GNU logs - #71777, boring messages


Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#71777: 29.4; sexp-at-point in latex-mode when sexp contains ";"
Resent-From: Gabriele Nicolardi <gabriele@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:41:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.71777.B.171934801623251 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: report 71777
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: 71777 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.171934801623251
          (code B ref -1); Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:41:02 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2024 20:40:16 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37682 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1sMCxT-00062m-08
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:40:15 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:51318)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <gabriele@HIDDEN>) id 1sMCwU-00060s-4t
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:40:05 -0400
Received: from [2001:470:142:3::10] (helo=eggs.gnu.org)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <gabriele@HIDDEN>)
 id 1sMAXy-0002f8-HY
 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:05:40 -0400
Received: from smtp01.cbsolt.net ([185.97.217.40])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <gabriele@HIDDEN>)
 id 1sMAXH-0001Ys-Au
 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:05:18 -0400
Received: from [10.0.2.15] (host-79-44-242-88.retail.telecomitalia.it
 [79.44.242.88])
 by smtp01.cbsolt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4W7ss43fpTz3wbM
 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:53:59 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cbsolt.net;
 s=201504-di4k2w; t=1719338042;
 bh=NGhT444E9f72cHagFormoxignfeTgj4iyhai+1M2JRs=;
 h=Date:To:Subject:From:From;
 b=DyyrhMt/3jNuoAKPDxbfqErM3709YwuC0yaYetgzfC2isEeO4pJi9OknQvnG/e9eF
 ODgqhXdoUDr4Lno6Gr5WgfMOV/ye2Ng+CX+QqzVNVSfU+ayq+wH8LsfnnM7WDlVhQa
 eHcjCtNL2v1scjA21tjLM+OBrIvyXTlh3IbMsOtE=
Message-ID: <bdc05dba-8106-40cb-9a58-7c5ae12a26a8@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:53:59 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
From: Gabriele Nicolardi <gabriele@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.97.217.40;
 envelope-from=gabriele@HIDDEN; helo=smtp01.cbsolt.net
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hi,

I have this string expression in latex-mode:

$K(U_1, V_1, x_1; t_2, x_2)$

If the pointer is located on the opened "(" and I run "forward-sexp" it 
works and the
pointer goes after the closed ")".

But if, again, the pointer is located on the opened "(" and I evaluate
"(sexp-at-point)" it returns nil.

If I remove the ";" symbol from the expression it works and returns the 
sexp-at-point:

$K(U_1, V_1, x_1 t_2, x_2)$

Is it a bug?

Best regards,

Gabriele


In GNU Emacs 29.4 (build 2, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.20,
cairo version 1.16.0) of 2024-06-24 built on lcy02-amd64-050
Repository revision: 176061eb965cf945e7627ce87bb16ec5a03f8a4d
Repository branch: master
Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12013000
System Description: Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS

Configured using:
'configure --prefix=/snap/emacs/current/usr --with-x-toolkit=gtk3
--without-xaw3d --with-modules --with-cairo
--with-native-compilation=aot --without-pgtk --with-xinput2
--with-tree-sitter --with-json
'CFLAGS=-isystem/build/emacs/parts/emacs/install/usr/include
-isystem/build/emacs/parts/emacs/install/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu
-isystem/build/emacs/stage/usr/include -O2'
'CPPFLAGS=-isystem/build/emacs/parts/emacs/install/usr/include
-isystem/build/emacs/parts/emacs/install/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu
-isystem/build/emacs/stage/usr/include'
'LDFLAGS=-L/build/emacs/parts/emacs/install/lib
-L/build/emacs/parts/emacs/install/usr/lib
-L/build/emacs/parts/emacs/install/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
-L/build/emacs/parts/emacs/install/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
-L/build/emacs/stage/usr/lib''

