GNU logs - #69381, boring messages


Message sent to bug-mumi@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#69381: mumi does not correctly display (some?) non-ascii characters
Resent-From: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-mumi@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 13:27:03 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.69381.B.170886761422083 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: report 69381
X-GNU-PR-Package: mumi
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-mumi@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.170886761422083
          (code B ref -1); Sun, 25 Feb 2024 13:27:03 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2024 13:26:54 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44810 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1reEWr-0005k0-PK
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 08:26:54 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:47118)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <~@wolfsden.cz>) id 1reEWp-0005je-8q
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 08:26:51 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <~@wolfsden.cz>) id 1reEB3-00045w-MW
 for bug-mumi@HIDDEN; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 08:04:21 -0500
Received: from wolfsden.cz ([37.205.8.62])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <~@wolfsden.cz>) id 1reEAy-0007Na-0w
 for bug-mumi@HIDDEN; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 08:04:20 -0500
Received: by wolfsden.cz (Postfix, from userid 104)
 id 88A95272361; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 13:04:11 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfsden.cz; s=mail;
 t=1708866251; bh=rDNHDRQNnoxWXsQsDbp+D/E9LZCnXQqlcybrD6QDFZw=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject;
 b=DSv9jlOwX8AWiFSEc8Hs7jMXxlWkBi1qF/wNnwjp1hONherD1wFcjmj49nLrcxZb0
 KPu3QMxChw0OJz1gEG6b6CXx7pyxeTtNInrJQy6s9Q13Fg07xc1SbDqMCj3VJd7hVj
 vFybYtCjc8jsmtLLU+Hqcmr9a6O2J3dFF665m9CtiQ+CiwOAnEPpazJgEjcKJbaTwe
 Z1hc3kE3Oue++QlfrHgRwHtBoPyLlPjxnUV1p8MRKsxwJyVZJ0FCyMjw5OJYjWVgg+
 L+mdFv22wdjLl+G24wAr46iFH9UB5XKQlS0JnS0EsaQv5xQ8O+XtrweaHW56bG4eqR
 Gu9rDuO0FVnPSN2xUzxg2SpNpnT5qeXJmMCGbAP5beb0//qgNNDIj2EDDUJ22PUUPb
 YFVVgoKZpbqooKrDnoKcPyPOMLyYDwiz2xagp5RNDUEfO1tpJ36xLaByVBCvYiAGIC
 dFXjP4kLK03H0ZVGKBWlLOLpVbs2/ULU3Fcs+VCWz0UcgsknwEcZJ2suDm7a5SzBA/
 Do3cH753sYIKyZvPg4ghl6lKjEBq0hwj5bM4aDioM9c+aDPbuK7vyifm8h9ktc38l2
 bUce8H7tOMYdFrXCjwLnVDr0GD/cRbkw0qPLYmdK7my0aYgKqgwaMiPlhRC88wg6GF
 +XkpheIZmLTlgTWONvwR8ID8=
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on wolfsden
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,
 URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received: from localhost (unknown [193.32.127.144])
 by wolfsden.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A732627145E
 for <bug-mumi@HIDDEN>; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 13:04:10 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfsden.cz; s=mail;
 t=1708866250; bh=rDNHDRQNnoxWXsQsDbp+D/E9LZCnXQqlcybrD6QDFZw=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject;
 b=anIRjgz/Se13avsIiBcvHiu88hRjWerJHT8DsR1kUHoECBiYoyCX26otEZLOqbAnc
 VLwERKd2Yc4PK9pgxYyb6Jy0jiFDG2AGhGaVUn1jj+WbAatIZJrOeMATLh+5MVVzt5
 oSzw77pKZpa96vRaRpJj4ANSDBFOOeBDrfxt+vIwZm/VpnLQrJzB1w67xhOv0q3Nuv
 0O7xyyC78LO10G+cDyxiWeIvDbwB1Na3wtIdNll1wp9yPYOHLPPmShD/VSYetHfggv
 sVP/pRUJn6+jSva/bGeVEFIsdbvlr0o3K9qTH1kMmoClKZJWG8OzY+KPZFO/2IFIbb
 62poA9owb+9+7rly7THgoEVd3oD0ar8hLWKf/Ri0zfLxpHNFz1m6258jy4Fszxuo5S
 Y0bX8RzLTzXViYEQk0TwrHpT8B9qBcaqlA8iWt4anMBFAEwUhnhF1S7dWrM3iT5p/f
 p5vu+9ExIZXWukxIIEk5KvZzns65GMkL38034d9s5NqCkYAeFG2Y9Q+FswuMvWq/83
 FF0MH/j4xpGnMIrJa3CQb4PbXH8hJV+ugQ96QDmNSYRe76c9WUBzAzcZE+vrFSIK75
 CQn4YO0fiAvQNW2NChLQDsvylTnUKanyGTAu2TKSaDOWDuArElbfDeykqhV9szme55
 S6ynrJh/jVjBj0wgMk+mfL9I=
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 14:04:10 +0100
From: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>
Message-ID: <Zds6yhPkZ0Id6SAT@ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CBmq/bXiaLg1Go6W"
Content-Disposition: inline
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=37.205.8.62; envelope-from=~@wolfsden.cz;
 helo=wolfsden.cz
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)


--CBmq/bXiaLg1Go6W
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

when I compare mumi page[0] with debbugs page[1], the from field displays "=
???"
in mumi, but "=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6" in debbugs.

Have a nice day,
Tomas Volf

0: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/57268
1: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D57268

--
There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.

