GNU bug report logs - #75080
guix pull fails on arm64 due to cmake DEB self-tests

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Package: guix; Reported by: Simon Josefsson <simon@HIDDEN>; Done: Simon Josefsson <simon@HIDDEN>; Maintainer for guix is bug-guix@HIDDEN.

Message received at 75080-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 75080-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Mar 2025 21:45:07 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 09 17:45:07 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34627 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1trOSJ-0004VM-Fh
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2025 17:45:07 -0400
Received: from fout-b4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([202.12.124.147]:59607)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1trOSH-0004Tv-BE
 for 75080-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2025 17:45:06 -0400
Received: from phl-compute-08.internal (phl-compute-08.phl.internal
 [10.202.2.48])
 by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0CD11400E2;
 Sun,  9 Mar 2025 17:44:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163])
 by phl-compute-08.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 09 Mar 2025 17:44:57 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name;
 h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from
 :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1741556697; x=
 1741643097; bh=jXoJP+MGzRS1SLLiUnC8Bua3kmRBcnLWp//yzLC7Kyg=; b=f
 S2cDUkoFSLuFouo42yEx8nb4qLAj3S3+bxmg2tZF9CEM4n+KN0Oh2W/c8LSXlu0A
 X6QV05EVWjdrZ7/pSvFQ/bfTKhtVgCxqCRqYHncr5XgN+IBgF4zyCiCBBD9+xk32
 XG5FiQ6pXqV2RfaXdrtZwfOjnxH86E2J4yK3d1Ne8Q=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date
 :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to
 :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=
 1741556697; x=1741643097; bh=jXoJP+MGzRS1SLLiUnC8Bua3kmRBcnLWp//
 yzLC7Kyg=; b=3+lQRqfNXIG+d/4wQtGOgZ78GThfzmK/TyBPn9HBfFv5ohkJ0eC
 4iHOsameQIZ/6bhFl04F083n3c+ZHTZo8Rv0+eNFjBquZmJI+rFQq1phdUgyA+fo
 Xn8s8Ayy9MNCxNVTHrAeBt93dpxtk8KtFH+vzi/lxcPhOTnzgqBrpbzYTMubcL6J
 vOxZcCXe1SeHVUKCh2n3FXCg9P0RTwQNLH+XTiVEiktPSd9pA8OgLonVC8suOTmO
 1v5E6VkhycWJR9N3+b2CTCIrIFjpTKAta0haaI3DITM9HQuK8PoF7QiK1m7qAzAw
 St8r9f9z/iEPOjgTu6dRo5MXGnfMEeeya4A==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:2AvOZ9n64SVwv-gdMDjXJ7x3ylsvYqg849aguggcdC1Skchqmrn1VA>
 <xme:2AvOZ43gmN5zzwH0MAMO_D8PqAdgFvvNuEsHVop4X5tjcuB_4YxsQadEwsRDX1EiH
 GAEGGZ159pg4e_WGQ>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:2AvOZzqiMmA2uIHGuWImze9WBlkeOLPkQadajPzbEuFwi5txPJ9CS0nqBHcVBiIVYIYBqvyvj29tWWlD-ityY52o>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgdduudejheeiucetufdoteggodetrf
 dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggv
 pdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpih
 gvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddt
 vdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhird
 hnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepieetudehfeekueefleegudfhjefgleehfeel
 uefhfeffgfeuudelhedvjeelieetnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrg
 hmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgdpnhgspghrtghp
 thhtohepfedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepshhimhhonhesjhhosh
 gvfhhsshhonhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopeejhedtkedtqdguohhnvgesuggvsggsuhhg
 shdrghhnuhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehluhguohesghhnuhdrohhrgh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:2AvOZ9maqpH2TqAsD4ixIoLSOmkR-AJZ9AGqctVj7hzZfAMMUl-j0w>
 <xmx:2AvOZ72oEnfadjcapi-Cm7zcX-6YLQ9WlqJ8_FaoUsTsCdv0ZYlr2w>
 <xmx:2AvOZ8tCrmt_EUp8tBRXkir6kPcwDxO5H-jWHgPuo08cgjzgMtmNJQ>
 <xmx:2AvOZ_Vj9ngahdsm81I04RFmrFysdY-bhiBikTQhqWvO5xDzCEJscw>
 <xmx:2QvOZ8wW8r5vOAmLSxCtwSg0V3KcoMYJYkmsA6SzCyvG0q9r0jDNrecJ>
Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun,
 9 Mar 2025 17:44:56 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2025 17:44:54 -0400
From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
To: Simon Josefsson <simon@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75080: guix pull fails on arm64 due to cmake DEB self-tests
Message-ID: <Z84L1t0GIe61MICr@HIDDEN>
References: <874j2sqiwx.fsf@HIDDEN> <875xmlnr69.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <874j19nvse.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z6LEXtdQ4fLauQQL@HIDDEN>
 <87ikoxjdya.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <eb60b7c0-62fd-41ec-9f8d-4f47471204b8@HIDDEN>
 <87wmd5vvug.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87wmd5vvug.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75080-done
Cc: 75080-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 01:11:51PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Fortunately it seems that building images without --disable-chroot now
> appears to work for me (at least some of the time).  Here is a
> successful arm64 Guix GitLab pipeline job where 'guix install' works:

Great! It's definitely expected that everything works with
'--disable-chroot'. And if it doesn't, then it's a bug.
Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#75080; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 75080-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 75080-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Mar 2025 12:12:33 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 04 07:12:33 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55979 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tpR8S-0004P9-IA
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2025 07:12:32 -0500
Received: from uggla.sjd.se ([2001:9b1:8633::107]:48088)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <simon@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tpR8O-0004Ow-Om
 for 75080-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2025 07:12:30 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=josefsson.org; s=ed2303; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:
 References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:
 Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description;
 bh=xNqkdxEbEKC2PQfiqkVC38lpjjCyjL8Wazez+6jiEiY=; t=1741090344; x=1742299944; 
 b=O9UXqlZkinv1SCVgCF0Go8S68aoqvoRRi+pnJRHgZ6kCSRTn7sgRBDoYfZROMDC46ra2wc16y7s
 lwQWRDot9Bw==;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=josefsson.org; s=rsa2303; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:
 References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:
 Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description;
 bh=xNqkdxEbEKC2PQfiqkVC38lpjjCyjL8Wazez+6jiEiY=; t=1741090344; x=1742299944; 
 b=W9ROJLY0FcRScnoJf+bTqdQnpsttJOQgfAGzx4nYpH8LWfRM1hlBVrp8+jagKj8prszfBUM57C/
 aW22wW3OIvTaViYnsal9+X/Zdy4sja4KbnffcWPgoAcUgrb5V6LIdncF/gAB3158u+dvAA4FavYnn
 uVRVWTXB3nONOXFFbHgxw3uyIOMeDbYjhMZPzS1fY1MaqzF/jXRvHDJJQ8JTXwtk8Xu94DDy8VuyL
 4H4Fz8yC8MSN6rL6f/M0D70S4MdsXHrWN75vhX8cG29aLBerdDtHmeXk8YwcgkJzoBdfcO7b6v0dU
 PoGqwXJ31RamWUusL0DN8BNjcq9X10R1Iv0uJy+Fr00ewEZTzuMk/0Pduk++g3fErkty2xosGUJsp
 OuuSCjVUzJ7ACBHeZjHaWq1wrHzWeMk7kMbuplVM53kiI/VhGpc8jVNuXKat6PQNWN14QtUbQ;
Received: from h-178-174-130-130.a498.priv.bahnhof.se ([178.174.130.130]:48520
 helo=kaka) by uggla.sjd.se with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95)
 (envelope-from <simon@HIDDEN>) id 1tpR8G-0021tL-H5;
 Tue, 04 Mar 2025 12:12:20 +0000
From: Simon Josefsson <simon@HIDDEN>
To: "Leo Famulari" <leo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75080: guix pull fails on arm64 due to cmake DEB self-tests
In-Reply-To: <eb60b7c0-62fd-41ec-9f8d-4f47471204b8@HIDDEN> (Leo
 Famulari's message of "Wed, 26 Feb 2025 13:14:02 -0500")
References: <874j2sqiwx.fsf@HIDDEN> <875xmlnr69.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <874j19nvse.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z6LEXtdQ4fLauQQL@HIDDEN>
 <87ikoxjdya.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <eb60b7c0-62fd-41ec-9f8d-4f47471204b8@HIDDEN>
OpenPGP: id=B1D2BD1375BECB784CF4F8C4D73CF638C53C06BE;
 url=https://josefsson.org/key-20190320.txt
X-Hashcash: 1:23:250304:leo@HIDDEN::FhjJlGztfltJQZEK:DW4u
X-Hashcash: 1:23:250304:ludo@HIDDEN::nNyLK0PpNMkZppHg:MZJB
X-Hashcash: 1:23:250304:75080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org::K9ilpWLUstv/63Sv:17D8m
X-Hashcash: 1:23:250304:75080-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org::8JHRlpe1/Spb0XdN:xoFD
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 13:11:51 +0100
Message-ID: <87wmd5vvug.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75080-done
Cc: 75080-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

