GNU logs - #68818, boring messages


Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#68818: [PATCH] lisp/emacs-lisp/inline.el: Autoload public macros
Resent-From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:20:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.68818.B.170662074813634 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: report 68818
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: 68818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.170662074813634
          (code B ref -1); Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:20:01 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2024 13:19:08 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34582 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1rUo15-0003Xp-VX
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 08:19:08 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:39860)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <yantar92@HIDDEN>) id 1rUo14-0003X6-5S
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 08:19:06 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <yantar92@HIDDEN>)
 id 1rUo0d-0003HK-4b
 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 08:18:47 -0500
Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <yantar92@HIDDEN>)
 id 1rUo0P-0002ut-Gl
 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 08:18:28 -0500
Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) 
 by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 779E9240028
 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:18:21 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017;
 t=1706620701; bh=CnoRpNX/v5VbNzf22VryaLpAzwBkT+JiTTaQeE4bUwU=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:From;
 b=IaWB2PwpZc9xOjj048gfPSSc+vudc2HRLj/t/1Wi7ov/Q5PiQkE+8I+SDMQEZusIq
 ye8IuO2j5tpT4w34ypPbZPFKVMBisIcKRh4nh4+vYe9LOMVQUk0PFGzzIStWn9xJa+
 m5/8DcV7ae+ORtY/byIGmB29mc1E6u/TM8O4ZMLZF22BXLaa1dnq5UkuZlxG242ruD
 tyRuGvaHfvW1GLnT5/zx9gtiuylMwKnWP+Ha/TjnnRGY7NZhddecLcm/Xl2PoyYQkx
 oytw/osL56Gub/nFW31os01LmuQP06HWDTMdo6RbhydwWi0Y3aWtS8p8w0lfBiLuz5
 umA69lNheSIjQ==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4TPQhr4m7hz6tsb
 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:18:20 +0100 (CET)
From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:21:51 +0000
Message-ID: <871q9zvtw0.fsf@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@HIDDEN;
 helo=mout01.posteo.de
X-Spam_score_int: -43
X-Spam_score: -4.4
X-Spam_bar: ----
X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001,
 SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Tags: patch

Hello,

This patch solves annoying problem with `define-inline' forms not being
indented correctly unless inline.el is explicitly loaded.

For illustration, try to open the following foo.el file:

(define-inline org-element-type-p (node types)
  "Return non-nil when NODE type is one of TYPES.
TYPES can be a type symbol or a list of symbols."
  (if (inline-const-p types)
      (if (listp (inline-const-val types))
          (inline-quote (memq (org-element-type ,node t) ,types))
        (inline-quote (eq (org-element-type ,node t) ,types)))
    (inline-letevals (node types)
      (inline-quote
       (if (listp ,types)
           (memq (org-element-type ,node t) ,types)
         (eq (org-element-type ,node t) ,types))))))

with emacs -Q, indenting the file will yield different results with and
without executing (require 'inline).

With the patch, indentation becomes consistent.

In GNU Emacs 30.0.50 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version
 3.24.39, cairo version 1.18.0) of 2024-01-28 built on localhost
Repository revision: 5e9ef5d65aea4c278bb58cfc84ea22e7983385da
Repository branch: master
Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12101010
System Description: Gentoo Linux

Configured using:
 'configure JAVAC=/etc/java-config-2/current-system-vm/bin/javac'


--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/patch
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename=0001-lisp-emacs-lisp-inline.el-Autoload-public-macros.patch

From c6f64171998a00c017e9dae5d7c96ad6d277adb5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-ID: <c6f64171998a00c017e9dae5d7c96ad6d277adb5.1706620775.git.yantar92@HIDDEN>
From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:18:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] lisp/emacs-lisp/inline.el: Autoload public macros

* lisp/emacs-lisp/inline.el (inline-quote):
(inline-const-p):
(inline-const-val):
(inline-error):
(inline-letevals): Autoload macros that may appear inside
`define-inline'.  This is necessary to load the indentation rules when
Elisp code that uses `define-inline' is edited.
---
 lisp/emacs-lisp/inline.el | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/inline.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/inline.el
index c774296084e..af841c0458d 100644
--- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/inline.el
+++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/inline.el
@@ -69,21 +69,25 @@
 
 (require 'macroexp)
 
+;;;###autoload
 (defmacro inline-quote (_exp)
   "Similar to backquote, but quotes code and only accepts , and not ,@."
   (declare (debug (backquote-form)))
   (error "inline-quote can only be used within define-inline"))
 