--CBmq/bXiaLg1Go6W
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=2/8p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--CBmq/bXiaLg1Go6W--




Message sent:


Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>
Subject: bug#69381: Acknowledgement (mumi does not correctly display
 (some?) non-ascii characters)
Message-ID: <handler.69381.B.170886761422083.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <Zds6yhPkZ0Id6SAT@ws>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 69381
X-Gnu-PR-Package: mumi
Reply-To: 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 13:27:03 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-mumi@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
69381: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D69381
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems


Message sent to bug-mumi@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#69381: [PATCH] Convert HTML to UTF-8 ourselves. (Closes: #69381)
References: <Zds6yhPkZ0Id6SAT@ws>
In-Reply-To: <Zds6yhPkZ0Id6SAT@ws>
Resent-From: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-mumi@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 23:14:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.69381.B69381.17157284023906 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69381
X-GNU-PR-Package: mumi
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: 69381@HIDDEN
Cc: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>, Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 69381-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B69381.17157284023906
          (code B ref 69381); Tue, 14 May 2024 23:14:01 +0000
Received: (at 69381) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2024 23:13:22 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41549 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1s71Kk-00010w-9d
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2024 19:13:22 -0400
Received: from sail-ipv4.us-core.com ([208.82.101.137]:45434)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>) id 1s71Kf-00010n-62
 for 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2024 19:13:20 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=2017; bh=MxeHZHe/XILKnAa
 imE2YqfFjMMmI3L4PdH4MsWmW7f0=; h=date:subject:cc:to:from;
 d=lease-up.com; b=m/rujQsKl7HdvG7O5801TGGyOeBVAzBfT2tRsZz8BfVBXO1ig2Bx
 dTXLoJVYAeXjX6ffk3tmeoncVfmZZaMXhQ0+eQugHvLNG2wjoEzLnNw7dLAJDO3WgIe7jH
 i9nI1GkEK3LhT6z0JG298G+j2soZOHwO6xG+gyNlxgK501BYc=
Received: by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id e8f248be
 for <69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 14 May 2024 23:13:14 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: 69381@HIDDEN
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=2017; bh=MxeHZHe/XILKnAa
 imE2YqfFjMMmI3L4PdH4MsWmW7f0=; h=date:subject:cc:to:from;
 d=lease-up.com; b=m/rujQsKl7HdvG7O5801TGGyOeBVAzBfT2tRsZz8BfVBXO1ig2Bx
 dTXLoJVYAeXjX6ffk3tmeoncVfmZZaMXhQ0+eQugHvLNG2wjoEzLnNw7dLAJDO3WgIe7jH
 i9nI1GkEK3LhT6z0JG298G+j2soZOHwO6xG+gyNlxgK501BYc=
Received: by sail-ipv4.us-core.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id b9008797
 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); 
 Tue, 14 May 2024 23:13:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [local])
 by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 66a71495;
 Tue, 14 May 2024 23:13:13 +0000 (UTC)
From: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 16:12:49 -0700
Message-ID: <20240514231249.18303-1-felix.lechner@HIDDEN>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)

This fixes a host of encoding issues in Mumi, including the diff
problems that are not mentioned in the bug.  An example is here:

    https://issues.guix.gnu.org/63508#4

The procedure version may one day be more efficient but does not work.
Based on comments in the Guile source code, the procedure style may
one day enable more advanced response formats.  The author is unclear
as to why the procedure does not work.  There may be a complex
interaction involving the response headers.

A preview of this code is live at patchwise.org.

The solution of this bug may depend on the patch in Bug#70907.  This
patch furthermore depends on the patch in Bug#70906, but the solution
of the bug may not.
---
 mumi/web/render.scm | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mumi/web/render.scm b/mumi/web/render.scm
index 316ca4c..9b16f8d 100644
--- a/mumi/web/render.scm
+++ b/mumi/web/render.scm
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
   #:use-module ((ice-9 textual-ports)
                 #:select (get-string-all put-string))
   #:use-module (ice-9 match)
+  #:use-module (rnrs bytevectors)
   #:use-module (web http)
   #:use-module (web request)
   #:use-module (web response)
@@ -104,13 +105,13 @@
 (define* (render-html sxml #:key (extra-headers '()))
   (values (append extra-headers
                   '((content-type . (text/html (charset . "utf-8")))))
-          (lambda (port)
-            (sxml->html sxml port))))
+          (string->utf8
+           (sxml->html-string sxml))))
 
 (define (render-json json)
   (values '((content-type . (application/json (charset . "utf-8"))))
-          (lambda (port)
-            (scm->json json port))))
+          (string->utf8
+           (scm->json-string json))))
 
 (define (not-found uri)
   (values (build-response #:code 404)
-- 
2.41.0





Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2024 23:15:36 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 14 19:15:36 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41555 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1s71Mt-000136-RU
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2024 19:15:36 -0400
Received: from sail-ipv4.us-core.com ([208.82.101.137]:44392)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>) id 1s71Mr-000130-M4
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2024 19:15:34 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=2017; bh=TenCA0v6Aws8fw+
 U8CTTQJoNeq70fR2OsxenIcyWt80=; h=date:cc:to:from;
 d=lease-up.com; b=QA
 sufy3hhjqxMPyiHl+qhb2QxwUenXEvnCz7ET9Jmpa13wvPgbvpT9mUXB6Qc1Tat4Mh/S8+
 L1m2VSKk9f+sHYsXKK6ySDjDPmWNhWuJQGXDIZJQCvNQfLt1RTeqz6ymkq9m/SKrWYVYZK
 aQoeaL4VMovn68FeHkviCC4s26JyQ=
Received: by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 5edbcb42
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 14 May 2024 23:15:31 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: control@HIDDEN
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=2017; bh=TenCA0v6Aws8fw+
 U8CTTQJoNeq70fR2OsxenIcyWt80=; h=date:cc:to:from;
 d=lease-up.com; b=QA
 sufy3hhjqxMPyiHl+qhb2QxwUenXEvnCz7ET9Jmpa13wvPgbvpT9mUXB6Qc1Tat4Mh/S8+
 L1m2VSKk9f+sHYsXKK6ySDjDPmWNhWuJQGXDIZJQCvNQfLt1RTeqz6ymkq9m/SKrWYVYZK
 aQoeaL4VMovn68FeHkviCC4s26JyQ=
Received: by sail-ipv4.us-core.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 790c1160
 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO)
 for <control@HIDDEN>; Tue, 14 May 2024 23:15:31 +0000 (UTC)
From: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>
To: control@HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 16:15:31 -0700
Message-ID: <87a5ksvvcc.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  block 69381 by 70906 70907 tags 69381 + patch thanks 
 Content analysis details:   (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header
 0.2 NO_SUBJECT             Extra score for no subject
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)