"Leo Famulari" <leo@HIDDEN> writes:

> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025, at 03:41, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> Hi.  What do you mean by disabled isolation?  In the initial e-mail I
>> quoted the set of commands used which involved:
>>
>> (guix-daemon --disable-chroot --build-users-group=_guixbuild &
>>
>> Is that what you mean?
>
> Yes, I'm sorry I missed that and made you spell it out!
>
>> Is building things without build isolation not supposed to work?
>
> Not really. We do accept help patching upstream build scripts to fix
> issues like this one, but I don't think anyone is regularly testing
> Guix without the build chroot, and the warranty is definitely void
> when Guix is used this way. I think that countless build will break
> without the chroot, as build scripts will look for dependencies in the
> "wrong" (i.e. non-Guixy) places.

Thank you for explaining!  These internal things are still rather
sktechy to me.  It makes perfect sense now that I see it this way.

Fortunately it seems that building images without --disable-chroot now
appears to work for me (at least some of the time).  Here is a
successful arm64 Guix GitLab pipeline job where 'guix install' works:

https://gitlab.com/debdistutils/guix/container-selftests/-/jobs/9305446937

That container image was built from a pure Guix container image, which
in turn was built from a Debian+Guix container image.

So I think my original request was simply a misunderstanding, closing...

/Simon

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=8imV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
Notification sent to Simon Josefsson <simon@HIDDEN>:
bug acknowledged by developer. Full text available.
Reply sent to Simon Josefsson <simon@HIDDEN>:
You have taken responsibility. Full text available.

