Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.
Received: (at 46124) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2021 12:08:44 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 14 08:08:44 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45228 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1lhWcW-0004Jy-69
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 08:08:44 -0400
Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:33804
helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <public@HIDDEN>) id 1lhWcU-0004Jd-B5
for 46124 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 08:08:43 -0400
From: Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz;
s=mail; t=1620994114;
bh=dhZmUesfwQf7d8SOkpHCERxwBqRNtNJYDTp4MgcJNXE=;
h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date;
b=KsLSQ5pW3mxw4//cMtrCybPw9wIb1nZLJmPVIJMg2YG3PnrkzinzzS4dJXiGKRF1s
oPJWvV7t5JuXNZi+cnRnlymyylgIoB59R2IwS1Dyxn0sO7AAqL59uFUpcyX74AFsaq
fGlBDjHlJx7zTX+Liimz6ll09TxT3HgKlVAWPk+E=
To: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#46124] [PATCH] Idris 2
In-Reply-To: <20210511234734.5cf190af@HIDDEN>
References: <20210127064337.6a226301@HIDDEN>
<87r1j267c6.fsf@HIDDEN> <20210426172240.683c4c2b@HIDDEN>
<5003aa160dc82b35b06e60d425a09309199e1670.camel@HIDDEN>
<20210429204317.7e3a707c@HIDDEN> <87im44nprp.fsf@HIDDEN>
<20210503041044.13358182@HIDDEN> <87mttae83x.fsf@HIDDEN>
<20210511234734.5cf190af@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 14:08:33 +0200
Message-ID: <87o8ddjz5q.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: On Tue, May 11 2021,
raingloom wrote: >> >> [1]: >>
https://github.com/nixos/nixpkgs/blob//pkgs/development/compilers/idris2/default.nix#L41
> > That link doesn't work. Sorry, this one should work
Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)]
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD
0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with
dynamic-looking rDNS
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46124
Cc: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>, 46124 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: On Tue, May 11 2021, raingloom wrote: >> >> [1]: >> https://github.com/nixos/nixpkgs/blob//pkgs/development/compilers/idris2/default.nix#L41
> > That link doesn't work. Sorry, this one should work
Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)]
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD
1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD
0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with
dynamic-looking rDNS
-1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
manager
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, May 11 2021, raingloom wrote:
>>=20
>> [1]:
>> https://github.com/nixos/nixpkgs/blob//pkgs/development/compilers/idris2=
/default.nix#L41
>
> That link doesn't work.
Sorry, this one should work=20
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/8284fc30c84ea47e63209d1a892aca1dfcd=
6bdf3/pkgs/development/compilers/idris2/default.nix#L35
=20=20
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=ZkQf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#46124; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 46124) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2021 14:53:14 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 12 10:53:14 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40042 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1lgqEb-0002J0-Nj
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 May 2021 10:53:13 -0400
Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:37056)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1lgqEZ-0002Il-9M
for 46124 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 May 2021 10:53:13 -0400
Received: from fews1.riseup.net (fews1-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.83])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "*.riseup.net",
Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FgHpT4m5VzF24f;
Wed, 12 May 2021 07:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
t=1620831185; bh=KwjS3xLJujLLGLf/4PiCf504b242XAGZubNshuhA/Ck=;
h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
b=pMiKYbgMS6zpWcvMUZyl3cbXDYC5F80NavP418bcKLEmx6eFbwKwqdpFeaprdmItQ
eUZMtpm5gYkNlULrY2evJ/CkfdArF8h1PxMjzBV1AChCYAhCoWZesUmQ4ZKp96vbDg
LoiwasTl60KYe44lPOkL/K6MLMblnAH97fJ/h1fI=
X-Riseup-User-ID: F833FE360E2DD37859E1CAF8B482937B694DAEE1B8894AF35D7DBFEA25DCF19B
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FgHpS4Vcsz5vcH;
Wed, 12 May 2021 07:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 23:47:34 +0200
From: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
To: Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#46124] [PATCH] Idris 2
Message-ID: <20210511234734.5cf190af@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87mttae83x.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <20210127064337.6a226301@HIDDEN> <87r1j267c6.fsf@HIDDEN>
<20210426172240.683c4c2b@HIDDEN>
<5003aa160dc82b35b06e60d425a09309199e1670.camel@HIDDEN>
<20210429204317.7e3a707c@HIDDEN> <87im44nprp.fsf@HIDDEN>
<20210503041044.13358182@HIDDEN> <87mttae83x.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: On Tue,
04 May 2021 19:12:18 +0200 Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN>
wrote: > On Mon, May 03 2021, raingloom wrote: > > > On Fri, 30 Apr 2021
10:24:42 +0200 > > Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN> wrote: > > > >> On Thu,
Apr 29 2021, raingloom wrote: > >> > >> > Here is the up [...]
Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.8 DATE_IN_PAST_12_24 Date: is 12 to 24 hours before Received: date
2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
-0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
low trust [198.252.153.129 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3)
[198.252.153.129 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46124
Cc: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>, 46124 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: On Tue, 04 May 2021 19:12:18 +0200 Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN>
wrote: > On Mon, May 03 2021, raingloom wrote: > > > On Fri, 30 Apr 2021
10:24:42 +0200 > > Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN> wrote: > > > >> On Thu,
Apr 29 2021, raingloom wrote: > >> > >> > Here is the up [...]
