Received: (at 43521) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2023 21:09:21 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 04 16:09:21 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35883 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rAGBt-0002gj-G3 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2023 16:09:21 -0500 Received: from laurent.telenet-ops.be ([2a02:1800:110:4::f00:19]:53864) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <maximedevos@HIDDEN>) id 1rAGBr-0002gX-Tz for 43521 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2023 16:09:20 -0500 Received: from [IPV6:2a02:1808:2:a5fe:5d8b:d2e7:7d3e:1aa1] ([IPv6:2a02:1808:2:a5fe:5d8b:d2e7:7d3e:1aa1]) by laurent.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id JM8x2B0094LPd0U01M911w; Mon, 04 Dec 2023 22:09:03 +0100 Message-ID: <b91d8f8b-71f0-75ec-9f46-2b04ac310fad@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 22:08:56 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Content-Language: en-US To: 43521 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: ports.test "non-revealed port is closed" breaks other tests Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------nrMQuwyL0OK0mEn8mpksc3ji" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r23; t=1701724143; bh=iAReFfLbzEwAayPf6VcVU6WQrPtyaB7FniIKskZo4LE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject; b=AVcxmNyk9dv34tBu1rHcXAnRBS7CZ7Gcd5fZd3f2rRBwgQ1+FDhB0txjflGTPcex/ hHrZLNkKDQpAYHGQrdXsgX45y9q5TOEQgNpfqqKZdA1+H0fR7YcyLwMAezzVlq9C+R oWZXu+vgbcyH6KWVxjbAXGpnNkOkXGIkP4ujPDrjFxEBIbtidSiZNCx4KiHCCHnTe4 oOpYNld1NW69ge4V1kAVby0EvEJSSfFfplTCoh+Rnmu/FD5KgCTUfLov+mTh7i3CVK O67v2yHefYLoOG7pVMDV5AovKNmdj0eLFz9vDVwhFem6hR0Tweiu2XCWQZSPGRXw5I xa/Zwa+GAq1bA== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43521 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --------------nrMQuwyL0OK0mEn8mpksc3ji Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------on1kS3wbV9vax3gozbSsxKTg"; protected-headers="v1" From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN> To: 43521 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <b91d8f8b-71f0-75ec-9f46-2b04ac310fad@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: ports.test "non-revealed port is closed" breaks other tests --------------on1kS3wbV9vax3gozbSsxKTg Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------Kv8ZLEfNk9Pv5HB9aIGmryj7" --------------Kv8ZLEfNk9Pv5HB9aIGmryj7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 UXVvdGluZyBteXNlbGYsIGFzIHRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZSBhcHBlYXJzIHRvIGhhdmUgYmVlbiBp Z25vcmVkIGZvciAxIHllYXIgDQphbmQgMjU4IGRheXM6DQoNCj4gTG9va3MgbGlrZSBpdCBo YXMgYmVlbiByZXNvbHZlZCBub3csIHNlZQ0KPiB0aGUgY29tbWl0IGJ5IFJvYiBCcm93aW5n Og0KPiA8aHR0cHM6Ly9naXQuc2F2YW5uYWguZ251Lm9yZy9jZ2l0L2d1aWxlLmdpdC9jb21t aXQvP2lkPTZlODJhNDUxNmFlNTk3ZDhmMWI2NGMyODMxYmYxNGYxODk5ZjQwYWQ+DQo+IA0K PiBEbyB3ZSBjbG9zZSB0aGUgaXNzdWUgbm93LCBvciBvbmx5IGF0IHRoZSBuZXh0IHJlbGVh c2U/DQo+IA0KPiBUaGFua3MsDQo+IE1heGltZS4NCg0KDQo= --------------Kv8ZLEfNk9Pv5HB9aIGmryj7 Content-Type: application/pgp-keys; name="OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP public key Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- xjMEX4ch6BYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdANPb/d6MrGnGi5HyvODCkBUJPRjiFQcRU5V+m xvMaAa/NL01heGltZSBEZXZvcyA8bWF4aW1lLmRldm9zQHN0dWRlbnQua3VsZXV2 ZW4uYmU+wpAEExYIADgWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCX4ch6AIbAwUL CQgHAwUVCgkICwUWAgMBAAIeAQIXgAAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7japAQC3opZ2KGWzWmRc /gIWSu0AAcfMwyinFEEPa/QhUt2CogD/e2RdF4CYAgaRHJJmZ9WU7piKbLZ7llB4 