GNU logs - #6737, boring messages

Message sent to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#6737: 24.0.50; Feature request for vc-annotate.el
Resent-From: aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN (Aneesh Kumar K.V)
Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 05:24:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.6737.B.12802082156511 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 6737 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN (Aneesh Kumar K.V)
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1-58-g6607fd6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.50.1
	(i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:53:29 +0530
Message-ID: <m3sk354hwu.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Precedence: list
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org


It would be nice to support incremental blame support in vc-annotate.el.
Currently we have to wait for the full blame information before the
annotate buffer is available. git blame support incremental blame
feature which should be used to imporve the user experience. A similar
implementation can be found at git://git.bunkus.org/mo-git-blame.git

-aneesh

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN (Aneesh Kumar K.V)
Subject: bug#6737: Acknowledgement (24.0.50; Feature request for
 vc-annotate.el)
Message-ID: <handler.6737.B.12802082156511.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <m3sk354hwu.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 6737
X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
Reply-To: 6737 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 05:24:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with GNU.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 6737 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
6737: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D6737
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#6737: Any update ?
Resent-From: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:09:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.6737.B6737.12877457004316 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 6737 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <handler.6737.B.12802082156511.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <m3sk354hwu.fsf@HIDDEN>
	<handler.6737.B.12802082156511.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1-90-g8071c5c (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.50.1
	(i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:42:04 +0530
Message-ID: <m3eibixz0b.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org


Any update on this bug ? For a source repo with large history this
really make the annotation slow. There is a example of how do to do this
in elisp at 

http://www.bunkus.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=mo-git-blame.git;a=summary

-aneesh

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#6737: 24.0.50; Feature request for vc-annotate.el
Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:34:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.6737.B6737.162270924013324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN (Aneesh Kumar K.V)
Cc: 6737 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
References: <m3sk354hwu.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 10:33:48 +0200
In-Reply-To: <m3sk354hwu.fsf@HIDDEN> (Aneesh Kumar K. V.'s message
 of "Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:53:29 +0530")
Message-ID: <87fsxz8hzn.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN (Aneesh Kumar K.V) writes:

> It would be nice to support incremental blame support in vc-annotate.el.
> Currently we have to wait for the full blame information before the
> annotate buffer is available. git blame support incremental blame
> feature which should be used to imporve the user experience. A similar
> implementation can be found at git://git.bunkus.org/mo-git-blame.git

(I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately got no response at
the time.)

vc-annotate seems to work quite fast for me (even in huge files that
have decades-long histories, as in Emacs), so I'm not sure adding
support for incremental annotation would be worth it.

But perhaps changing the function to only work on the narrowed portion
of the buffer would be nice?  That way you could `C-x n d C-x v g' (for
instance) and get a very snappy annotation of just the current function,
for instance.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Message sent:

MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#6737: closed (24.0.50; Feature request for vc-annotate.el)
CC: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Message-ID: <handler.6737.D6737.174193268121786.ackdone <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <874izwxhtw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <m3sk354hwu.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: closed 6737
X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 06:12:02 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1741932722-21853-0"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1741932722-21853-0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Your message dated Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:11:07 +0800
with message-id <874izwxhtw.fsf@HIDDEN>
and subject line Re: bug#6737: 24.0.50; Feature request for vc-annotate.el
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #6737,
regarding 24.0.50; Feature request for vc-annotate.el
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@HIDDEN)


--=20
6737: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D6737
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