Content analysis details: (1.1 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
low trust
[198.252.153.129 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3)
[198.252.153.129 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
0.8 DATE_IN_PAST_12_24 Date: is 12 to 24 hours before Received: date
2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders
-1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
manager
On Tue, 04 May 2021 19:12:18 +0200
Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN> wrote:
> On Mon, May 03 2021, raingloom wrote:
>=20
> > On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 10:24:42 +0200
> > Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN> wrote:
> > =20
> >> On Thu, Apr 29 2021, raingloom wrote:
> >> =20
> >> > Here is the updated patch. No idea if this actually works cross
> >> > compiled, but I don't have much time to test it. My suspicion is
> >> > that it's likely broken and requires changes to Idris 2's code
> >> > generators, because they almost definitely call Chez, GCC, etc,
> >> > with the wrong arguments. =20
> >>=20
> >> I noticed that there is an =E2=80=98idris2_app=E2=80=99 directory in t=
he =E2=80=98bin=E2=80=99
> >> directory
> >>=20
> >> $ ls /gnu/store/va62hzp46c3dp2vlcnqc7fg109axj8rq-idris2-0.3.0/bin
> >> idris2* idris2_app/
> >>=20
> >> What is this used for? =20
> >
> > If you take a look at $(guix build idris2)/bin/idris2, it's actually
> > just a wrapper. It contains the supporting dynamically linked shared
> > objects and the executable itself.
> >
> > I don't know the details of what each file does or why it's like
> > this, the codegen seems to use a similar structure for all
> > backends. The scheme files are probably all for the Chez backend,
> > the shared objects are either C libraries (for socket support and
> > stuff), or compiled Chez code. I just noticed the Racket script,
> > that I have no idea about.
> >
> > Idris 2's build system makes some... uhm... interesting choices, so
> > it's entirely possible that not all of those are necessary, or
> > could be moved somewhere more sensible. =20
>=20
> Looking at the Nix package, they remove the wrapper and instead move
> bin/idris2_app/idris2.so to bin/idris2 and wraps that executable[1].
> Perhaps we could do the same thing? I am not familiar with Idris,
> though.
>=20
> [1]:
> https://github.com/nixos/nixpkgs/blob//pkgs/development/compilers/idris2/=
default.nix#L41
That link doesn't work.
I have some more pressing projects to work on, but I'll look into it.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#46124; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 46124) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2021 17:12:30 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 04 13:12:30 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54364 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1ldyb0-0003bS-8E
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 13:12:30 -0400
Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:54754
helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <public@HIDDEN>) id 1ldyaw-0003bL-T4
for 46124 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 13:12:29 -0400
From: Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz;
s=mail; t=1620148339;
bh=z4tAIrwX1y2UAWOSinUVmGptDet1iJxgtBtTWEGfbyM=;
h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date;
b=GP9k01kn7lMU8yApUNRQaiTRDXTW5n1KodSJFUoArGJP7zL/aTMoxTI0B32rkLYyC
TQS4RJnA9TkkRw8HaoasxSfWlxNq0ROYukjrO04N373Qpja7ccDNO9XTb7GhcyXvkL
qyJHz8CHXd+sjzmtgGpTubZOj4HOjda3wzXUNwGk=
To: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#46124] [PATCH] Idris 2
In-Reply-To: <20210503041044.13358182@HIDDEN>
References: <20210127064337.6a226301@HIDDEN>
<87r1j267c6.fsf@HIDDEN> <20210426172240.683c4c2b@HIDDEN>
<5003aa160dc82b35b06e60d425a09309199e1670.camel@HIDDEN>
<20210429204317.7e3a707c@HIDDEN> <87im44nprp.fsf@HIDDEN>
<20210503041044.13358182@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 19:12:18 +0200
Message-ID: <87mttae83x.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: On Mon, May 03 2021, raingloom wrote: > On Fri, 30 Apr 2021
10:24:42 +0200 > Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN> wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr
29 2021, raingloom wrote: >> >> > Here is the updated patch. No idea if this
actually works cross >> > [...]
Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)]
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with
dynamic-looking rDNS 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46124
Cc: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>, 46124 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: On Mon, May 03 2021, raingloom wrote: > On Fri, 30 Apr 2021
10:24:42 +0200 > Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN> wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr
29 2021, raingloom wrote: >> >> > Here is the updated patch. No idea if this
actually works cross >> > [...]
Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)]
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with
dynamic-looking rDNS
0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD
1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD
-1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
manager
On Mon, May 03 2021, raingloom wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 10:24:42 +0200
> Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 29 2021, raingloom wrote:
>>=20
>> > Here is the updated patch. No idea if this actually works cross
>> > compiled, but I don't have much time to test it. My suspicion is
>> > that it's likely broken and requires changes to Idris 2's code
>> > generators, because they almost definitely call Chez, GCC, etc,
>> > with the wrong arguments.=20=20
>>=20
>> I noticed that there is an =E2=80=98idris2_app=E2=80=99 directory in the=
=E2=80=98bin=E2=80=99
>> directory
>>=20
>> $ ls /gnu/store/va62hzp46c3dp2vlcnqc7fg109axj8rq-idris2-0.3.0/bin
>> idris2* idris2_app/
>>=20
>> What is this used for?