LzgezVDHggzNJU1heGltZSBEZXZvcyA8bWF4aW1lZGV2b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZT7C kAQTFggAOBYhBMHzPuIMUo/bfdcBH0nj7iIZFyXuBQJf56ycAhsDBQsJCAcDBRUK CQgLBRYCAwEAAh4BAheAAAoJEEnj7iIZFyXujpQBAKV1SwDDl4f24rXciDlB9L8W ycZt30CgbewMSRQk4mvbAP9dFMbVVixYBd6C8cfhR+NsOBGiOJnQABlUmgNuqGFJ Dc44BF+HIegSCisGAQQBl1UBBQEBB0BOlzIWiJzgobMF6/cqwLaLk7jIcFSZ++c0 k9cCNT6YXwMBCAfCeAQYFggAIBYhBMHzPuIMUo/bfdcBH0nj7iIZFyXuBQJfhyHo AhsMAAoJEEnj7iIZFyXuMr0BAJc8cl5PGvVmVuSQVKjleNl4DK1/XAaPAYPe34AE fZJPAP9IqLCQhH/FeJanHqBP8gNdGNI2qn8RnnLVfRJgUjZ1BA=3D=3D =3DOVqp -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- --------------Kv8ZLEfNk9Pv5HB9aIGmryj7-- --------------on1kS3wbV9vax3gozbSsxKTg-- --------------nrMQuwyL0OK0mEn8mpksc3ji Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wnsEABYIACMWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCZW4/6AUDAAAAAAAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7oXP AQDaah95BsEGvCIeZSUTx9msZMfo0giR33jdTqyuaADeYAD/fAbzoqzJPH3/IY/bu3U4gQxyPH8/ OwxLp18WcSDuWQE= =gSQV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------nrMQuwyL0OK0mEn8mpksc3ji--
bug-guile@HIDDEN:bug#43521; Package guile.
Full text available.Received: (at 43521) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Mar 2022 21:54:55 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 20 17:54:55 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35250 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1nW3Vn-000065-5e for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2022 17:54:55 -0400 Received: from michel.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.88]:42430) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <maximedevos@HIDDEN>) id 1nW3Vl-00005w-8x for 43521 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2022 17:54:53 -0400 Received: from ptr-bvsjgyhxw7psv60dyze.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:3c5f:2eff:feb0:ba5a]) by michel.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id 8lur270084UW6Th06lurHj; Sun, 20 Mar 2022 22:54:51 +0100 Message-ID: <4a2fd1b280d203111466c5da3827a6cae3318227.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: ports.test "non-revealed port is closed" breaks other tests From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN> To: 43521 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2022 22:54:46 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-WK6RKsCgigFvS5fev+0/" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r22; t=1647813291; bh=OMcWuc4DWbLyrxUKwHwxLNPNgpf+i/cZjzjW0HyZomc=; h=Subject:From:To:Date; b=exVm6do4PAe6yJdVKP9fDAG8hJK/wWsfdjMhy25IBZkACcVNh0pygREwn0Q8ZKHdG 3km5uYD1multtaJo6uK4Va2zV9Bx10vbJ9Jbnyh/0Lhg71SILCTRm9c7XTRlmWSDQV cpdaSRGVm/I3rKDfB6samEdjomEbksV0EKUlXbUTeA+89Ro9Ziqdc5RbkKP6g3WCc1 t6RqF5HjBGyiAs9fi9wWW5EoV4ceNiovIrrhayGF9lXw1hjtAAeDIDhp4mnsV2NzU/ 7w9xdzllGOETAR6CdOFaG9vUNpS6lLRqAq2QhCJX3FiG9fejCXFSd/dAPcQi8GwFYQ k4l8TEsmwf2tg== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43521 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-WK6RKsCgigFvS5fev+0/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Looks like it has been resolved now, see the commit by Rob Browing: <https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/commit/?id=3D6e82a4516ae597d8f= 1b64c2831bf14f1899f40ad> Do we close the issue now, or only at the next release? Thanks, Maxime. --=-WK6RKsCgigFvS5fev+0/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYjeiphccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7iftAP9Kif6nMTaB3AUwYuwt4O92LeUW C9zlmriaw7E2C7ATkAEAym0B84m1iZeVJkJBsSEyxdR8s+w3rULOcSSIfcqJ9gc= =BRxa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-WK6RKsCgigFvS5fev+0/--
bug-guile@HIDDEN:bug#43521; Package guile.