+;;;###autoload
 (defmacro inline-const-p (_exp)
   "Return non-nil if the value of EXP is already known."
   (declare (debug t))
   (error "inline-const-p can only be used within define-inline"))
 
+;;;###autoload
 (defmacro inline-const-val (_exp)
   "Return the value of EXP."
   (declare (debug t))
   (error "inline-const-val can only be used within define-inline"))
 
+;;;###autoload
 (defmacro inline-error (_format &rest _args)
   "Signal an error."
   (declare (debug t))
@@ -100,6 +104,7 @@ inline--letlisteval
   ;; inline-letevals, so signal the error in terms of the user's code.
   (error "inline-letevals can only be used within define-inline"))
 
+;;;###autoload
 (defmacro inline-letevals (vars &rest body)
   "Make sure the expressions in VARS are evaluated.
 VARS should be a list of elements of the form (VAR EXP) or just VAR, in case
-- 
2.43.0


--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain


-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>

--=-=-=--




Message sent:


Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#68818: Acknowledgement ([PATCH] lisp/emacs-lisp/inline.el:
 Autoload public macros)
Message-ID: <handler.68818.B.170662074813634.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <871q9zvtw0.fsf@localhost>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 68818
X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
X-Gnu-PR-Keywords: patch
Reply-To: 68818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:20:01 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 68818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
68818: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D68818
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems


Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#68818: [PATCH] lisp/emacs-lisp/inline.el: Autoload public macros
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:11:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.68818.B68818.170662382119826 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68818
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@HIDDEN>, Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Cc: 68818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 68818-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B68818.170662382119826
          (code B ref 68818); Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:11:02 +0000
Received: (at 68818) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2024 14:10:21 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34675 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1rUoof-00059i-Go
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:10:21 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54156)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1rUood-00059O-At
 for 68818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:10:20 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1rUooL-0005l9-0c; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:10:02 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=vgGMClEh0aaQpO43caDGeJ2zSKCgUJi3WNbQzZM4C68=; b=VXW1BWftNPwf
 2cVddlZ/B9XJsWqSkftWPONSNyn55IwyV1ISVaT2iH03juZLxuDZ7x7nUYJXDHFW3FOYTtKiAaOjX
 8rkkTq8zhmZdun+Vp2FLWyh/O1QgscusNMYMIBRVezUVzBpfg7oCL2At2zELW71vXAtD1xj6VxiqQ
 KL4H+n1ykTv+WpYI5T2NGkw6GEOJF7s6r3dExqcKrzULZCBky+VYj+5/vpsghv0j0tt1pWvpGDwwa
 vcKfz805KqybuJnjvp0bj5w9YBPArtn/kQoJJ5dQljllZ/99CXuaN+HFCs3DuUMJt3LYXaHjigrGr
 pK6mwOw7qKZxKph/gALitg==;
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 16:09:52 +0200
Message-Id: <86cyti3ob3.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <871q9zvtw0.fsf@localhost> (message from Ihor Radchenko on Tue,
 30 Jan 2024 13:21:51 +0000)
References: <871q9zvtw0.fsf@localhost>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

> From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@HIDDEN>
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:21:51 +0000
> 
> This patch solves annoying problem with `define-inline' forms not being
> indented correctly unless inline.el is explicitly loaded.
> 
> For illustration, try to open the following foo.el file:
> 
> (define-inline org-element-type-p (node types)
>   "Return non-nil when NODE type is one of TYPES.
> TYPES can be a type symbol or a list of symbols."
>   (if (inline-const-p types)
>       (if (listp (inline-const-val types))
>           (inline-quote (memq (org-element-type ,node t) ,types))
>         (inline-quote (eq (org-element-type ,node t) ,types)))
>     (inline-letevals (node types)
>       (inline-quote
>        (if (listp ,types)
>            (memq (org-element-type ,node t) ,types)
>          (eq (org-element-type ,node t) ,types))))))
> 
> with emacs -Q, indenting the file will yield different results with and
> without executing (require 'inline).
> 
> With the patch, indentation becomes consistent.

Hmm, I wonder whether there's a less heavy-handed approach to this.

Stefan, any suggestions?




Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#68818: [PATCH] lisp/emacs-lisp/inline.el: Autoload public macros
Resent-From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:31:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.68818.B68818.170662505622180 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68818
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Cc: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@HIDDEN>, 68818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 68818-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B68818.170662505622180
          (code B ref 68818); Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:31:01 +0000
Received: (at 68818) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2024 14:30:56 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34720 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1rUp8Z-0005lg-GP
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:30:55 -0500
Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:45038)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>) id 1rUp8X-0005lR-VM
 for 68818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:30:54 -0500
Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8CA3A4412EA;
 Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:30:38 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca;
 s=mail; t=1706625037;
 bh=Y/KuTSZsMxYIvydyxDjgts1dWapbFxVztGA2gHQ/O1E=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
 b=W35JKyw4mBAxgTCCdfo12xoP26+6s27g0FnH/xc42oBHjh2AgyBKSII8IZ39TCLeO
 xmGBTSKKVC8Gkt9ToEEFfQ69cJ0nJiw2hny4ab0kJ62238iKrqyqSLjWqIzKDZW45N
 rluCBWfPhiQAaq2leKBo9k8CrUig2GGlwvSczMNKh6b92hWexw+nhWDUqW3FvjcF7+
 g5GNoE7Dj08CGoKKKWSU7TMCHa+prR9sUDDo7g5DPWdZ10lBSW0iEJoQ9i643gefPf
 KPw0BluvX3B/Q3fcgFfmyhQ6l/o0EDoral6O0dd2/VEnhVqTpRZxytVRmjQCLbb4AM
 NPu6TOrBF78/w==
Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1])
 by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 228054412DF;
 Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:30:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pastel (104-222-119-131.cpe.teksavvy.com [104.222.119.131])
 by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6E291204F5;
 Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:30:36 -0500 (EST)
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <86cyti3ob3.fsf@HIDDEN> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 30 Jan
 2024 16:09:52 +0200")
Message-ID: <jwvsf2eaof4.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
References: <871q9zvtw0.fsf@localhost> <86cyti3ob3.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:30:36 -0500
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results:  0
 ALL_TRUSTED                -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 AWL -0.221 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
 domain
 DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from
 domain T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
X-SPAM-LEVEL: 
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

>> This patch solves annoying problem with `define-inline' forms not being
>> indented correctly unless inline.el is explicitly loaded.
>> 
>> For illustration, try to open the following foo.el file:
>> 
>> (define-inline org-element-type-p (node types)
>>   "Return non-nil when NODE type is one of TYPES.
>> TYPES can be a type symbol or a list of symbols."
>>   (if (inline-const-p types)
>>       (if (listp (inline-const-val types))
>>           (inline-quote (memq (org-element-type ,node t) ,types))
>>         (inline-quote (eq (org-element-type ,node t) ,types)))
>>     (inline-letevals (node types)
>>       (inline-quote
>>        (if (listp ,types)
>>            (memq (org-element-type ,node t) ,types)
>>          (eq (org-element-type ,node t) ,types))))))

[ Side note: IIRC the above can be simplified as:

    (define-inline org-element-type-p (node types)
      "Return non-nil when NODE type is one of TYPES.
    TYPES can be a type symbol or a list of symbols."
      (inline-letevals (node types)
        (if (listp (inline-const-val types))
            (inline-quote (memq (org-element-type ,node t) ,types))
          (inline-quote (eq (org-element-type ,node t) ,types)))))

]

>> with emacs -Q, indenting the file will yield different results with and
>> without executing (require 'inline).
>> With the patch, indentation becomes consistent.
> Hmm, I wonder whether there's a less heavy-handed approach to this.

Agreed.  Also, I think this problem is not specific to `define-inline`.
Maybe the indentation code should try and (auto)load the macros
it encounters.