Configured features:
ACL CAIRO DBUS FREETYPE GIF GLIB GMP GNUTLS GPM GSETTINGS HARFBUZZ JPEG
JSON LCMS2 LIBOTF LIBSELINUX LIBSYSTEMD LIBXML2 M17N_FLT MODULES
NATIVE_COMP NOTIFY INOTIFY PDUMPER PNG RSVG SECCOMP SOUND SQLITE3
THREADS TIFF TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS TREE_SITTER X11 XDBE XIM XINPUT2 XPM
GTK3 ZLIB

Important settings:
value of $LANG: it_IT.UTF-8
locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix

Major mode: LaTeX

Minor modes in effect:
shell-dirtrack-mode: t
tooltip-mode: t
global-eldoc-mode: t
show-paren-mode: t
electric-indent-mode: t
mouse-wheel-mode: t
tool-bar-mode: t
menu-bar-mode: t
file-name-shadow-mode: t
global-font-lock-mode: t
font-lock-mode: t
blink-cursor-mode: t
line-number-mode: t
transient-mark-mode: t
auto-composition-mode: t
auto-encryption-mode: t
auto-compression-mode: t

Load-path shadows:
None found.

Features:
(shadow sort mail-extr emacsbug message mailcap yank-media puny dired
dired-loaddefs rfc822 mml mml-sec password-cache epa derived epg rfc6068
epg-config gnus-util mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mail-parse rfc2231
mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader sendmail rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums
mm-util mail-prsvr mail-utils tex-mode compile text-property-search
shell pcomplete comint ansi-osc ansi-color ring time-date cl-loaddefs
comp comp-cstr warnings icons subr-x rx cl-seq cl-macs gv cl-extra
help-mode bytecomp byte-compile cl-lib rmc iso-transl tooltip cconv
eldoc paren electric uniquify ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type
elisp-mode mwheel term/x-win x-win term/common-win x-dnd tool-bar dnd
fontset image regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list replace newcomment
text-mode lisp-mode prog-mode register page tab-bar menu-bar rfn-eshadow
isearch easymenu timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax
font-core term/tty-colors frame minibuffer nadvice seq simple cl-generic
indonesian philippine cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese
tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese eucjp-ms cp51932 hebrew greek
romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese
composite emoji-zwj charscript charprop case-table epa-hook
jka-cmpr-hook help abbrev obarray oclosure cl-preloaded button loaddefs
theme-loaddefs faces cus-face macroexp files window text-properties
overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget keymap
hashtable-print-readable backquote threads dbusbind inotify lcms2
dynamic-setting system-font-setting font-render-setting cairo
move-toolbar gtk x-toolkit xinput2 x multi-tty make-network-process
native-compile emacs)

Memory information:
((conses 16 94745 6994)
(symbols 48 8180 0)
(strings 32 23981 1842)
(string-bytes 1 748444)
(vectors 16 18526)
(vector-slots 8 362068 6080)
(floats 8 40 162)
(intervals 56 343 0)
(buffers 984 12))





Message sent:


Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Gabriele Nicolardi <gabriele@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#71777: Acknowledgement (29.4; sexp-at-point in latex-mode
 when sexp contains ";")
Message-ID: <handler.71777.B.171934801623251.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <bdc05dba-8106-40cb-9a58-7c5ae12a26a8@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 71777
X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
Reply-To: 71777 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:41:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 71777 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
71777: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D71777
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems


Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#71777: 29.4; sexp-at-point in latex-mode when sexp contains ";"
Resent-From: Jeremy Bryant <jb@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:55:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.71777.B71777.171935245729668 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71777
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Gabriele Nicolardi <gabriele@HIDDEN>
Cc: 71777 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 71777-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B71777.171935245729668
          (code B ref 71777); Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:55:02 +0000
Received: (at 71777) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2024 21:54:17 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37733 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1sME78-0007iL-8F
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:54:17 -0400
Received: from out-174.mta0.migadu.com ([91.218.175.174]:30364)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <jb@HIDDEN>) id 1sME6q-0007hP-0b
 for 71777 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:54:08 -0400
X-Envelope-To: 71777 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jeremybryant.net;
 s=key1; t=1719352373;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=xcZTcO3O/+Eaja9b1JX+nfQ7E5FFSZc42mLN9QnoXG8=;
 b=QXnBYzKoi2/6oJEUhOmZbmVodO8V0Y+TUwxTSexVw8CZBvIfOlHgZF4OT3ByEu3b8X3KwI
 mvur5HXhjsai/WP2E+GEp7rWbNnkC3h/cubsKd8h6DdnqE6JWZe2xf7afCyNIcRQok6ZNc
 9ksfe09FzInd1kmWCaJIgpls7S/cyy30+tBVjDsL+7QYXz1I7y1pMij+A1+loC8T2Y+agN
 MigntKoK5ceQvLEghrA2S84jVvCFYfJlIM2GOs7HFkYutsSuE9m1T9H3iA6FOzWEX9rvpy
 LbikyuQNazdFvFuCVNgsVF++uITpdwJaqYx8+Aon48CjSvW23++Wj0kspWMPnQ==
X-Envelope-To: gabriele@HIDDEN
X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@HIDDEN and
 include these headers.
From: Jeremy Bryant <jb@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <bdc05dba-8106-40cb-9a58-7c5ae12a26a8@HIDDEN>
 (Gabriele Nicolardi's message of "Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:53:59 +0200")
References: <bdc05dba-8106-40cb-9a58-7c5ae12a26a8@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:52:51 +0100
Message-ID: <87tthg1yh8.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Gabriele Nicolardi <gabriele@HIDDEN> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I have this string expression in latex-mode:
>
> $K(U_1, V_1, x_1; t_2, x_2)$
>
> If the pointer is located on the opened "(" and I run "forward-sexp"
> it works and the
> pointer goes after the closed ")".
>
> But if, again, the pointer is located on the opened "(" and I evaluate
> "(sexp-at-point)" it returns nil.
>
> If I remove the ";" symbol from the expression it works and returns
> the sexp-at-point:
>
> $K(U_1, V_1, x_1 t_2, x_2)$
>
> Is it a bug?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Gabriele
>
>
> In GNU Emacs 29.4 (build 2, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.20,
> cairo version 1.16.0) of 2024-06-24 built on lcy02-amd64-050
> Repository revision: 176061eb965cf945e7627ce87bb16ec5a03f8a4d
> Repository branch: master
> Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12013000
> System Description: Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS
>

> Important settings:
> value of $LANG: it_IT.UTF-8
> locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix
>
> Major mode: LaTeX

This suggests you are using the major mode from AUCTeX, rather than the
built-in latex-mode?  Is this right?




Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#71777: 29.4; sexp-at-point in latex-mode when sexp contains ";"
Resent-From: Gabriele Nicolardi <gabriele@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:52:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.71777.B71777.17193559152139 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71777
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Jeremy Bryant <jb@HIDDEN>
Cc: 71777 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 71777-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B71777.17193559152139
          (code B ref 71777); Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:52:02 +0000
Received: (at 71777) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2024 22:51:55 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37738 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1sMF0r-0000YF-5K
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:51:55 -0400
Received: from smtp01.cbsolt.net ([185.97.217.40]:51992)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <gabriele@HIDDEN>) id 1sMF0X-0000Xe-A0
 for 71777 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:51:42 -0400
Received: from [10.0.2.15] (host-79-44-242-88.retail.telecomitalia.it
 [79.44.242.88])
 by smtp01.cbsolt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4W80Rt5CqCz3wcR;
 Wed, 26 Jun 2024 00:51:06 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cbsolt.net;
 s=201504-di4k2w; t=1719355868;
 bh=Oz7Z+d7udRX3RLYie70/lZ6roH9S72f6KwZ/THxkQs4=;
 h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=b7d6+iz8EdZzXZIN1xq5CoZTHuB+0HZpe9FMOOJJ4HsCUoqrijYD2TIlbXjt3gr5d
 dsiOeo4BnNCW1G9Ab03gZXIvVjytRvkHIqbb4el8/GXCCWMqrNHjeaudTcUcL9rYiF
 fgJcx79uxz5S0/owObk9939Fw5Z0CBCFrftRMd5g=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------WOljIzw4G00of0yRV0JcNVUz"
Message-ID: <37a79184-c35f-4180-b3dc-e567272baee6@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 00:51:05 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
References: <bdc05dba-8106-40cb-9a58-7c5ae12a26a8@HIDDEN>
 <87tthg1yh8.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Gabriele Nicolardi <gabriele@HIDDEN>
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <87tthg1yh8.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------WOljIzw4G00of0yRV0JcNVUz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Il 25/06/24 23:52, Jeremy Bryant ha scritto:
>> Important settings:
>> value of $LANG: it_IT.UTF-8
>> locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix
>>
>> Major mode: LaTeX
> This suggests you are using the major mode from AUCTeX, rather than the
> built-in latex-mode?  Is this right?
No, I'm using the built-in latex-mode. AUCTeX is not installed on my 
machine.
--------------WOljIzw4G00of0yRV0JcNVUz
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    Il 25/06/24 23:52, Jeremy Bryant ha scritto:<br>
    <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:87tthg1yh8.fsf@HIDDEN">
      <pre><blockquote type="cite" style="color: #007cff;"><pre
      class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">Important settings:
value of $LANG: it_IT.UTF-8
locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix

Major mode: LaTeX
</pre></blockquote><pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">This suggests you are using the major mode from AUCTeX, rather than the
built-in latex-mode?  Is this right?
</pre></pre>
    </blockquote>
    No, I'm using the built-in latex-mode. AUCTeX is not installed on my
    machine.<br>
  </body>
</html>

--------------WOljIzw4G00of0yRV0JcNVUz--




Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#71777: 29.4; sexp-at-point in latex-mode when sexp contains "; "
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 12:40:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.71777.B71777.171940559228218 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71777
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Gabriele Nicolardi <gabriele@HIDDEN>, Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Cc: 71777 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 71777-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B71777.171940559228218
          (code B ref 71777); Wed, 26 Jun 2024 12:40:01 +0000
Received: (at 71777) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2024 12:39:52 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38744 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1sMRwF-0007L3-UV
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 08:39:52 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37180)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1sMRwD-0007Ko-7u
 for 71777 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 08:39:49 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1sMRw3-0008Ez-Ow; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 08:39:39 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=yRPfesUmkITkRfwemHNvNRtMD3GmMYnV/tVsjkf/HtA=; b=NuBA4NVJ69uK
 q2/QnilJr18R850WTQL7gNmzPqrMbupvc9BKQvDbkh8KwtgaB/m31Ef9vw/J91lsPlxQA3Lxwt9/E
 8quQxDRazvlbhb8n8CkNwGMoA1Nx6yQs7bz7/kPWS3HqYmHd7i1GfTM0RoCbqvDH4PJtzMhC1WP6V
 56r3UTc27xkWFeWEeq81QlzTgurfuJwOVO15KZfzPRUn+eTbkmVUzxJUs/0MQvKUWPQfI8zAxlmGL
 8OH+gyVi8XDNY5+f7snLR4zX76HJqq5rytNFEN4PLJ4yqL3T36n1seXel8z1DxgvWw4NSavd6g/qv
 8Rbb37HC7pa6O/Apaz+Vfg==;
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:39:35 +0300
Message-Id: <86v81v98u0.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <bdc05dba-8106-40cb-9a58-7c5ae12a26a8@HIDDEN> (message
 from Gabriele Nicolardi on Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:53:59 +0200)
References: <bdc05dba-8106-40cb-9a58-7c5ae12a26a8@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:53:59 +0200
> From: Gabriele Nicolardi <gabriele@HIDDEN>
> 
> I have this string expression in latex-mode:
> 
> $K(U_1, V_1, x_1; t_2, x_2)$
> 
> If the pointer is located on the opened "(" and I run "forward-sexp" it 
> works and the
> pointer goes after the closed ")".
> 
> But if, again, the pointer is located on the opened "(" and I evaluate
> "(sexp-at-point)" it returns nil.
> 
> If I remove the ";" symbol from the expression it works and returns the 
> sexp-at-point:
> 
> $K(U_1, V_1, x_1 t_2, x_2)$
> 
> Is it a bug?