>
> If you take a look at $(guix build idris2)/bin/idris2, it's actually
> just a wrapper. It contains the supporting dynamically linked shared
> objects and the executable itself.
>
> I don't know the details of what each file does or why it's like this,
> the codegen seems to use a similar structure for all backends. The
> scheme files are probably all for the Chez backend, the shared objects
> are either C libraries (for socket support and stuff), or compiled Chez
> code. I just noticed the Racket script, that I have no idea about.
>
> Idris 2's build system makes some... uhm... interesting choices, so
> it's entirely possible that not all of those are necessary, or could be
> moved somewhere more sensible.
Looking at the Nix package, they remove the wrapper and instead move
bin/idris2_app/idris2.so to bin/idris2 and wraps that executable[1].
Perhaps we could do the same thing? I am not familiar with Idris,
though.
[1]: https://github.com/nixos/nixpkgs/blob//pkgs/development/compilers/idri=
s2/default.nix#L41
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#46124; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 46124) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2021 09:07:03 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 03 05:07:02 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46209 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1ldUXe-0001WT-3X
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 05:07:02 -0400
Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:55938)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1ldUXZ-0001Vx-K8
for 46124 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 05:07:00 -0400
Received: from fews1.riseup.net (fews1-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.83])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "*.riseup.net",
Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FYcY80x9VzDqCq;
Mon, 3 May 2021 02:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
t=1620032812; bh=Xj0mXdlPCpBF/jE2mnzQ9pRHhGtssEH+L01pUTYHg+4=;
h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
b=jmgMcmiXQvKlcW9gSZs6QrTMKqUAmWi2kRRP2AX/4CE4l/cwOWxJ/h/mhz0CycIOW
4SgQgdSyl9t1ulrABPM5H/Ysj407fSqYSkcRn03A/nNS3PcEO/iXJUEQnSQQQ+vVR8
xPKfLnvG3auo3YFGMokb0Zh0+RC4PivfvE5Wu1RM=
X-Riseup-User-ID: 41ADFC538ACE53CC682C99CD2FCB2A9AD5CEBB8F6D0E115F355DD9B6E04CAD90
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FYcY66Mxdz5vRy;
Mon, 3 May 2021 02:06:50 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 04:10:44 +0200
From: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
To: Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#46124] [PATCH] Idris 2
Message-ID: <20210503041044.13358182@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87im44nprp.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <20210127064337.6a226301@HIDDEN> <87r1j267c6.fsf@HIDDEN>
<20210426172240.683c4c2b@HIDDEN>
<5003aa160dc82b35b06e60d425a09309199e1670.camel@HIDDEN>
<20210429204317.7e3a707c@HIDDEN> <87im44nprp.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 2.4 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: On Fri,
30 Apr 2021 10:24:42 +0200 Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN>
wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29 2021, raingloom wrote: > > > Here is the updated
patch. No idea if this actually works cross > > compiled, but I don't have
much time to test it. My suspicion is > > that it's likely [...]
Content analysis details: (2.4 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
low trust [198.252.153.129 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)]
1.1 DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours before Received: date
-0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3)
[198.252.153.129 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
-0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46124
Cc: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>, 46124 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 10:24:42 +0200 Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN>
wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29 2021, raingloom wrote: > > > Here is the updated
patch. No idea if this actually works cross > > compiled, but I don't have
much time to test it. My suspicion is > > that it's likely [...]
Content analysis details: (1.4 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
low trust
[198.252.153.129 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3)
[198.252.153.129 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)]
1.1 DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours before Received: date
-0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders
-1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
manager
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 10:24:42 +0200
Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29 2021, raingloom wrote:
>=20
> > Here is the updated patch. No idea if this actually works cross
> > compiled, but I don't have much time to test it. My suspicion is
> > that it's likely broken and requires changes to Idris 2's code
> > generators, because they almost definitely call Chez, GCC, etc,
> > with the wrong arguments. =20
>=20
> I noticed that there is an =E2=80=98idris2_app=E2=80=99 directory in the =
=E2=80=98bin=E2=80=99
> directory
>=20
> $ ls /gnu/store/va62hzp46c3dp2vlcnqc7fg109axj8rq-idris2-0.3.0/bin
> idris2* idris2_app/
>=20
> What is this used for?
>=20
If you take a look at $(guix build idris2)/bin/idris2, it's actually
just a wrapper. It contains the supporting dynamically linked shared
objects and the executable itself.
I don't know the details of what each file does or why it's like this,
the codegen seems to use a similar structure for all backends. The
scheme files are probably all for the Chez backend, the shared objects
are either C libraries (for socket support and stuff), or compiled Chez
code. I just noticed the Racket script, that I have no idea about.