block 69381 by 70906 70907
tags 69381 + patch
thanks




Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2024 23:15:36 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 14 19:15:36 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41555 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1s71Mt-000136-RU
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2024 19:15:36 -0400
Received: from sail-ipv4.us-core.com ([208.82.101.137]:44392)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>) id 1s71Mr-000130-M4
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2024 19:15:34 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=2017; bh=TenCA0v6Aws8fw+
 U8CTTQJoNeq70fR2OsxenIcyWt80=; h=date:cc:to:from;
 d=lease-up.com; b=QA
 sufy3hhjqxMPyiHl+qhb2QxwUenXEvnCz7ET9Jmpa13wvPgbvpT9mUXB6Qc1Tat4Mh/S8+
 L1m2VSKk9f+sHYsXKK6ySDjDPmWNhWuJQGXDIZJQCvNQfLt1RTeqz6ymkq9m/SKrWYVYZK
 aQoeaL4VMovn68FeHkviCC4s26JyQ=
Received: by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 5edbcb42
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 14 May 2024 23:15:31 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: control@HIDDEN
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=2017; bh=TenCA0v6Aws8fw+
 U8CTTQJoNeq70fR2OsxenIcyWt80=; h=date:cc:to:from;
 d=lease-up.com; b=QA
 sufy3hhjqxMPyiHl+qhb2QxwUenXEvnCz7ET9Jmpa13wvPgbvpT9mUXB6Qc1Tat4Mh/S8+
 L1m2VSKk9f+sHYsXKK6ySDjDPmWNhWuJQGXDIZJQCvNQfLt1RTeqz6ymkq9m/SKrWYVYZK
 aQoeaL4VMovn68FeHkviCC4s26JyQ=
Received: by sail-ipv4.us-core.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 790c1160
 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO)
 for <control@HIDDEN>; Tue, 14 May 2024 23:15:31 +0000 (UTC)
From: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>
To: control@HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 16:15:31 -0700
Message-ID: <87a5ksvvcc.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  block 69381 by 70906 70907 tags 69381 + patch thanks 
 Content analysis details:   (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header
 0.2 NO_SUBJECT             Extra score for no subject
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)

block 69381 by 70906 70907
tags 69381 + patch
thanks




Message sent to ~@wolfsden.cz, felix.lechner@HIDDEN, bug-mumi@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#69381: [PATCH] web: Use string to avoid losing unicode characters.
References: <Zds6yhPkZ0Id6SAT@ws>
In-Reply-To: <Zds6yhPkZ0Id6SAT@ws>
Resent-From: noe@HIDDEN
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: ~@wolfsden.cz, felix.lechner@HIDDEN, bug-mumi@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2024 00:07:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.69381.B69381.173050599814342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69381
X-GNU-PR-Package: mumi
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez <noelopez@HIDDEN>, Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>, Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>
X-Debbugs-Original-Xcc: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>, Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 69381-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B69381.173050599814342
          (code B ref 69381); Sat, 02 Nov 2024 00:07:02 +0000
Received: (at 69381) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2024 00:06:38 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52495 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1t71f4-0003jG-2l
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2024 20:06:38 -0400
Received: from smtp.domeneshop.no ([194.63.252.55]:56289)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <noe@HIDDEN>) id 1t71f0-0003j8-NH
 for 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2024 20:06:36 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=xn--no-cja.eu; s=ds202402; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:
 MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:
 Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
 Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
 Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:
 List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=kYgaIN8Zp/rvIZcSEr61/L3RsHgEN3AoHGYcFqtOgeM=; b=TfYxjVIGKgwdjzGm1KfDGA3xLP
 amPJ6jeUSfCpjWMNHo3bBGBZhoBcIGFbMbj5ow75KuVW50xHMNJwcnit7V7cIKmV6SrVPF/2hHjwo
 eYkEt1ODpfAzvP70TGaAQ1ZS59EX33vqum5VwB3JRei/oosZUmm3Ea2SuJBeX+4+t71ASZvm1NU0k
 A448JOSzMV/V5Jmx5BrG+sgytg4TOxilJISolHIx6normDeK4OcW7Ak+EHwckMgW4MiPCoDXr0SWR
 LBBXuGZCHqO5SfWq7AcFTDg7hCoKNfiXmcuA/wQr1p1AqZb+6W6PFZymHGJ4RlnG5Drz2Q+Ic/E6O
 2afwz/FQ==;
Received: from [2a01:e0a:990:a960:b4f3:8f44:ec4:5af5] (port=54428
 helo=localhost.localdomain)
 by smtp.domeneshop.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95)
 (envelope-from <noe@HIDDEN>) id 1t71et-005jNZ-W8;
 Sat, 02 Nov 2024 01:06:28 +0100
From: noe@HIDDEN
Date: Sat,  2 Nov 2024 01:07:28 +0100
Message-ID: <20241102000730.3330-1-noe@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

From: Noé Lopez <noelopez@HIDDEN>

I don’t really understand why the unicode characters were lost in the
first place, maybe something in the sanitize-response of (fibers web
server)?  Specifically, strings and procedures don’t take the same
path there.

* mumi/web/render.scm (render-html): Return string instead of procedure.
---
 mumi/web/render.scm | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mumi/web/render.scm b/mumi/web/render.scm
index 168f3bc..c28a26f 100644
--- a/mumi/web/render.scm
+++ b/mumi/web/render.scm
@@ -105,8 +105,9 @@
 (define* (render-html sxml #:key (extra-headers '()))
   (values (append extra-headers
                   '((content-type . (text/html (charset . "utf-8")))))
-          (lambda (port)
-            (sxml->html sxml port))))
+          (call-with-output-string
+	    (lambda (port)
+              (sxml->html sxml port)))))
 
 (define (render-json json)
   (values '((content-type . (application/json)))
-- 
2.46.0