Message received at 75080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 75080) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2025 18:14:31 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 26 13:14:30 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55432 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tnLvS-0000St-He
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 13:14:30 -0500
Received: from fout-b8-smtp.messagingengine.com ([202.12.124.151]:52481)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1tnLvP-0000Sc-RC
 for 75080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 13:14:28 -0500
Received: from phl-compute-06.internal (phl-compute-06.phl.internal
 [10.202.2.46])
 by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB129114008C;
 Wed, 26 Feb 2025 13:14:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from phl-imap-08 ([10.202.2.84])
 by phl-compute-06.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 26 Feb 2025 13:14:21 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name;
 h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type
 :date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id
 :mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=
 mesmtp; t=1740593661; x=1740680061; bh=wMokJlWs8/HJV7ZduVMh5h3Rb
 3x3+xbdhhgJzyi/5pQ=; b=oqTbw4G9DmBgBQ0MQBZn96QihnmzZZw+yqEMS3yB5
 H+XJjgGnL5sgnJDWseZGwFFAB1OANISeR/uRikhTcGOfzVV/GCvT4S0pkeJkDhiQ
 iRuzA9AHUIMNIhgmJDsy6o8YMKYGnlir66lF0a+h3pftoqIFpAoNoGusJ5q6TG9C
 58=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding
 :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id
 :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version
 :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy
 :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1740593661; x=
 1740680061; bh=wMokJlWs8/HJV7ZduVMh5h3Rb3x3+xbdhhgJzyi/5pQ=; b=s
 RXMaiwBChjCeqpK2RYAHyphX7sDRyK+T1NihTsvNj4l12V109aoZJCbUUPjA/GFO
 VrZ1DeMWYE75ey/oDs7y6aum2M6r9q7YX+Tofp90elzpF5MzCqdR6bRAFDzG5Ro0
 jVRBGxFIC+SOWVfJ1yOeAppfmA7FL9jwUzB7pVdNE3EaQ8NseHd9Tfez/U8531sp
 jKcKRxp9ZwGTDuJwEuph9jNwtzNatKFhbMXvo/U412RJzBsAqA2uwwLLi+6eXBUO
 fYnAl5IDUp44stsv08iHL+sJBKBp0/S7m/5khpQ/rYcjb2B9KubEnsqZrFjWNzI2
 X5Lqj4Sfb6rjzhEhYDNVQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:_Vm_Z_09Y_Qwx2g9Uy8fltgUQKjcI-ttcSXGSA3QfaQiLIOnulV7lw>
 <xme:_Vm_Z-HOJAszKfMkShDwg39TU2hQSFwOtOstDx8bZx6wKi1hl3sxc5pvShebYcN4p
 kqIUQbs0ezIFFFAoA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgdekhedvjecutefuodetggdotefrod
 ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdp
 uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivg
 hnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefoggffhffvvefkjghfufgtgfesthejredtredt
 tdenucfhrhhomhepfdfnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihdfuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrh
 hirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepledtteelleevueevfeetieffudeikeev
 ueduieeufeehteeiueejveduueelfefhnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrg
 hrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgdpnhgspghr
 tghpthhtohepfedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepjeehtdektdesug
 gvsggsuhhgshdrghhnuhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehluhguohesghhnuhdrohhrghdp
 rhgtphhtthhopehsihhmohhnsehjohhsvghfshhsohhnrdhorhhg
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:_Vm_Z_6TVp18CbdtfSA98FbNMhy6QZCTy6eW2kgieiiS8uJ1Tb-2tg>
 <xmx:_Vm_Z02j3r0C2vIINepsgrju6KQy3odMNTOKBB7JlQj1WfN2uPZGmQ>
 <xmx:_Vm_ZyF6wmvYuJun1-rper6DMQmi8CaJc6VL0HMVPzr5Yumc025_OA>
 <xmx:_Vm_Z19C2lBYGKrlWPPhJ7QJqjF8Ow_nUt-tuWsG0p4Lm2BWZrvTrg>
 <xmx:_Vm_Z3RKfJBnXzLq-Sp9pJmoeJKLj1E5LXxfhVm5-XC1ShCqjCPCQr4k>
Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.phl.internal (Postfix, from userid 501)
 id 5EA9218A006B; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 13:14:21 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 13:14:02 -0500
From: "Leo Famulari" <leo@HIDDEN>
To: "Simon Josefsson" <simon@HIDDEN>
Message-Id: <eb60b7c0-62fd-41ec-9f8d-4f47471204b8@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87ikoxjdya.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <874j2sqiwx.fsf@HIDDEN> <875xmlnr69.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <874j19nvse.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z6LEXtdQ4fLauQQL@HIDDEN>
 <87ikoxjdya.fsf@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75080: guix pull fails on arm64 due to cmake DEB self-tests
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75080
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, 75080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

On Wed, Feb 26, 2025, at 03:41, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Hi.  What do you mean by disabled isolation?  In the initial e-mail I
> quoted the set of commands used which involved:
>
> (guix-daemon --disable-chroot --build-users-group=_guixbuild &
>
> Is that what you mean?

Yes, I'm sorry I missed that and made you spell it out!

> Is building things without build isolation not supposed to work?