Idris 2's build system makes some... uhm... interesting choices, so
it's entirely possible that not all of those are necessary, or could be
moved somewhere more sensible.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#46124; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 46124) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2021 08:51:05 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Apr 30 04:51:05 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57455 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1lcOrZ-0005tj-C0 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:51:05 -0400 Received: from laurent.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.89]:53396) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <maximedevos@HIDDEN>) id 1lcOrV-0005tH-Hc for 46124 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:51:04 -0400 Received: from ptr-bvsjgyjmffd7q9timvx.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:aaf1:9810:a0b8:a55d]) by laurent.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id ywqz2400H0mfAB401wqzyk; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 10:50:59 +0200 Message-ID: <f6728a87fd3de484c16935273bb7ddf5ec656636.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#46124] [PATCH] Idris 2 From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN> To: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 10:50:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20210429204317.7e3a707c@HIDDEN> References: <20210127064337.6a226301@HIDDEN> <87r1j267c6.fsf@HIDDEN> <20210426172240.683c4c2b@HIDDEN> <5003aa160dc82b35b06e60d425a09309199e1670.camel@HIDDEN> <20210429204317.7e3a707c@HIDDEN> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-eegqEHnuNfQ5EQVOsGsM" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r21; t=1619772659; bh=wByehzKXMQo/tsneKo60ycPEXln53M5SSIbsK2ZUuIA=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=kfl0U68WUKC2SQ3g3hWGphwCym8l7iiEDxAdAgdTn23q1fEyNekPkzPX7SWqks6kB J6dp62u2kXiCzZrTKKM9J7sT+oGX4s7wV6zEKhXpwvW2R0Ue7EozxivULTT+vC8Vvx K2nmszy/iYvV9LVJ1MO1HMBrKjHcGJDllbc+nLSnIwA0tRnvCatIYS1hFUdpKMIdbR HpZfYG94F0tCqnuMvO4ROlckN7fSnU1Wp8fm+sBbRnkUTMm3yrp2h2dXDHNy3irm9W L9PKeLuYT/D8yoOk/ItFmdZDpkKXCIVRlF6ztwQJi2YCeyZBeLWT2BHEU/CmblLer0 6hwsyG3qTVrOA== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46124 Cc: Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN>, 46124 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-eegqEHnuNfQ5EQVOsGsM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable raingloom schreef op do 29-04-2021 om 20:43 [+0200]: > On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:27:39 +0200 > Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN> wrote: >=20 > > raingloom schreef op ma 26-04-2021 om 17:22 [+0200]: > > > [...] > > >=20 > > > + ;; TODO detect toolchain > > > + "CC=3Dgcc"))) =20 > >=20 > > Unless idris has a compiler built in that uses gcc for compiling > > idris to machine code, this should likely be > > ,(string-append "CC=3D" (cc-for-target)) instead, such that the > > cross-compiler is used when cross-compiling. > >=20 > > [...] > Oh, that's a leftover, I was using clang for a while, since it's > said to use less RAM. I switched back to gcc and left that in. >=20 > Here is the updated patch. No idea if this actually works cross > compiled, but I don't have much time to test it. IIUC, cross-compilation is not required to be supported by each package in guix. It is something nice-to-have, but not strictly required. Greetings, Maxime. --=-eegqEHnuNfQ5EQVOsGsM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYIvE6xccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7lbgAP9K3rd7WywkbN9sXQRo5g133gvs wB/gM4kgG1twdqJWLwEAzvg8wNd2oAlo8Hw/jmbS8mJJfvAQFydiM5V5c9PpLAI= =O2R1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-eegqEHnuNfQ5EQVOsGsM--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#46124; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 46124) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2021 08:24:55 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Apr 30 04:24:55 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57429 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1lcOSF-0005GP-MS
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:24:55 -0400
Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:38208
helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <public@HIDDEN>) id 1lcOSD-0005G7-GL
for 46124 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:24:54 -0400
From: Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz;
s=mail; t=1619771084;
bh=HuLMjJSAHea+ZMyVTFbLBptJSvzsOcE8sraxUKPXLgE=;
h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date;
b=OK/O/Cqh62+VdV3REVBMlzllGzR3L0NQabYQJpDuZvHGGChhh6S9ic1a7kaYrBJLN
ZhY1VmWeX9mfRdejeESfRHskmlwjRQjEQdjRq3UpD/M884c045ST6/SXqYKd87buWk
BSTz5/lB7OLXCwS/WU7yNcNrT08l7o9bhHLzR1yQ=
To: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>, Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#46124] [PATCH] Idris 2
In-Reply-To: <20210429204317.7e3a707c@HIDDEN>
References: <20210127064337.6a226301@HIDDEN>
<87r1j267c6.fsf@HIDDEN> <20210426172240.683c4c2b@HIDDEN>
<5003aa160dc82b35b06e60d425a09309199e1670.camel@HIDDEN>
<20210429204317.7e3a707c@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 10:24:42 +0200
Message-ID: <87im44nprp.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: On Thu, Apr 29 2021, raingloom wrote: > Here is the updated
patch. No idea if this actually works cross > compiled, but I don't have
much time to test it. My suspicion is that > it's likely broken and requires
changes to Idris 2's code ge [...]
Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with
dynamic-looking rDNS 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46124
Cc: 46124 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: On Thu, Apr 29 2021, raingloom wrote: > Here is the updated
patch. No idea if this actually works cross > compiled, but I don't have
much time to test it. My suspicion is that > it's likely broken and requires
changes to Idris 2's code ge [...]
Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD
0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with
dynamic-looking rDNS
0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD
-1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
manager
On Thu, Apr 29 2021, raingloom wrote:
> Here is the updated patch. No idea if this actually works cross
> compiled, but I don't have much time to test it. My suspicion is that
> it's likely broken and requires changes to Idris 2's code generators,
> because they almost definitely call Chez, GCC, etc, with the wrong
> arguments.
I noticed that there is an =E2=80=98idris2_app=E2=80=99 directory in the =
=E2=80=98bin=E2=80=99 directory
$ ls /gnu/store/va62hzp46c3dp2vlcnqc7fg109axj8rq-idris2-0.3.0/bin
idris2* idris2_app/
What is this used for?
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#46124; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 46124) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2021 23:20:56 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 29 19:20:56 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57065 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1lcFxn-00071H-Tc
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 19:20:56 -0400
Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:49854)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1lcFxi-00070o-8d
for 46124 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 19:20:53 -0400
Received: from fews2.riseup.net (fews2-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.84])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "*.riseup.net",
Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FWWhD5djYzF2pM;
Thu, 29 Apr 2021 16:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Riseup-User-ID: A85BAEA94A02D06A71FF8650C4D829F7C74316CA3801AADC06C1C60B29709618
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by fews2.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FWWhC3Zy6z1yS8;
Thu, 29 Apr 2021 16:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 20:43:17 +0200
From: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#46124] [PATCH] Idris 2
Message-ID: <20210429204317.7e3a707c@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <5003aa160dc82b35b06e60d425a09309199e1670.camel@HIDDEN>
References: <20210127064337.6a226301@HIDDEN> <87r1j267c6.fsf@HIDDEN>
<20210426172240.683c4c2b@HIDDEN>
<5003aa160dc82b35b06e60d425a09309199e1670.camel@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="MP_/X7RxX_rpJMU.w8Ngt.a7fAX"
X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46124
Cc: Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN>, 46124 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
--MP_/X7RxX_rpJMU.w8Ngt.a7fAX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:27:39 +0200
Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN> wrote:
> raingloom schreef op ma 26-04-2021 om 17:22 [+0200]:
> > There hasn't been a tagged release since then, so I'm sending my
> > original patch, but I should note that in my channel I've been
> > tracking the latest commit, which does seem to work, although it's
> > been a while since I used Idris for anything complicated.
> >
> > + ;; TODO detect toolchain
> > + "CC=gcc")))
>
> Unless idris has a compiler built in that uses gcc for compiling
> idris to machine code, this should likely be
> ,(string-append "CC=" (cc-for-target)) instead, such that the
> cross-compiler is used when cross-compiling.
>
> Teaching (cc-for-target) to detect which toolchain should be used
> is a separate matter. Maybe it could be a macro that looks at
> (package-native-inputs this-package) or something.
>
> Greetings,
> Maxime.
Oh, that's a leftover, I was using clang for a while, since it's
said to use less RAM. I switched back to gcc and left that in.
Here is the updated patch. No idea if this actually works cross
compiled, but I don't have much time to test it. My suspicion is that
it's likely broken and requires changes to Idris 2's code generators,
because they almost definitely call Chez, GCC, etc, with the wrong
arguments.
--MP_/X7RxX_rpJMU.w8Ngt.a7fAX
Content-Type: text/x-patch
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=0001-gnu-Added-Idris-2.patch
From e3c942454af34879393d073be755fa53390891bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 06:21:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Added Idris 2.
* gnu/packages/idris.scm (idris2): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/idris.scm | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/idris.scm b/gnu/packages/idris.scm
index ca2772b904..da66f7b0d8 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/idris.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/idris.scm
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
(define-module (gnu packages idris)
#:use-module (gnu packages)
+ #:use-module (gnu packages bash)
+ #:use-module (gnu packages chez)
#:use-module (gnu packages haskell-check)
#:use-module (gnu packages haskell-web)
#:use-module (gnu packages haskell-xyz)
@@ -28,12 +30,15 @@
#:use-module (gnu packages multiprecision)
#:use-module (gnu packages ncurses)
#:use-module (gnu packages perl)
+ #:use-module (gnu packages python)
+ #:use-module (gnu packages sphinx)
#:use-module (guix build-system gnu)
#:use-module (guix build-system haskell)
#:use-module (guix download)
#:use-module (guix git-download)
#:use-module ((guix licenses) #:prefix license:)
- #:use-module (guix packages))
+ #:use-module (guix packages)
+ #:use-module (ice-9 regex))
(define-public idris
(package
@@ -150,6 +155,79 @@ can be specified precisely in the type. The language is closely related to
Epigram and Agda.")