Full text available.Received: (at 43521) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jul 2021 11:05:39 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 19 07:05:39 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58148 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1m5R5f-00061Q-1a for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 07:05:39 -0400 Received: from laurent.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.89]:34386) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <maximedevos@HIDDEN>) id 1m5R5V-00060p-60 for 43521 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 07:05:30 -0400 Received: from ptr-bvsjgyjmffd7q9timvx.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:aaf1:9810:a0b8:a55d]) by laurent.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id Wz5T2500G0mfAB401z5TAQ; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 13:05:27 +0200 Message-ID: <0ca8049ef1812d2d4079d57c5c9fb9ea874abc4d.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98non-revealed?= port is =?UTF-8?Q?closed=E2=80=99?= test case is already fixed From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN> To: 45788 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 43521 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 48389 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 13:05:21 +0200 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-25/RywgJR9JKgoPNdiwz" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r21; t=1626692727; bh=rZ8ZwGT55LtJQp78wZ08AmHc5IwCyC/4uiLgOc9RhBk=; h=Subject:From:To:Date; b=ZSX9B/Dvic5NW0XspeEttM+224RDuxpuGfHJGwpA66h22eTgWulgTSqd/v62XePIX 6wQFpkDM7nf7vJGMBPWUm1QrbZw3kP0UOTSne7+JSSyhtic+vddce44WBvhDm680E+ 5UO67WH9HREmnLizkkR/WQ7EGputQVpk120VZzzOZ+M8hFAV8zd7r5o1U4vOMfvh31 ypeDb/FrVDcHaq0oBfOaCs5XdSDrXy+dVaPT9wqvPmoducOOez+PSHiVCFuZYX9Gu3 fk9cbn9ACt3uXpYkygyAVXLjhf+oGosmP3zPfN/vrUacdygvvaZE3FOWXCDqn0ciWT HQPT5N4oKPyOg== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43521 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-25/RywgJR9JKgoPNdiwz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi guilers and guix, I (and some other people) encountered this bug: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D43521#11 https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D45788 https://issues.guix.gnu.org/48389#8 There is already a fix: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D43521#11 Apparently it is already applied on Debian: https://salsa.debian.org/rlb/deb-guile/-/commit/9fae58b134d8951e15b39b8e175= 1160a245228a6 https://salsa.debian.org/rlb/deb-guile/-/blob/f24ab0150132d906b9724128576c3= 6c39361cab7/debian/patches/0007-Fix-non-revealed-port-is-closed-ports.test.= patch Maybe it can be applied now on 'main'?=20 Also, could it be added to the 'patches' in Guix? Greetings, Maxime. --=-25/RywgJR9JKgoPNdiwz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYPVccRccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7rVeAQDMgKFXqRr2qm32DypkLzXnDhdA 64HqcDXM5wx6fidxkwD+IiuO58YfdwKqfSQe6uM9f5WxH0g6Q45MbWxX8Q/hzAs= =gjmC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-25/RywgJR9JKgoPNdiwz--
bug-guile@HIDDEN:bug#43521; Package guile.
Full text available.Received: (at 43521) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jan 2021 15:14:49 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 11 10:14:49 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57805 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1kyyu8-00070a-Sw for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:14:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55638) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1kyyu7-00070P-L9 for 43521 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:14:48 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38072) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1kyyu2-0003KI-73; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:14:42 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:d54b:f4e5:4687:8012] (port=51332 helo=cervin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1kyyu1-00035s-4Y; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:14:41 -0500 From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN> To: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#43521: ports.test "non-revealed port is closed" breaks other tests References: <87ft7d601y.fsf@HIDDEN> <87d02h5zlt.fsf@HIDDEN> <87a6xl5wl3.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:14:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87a6xl5wl3.fsf@HIDDEN> (Rob Browning's message of "Sat, 19 Sep 2020 15:40:40 -0500") Message-ID: <87a6tf5wv4.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43521 Cc: 43521 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello Rob, > I ended up doing that for now: > > https://salsa.debian.org/rlb/deb-guile/-/commit/9fae58b134d8951e15b39b8e1751160a245228a6 Nice catch! I had the exact same issue, reported here: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=45788. Except for a small typo: s/subseuquent/subsequent, your fix looks good to me, and could by applied mainline I think. Thanks, Mathieu
bug-guile@HIDDEN:bug#43521; Package guile.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2020 20:40:47 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 19 16:40:47 2020 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48219 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1kJjf5-0000Di-6H for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 16:40:47 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:49312) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1kJjf4-0000Db-4j for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 16:40:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41638) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1kJjf3-0003ox-99 for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 16:40:45 -0400 Received: from defaultvalue.org ([45.33.119.55]:37508) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1kJjf1-00065X-Fn for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 16:40:44 -0400 Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: rlb@HIDDEN) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4809420147 for <bug-guile@HIDDEN>; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 15:40:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E30BB14E072; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 15:40:40 -0500 (CDT) From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> To: bug-guile@HIDDEN Subject: Re: ports.test "non-revealed port is closed" breaks other tests In-Reply-To: <87d02h5zlt.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <87ft7d601y.fsf@HIDDEN> <87d02h5zlt.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 15:40:40 -0500 Message-ID: <87a6xl5wl3.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.33.119.55; envelope-from=rlb@HIDDEN; helo=defaultvalue.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/19 15:25:46 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> writes: > ...and I'd have to think about it more carefully, but if dropping > the close-fdes call would completely prevent any subsequent test from > re-using the fd unsafely before the lingering port is collected, then > perhaps that's one potential fix. I ended up doing that for now: https://salsa.debian.org/rlb/deb-guile/-/commit/9fae58b134d8951e15b39b8e1751160a245228a6 -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