------------=_1741932722-21853-0
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jul 2010 05:23:35 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1Odcda-0001gy-4A
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:23:34 -0400
Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN>) id 1OdcdX-0001gs-PK
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:23:32 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:38717)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN>) id 1Odcde-0004L9-Oe
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:23:38 -0400
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=32997 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Odcdd-0007RF-8X
	for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:23:38 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN>) id 1Odcdb-0005EB-Tg
	for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:23:37 -0400
Received: from e23smtp06.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.148]:59812)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN>) id 1Odcdb-0005Dq-Cy
	for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:23:35 -0400
Received: from d23relay04.au.ibm.com (d23relay04.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.246])
	by e23smtp06.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o6R5NSdr018973
	for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:23:28 +1000
Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.138])
	by d23relay04.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id
	o6R5NW191605776
	for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:23:32 +1000
Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id
	o6R5NWHA031802
	for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:23:32 +1000
Received: from skywalker.linux.vnet.ibm.com ([9.124.35.77])
	by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id
	o6R5NUGV031752
	for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:23:31 +1000
From: aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN (Aneesh Kumar K.V)
To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Subject: 24.0.50; Feature request for vc-annotate.el
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1-58-g6607fd6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.50.1
	(i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:53:29 +0530
Message-ID: <m3sk354hwu.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older,
	4)
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6,
	seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/pipermail/debbugs-submit>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------)


It would be nice to support incremental blame support in vc-annotate.el.
Currently we have to wait for the full blame information before the
annotate buffer is available. git blame support incremental blame
feature which should be used to imporve the user experience. A similar
implementation can be found at git://git.bunkus.org/mo-git-blame.git

-aneesh



------------=_1741932722-21853-0
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at 6737-close) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Mar 2025 06:11:21 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59665 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tsyGP-0005fJ-0q
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2025 02:11:21 -0400
Received: from sendmail.purelymail.com ([34.202.193.197]:37288)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <spwhitton@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tsyGM-0005f0-Dt
 for 6737-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2025 02:11:19 -0400
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256;
 b=DQBDmLGGiJPGLd7GULUobeIKnU3w4+pF21xjPvOwe8pPdTQCa2kP+jJ4YHAgSE0t85VWb7CDa/pZdYYNOLNtJDdXxl5fPC32SrrJwkV14JOpYkDVG3TU5TF10+hdCAVytzhlB/hN58/nc4/bCmLCbiUDLLUIsC2WfSfDVurVXBxgB13yJtbSNu1RolNYnE0rNeOjzkrW/6dwPWmRpzid080FE9EOvmUHUho99wwaGDb4ZghH3PrcPwKbz25cJliBXD7NWN6mu0LAqvtQP3sJEYblt+9bSN6yXY+utLlEN0tsK4ROKb+2FCK6sR1oTpywda+EXdps25HOQSoiJjQ6UQ==;
 s=purelymail1; d=spwhitton.name; v=1;
 bh=jIfE2KW4i9pUdcR/5gG1JW5petYUpFY3xpe58Zuxl+U=;
 h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date; 
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256;
 b=Agiv34wKy8OhqWBx0N+nk2YPg8JLulNcinsWUF+KXLT+gOp+OG601EInL270qLdNB2EvzF05Coslu7Rjc6+mpSO5cHkGcVB5zyv18G0JH16EvgQ+v+wRZNRu3MCr5dhZizc5QEyKf3UCJ129nSiCUgu5COafnpTZqdeW+ENqDgS8uL7EkUy3740WtN3ef9plGjvXydomClHBIRro9ajTldVuKPdKSnz1g74xzWzRL1oaqRpD/mIN8580ra9ryNVafGiFurY4apjXWFLrYoIohCB1j3/YV+/8QMBIWhAnPbOe70n+6I9LwE70GqLKdWLbn+CriArnzbC6b9DwLCk/kA==;
 s=purelymail1; d=purelymail.com; v=1;
 bh=jIfE2KW4i9pUdcR/5gG1JW5petYUpFY3xpe58Zuxl+U=;
 h=Feedback-ID:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date; 
Feedback-ID: 20115:3760:null:purelymail
X-Pm-Original-To: 6737-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: by smtp.purelymail.com (Purelymail SMTP) with ESMTPSA id 627532976
 for <6737-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384);
 Fri, 14 Mar 2025 06:11:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by melete.silentflame.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 9B5F07EE81F; Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:11:07 +0800 (CST)
From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@HIDDEN>
To: 6737-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#6737: 24.0.50; Feature request for vc-annotate.el
In-Reply-To: <87fsxz8hzn.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <m3sk354hwu.fsf@HIDDEN> <87fsxz8hzn.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:11:07 +0800
Message-ID: <874izwxhtw.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6737-close
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hello,