(license license:bsd-3)))
+(define-public idris2
+ (package
+ (name "idris2")
+ (version "0.3.0")
+ (source (origin
+ (method git-fetch)
+ (uri (git-reference
+ (url "https://github.com/idris-lang/Idris2")
+ (commit (string-append "v" version))))
+ (sha256
+ (base32
+ "0sa2lpb7n6xqfknwld9rzm4bnb6qcd0ja1n63cnc5v8wdzr8q7kh"))))
+ (build-system gnu-build-system)
+ (arguments
+ `(#:tests? #f ;; they are run as part of other targets
+ #:phases
+ (modify-phases
+ %standard-phases
+ (add-after 'unpack 'patch-paths
+ (lambda* (#:key outputs inputs #:allow-other-keys)
+ (substitute* "config.mk"
+ ((,(regexp-quote "PREFIX ?= $(HOME)/.idris2"))
+ (string-append "PREFIX = "
+ (assoc-ref outputs "out"))))
+ (for-each
+ (lambda (f)
+ (substitute* f
+ ((,(regexp-quote "#!/bin/sh"))
+ (string-append "#!" (assoc-ref inputs "sh")
+ "/bin/sh"))))
+ (list "src/Compiler/Scheme/Chez.idr"
+ "src/Compiler/Scheme/Racket.idr"
+ "bootstrap/idris2_app/idris2.rkt"
+ "bootstrap/idris2_app/idris2.ss"))))
+ ;; this is not the kind of bootstrap we want to run
+ (delete 'bootstrap)
+ (delete 'configure)
+ (replace 'build
+ (lambda _
+ (invoke "make" "bootstrap"
+ "SCHEME=scheme"
+ ;; TODO detect toolchain
+ ,(string-append "CC=" (cc-for-target)))))
+ (add-after 'build 'build-doc
+ (lambda _
+ (with-directory-excursion
+ "docs"
+ (invoke "make" "html"))))
+ (add-after 'install 'install-doc
+ (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
+ (copy-recursively
+ "docs/build/html"
+ (string-append
+ (assoc-ref outputs "out")
+ "/share/doc/"
+ ,name "-" ,version)))))))
+ (inputs
+ `(("sh" ,bash-minimal)
+ ("chez-scheme" ,chez-scheme)))
+ (native-inputs
+ `(("python-sphinx" ,python-sphinx)
+ ("python-sphinx-rtd-theme" ,python-sphinx-rtd-theme)
+ ("python" ,python)))
+ (home-page "https://idris-lang.org/")
+ (synopsis "A dependently typed programming language, a successor to Idris")
+ (description
+ "Idris 2 is a general purpose language with dependent linear types.
+It is compiled, with eager evaluation. Dependent types allow types to
+be predicated on values, meaning that some aspects of a program's behaviour
+can be specified precisely in the type. It can use multiple languages as code
+generation backends.")
+ (license license:bsd-3)))
+
;; Idris modules use the gnu-build-system so that the IDRIS_LIBRARY_PATH is set.
(define (idris-default-arguments name)
`(#:modules ((guix build gnu-build-system)
--
2.31.1
--MP_/X7RxX_rpJMU.w8Ngt.a7fAX--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#46124; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 46124) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Apr 2021 21:27:50 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 26 17:27:49 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47412 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1lb8lh-0006ut-M4 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 17:27:49 -0400 Received: from baptiste.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.51]:52926) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <maximedevos@HIDDEN>) id 1lb8le-0006ui-CT for 46124 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 17:27:47 -0400 Received: from ptr-bvsjgyjmffd7q9timvx.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:aaf1:9810:a0b8:a55d]) by baptiste.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id xZTk240070mfAB401ZTksh; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:27:44 +0200 Message-ID: <5003aa160dc82b35b06e60d425a09309199e1670.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#46124] [PATCH] Idris 2 From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN> To: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>, Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:27:39 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20210426172240.683c4c2b@HIDDEN> References: <20210127064337.6a226301@HIDDEN> <87r1j267c6.fsf@HIDDEN> <20210426172240.683c4c2b@HIDDEN> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+ECGZ9mk7Seq81Ss302w" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r21; t=1619472464; bh=C0ZabV06I83s7HJGWgfesFuW2VWAR1Pk6c+bAL2eKrA=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=aYTN0MNhNvFcTJGJdfOGqzGEMu42V0tQuJLwatUrGf9bw3lYg4PE2FZjW4p+lQv9S R6XVWHXwKLMavlMucpG9geoFtH7W3LxujzUV/XbqSEe9dCEO4XhfS5VGIbyF+A8MVn XWs2bL4eWa3iGDkiPC7qo4/vTr2fEQmP995TzUluyufF2qTrSlFYxPQpR/MsZeMA3G /6T/SY1QzArb0W/kEkCDgRdzN5Jbped5apdpdWnZla7eivveWG5Otm5gDRbFZmpM+s KC2LhTwpe6WZBC324wh3x/HYJc6CQmVCsntXBiPfUVdZnbl76mePRFDKGk8zSLE2h7 iZdIGhcuj1e/w== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46124 Cc: 46124 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-+ECGZ9mk7Seq81Ss302w Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable raingloom schreef op ma 26-04-2021 om 17:22 [+0200]: > There hasn't been a tagged release since then, so I'm sending my > original patch, but I should note that in my channel I've been tracking > the latest commit, which does seem to work, although it's been a while > since I used Idris for anything complicated. >=20 > + ;; TODO detect toolchain > + "CC=3Dgcc"))) Unless idris has a compiler built in that uses gcc for compiling idris to machine code, this should likely be ,(string-append "CC=3D" (cc-for-target)) instead, such that the cross-compiler is used when cross-compiling. Teaching (cc-for-target) to detect which toolchain should be used is a separate matter. Maybe it could be a macro that looks at (package-native-inputs this-package) or something. Greetings, Maxime. --=-+ECGZ9mk7Seq81Ss302w Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYIcwSxccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7ou8AP9bagGIjCuIbHAiN1XmNgTMzlXr ix9XJKe7v5D9uIVqFwEA95EeNJSEiX9jM8QBH4KAsrvNtbh+rQYznhbxAG1MeAo= =qTHC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-+ECGZ9mk7Seq81Ss302w--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#46124; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 46124) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Apr 2021 20:46:14 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 26 16:46:14 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47333 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1lb87R-0005tU-QV