Message sent to bug-mumi@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#69381: [PATCH] web: Use string to avoid losing unicode characters.
References: <Zds6yhPkZ0Id6SAT@ws>
In-Reply-To: <Zds6yhPkZ0Id6SAT@ws>
Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez <noe@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-mumi@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2024 00:14:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.69381.B69381.173050639715033 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69381
X-GNU-PR-Package: mumi
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 69381-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B69381.173050639715033
          (code B ref 69381); Sat, 02 Nov 2024 00:14:02 +0000
Received: (at 69381) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2024 00:13:17 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52504 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1t71lU-0003uP-UV
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2024 20:13:17 -0400
Received: from smtp.domeneshop.no ([194.63.252.55]:54731)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <noe@HIDDEN>) id 1t71lT-0003uH-U3
 for 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2024 20:13:16 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=xn--no-cja.eu; s=ds202402; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:
 MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:
 Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
 Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
 Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:
 List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=VuwpJEeLBUGErMDbLuf6A75VwaXLt5MD0k2thgyNaSc=; b=GHtWrhB92ToS1UAuT8LBMRJ4hx
 c+QO0uoSpTud7YqBe8T3+cUSJ2qnNaVHb4m49aEBlwY9F0r9sWQfaJsxunjfelKIv4k5PrheGDE5W
 LQpELfz80Qf6TC/CzAfd5UHn71mjRfcI0Xxdbxqy9jT3A9a4eMaglaPkw3XF53ZijX47Bd6tg6YUl
 E4vDfnV/dT7sYj1YhefjKTfeVugTr46nWROp/rXa0dqYvG6CcfODedJWbSUTtHH40OZWXayil0vfC
 A6FfnmOUGq1NoebAXOpqF+EF/8YY8Hj/o8HGBaUBzc8AcEL7PbMJ1lRoc7hN6hfGDNbxNd4Gq6Gbu
 McQvNrEQ==;
Received: from [2a01:e0a:990:a960:b4f3:8f44:ec4:5af5] (port=55412 helo=lignux)
 by smtp.domeneshop.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95)
 (envelope-from <noe@HIDDEN>) id 1t71lO-005kFO-9g
 for 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2024 01:13:10 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez <noe@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2024 01:14:15 +0100
Message-ID: <87ikt6pk4o.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hi,

Wanted to send this patch separately but had this issue selected in mumi
so it sent it here, oops.

I recognize this solution is not optimal (a hack even), but it should be
heavily considered as the issue is rampant among international users.

I suspect the actual issue lies in fibers, as said in the commit message
and I=E2=80=99ll try to fix it there but this patch is still important in t=
he
meanwhile.

Good night,
No=C3=A9




Message sent to bug-mumi@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#69381: [PATCH] web: Use string to avoid losing unicode characters.
References: <Zds6yhPkZ0Id6SAT@ws>
In-Reply-To: <Zds6yhPkZ0Id6SAT@ws>
Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez <noe@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-mumi@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2024 02:23:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.69381.B69381.173051414830202 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69381
X-GNU-PR-Package: mumi
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 69381-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B69381.173051414830202
          (code B ref 69381); Sat, 02 Nov 2024 02:23:02 +0000
Received: (at 69381) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2024 02:22:28 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52631 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1t73mW-0007r4-29
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2024 22:22:28 -0400
Received: from smtp.domeneshop.no ([194.63.252.55]:57407)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <noe@HIDDEN>) id 1t73mT-0007qu-J5
 for 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2024 22:22:27 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=xn--no-cja.eu; s=ds202402; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:
 MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:
 Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
 Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
 Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:
 List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=QG7ExHqLJTGlVMYwZVQCnOGP3L3TjA2She0NIGWjeMM=; b=wjGMcOEnS/W7QwbVlf69+EDNTk
 wGo6NvG1+RqxX2meCTEhRSiZYEQUGvGWJ5Oh4FRt+P5moLwP5xKldMq6GyzrkB2u5SnPoBe2jFJBw
 qSdp50FrhWY1xcS67AriolDNpzq9XJdjpVz6StcBkj3Hj6LSFtFg6nWuyDQ1uJmZUYAjwmP15ZCHO
 xGh/GYrcEyZwfb+3B7pmxzzX2JHLUIZCaXACEL6zThboUwthJjKE5oCRRUZIO4bXkCwmIaTVAnE0L
 UuPosbAJHkJl3T56jt6rg1HmuWDx5WfgM8cCjCB7xWf9vh/iApQKVe7qqmTrjV9hL+6CWnCLnF/fZ
 6Dk4iPvQ==;
Received: from [2a01:e0a:990:a960:b4f3:8f44:ec4:5af5] (port=60784 helo=lignux)
 by smtp.domeneshop.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95)
 (envelope-from <noe@HIDDEN>) id 1t73mN-0060Ty-3i
 for 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2024 03:22:19 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez <noe@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2024 03:23:24 +0100
Message-ID: <87froape5f.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Small update,

I=E2=80=99ve investigated the issue in fibers and I now blame the guile web
library for the issue.  Apparently it sets the port to ISO-8859-1
encoding each time you call read-request, but it acts like =C2=AB yeah don=
=E2=80=99t
worry just use utf-8 for your body =C2=BB in the docs.

That=E2=80=99s fine UNLESS you use chunked transfers (omitting content-leng=
th in
fibers), in which case it just decides to blow up :///// (it assumes one
character =3D one byte)

In the end I=E2=80=99m pretty sure any of this could have been avoided by j=
ust
not replacing every character with question marks.  Had it kept the
invalid bytes intact they would have translated back with no issue.