        Stefan





Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#68818: [PATCH] lisp/emacs-lisp/inline.el: Autoload public macros
Resent-From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 16:22:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.68818.B68818.17066316743797 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68818
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>, 68818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 68818-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B68818.17066316743797
          (code B ref 68818); Tue, 30 Jan 2024 16:22:02 +0000
Received: (at 68818) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2024 16:21:14 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36553 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1rUqrJ-0000zA-Ih
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 11:21:13 -0500
Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:34089)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <yantar92@HIDDEN>) id 1rUqrH-0000yZ-1m
 for 68818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 11:21:12 -0500
Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) 
 by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF9A7240103
 for <68818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 17:20:55 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017;
 t=1706631655; bh=PnDrdDkDPoF9w2pOqSnsGFl8d/NNPPQFVhS9dyXW61U=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:
 From;
 b=CInG9UqKdEaE7ylfHZR8Z+9weAGHodsDcpvjHKvOOBWQdU7dyFPGbcQGZLwKVzuac
 vzbL3a5ZyqeqPi5/8PF1au1hLeQpJmW/340ZhpHnrupFsSx+1kNyZefwOj9TlZPB5K
 L1u6gd0AYRgn+QGCZO9Slr3R7PV2mKrIIZlKJx5szBr+qAFDfVxh3LwimCW1tnNS4k
 jEVK/v3HvbPCBCLGEgByggxxvBwipKO16YdzFNHXvtC8YN6329dgleYQtUE8uWmyzi
 Ms75HCkdbUcVpD/RXwzJWe1ipf8W44JAD+eIyI09Q9t0Dn4QCCiqy1n0/hesjhb9p+
 +wSzMadCjaQKw==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4TPVlV2ZPNz9rxR;
 Tue, 30 Jan 2024 17:20:53 +0100 (CET)
From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <jwvsf2eaof4.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
References: <871q9zvtw0.fsf@localhost> <86cyti3ob3.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <jwvsf2eaof4.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 16:24:25 +0000
Message-ID: <87sf2e23ie.fsf@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> writes:

> [ Side note: IIRC the above can be simplified as:
>
>     (define-inline org-element-type-p (node types)
>       "Return non-nil when NODE type is one of TYPES.
>     TYPES can be a type symbol or a list of symbols."
>       (inline-letevals (node types)
>         (if (listp (inline-const-val types))
>             (inline-quote (memq (org-element-type ,node t) ,types))
>           (inline-quote (eq (org-element-type ,node t) ,types)))))

Thanks!
`inline-const-val' docstring does not make it clear what happens when
the value is not known at compile time.

>>> with emacs -Q, indenting the file will yield different results with and
>>> without executing (require 'inline).
>>> With the patch, indentation becomes consistent.
>> Hmm, I wonder whether there's a less heavy-handed approach to this.
>
> Agreed.  Also, I think this problem is not specific to `define-inline`.
> Maybe the indentation code should try and (auto)load the macros
> it encounters.

But how does it know that a given (expr ...) is a macro call or a
function call without loading the containing library? AFAIK, only
autoloading can provide such information.

Maybe, autoloading can automatically collect information about all the
symbols defined in each library - whether they are a
function/variable/macro and their declare statement?

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>




Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#68818: [PATCH] lisp/emacs-lisp/inline.el: Autoload public macros
Resent-From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:12:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.68818.B68818.17066382853816 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68818
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@HIDDEN>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>, 68818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 68818-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B68818.17066382853816
          (code B ref 68818); Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:12:02 +0000
Received: (at 68818) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2024 18:11:25 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36680 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1rUsZx-0000zU-G1
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:11:25 -0500
Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:48919)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>) id 1rUsZv-0000zF-5F
 for 68818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:11:23 -0500
Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 753501000DA;
 Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:11:08 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca;
 s=mail; t=1706638267;
 bh=DSWIRNDrSZ3Mire9V6HCfvK1hyKvE/rhzoBPwk1wPXc=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
 b=Nyt4lgruIVmn01XiCumC0yrs48u2UzxQL5ix28CCw86m1XMfEEasgNdFq9a4vqtVu
 EfuaxBOkFrsFCrcQuy8lJigvH49ee+ZlTNpDf9mdetRCjUs0mtbFNPKNN417lCAELn
 4JRA7jMaf6cM3dHL9P5KmHJsEsh6QKywcO/FH8WiOvGPtXh2C+7whK6aF6bTYajiP4
 bUjzqL5wwrhNLTnzmFB5wzsQnWlelI6I4d2dNYZzIB082zRYu704XDc70NnMOWFpPc
 4u1ZvLPa7c78faq/+Ju4w5fmAxCwbPqB/OOzk2XsZrMJBVojpmzf8DdKo3bKgsXkOf
 gGvXFeFyVZU/w==
Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1])
 by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4AA35100054;
 Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:11:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from alfajor (unknown [23.233.149.155])
 by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1702C1202CB;
 Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:11:07 -0500 (EST)
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87sf2e23ie.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Tue, 30
 Jan 2024 16:24:25 +0000")
Message-ID: <jwvil3aofwj.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
References: <871q9zvtw0.fsf@localhost> <86cyti3ob3.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <jwvsf2eaof4.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN> <87sf2e23ie.fsf@localhost>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:11:06 -0500
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results:  0
 ALL_TRUSTED                -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 AWL -0.142 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
 domain
 DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from
 domain T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
X-SPAM-LEVEL: 
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

> Thanks!
> `inline-const-val' docstring does not make it clear what happens when
> the value is not known at compile time.

