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sun, 05 May 2019 14:20:46 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3303083E for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Sun, 5 May 2019 20:20:43 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1MdtCi7sX5gN for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Sun, 5 May 2019 20:20:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <c99df64bf65aed4210c059cc2ff5628129be9abc.camel@HIDDEN> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1557080441; bh=PlZYSaNNquD2l7wBsdym3gfbeePBlXy64yrRb+Wa+EA=; h=Subject:From:To:Date; b=Rc5j7KkCpBQ4ZV0JSqRIowmwSyHiVSLqePNrqe69CYL86sf+qTzu4xp0y7jixcy3z rA0d+/3ZkUqL4woR9LNMNk15Tk6zwcEcQ66E3To95IvZy0h4aIZKReHBG1f6aWUnkW k5nmLBevDK4iIBkYJzwvYl0eN/RwpW6skGI2j9N1XSjrTcSrIMXXq08JhHsI/HpMAI pmNV6YbkFuSqhN+8txOivIlpjAeF1auvlsgAVbz8sd6WDLzLddCoqCqEpYOQ/6QHu0 x8Lh/CQo9HTOyIwp8YSwFLgFFPZ5UXu7PYFjYxDJ7t39AIbssiRTGLsM+EGE8zsV2+ TqDzyWZTxwsAw== Subject: GNOME From: Raghav Gururajan <rvgn@HIDDEN> To: bug-guix@HIDDEN Date: Sun, 05 May 2019 14:20:39 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 178.21.23.139 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Hello Guix! Based on the mail-list thread "https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help- guix/2019-05/msg00124.html", it appears that there is a bug, where some GNOME Core Applications are actually packaged in guix but have not been included in guix's "gnome" package. So I did [guix search "gnome-*"] and cross-checked the results with guix's gnome package source (https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git /tree/gnu/packages/gnome.scm?id=3Dv0.16.0-5851-g5f83b5153a#n6422); and found out that the following gnome core application packages are indeed packaged in guix, but have not been included in guix's gnome package.=20 gnome-calendar gnome-clocks gnome-common gnome-desktop gnome-dictionary gnome-doc-utils gnome-icon-theme gnome-klotski gnome-maps gnome-mime-data gnome-mines gnome-mpv gnome-planner gnome-screenshot gnome-shell-extensions gnome-sudoku gnome-todo gnome-tweak-tool gnome-vfs gnome-video-effects The following gnome core applications are also already packaged in guix but requires correct renaming before adding to guix's gnome package? rhythmbox --> gnome-music shotwell --> gnome-photos The following gnome core applications have already been included in guix's gnome package but requires correct renaming? epiphany --> gnome-web envice --> gnome-documents eog --> gnome-images file-roller --> gnome-autoar gedit --> gnome-text nautilus --> gnome-files I really hope if the above modifications are made, it will fulfill the actual description of guix's gnome package (http://guix.gnu.org/package s/gnome-3.28.2/). =E2=98=BA Thank you! Regards, RG.
Raghav Gururajan <rvgn@HIDDEN>:bug-guix@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#35586; Package guix.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.