Message sent to bug-mumi@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#69381: mumi does not correctly display (some?) non-ascii characters
Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-mumi@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 14:56:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.69381.B69381.17389401089932 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69381
X-GNU-PR-Package: mumi
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: =?UTF-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez <noe@HIDDEN>
Cc: 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 69381-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B69381.17389401089932
          (code B ref 69381); Fri, 07 Feb 2025 14:56:01 +0000
Received: (at 69381) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2025 14:55:08 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33687 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tgPl5-0002a8-Na
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2025 09:55:08 -0500
Received: from mail-pl1-x62a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::62a]:60616)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tgPky-0002ZE-VS
 for 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2025 09:55:01 -0500
Received: by mail-pl1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id
 d9443c01a7336-21f5a224544so7153715ad.0
 for <69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 07 Feb 2025 06:55:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1738940094; x=1739544894; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date
 :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date
 :message-id:reply-to;
 bh=XL+4As4qmf86PhsokK2OUPCFxtwcR2O3UW6lK6Lh7/s=;
 b=ZfhQo0z2jcvwQ+OAgUKH6XMg013obujDfTorpKSGh5Uhhxeb2UbcidRJ/HUOpzj0mM
 eCF2nJ3BTI4p5uR0DUliAISSKJeS3Lrg5cdcBuuVvICGU8HetxAenEbk3Y0zKlVfEKz6
 LATw7Flidl0z5lcyHmONqEh6WYMrHwirUpJoNoW+uT6BBMV2barR3BOlKLgwYWySeFXn
 IQfhRa55dOmdbwVOXAdWMTbVU0vBZfaWgzpbwUC5kAXkknG1g0I8MyNFeUxN0/kkS3TG
 g3eNhNaB2LTjkoHBOfWacwP/ryhWekQkx+uLiBPzCeB+OIa2gjNMJFJVrHiz35eUtAkc
 apQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1738940094; x=1739544894;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date
 :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from
 :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=XL+4As4qmf86PhsokK2OUPCFxtwcR2O3UW6lK6Lh7/s=;
 b=Cd5q7Ix2mrZbwxM+tiOXM8hFMH5JEzJv+3iTFvbyf1u32gaa6bCfWpBNWhmufEVh8g
 sicNHOjAV+syvEyM4MvzRY8SiDmvQbkh6kjZbTT1AeF66WJ3wKE2MCXmdLB/umnIIsR0
 orxdwBwp+fuXIsMJ0CHqiP6ptefuFqAC0pNxbbYqGCkf2VQsMUSSCoBsmoRc/nfBCtep
 9O+iSJty+4r7CNxTXq5l1hfnEO3z6X2S8H8H+VKdLhIdqB74rTLi3vLaAx19ywpzy/oW
 0fzyXOD0lPSd5bTpA4VmJI1cvePYuC022UcaYsqj+JtYy8dNqhB8ltVj4UbwtdAp+Aoc
 hrBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz8X1wtBPfVxipSbH0X2L+L81q+L1jkz6SB/YKprbtHg1e841e0
 Ys50Ay4lq2uOA1UXXyYjtdYGmPNWgYOjtgVD5maQP3pnVaazV9TJpEI1IQsw
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncup/qiEaZk8W6Y8imr74IaCiIKcqMn2iVzcAaSfVPqxJb50VVLrxYbzbg6YA1b
 Gc2ixxQkRlv2pP2aYHQJIMuyLaAXbtskEWz35Gc5Y5RNTvhLS0aruy1ZLa8bdqomJLgGuUxZ5d8
 G679Xr3kVfEduOFUrv6Trol23zutg102VJkiv88YfacpPSWCXRrWXXybyxeJDX9Rt8Ogaf1ia76
 PpzcFlTOrdJdrrgX6vB+/ESNQipbwHQwoi55f2E4k0/2PtcKbGT4QAVyqcP3KRUYUebEybnNGIY
 CpXDMW2KEw0G
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEBB5GVbbZmVxNvV9EcQIjqwz0b66MXyKRpuL1IVkS9BlkdYN3jlE+HfeC9wsgHw8gf3/SrWg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:da90:b0:21e:ff31:531 with SMTP id
 d9443c01a7336-21f4e6e8d6amr59942985ad.22.1738940094038; 
 Fri, 07 Feb 2025 06:54:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from terra ([2405:6586:be0:0:c8ff:1707:9b9:af89])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 d9443c01a7336-21f3687c6ecsm31654325ad.198.2025.02.07.06.54.52
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Fri, 07 Feb 2025 06:54:53 -0800 (PST)
From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87froape5f.fsf@HIDDEN> ("=?UTF-8?Q?No=C3=A9?=
 Lopez"'s message of "Sat, 02 Nov 2024 03:23:24 +0100")
References: <Zds6yhPkZ0Id6SAT@ws> <87froape5f.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 23:54:41 +0900
Message-ID: <87bjvdajpq.fsf_-_@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hi No=C3=A9,

No=C3=A9 Lopez <noe@no=C3=A9.eu> writes:

> Small update,
>
> I=E2=80=99ve investigated the issue in fibers and I now blame the guile w=
eb
> library for the issue.  Apparently it sets the port to ISO-8859-1
> encoding each time you call read-request, but it acts like =C2=AB yeah do=
n=E2=80=99t
> worry just use utf-8 for your body =C2=BB in the docs.
>
> That=E2=80=99s fine UNLESS you use chunked transfers (omitting content-le=
ngth in
> fibers), in which case it just decides to blow up :///// (it assumes one
> character =3D one byte)
>
> In the end I=E2=80=99m pretty sure any of this could have been avoided by=
 just
> not replacing every character with question marks.  Had it kept the
> invalid bytes intact they would have translated back with no issue.

Nice investigation!  Did you create an issue at bug-guile@HIDDEN?=20=20
don't see it on the tracker.  Or perhaps this could be tackled from the
angle of fibers?  For example by adding a new failing test reproducing
the problem to its test suite, and going from there.

--=20
Thanks,
Maxim




Message sent to bug-mumi@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#69381: mumi does not correctly display (some?) non-ascii characters
Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez <noe@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-mumi@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 15:12:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.69381.B69381.173894111515130 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69381
X-GNU-PR-Package: mumi
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
Cc: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN>, 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 69381-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B69381.173894111515130
          (code B ref 69381); Fri, 07 Feb 2025 15:12:02 +0000
Received: (at 69381) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2025 15:11:55 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35837 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tgQ1L-0003vy-AE
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2025 10:11:55 -0500
Received: from smtp.domeneshop.no ([2a01:5b40:0:3006::1]:37994)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <noe@HIDDEN>) id 1tgQ1H-0003vc-Id
 for 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2025 10:11:53 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=xn--no-cja.eu; s=ds202402; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:
 MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:From:
 Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:
 Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:
 Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:
 References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:
 List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ek69G52pcD7hYSJ4K2e+a4BQ9SK46Hs6xDkDW6ijGJ4=; b=E
 xOe3yRiQD9nGA/v19MACrJnICCUQV3nTAmjEtXfgFYAuko6F0bgeMBzVqao8IS4iy36d+ma+bFit4
 Tj38pbvW5qHDoqhoQFQpYWfdx2NEyteQZp8z+jXUf+VainJaT9NLHcW/fBZjAaUoBG80WJAj0h8/c
 e4b4lZpQ/ztWgiw25CfWRIr37kleVGERUpXK94kWXrWx8S8ilTHsnCd4m2xr8xh7TOvc/pR5NiSN/
 uR7VCHnQxu8HJOUZpV7/5R+B+3RleCLP8pQzeBWhvHbdNRTt4wsGeCqoREdCm/RcBP53+UVAp8vF2
 rNGde9qipfBM6dQUB61NZlltWoHO6HBdQ==;
Received: from smtp by smtp.domeneshop.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95)
 id 1tgQ19-002lgj-3F; Fri, 07 Feb 2025 16:11:43 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez <noe@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87bjvdajpq.fsf_-_@HIDDEN>
References: <Zds6yhPkZ0Id6SAT@ws> <87froape5f.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87bjvdajpq.fsf_-_@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 16:11:12 +0100
Message-ID: <878qqhg57z.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN> writes:

> Hi No=C3=A9,
>
> No=C3=A9 Lopez <noe@no=C3=A9.eu> writes:
>
>> Small update,
>>
>> I=E2=80=99ve investigated the issue in fibers and I now blame the guile =
web
>> library for the issue.  Apparently it sets the port to ISO-8859-1
>> encoding each time you call read-request, but it acts like =C2=AB yeah d=
on=E2=80=99t
>> worry just use utf-8 for your body =C2=BB in the docs.
>>
>> That=E2=80=99s fine UNLESS you use chunked transfers (omitting content-l=
ength in
>> fibers), in which case it just decides to blow up :///// (it assumes one
>> character =3D one byte)
>>
>> In the end I=E2=80=99m pretty sure any of this could have been avoided b=
y just
>> not replacing every character with question marks.  Had it kept the
>> invalid bytes intact they would have translated back with no issue.
>
> Nice investigation!  Did you create an issue at bug-guile@HIDDEN?=20=20
> don't see it on the tracker.  Or perhaps this could be tackled from the
> angle of fibers?  For example by adding a new failing test reproducing
> the problem to its test suite, and going from there.
>

I talked about this with Christopher Baines at FOSDEM and he seemed to
know much more about it than me, so maybe he can suggest a way forward?

Starting with a failing test seems like a good idea.

Have a nice day,
No=C3=A9




Message sent to bug-mumi@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#69381: mumi does not correctly display (some?) non-ascii characters
Resent-From: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-mumi@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2025 09:41:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.69381.B69381.173900764924726 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69381
X-GNU-PR-Package: mumi
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: =?UTF-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez <noe@HIDDEN>
Cc: 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 69381-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B69381.173900764924726
          (code B ref 69381); Sat, 08 Feb 2025 09:41:01 +0000
Received: (at 69381) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2025 09:40:49 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38583 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tghKS-0006Qj-Pn
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2025 04:40:49 -0500
Received: from mira.cbaines.net
 ([2a01:7e00:e000:2f8:fd4d:b5c7:13fb:3d27]:45397)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1tghKQ-0006QY-9w
 for 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2025 04:40:47 -0500
Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a02:6b67:e390:8b00::1ce5])
 by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDB0F27BBE2;
 Sat,  8 Feb 2025 09:40:43 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from fang (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 413e5faf;
 Sat, 8 Feb 2025 09:40:42 +0000 (UTC)
From: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <878qqhg57z.fsf@HIDDEN> ("=?UTF-8?Q?No=C3=A9?=
 Lopez"'s message of "Fri, 07 Feb 2025 16:11:12 +0100")
References: <Zds6yhPkZ0Id6SAT@ws> <87froape5f.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87bjvdajpq.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <878qqhg57z.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2025 09:40:40 +0000
Message-ID: <87tt94lqp3.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

No=C3=A9 Lopez <noe@no=C3=A9.eu> writes:

> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>> Hi No=C3=A9,
>>
>> No=C3=A9 Lopez <noe@no=C3=A9.eu> writes:
>>
>>> Small update,
>>>
>>> I=E2=80=99ve investigated the issue in fibers and I now blame the guile=
 web
>>> library for the issue.  Apparently it sets the port to ISO-8859-1
>>> encoding each time you call read-request, but it acts like =C2=AB yeah =
don=E2=80=99t
>>> worry just use utf-8 for your body =C2=BB in the docs.
>>>
>>> That=E2=80=99s fine UNLESS you use chunked transfers (omitting content-=
length in
>>> fibers), in which case it just decides to blow up :///// (it assumes one
>>> character =3D one byte)
>>>
>>> In the end I=E2=80=99m pretty sure any of this could have been avoided =
by just
>>> not replacing every character with question marks.  Had it kept the
>>> invalid bytes intact they would have translated back with no issue.
>>
>> Nice investigation!  Did you create an issue at bug-guile@HIDDEN?=20=20
>> don't see it on the tracker.  Or perhaps this could be tackled from the
>> angle of fibers?  For example by adding a new failing test reproducing
>> the problem to its test suite, and going from there.
>>
>
> I talked about this with Christopher Baines at FOSDEM and he seemed to
> know much more about it than me, so maybe he can suggest a way forward?
>
> Starting with a failing test seems like a good idea.

I've raised a Pull Request which I think should help in fibers:

  https://github.com/wingo/fibers/pull/116

I think this issue should be possible to work around in Mumi as well,
the encoding on the port needs to be set, and I think Guile 3.0.10 needs
to be used.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Zbun
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--




Message sent to bug-mumi@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#69381: mumi does not correctly display (some?) non-ascii characters
Resent-From: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-mumi@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 22:13:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.69381.B69381.173931195919066 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69381
X-GNU-PR-Package: mumi
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN>
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez <noe@HIDDEN>, 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 69381-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B69381.173931195919066
          (code B ref 69381); Tue, 11 Feb 2025 22:13:01 +0000
Received: (at 69381) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2025 22:12:39 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59258 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1thyUh-0004xR-I1
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 17:12:39 -0500
Received: from sail-ipv4.us-core.com ([208.82.101.137]:57522)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>)
 id 1thyUe-0004xE-VD
 for 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 17:12:38 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=2017; bh=KSf6ZnItdDjnjVC
 GPOfUGp2OVOX19PNKffb9MqBpiD8=;
 h=date:references:in-reply-to:subject:
 cc:to:from; d=lease-up.com; b=drPHZvuWIHZRMulB6KsJS7kJYLrBFGkyoDcsbz9m
 YVyl7vXM+h/9OgRs2/kHFBB7u6zevObm+WfMCkb+KZkeuSOUO+cb+Nxi0w5FgEQWMVxP0h
 Ac5A5Q0wp2EAc6c8vjd3eqcdQR8qVf5+Icoo0YJfhyUKpUePP33dlBuDwkxN4=
Received: by sail-ipv4.us-core.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 9efd92e8
 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); 
 Tue, 11 Feb 2025 22:12:33 +0000 (UTC)
From: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87tt94lqp3.fsf@HIDDEN> (Christopher Baines's message of
 "Sat, 08 Feb 2025 09:40:40 +0000")
References: <Zds6yhPkZ0Id6SAT@ws> <87froape5f.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87bjvdajpq.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <878qqhg57z.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87tt94lqp3.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 29.4
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 14:12:33 -0800
Message-ID: <87mses2kry.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hi,