On Thu 03 Jun 2021 at 10:33am +02, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:

> aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN (Aneesh Kumar K.V) writes:
>
>> It would be nice to support incremental blame support in vc-annotate.el.
>> Currently we have to wait for the full blame information before the
>> annotate buffer is available. git blame support incremental blame
>> feature which should be used to imporve the user experience. A similar
>> implementation can be found at git://git.bunkus.org/mo-git-blame.git
>
> (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately got no response at
> the time.)
>
> vc-annotate seems to work quite fast for me (even in huge files that
> have decades-long histories, as in Emacs), so I'm not sure adding
> support for incremental annotation would be worth it.
>
> But perhaps changing the function to only work on the narrowed portion
> of the buffer would be nice?  That way you could `C-x n d C-x v g' (for
> instance) and get a very snappy annotation of just the current function,
> for instance.

It's been fifteen years since the original report.  Git has probably had
numerous performance improvements made; machines have got faster; the
Git repository with sample code 404s; adding this incremental support
might complicate debugging.  So I'm closing this one.

-- 
Sean Whitton


------------=_1741932722-21853-0--

Message sent:

MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN (Aneesh Kumar K.V)
Subject: bug#6737: closed (Re: bug#6737: 24.0.50; Feature request for
 vc-annotate.el)
Message-ID: <handler.6737.D6737.174193268121786.notifdone <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <874izwxhtw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <m3sk354hwu.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 6737
X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
Reply-To: 6737 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 06:12:02 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1741932722-21853-1"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1741932722-21853-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Your bug report

#6737: 24.0.50; Feature request for vc-annotate.el

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 6737 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

--=20
6737: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D6737
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

------------=_1741932722-21853-1
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at 6737-close) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Mar 2025 06:11:21 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59665 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tsyGP-0005fJ-0q
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2025 02:11:21 -0400
Received: from sendmail.purelymail.com ([34.202.193.197]:37288)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <spwhitton@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tsyGM-0005f0-Dt
 for 6737-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2025 02:11:19 -0400
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256;
 b=DQBDmLGGiJPGLd7GULUobeIKnU3w4+pF21xjPvOwe8pPdTQCa2kP+jJ4YHAgSE0t85VWb7CDa/pZdYYNOLNtJDdXxl5fPC32SrrJwkV14JOpYkDVG3TU5TF10+hdCAVytzhlB/hN58/nc4/bCmLCbiUDLLUIsC2WfSfDVurVXBxgB13yJtbSNu1RolNYnE0rNeOjzkrW/6dwPWmRpzid080FE9EOvmUHUho99wwaGDb4ZghH3PrcPwKbz25cJliBXD7NWN6mu0LAqvtQP3sJEYblt+9bSN6yXY+utLlEN0tsK4ROKb+2FCK6sR1oTpywda+EXdps25HOQSoiJjQ6UQ==;
 s=purelymail1; d=spwhitton.name; v=1;
 bh=jIfE2KW4i9pUdcR/5gG1JW5petYUpFY3xpe58Zuxl+U=;
 h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date; 
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256;
 b=Agiv34wKy8OhqWBx0N+nk2YPg8JLulNcinsWUF+KXLT+gOp+OG601EInL270qLdNB2EvzF05Coslu7Rjc6+mpSO5cHkGcVB5zyv18G0JH16EvgQ+v+wRZNRu3MCr5dhZizc5QEyKf3UCJ129nSiCUgu5COafnpTZqdeW+ENqDgS8uL7EkUy3740WtN3ef9plGjvXydomClHBIRro9ajTldVuKPdKSnz1g74xzWzRL1oaqRpD/mIN8580ra9ryNVafGiFurY4apjXWFLrYoIohCB1j3/YV+/8QMBIWhAnPbOe70n+6I9LwE70GqLKdWLbn+CriArnzbC6b9DwLCk/kA==;
 s=purelymail1; d=purelymail.com; v=1;
 bh=jIfE2KW4i9pUdcR/5gG1JW5petYUpFY3xpe58Zuxl+U=;
 h=Feedback-ID:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date; 
Feedback-ID: 20115:3760:null:purelymail
X-Pm-Original-To: 6737-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: by smtp.purelymail.com (Purelymail SMTP) with ESMTPSA id 627532976
 for <6737-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384);
 Fri, 14 Mar 2025 06:11:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by melete.silentflame.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 9B5F07EE81F; Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:11:07 +0800 (CST)
From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@HIDDEN>
To: 6737-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#6737: 24.0.50; Feature request for vc-annotate.el
In-Reply-To: <87fsxz8hzn.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <m3sk354hwu.fsf@HIDDEN> <87fsxz8hzn.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:11:07 +0800
Message-ID: <874izwxhtw.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6737-close
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hello,