Indeed, the docstring is lacking. =F0=9F=99=81
It "fails" which means that we revert to the "fallback" of not inlining.

>>>> with emacs -Q, indenting the file will yield different results with and
>>>> without executing (require 'inline).
>>>> With the patch, indentation becomes consistent.
>>> Hmm, I wonder whether there's a less heavy-handed approach to this.
>>
>> Agreed.  Also, I think this problem is not specific to `define-inline`.
>> Maybe the indentation code should try and (auto)load the macros
>> it encounters.
>
> But how does it know that a given (expr ...) is a macro call or a
> function call without loading the containing library? AFAIK, only
> autoloading can provide such information.

The autoload of `define-inline` says that it's a macro, so I was
thinking that maybe when the indentation code see `define-inline` it
could `autoload-do-load`.

> Maybe, autoloading can automatically collect information about all the
> symbols defined in each library - whether they are a
> function/variable/macro and their declare statement?

The point of an autoload object is that it's *much* cheaper than the
real thing.  So we can't add very much info to them.


        Stefan





Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#68818: [PATCH] lisp/emacs-lisp/inline.el: Autoload public macros
Resent-From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 19:01:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.68818.B68818.17066412238976 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68818
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>, 68818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 68818-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B68818.17066412238976
          (code B ref 68818); Tue, 30 Jan 2024 19:01:01 +0000
Received: (at 68818) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2024 19:00:23 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36767 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1rUtLK-0002Ki-Te
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:00:23 -0500
Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:51453)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <yantar92@HIDDEN>) id 1rUtLJ-0002KP-Gi
 for 68818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:00:22 -0500
Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) 
 by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64A4124002A
 for <68818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 20:00:06 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017;
 t=1706641206; bh=jNF/PCeI/NyFkVLfb7LzyueQGuVGnx9DY3/YC1G8VB8=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:
 From;
 b=HIRFlIk6NXszMkPwsD4sjunT5FHMPg3QwyZrIuoHLE6iECRcdHYQcXKuVibVZf4Ev
 I6DfJYfOcl8MUL1yiQzDjNJGuwqqwo65gZyuBx59XLpydQ+eNG7Nxn4w4YmzhKzoOF
 i9QpH4HlNCBOp9tRpxAgwpxSgaoSIFIg7FQbtmLGdDJn/oKytyMsDrnSDoBXdGJC+o
 WxB7p/6uq33cPQAnW5oAf675/zIS2K8vXmVHUWj0AX8TDiAb49oQLnoC5kZXpXuQSX
 ytFIm4pv3NuhS48WVGiHgWcdQRLOb0YOMdzk14V4LWkNLpsPc1lVc9vI+4xr51bEUB
 BD7G2671GabRg==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4TPZH91nJYz9rxD;
 Tue, 30 Jan 2024 20:00:04 +0100 (CET)
From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <jwvil3aofwj.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
References: <871q9zvtw0.fsf@localhost> <86cyti3ob3.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <jwvsf2eaof4.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN> <87sf2e23ie.fsf@localhost>
 <jwvil3aofwj.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 19:03:36 +0000
Message-ID: <87h6iuve2f.fsf@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> writes:

>> But how does it know that a given (expr ...) is a macro call or a
>> function call without loading the containing library? AFAIK, only
>> autoloading can provide such information.
>
> The autoload of `define-inline` says that it's a macro, so I was
> thinking that maybe when the indentation code see `define-inline` it
> could `autoload-do-load`.

That would make sense, yes.