On Sat, Feb 08 2025, Christopher Baines wrote:

> this issue should be possible to work around in Mumi as well,

What is wrong with my proposed patch, please?  Just because a lambda
will eventually save memory and enable chunking?

Kind regards,
Felix




Message sent to bug-mumi@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#69381: mumi does not correctly display (some?) non-ascii characters
Resent-From: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-mumi@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 22:43:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.69381.B69381.173931375525289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69381
X-GNU-PR-Package: mumi
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>
Cc: 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 69381-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B69381.173931375525289
          (code B ref 69381); Tue, 11 Feb 2025 22:43:02 +0000
Received: (at 69381) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2025 22:42:35 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59440 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1thyxf-0006Zp-ED
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 17:42:35 -0500
Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:44122)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1thyxd-0006Ze-6E
 for 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 17:42:33 -0500
Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a02:6b67:e390:8b00::1ce5])
 by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 332B127BBE2;
 Tue, 11 Feb 2025 22:42:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from fang (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id e476e514;
 Tue, 11 Feb 2025 22:42:30 +0000 (UTC)
From: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87mses2kry.fsf@HIDDEN> (Felix Lechner's message of "Tue,
 11 Feb 2025 14:12:33 -0800")
References: <Zds6yhPkZ0Id6SAT@ws> <87froape5f.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87bjvdajpq.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <878qqhg57z.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87tt94lqp3.fsf@HIDDEN> <87mses2kry.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 22:42:28 +0000
Message-ID: <87tt90je7f.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@HIDDEN> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Feb 08 2025, Christopher Baines wrote:
>
>> this issue should be possible to work around in Mumi as well,
>
> What is wrong with my proposed patch, please?  Just because a lambda
> will eventually save memory and enable chunking?

I'm late to this thread but looking at your patch that looks like it
should work, there's nothing wrong with it, I was just looking at fixing
the issue with chunked responses.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmer0lRfFIAAAAAALgAo
aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF
ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh
aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9Xeu/Q/+LaK0o6yoMy1frlPtYEoPE01UPfd7Mi3o
XhccA2sLd4KMUFl4jhoCCQuBuDD5mIn9pK9a+P3SHgzFNGwCutneLxJbiMIcFMYc
/9fR1ISfBNxzVTS8GJsByilldS7jhzpW5Om+fHcCBQoZ7VRT0NwAO1gcGFU32DCw
MIymJuiGz+8AJ1A7TOdP/mYB1P7KgCwTeJzSi+/CNpaTZWVhv+gLT1+NxrGU0IDD
Semr+4ZACfuG4XOX6UiOJ9Z/xempidk8P1nUkZe7t9Ta93rwIel8SawggWhgDUBL
eRwoNAIbqLJgA5iBaLYvFvrFboAln2HhbhI5Y1gDhHpJuaV6oJVmrAuR4n/4P33m
Y1KEj9gRCswP7ms81UH6/Mrmlz/Vc6gMW+5LrmMzvkY+/RNTGdpNT3for+JFaL2a
Vo/15V7gbcl7m1tv20WiXuaCzEZNe2T36qaEdHFbOf8vaWmpnfTff/z81RqUxCLX
XULLFkXamDbN+BQQuRP4o53jeiNt93SYI7ekvZ2ljavjOJUxei70kfxO+5XEL2+F
NvzcN+VPrBPgddJbfPvqSw0tJnUYIPjsHw/EvT4JaN+eJVFkXt8k4a+//ClhGsaI
xO+JPczN6vh4kcwYm+nn3Qp9Rgd8mJhU/GE1WnJ5rQifmJP7csBKtZiS4+OpJvvJ
/ZZU798Sk0c=
=TKmJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--