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 16:46:14 -0400
Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:39342)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1lb87H-0005sC-6i
for 46124 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 16:46:06 -0400
Received: from fews1.riseup.net (fews1-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.83])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "*.riseup.net",
Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FTcP64W7lzDqgQ;
Mon, 26 Apr 2021 13:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Riseup-User-ID: 67A3C5CC5B40807FD571DE8A7D773202A220DF8DD7985CD49E850154237E3F10
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FTcP56fRTz5w4h;
Mon, 26 Apr 2021 13:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 17:22:40 +0200
From: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
To: Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#46124] [PATCH] Idris 2
Message-ID: <20210426172240.683c4c2b@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87r1j267c6.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <20210127064337.6a226301@HIDDEN> <87r1j267c6.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="MP_/=J6D/.pR/cuCeavvn7rp8qV"
X-Spam-Score: 2.4 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: On Thu,
22 Apr 2021 10:39:53 +0200 Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN>
wrote: > I think you forgot the attach the patch. ;) > Ah heck. That might
have been the case. Here it is.
Content analysis details: (2.4 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3)
[198.252.153.129 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
-0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
low trust [198.252.153.129 listed in list.dnswl.org]
2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)]
1.1 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46124
Cc: 46124 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:39:53 +0200 Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN>
wrote: > I think you forgot the attach the patch. ;) > Ah heck. That might
have been the case. Here it is.
Content analysis details: (1.4 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3)
[198.252.153.129 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
-0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
low trust
[198.252.153.129 listed in list.dnswl.org]
2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)]
1.1 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders
-1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
manager
--MP_/=J6D/.pR/cuCeavvn7rp8qV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:39:53 +0200
Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN> wrote:
> I think you forgot the attach the patch. ;)
>
Ah heck. That might have been the case.
Here it is.
There hasn't been a tagged release since then, so I'm sending my
original patch, but I should note that in my channel I've been tracking
the latest commit, which does seem to work, although it's been a while
since I used Idris for anything complicated.
--MP_/=J6D/.pR/cuCeavvn7rp8qV
Content-Type: text/x-patch
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=0001-gnu-Added-Idris-2.patch
From 7554e53ad682e5baa40fee0776ab88cffc1a7772 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 06:21:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Added Idris 2.
* gnu/packages/idris.scm (idris2): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/idris.scm | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/idris.scm b/gnu/packages/idris.scm
index ca2772b904..14de2762a1 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/idris.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/idris.scm
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
(define-module (gnu packages idris)
#:use-module (gnu packages)
+ #:use-module (gnu packages bash)
+ #:use-module (gnu packages chez)
#:use-module (gnu packages haskell-check)
#:use-module (gnu packages haskell-web)
#:use-module (gnu packages haskell-xyz)
@@ -28,12 +30,15 @@
#:use-module (gnu packages multiprecision)
#:use-module (gnu packages ncurses)
#:use-module (gnu packages perl)
+ #:use-module (gnu packages python)
+ #:use-module (gnu packages sphinx)
#:use-module (guix build-system gnu)
#:use-module (guix build-system haskell)
#:use-module (guix download)
#:use-module (guix git-download)
#:use-module ((guix licenses) #:prefix license:)
- #:use-module (guix packages))
+ #:use-module (guix packages)
+ #:use-module (ice-9 regex))
(define-public idris
(package
@@ -150,6 +155,79 @@ can be specified precisely in the type. The language is closely related to
Epigram and Agda.")