bug-guile@HIDDEN:bug#43521; Package guile.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2020 19:35:31 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 19 15:35:31 2020 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48155 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1kJidv-00075O-La for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 15:35:31 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:58372) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1kJidu-00075H-TV for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 15:35:31 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59822) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1kJidu-0007sa-Lh for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 15:35:30 -0400 Received: from defaultvalue.org ([45.33.119.55]:37504) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1kJids-00077H-8i for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 15:35:30 -0400 Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: rlb@HIDDEN) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0FCC92008E for <bug-guile@HIDDEN>; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 14:35:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9A8E614E072; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 14:35:26 -0500 (CDT) From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> To: bug-guile@HIDDEN Subject: Re: ports.test "non-revealed port is closed" breaks other tests In-Reply-To: <87ft7d601y.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <87ft7d601y.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 14:35:26 -0500 Message-ID: <87d02h5zlt.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.33.119.55; envelope-from=rlb@HIDDEN; helo=defaultvalue.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/19 15:25:46 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> writes: > I believe the problem is that if the gc doesn't collect the port when > the test calls (gc), then the test (which recognizes that possibility) > calls close-fdes on the underlying fd. However, the port still exists, > and it may be garbage collected later, during a test that's using the > same fd, which may break that test. ...and I'd have to think about it more carefully, but if dropping the close-fdes call would completely prevent any subsequent test from re-using the fd unsafely before the lingering port is collected, then perhaps that's one potential fix. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
bug-guile@HIDDEN:bug#43521; Package guile.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2020 19:26:11 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 19 15:26:11 2020 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48141 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1kJiUl-0006qT-Fy for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 15:26:11 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:54336) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1kJiUj-0006q2-91 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 15:26:02 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58178) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1kJiUi-0005Px-RT for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 15:26:01 -0400 Received: from defaultvalue.org ([45.33.119.55]:37502) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1kJiUb-0005yG-NS for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 15:26:00 -0400 Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: rlb@HIDDEN) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 334A720147 for <bug-guile@HIDDEN>; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 14:25:46 -0500 (CDT) Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B23D014E072; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 14:25:45 -0500 (CDT) From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> To: bug-guile@HIDDEN Subject: ports.test "non-revealed port is closed" breaks other tests Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 14:25:45 -0500 Message-ID: <87ft7d601y.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.33.119.55; envelope-from=rlb@HIDDEN; helo=defaultvalue.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/19 15:25:46 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) I think the "non-revealed port is closed" test can break other tests, depending on the gc's behavior. At the moment this is easy to reproduce for some reason (presumably differing gc behavior) on the Debian s390x machines. I believe the problem is that if the gc doesn't collect the port when the test calls (gc), then the test (which recognizes that possibility) calls close-fdes on the underlying fd. However, the port still exists, and it may be garbage collected later, during a test that's using the same fd, which may break that test. I did add some low-level fprintf diagnostics which confirmed that exact behavior. i.e. one of the subsequent tests would call (gc), and I could see that the old port object (identified by the %p pointer) from the earlier "non-revealed port is closed" test, closed the fd which broke the the current test when it attempted a seek on the fd that should still be open. For now, I've just commented out the test in the Debian packages, and unless some other arrangements can be made, suspect we might want to do the same thing in Guile itself. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>:bug-guile@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-guile@HIDDEN:bug#43521; Package guile.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.