On Thu 03 Jun 2021 at 10:33am +02, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:

> aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN (Aneesh Kumar K.V) writes:
>
>> It would be nice to support incremental blame support in vc-annotate.el.
>> Currently we have to wait for the full blame information before the
>> annotate buffer is available. git blame support incremental blame
>> feature which should be used to imporve the user experience. A similar
>> implementation can be found at git://git.bunkus.org/mo-git-blame.git
>
> (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately got no response at
> the time.)
>
> vc-annotate seems to work quite fast for me (even in huge files that
> have decades-long histories, as in Emacs), so I'm not sure adding
> support for incremental annotation would be worth it.
>
> But perhaps changing the function to only work on the narrowed portion
> of the buffer would be nice?  That way you could `C-x n d C-x v g' (for
> instance) and get a very snappy annotation of just the current function,
> for instance.

It's been fifteen years since the original report.  Git has probably had
numerous performance improvements made; machines have got faster; the
Git repository with sample code 404s; adding this incremental support
might complicate debugging.  So I'm closing this one.

-- 
Sean Whitton


------------=_1741932722-21853-1
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jul 2010 05:23:35 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1Odcda-0001gy-4A
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:23:34 -0400
Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN>) id 1OdcdX-0001gs-PK
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:23:32 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:38717)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN>) id 1Odcde-0004L9-Oe
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:23:38 -0400
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=32997 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Odcdd-0007RF-8X
	for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:23:38 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN>) id 1Odcdb-0005EB-Tg
	for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:23:37 -0400
Received: from e23smtp06.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.148]:59812)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN>) id 1Odcdb-0005Dq-Cy
	for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:23:35 -0400
Received: from d23relay04.au.ibm.com (d23relay04.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.246])
	by e23smtp06.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o6R5NSdr018973
	for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:23:28 +1000
Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.138])
	by d23relay04.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id
	o6R5NW191605776
	for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:23:32 +1000
Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id
	o6R5NWHA031802
	for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:23:32 +1000
Received: from skywalker.linux.vnet.ibm.com ([9.124.35.77])
	by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id
	o6R5NUGV031752
	for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:23:31 +1000
From: aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN (Aneesh Kumar K.V)
To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Subject: 24.0.50; Feature request for vc-annotate.el
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1-58-g6607fd6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.50.1
	(i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:53:29 +0530
Message-ID: <m3sk354hwu.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older,
	4)
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6,
	seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/pipermail/debbugs-submit>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------)


It would be nice to support incremental blame support in vc-annotate.el.
Currently we have to wait for the full blame information before the
annotate buffer is available. git blame support incremental blame
feature which should be used to imporve the user experience. A similar
implementation can be found at git://git.bunkus.org/mo-git-blame.git

-aneesh



------------=_1741932722-21853-1--

Last modified: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 06:15:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.