(license license:bsd-3)))
+(define-public idris2
+ (package
+ (name "idris2")
+ (version "0.3.0")
+ (source (origin
+ (method git-fetch)
+ (uri (git-reference
+ (url "https://github.com/idris-lang/Idris2")
+ (commit (string-append "v" version))))
+ (sha256
+ (base32
+ "0sa2lpb7n6xqfknwld9rzm4bnb6qcd0ja1n63cnc5v8wdzr8q7kh"))))
+ (build-system gnu-build-system)
+ (arguments
+ `(#:tests? #f ;; they are run as part of other targets
+ #:phases
+ (modify-phases
+ %standard-phases
+ (add-after 'unpack 'patch-paths
+ (lambda* (#:key outputs inputs #:allow-other-keys)
+ (substitute* "config.mk"
+ ((,(regexp-quote "PREFIX ?= $(HOME)/.idris2"))
+ (string-append "PREFIX = "
+ (assoc-ref outputs "out"))))
+ (for-each
+ (lambda (f)
+ (substitute* f
+ ((,(regexp-quote "#!/bin/sh"))
+ (string-append "#!" (assoc-ref inputs "sh")
+ "/bin/sh"))))
+ (list "src/Compiler/Scheme/Chez.idr"
+ "src/Compiler/Scheme/Racket.idr"
+ "bootstrap/idris2_app/idris2.rkt"
+ "bootstrap/idris2_app/idris2.ss"))))
+ ;; this is not the kind of bootstrap we want to run
+ (delete 'bootstrap)
+ (delete 'configure)
+ (replace 'build
+ (lambda _
+ (invoke "make" "bootstrap"
+ "SCHEME=scheme"
+ ;; TODO detect toolchain
+ "CC=gcc")))
+ (add-after 'build 'build-doc
+ (lambda _
+ (with-directory-excursion
+ "docs"
+ (invoke "make" "html"))))
+ (add-after 'install 'install-doc
+ (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
+ (copy-recursively
+ "docs/build/html"
+ (string-append
+ (assoc-ref outputs "out")
+ "/share/doc/"
+ ,name "-" ,version)))))))
+ (inputs
+ `(("sh" ,bash-minimal)
+ ("chez-scheme" ,chez-scheme)))
+ (native-inputs
+ `(("python-sphinx" ,python-sphinx)
+ ("python-sphinx-rtd-theme" ,python-sphinx-rtd-theme)
+ ("python" ,python)))
+ (home-page "https://idris-lang.org/")
+ (synopsis "A dependently typed programming language, a successor to Idris")
+ (description
+ "Idris 2 is a general purpose language with dependent linear types.
+It is compiled, with eager evaluation. Dependent types allow types to
+be predicated on values, meaning that some aspects of a program's behaviour
+can be specified precisely in the type. It can use multiple languages as code
+generation backends.")
+ (license license:bsd-3)))
+
;; Idris modules use the gnu-build-system so that the IDRIS_LIBRARY_PATH is set.
(define (idris-default-arguments name)
`(#:modules ((guix build gnu-build-system)
--
2.31.1
--MP_/=J6D/.pR/cuCeavvn7rp8qV--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#46124; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2021 06:31:57 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 27 01:31:57 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43468 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1l4eMu-00063j-OD for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 01:31:57 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:53426) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1l4eMr-000615-Mf for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 01:31:54 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46082) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1l4eMq-0005oT-RI for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 01:31:53 -0500 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:42308) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1l4eMo-0007Fk-B7 for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 01:31:52 -0500 Received: from fews1.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.83]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DQYfV0lh9zFdtV for <guix-patches@HIDDEN>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 22:31:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1611729106; bh=7zdSXsWWuB7e3t41wohuMyt05BMJmiaORR3SannEAEI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=RytrKUKmhd25vrYExuSpWwTCCXp6/oOW+ah30ESulYLrbonWy9B5ZdZHrG+Ek5IzU 5cldwzbV1NqHH51HcG3/HaMYrzUrk9Z5F3H218LQ3TARvFveZApBwNZQPmTotJNt+K U7j7qQymALQLPgJ90mKncV5Fw3p+UbcuNgR+iJbw= X-Riseup-User-ID: 1C9A1DACFC11D9DEDC54C2F630DC1A35FF850E777CA9251D062000E093E4723A Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DQYfT2sYMz5wFM for <guix-patches@HIDDEN>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 22:31:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 06:43:37 +0100 From: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN> To: Guix Patches <guix-patches@HIDDEN> Subject: [PATCH] Idris 2 Message-ID: <20210127064337.6a226301@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129; envelope-from=raingloom@HIDDEN; helo=mx1.riseup.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Now that Idris 2 has had some proper tagged releases, I thought I'd move it from my channel to Guix proper. I've been using this package for quite a few months now and it pretty much works. REPL works, building things works. Couldn't try IDE functionality but I suppose it probably works if you can set it up in Vim. That reminds me, I still haven't packaged the Vim mode, but I don't use Vim so I don't really know its module system. ## Still TODO for the package: search paths: There are no 3rd party Idris 2 modules yet, but it should be done soon. output prefix weirdness: Output is a bit odd, having an idris2-0.3.0 directory in its root, but since this is Guix, I suppose that's not really a problem. Everything else is in its proper place, in bin, lib, and share. clang-toolchain support: Right now CC=gcc is hardcoded. Auto detection would be preferable. bootstrap: Right now it's bootstrapped from auto-generated Chez or Racket. It **can** be built with Idris 1, but it uses such on obscene amount of RAM that I refuse to consider building it that way ever again. If someone wants to incorporate that step into Guix, they are free to do so. Or we could generate it once and then freeze it and use it as an input. Just leave my poor laptop out of it, it already suffered enough. And probably leave the CI infrastructure out of it too. ## Bigger TODO: Build system. Eventually it will need one. Considering that it has multiple code generation backends, this is not trivial, as each backend uses a different existing language, the official ones (that I can remember right now) being: * Chez * Racket * Gambit * Chicken * JavaScript/Node * C It might also make sense to compile Idris 2 itself with different backends. It "officially" supports bootstrapping with Chez and Racket, but others might be possible too. Anyways, here's the patch, have fun with it, and/or suggest changes, etc!
raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>:guix-patches@HIDDEN.
Full text available.guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#46124; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.