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>




Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#68818: [PATCH] lisp/emacs-lisp/inline.el: Autoload public macros
Resent-From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 01:01:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.68818.B68818.17402724348925 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68818
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@HIDDEN>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>, Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>, 68818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 68818-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B68818.17402724348925
          (code B ref 68818); Sun, 23 Feb 2025 01:01:02 +0000
Received: (at 68818) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2025 01:00:34 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58101 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tm0MD-0002JE-Sv
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2025 20:00:34 -0500
Received: from mail-ed1-x52f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52f]:46558)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <stefankangas@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tm0M9-0001wT-Kt
 for 68818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2025 20:00:31 -0500
Received: by mail-ed1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id
 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5e08064b4ddso4463914a12.1
 for <68818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2025 17:00:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1740272423; x=1740877223; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
 h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
 :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=aR2IggjuPpqm8lzuJFwT/eb3Evv0RWB4HsBZErNfmpc=;
 b=jxLGUWi6LJMdhXCuO08VOEmBi+H/72wTy7vWvAHRp1CfIsqxikO/2hlIoTHRYMWWcH
 Vjhprmwty8V30l42qD5pvalhf98NABwFo6YvwN6NIPBw5IGkajaJhDejXJ8rKWYdi7oz
 KRtZeeDuZmYkJcdiiitxTygxroRJjmZIX4P+piFIYbGQxtEC+B4CwzC+yGwoHE+6hz/o
 u7ZTvI6XXl27TzAospdGrekAU0Y/k5DOAY5PpnK7VA5D+HhpMZLrQMm9L8t9rPW/c6gq
 kVeG1++sDFBr4g6KPqPBhB9+zDRVpAq8rVL7YNVomDzqiyarxQkMhx8ZbsJsQYWG2g/D
 R5Ew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1740272423; x=1740877223;
 h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
 :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=aR2IggjuPpqm8lzuJFwT/eb3Evv0RWB4HsBZErNfmpc=;
 b=TWycl+TVxVnDA4xnU5Kpt+hVij+STOjQ7rRrUWukyj9B+DEjaC1UFih4f/cM/NNIzC
 kvm8KSK3ABTVgR0jURfSWNBWsuZuGe7/tCXj8E0Bo3RvN7prXk38ogevfMB5sxIG1j6h
 YrYQrIP/kR4FM3IkAoz/k8hlV7WmoDTdrkb2QH6x8FARjp/VnAKcSVfcN5xjjB41VFUy
 jRDu+XsZUFOZTtGDzw3eSwzrnQfa0QFI3By7vOj+sFtGNEYw/TK4wZFaH64Y9AokowAQ
 WAJZ+isqej2fxuUioViPFKTjaan6B0PopGowAq3xbO3V3i7BoQkvW0QtTK7fFLuNAJE5
 ifBQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1;
 AJvYcCX9C63RmDeisKcHlVgdS7vLiFQEjq/UvnGdHyp6RltvA9QLQHalpw/8fqRwNaXHl4+lW242Cw==@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzggnupe09z4hPglwVzJ7OEwSIDAxBCOVinFDCm+RQQaUanKUTR
 ed7qUwiwzDm4md2P/57IotFDkmt/qlNPUZOajb3odH74Z5M1PRgW2CNwpHq8wDIs3a8OhpBuezE
 UKpfOIHXrxeKgyjYun1LLmF46mVM=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncu+2XtLYkR/1Dy8kiFVbWFBo8o6Y0tfnehVnBJG1dMU6h5eiwb73g0sqbv2y4e
 Jo8RDXp3wPV6KguZ+JwiGFLWqmyw/yxW0Qaxf3phbs/vNoyVpgS8i4GheJD+7LRwmJNYaFFkBGK
 u7lKoLt5Be
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IER0/PWAPkBxviw3wkGFkzwOn1yXt3y0TMUjfscT4Lrki6syZRJwkovakgHvbyXtWN5uT+jrPltpLxGortbNa8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:530b:b0:5de:ce71:bacb with SMTP id
 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5e0b70f334emr6894426a12.16.1740272423264; Sat, 22 Feb 2025
 17:00:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with
 HTTPREST; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 01:00:22 +0000
From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87h6iuve2f.fsf@localhost>
References: <871q9zvtw0.fsf@localhost> <86cyti3ob3.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <jwvsf2eaof4.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN> <87sf2e23ie.fsf@localhost>
 <jwvil3aofwj.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN> <87h6iuve2f.fsf@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 01:00:22 +0000
X-Gm-Features: AWEUYZlsltJcIAx5TnYPUOUV5fXSLu4X5d6FZwpqR1t36z8TmVFjeaJaCsrqi6c
Message-ID: <CADwFkmnJZUy+DennJnAixmaK8W2cFOmjJLh4vAOkTGj2SNHL8A@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@HIDDEN> writes:

> Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>>> But how does it know that a given (expr ...) is a macro call or a
>>> function call without loading the containing library? AFAIK, only
>>> autoloading can provide such information.
>>
>> The autoload of `define-inline` says that it's a macro, so I was
>> thinking that maybe when the indentation code see `define-inline` it
>> could `autoload-do-load`.
>
> That would make sense, yes.

Did you make any progress here?  Does it still make sense to keep this
bug report open?  Thanks in advance.





Last modified: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 01:15:01 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.