Message sent to bug-mumi@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#69381: mumi does not correctly display (some?) non-ascii characters
Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-mumi@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 02:50:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.69381.B69381.173932859518829 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69381
X-GNU-PR-Package: mumi
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez <noe@HIDDEN>, Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN>, 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 69381-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B69381.173932859518829
          (code B ref 69381); Wed, 12 Feb 2025 02:50:01 +0000
Received: (at 69381) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Feb 2025 02:49:55 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59855 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1ti2p0-0004tc-AM
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:49:54 -0500
Received: from mail-pl1-x62d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::62d]:43133)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>)
 id 1ti2ow-0004tJ-LL
 for 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:49:51 -0500
Received: by mail-pl1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id
 d9443c01a7336-21f6022c2c3so6205915ad.0
 for <69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:49:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1739328583; x=1739933383; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
 h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
 :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=qOXNYaXZOHi+BCKVowKflVaMsiRIp1DVu684oOhLDTY=;
 b=fk/SGJkTiayIqXhBs9mtK7ykGiZPLHyFOqvVX5/Fz338X0qMqNsvq0k1+sS/SmTWQK
 03wZP87Wuq9IVmlyznxud6B51b7zbUbjrkXUfaZ1Jxw4AxjU1kAuatg+iLsTTrNaR6tG
 ZOQPbCqkcRmfquNq8Sszt2TLVwB5+K2WZ9ZQPhHIS2V4aOLoxmj8ZXw9myVcgy6NkMiL
 2Fxju2SnevOMCyuC6lggIiEwHhhI7A+1fLivfDKRbXQo3RvwjMAp4aiWe21kRHN71OWs
 AJh1qbZwIOcTAyC8tTfFy4R66dxQ5ozRB+FPmK+GfyfzKbqn5TohUJNFHf5MuFTIIR6+
 wsag==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1739328583; x=1739933383;
 h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
 :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date
 :message-id:reply-to;
 bh=qOXNYaXZOHi+BCKVowKflVaMsiRIp1DVu684oOhLDTY=;
 b=V9EAayzycs6/DI02cNgquonmS/jXliS6OhA4oxBeVjulpxHaq5Y3NYPhagL1eu2dE7
 LMu/1RtrsmxjInctKAem6E5vULpRL+mx3VwaPYmvnX5gxgzcBlmgW9iTZccHUQk2UjiS
 4ooY0GCGP9MJTsbZZ4xsbSW3x0Ssx3EkJsdTDAYoF9bzg2k0wLwAMDU5HEM/ghTtgAy5
 b+PsulIyigwcfiSAAncYOtUtEHJAxrLzA7xZvaw16uDuEzc2eUhPR06sKAr3zhBwBb/o
 YmVE+1gZBhlSYBBtwco4GwZZJVEUJ/7TSncX6wCssDVQDwd2mxyTv4gsLEQQA27zJx5h
 81lw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1;
 AJvYcCWOagkbb1AG4PGR6UfrbxOXHmqvY6lXbQEGNeiPF99VzNNusgK2yq62tXUoxR8kW1HJE3gdRg==@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzlETCp6DyTna2z0KVulJR750ExbTOOdSf5GEe1OxLMg4o3Vi/m
 FZsQX8ufjQ5J4tYjoT3nCbg7rDR1ISZ6VxMhiJ1i5hz2zhZF9SfYxQeUzw==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctwLoStljW+4PMJ4Yl0+FKPsOuX/UCmUuWmj/ln7moQ7NMGN8Y604/mAD4QUg9
 zRpDoCZsVkbcXIf/V4EIh5SLuQ3EikQ4bGj1qM5TiYoFwJ9COLz8ggZGjo8U7r8buIPdxC7j9Bp
 FVPbNGN3fTm3GPsWcv1pmt1YRpKIMGHv34Uh1CVH/1M86amR8ebbGtn3JhP1ts7FlUxoDpUgkJw
 peHSoO2fckyIW+nK8+1lAeHCAhwRGCDTWwf2z0vjgOKTWFxMMH+2rEiouOq224GjswWvJ+Pa/Q1
 RGPIsxvuXsje
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGWYFm63cs9VygDwfZMX4RCeLkzhjwy0U+dcNSBhvNYcdA2e5beMrqWQ0fQScespcqDf9L2ew==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:418b:b0:725:ebc2:c321 with SMTP id
 d2e1a72fcca58-73218ba8420mr9565531b3a.4.1739328583428; 
 Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:49:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from terra ([2405:6586:be0:0:c8ff:1707:9b9:af89])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 41be03b00d2f7-ad51aecd55esm10054759a12.29.2025.02.11.18.49.41
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:49:42 -0800 (PST)
From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87mses2kry.fsf@HIDDEN> (Felix Lechner's message of "Tue,
 11 Feb 2025 14:12:33 -0800")
References: <Zds6yhPkZ0Id6SAT@ws> <87froape5f.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87bjvdajpq.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <878qqhg57z.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87tt94lqp3.fsf@HIDDEN> <87mses2kry.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 11:49:30 +0900
Message-ID: <87y0ybri6d.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hi Felix,

Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@HIDDEN> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Feb 08 2025, Christopher Baines wrote:
>
>> this issue should be possible to work around in Mumi as well,
>
> What is wrong with my proposed patch, please?  Just because a lambda
> will eventually save memory and enable chunking?

There's nothing wrong with it; I believe it could be pushed already,
while a more definitive fix in fibers or guile is pursued!  I just
haven't gotten round to it yet.  Anyone with commit access please feel
free to beat me to it, and update mumi on berlin with it.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim




Message sent to bug-mumi@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#69381: mumi does not correctly display (some?) non-ascii characters
Resent-From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-mumi@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 13:02:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.69381.B69381.17393653048257 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69381
X-GNU-PR-Package: mumi
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>, Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez <noe@HIDDEN>, Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN>, 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 69381-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B69381.17393653048257
          (code B ref 69381); Wed, 12 Feb 2025 13:02:02 +0000
Received: (at 69381) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Feb 2025 13:01:44 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33202 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tiCN6-000295-8C
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2025 08:01:44 -0500
Received: from mugam.systemreboot.net ([139.59.75.54]:59448)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <arunisaac@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tiCN2-00028o-D6
 for 69381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2025 08:01:42 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=systemreboot.net;
 s=default; t=1739365294;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=ilF1Uvb6hv6KZqjLFmADuwe6lMhoSJPHvJdPjgrI6kc=;
 b=CQ/7RZexQ9ChUI0idhMctoPCTNcgeKfCVSQIGYbEQ9Wc6l70Vm1M+SEEIM/xiAcWkMohz/
 tkhVpFNTiMKZQlRdDiDKMRKtNJecCbXqe4zP8Fbh4RToJ8NM4aPlwL1PfbmGaTLb8acD4E
 zelOF17t8fGDH4IFTseuZi12X2RPSx4y1RlDTH8z4D+V47uXLYtSKQbXD/a5x/nHMX7yE2
 G7QP3ev4nNCButMIQq6Zx4WM4KP+IYlc2V1oXn5Nv4pw+glD042qtW/Cp0tYJ0DBPqUMhL
 z9VjosrWktiUkIM9PFnvOX2PcPpQh6ZTkDV0gGjQXVg/endju1C/mvfQu+fdWg==
Received: from localhost (<unknown> [192.168.2.1])
 by mugam.systemreboot.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 80da1462
 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); 
 Wed, 12 Feb 2025 13:01:33 +0000 (UTC)
From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87y0ybri6d.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <Zds6yhPkZ0Id6SAT@ws> <87froape5f.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87bjvdajpq.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <878qqhg57z.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87tt94lqp3.fsf@HIDDEN> <87mses2kry.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87y0ybri6d.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 13:01:26 +0000
Message-ID: <87ldub2u6x.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)


Hi Maxim,

I am redeploying mumi on berlin today for a bunch of other commits. I
can take this over, if you don't mind.

Regards,
Arun





Last modified: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 13:15:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.