I don't think it's a bug.  forward-sexp moves across balanced
expressions, so it is not specific to Lisp.  By contrast,
sexp-at-point is specific to Lisp and Lisp-like syntax, and so it uses
the buffer's syntax.  Which is why ';' affects the result.

Adding Stefan in case he has comments for this.




Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#71777: 29.4; sexp-at-point in latex-mode when sexp contains ";"
Resent-From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 13:48:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.71777.B71777.17194096312840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71777
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Cc: Gabriele Nicolardi <gabriele@HIDDEN>, 71777 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 71777-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B71777.17194096312840
          (code B ref 71777); Wed, 26 Jun 2024 13:48:02 +0000
Received: (at 71777) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2024 13:47:11 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38833 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1sMSzO-0000jk-Sc
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 09:47:11 -0400
Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:37783)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>) id 1sMSzN-0000jX-AQ
 for 71777 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 09:47:09 -0400
Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6B06910006B;
 Wed, 26 Jun 2024 09:47:01 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca;
 s=mail; t=1719409620;
 bh=rtS7y2OHTrhlA2opha1zV3ZR3ZLfjCA0C1J84lYUZ7o=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
 b=Hx34R2inQQNl8UW0FsqvRiE5N8YHecO5IkgURQQRFrq3rtPRKnTQ5QVIIrmSNW14f
 HFbdGUXLgsi8K/SNxy4App8o95r7HED+3CxSDzr4rOdVd1UQXw706RgF4UvO5YVFBR
 qAmi8xTJRY04m+C9bcQiL7msr9SCN2ZZGN0lj37Lv/0HJYzge4wWmCGPr8zt6kl0E/
 uf1P0eHlUYrTH4Ylrh0OpKNQ4+rxZg+VCNPHts5Jin6ntB1XiNL1Jssv+jFzUwzKSd
 t+EFVGcqTRu3ucNLxm4Kc4Rz2sBqgK7Jpp2Dfmc7IxpWBuQNUdbQhDjQ6qEqknjRKG
 mZtA6yDeth6JA==
Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1])
 by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 11818100035;
 Wed, 26 Jun 2024 09:47:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pastel (unknown [24.140.236.196])
 by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DAE15120399;
 Wed, 26 Jun 2024 09:46:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <86v81v98u0.fsf@HIDDEN> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 26 Jun
 2024 15:39:35 +0300")
Message-ID: <jwvo77nzv42.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
References: <bdc05dba-8106-40cb-9a58-7c5ae12a26a8@HIDDEN>
 <86v81v98u0.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 09:46:59 -0400
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results:  0
 ALL_TRUSTED                -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 AWL -0.140 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
 domain
 DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from
 domain
X-SPAM-LEVEL: 
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

>> $K(U_1, V_1, x_1; t_2, x_2)$
>> 
>> If the pointer is located on the opened "(" and I run "forward-sexp" it 
>> works and the
>> pointer goes after the closed ")".
>> 
>> But if, again, the pointer is located on the opened "(" and I evaluate
>> "(sexp-at-point)" it returns nil.
>> 
>> If I remove the ";" symbol from the expression it works and returns the 
>> sexp-at-point:
>> 
>> $K(U_1, V_1, x_1 t_2, x_2)$
>> 
>> Is it a bug?
>
> I don't think it's a bug.  forward-sexp moves across balanced
> expressions, so it is not specific to Lisp.  By contrast,
> sexp-at-point is specific to Lisp and Lisp-like syntax, and so it uses
> the buffer's syntax.  Which is why ';' affects the result.
>
> Adding Stefan in case he has comments for this.

AFAICT, `sexp-at-point` correctly finds the parenthesized thingy, but it
is asked to return the Lisp object it represents rather than a string,
so it `read`s, which inevitably obeys the ELisp syntax.

IOW, I suspect you want (thing-at-point 'sexp) rather than
(sexp-at-point).


        Stefan






Last modified: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 14:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.