Not really. We do accept help patching upstream build scripts to fix issues like this one, but I don't think anyone is regularly testing Guix without the build chroot, and the warranty is definitely void when Guix is used this way. I think that countless build will break without the chroot, as build scripts will look for dependencies in the "wrong" (i.e. non-Guixy) places.
Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#75080; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 75080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 75080) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2025 08:41:43 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 26 03:41:43 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50916 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tnCz8-0006uf-PB
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 03:41:43 -0500
Received: from uggla.sjd.se ([2001:9b1:8633::107]:37144)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <simon@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tnCz3-0006uQ-Ck
 for 75080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 03:41:40 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=josefsson.org; s=ed2303; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:
 References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:
 Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description;
 bh=SSughF7erMwmG2uRm0QofZWB3HXD/XXgsElpIGIn5cQ=; t=1740559294; x=1741768894; 
 b=Pk5/zOduloAFTi4f9QxQAvglsdZQCI22nek8nZL1Kkorzwq3hjHdoBgRLMksXEZ4yQwUDeNJ9iv
 UmGU5B+/hAA==;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=josefsson.org; s=rsa2303; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:
 References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:
 Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description;
 bh=SSughF7erMwmG2uRm0QofZWB3HXD/XXgsElpIGIn5cQ=; t=1740559294; x=1741768894; 
 b=YtBbUCY6NxgLOjpxdsbJNJiPAcErmvQ4qdYVbajg8YaKkmm3G6R0xUl2pohkoLKXF/dwR1/Za+K
 aQyKvVkpKvRIl8kmKVxm9WExQyxmo4ivbL+QruqEoN2dfGYl5e7Pu6t8MyvmTJrKQKNudQEIGtNeP
 AIVpAPIj31Ej4Iha4cYSagTR/AMzmZY4Xa3VijKOL4DArdBwJ39pXbcH+kMDPWmfgWviAjlGM6naA
 uc/halK/VifN8C2SpOMftqBV5SKG/CWWR9alR7v9TcTZbBAJUw51u+zvtTARBuTuAPupuaDHI75rR
 lYcksoXS8Wce8gkbOEDKgx4kD6gVfBbu9GBUSQjdFOkP5w5UUAmS2nA31G2kJQbWWo737R0z8Rc5r
 mu8BwVn1NhTtZRTSZcbC+tbTT9rJr3vJRHNyOTPy9jFiKPNUI4kqBDzTqOMGa+uJO+5RU1Gi2;
Received: from [82.147.58.18] (port=43022 helo=kaka)
 by uggla.sjd.se with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95)
 (envelope-from <simon@HIDDEN>) id 1tnCyx-008l9W-17;
 Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:41:31 +0000
From: Simon Josefsson <simon@HIDDEN>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75080: guix pull fails on arm64 due to cmake DEB self-tests
In-Reply-To: <Z6LEXtdQ4fLauQQL@HIDDEN> (Leo Famulari's message of "Tue, 4
 Feb 2025 20:52:30 -0500")
References: <874j2sqiwx.fsf@HIDDEN> <875xmlnr69.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <874j19nvse.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z6LEXtdQ4fLauQQL@HIDDEN>
OpenPGP: id=B1D2BD1375BECB784CF4F8C4D73CF638C53C06BE;
 url=https://josefsson.org/key-20190320.txt
X-Hashcash: 1:23:250226:leo@HIDDEN::nKQr215ydsmGTmIo:C7f/
X-Hashcash: 1:23:250226:75080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org::b01xolYnHp+/A4kF:9Xdv
X-Hashcash: 1:23:250226:ludo@HIDDEN::1il7/r/XOYxlReDO:PKNU
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 09:41:01 +0100
Message-ID: <87ikoxjdya.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75080
Cc: ludo@HIDDEN, 75080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> writes:

> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 12:18:41AM +0100, Simon Josefsson via Bug
> reports for GNU Guix wrote:
>> Looking more carefully at the errors, I notice this part:
>>=20
>>    actual-err>    cpack-cfg> set(DPKG_EXECUTABLE "/usr/bin/dpkg")
>>    actual-err> cpack-cfg> set(READELF_EXECUTABLE
>> "/gnu/store/pqai4n95zn5wdw430gslb00sb967jdg8-binutils-2.41/bin/readelf")
>>=20
>> So for some reason building cmake-bootstrap in guix in Debian picks up
>> Debian's /usr/bin/dpkg, doesn't it?!
>>=20
>> I suppose that Guix's build servers aren't running Debian, so it won't
>> find any /usr/bin/dpkg.
>
> It would be really surprising if '/usr/bin/dpkg' could be found or
> accessed from within the package build environment, unless the build
> isolation has been disabled.
>
> Are you able to confirm if that is what's happening?

Hi.  What do you mean by disabled isolation?  In the initial e-mail I
quoted the set of commands used which involved:

(guix-daemon --disable-chroot --build-users-group=3D_guixbuild &

Is that what you mean?

Is building things without build isolation not supposed to work?

Maybe there is now sufficient details to reproduce this: rebuild
cmake-bootstrap in a Debian container with Guix installed without build
isolation.  I'm not sure how to trigger a cmake-bootstrap rebuild
though, guix just seems to use the cached result for me.

Btw, substitutes were available at some point, so there is now arm64
Guix container images suitable for GitLab pipeline!

https://gitlab.com/debdistutils/guix/container/-/pipelines/1682821432
https://gitlab.com/debdistutils/guix/container/-/jobs/9211075760

/Simon

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=VT4H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#75080; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 75080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 75080) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2025 01:52:41 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 04 20:52:40 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47367 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tfUam-0007iC-Mj
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2025 20:52:40 -0500
Received: from fhigh-a7-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.158]:39601)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1tfUak-0007hv-2s
 for 75080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2025 20:52:38 -0500
Received: from phl-compute-05.internal (phl-compute-05.phl.internal
 [10.202.2.45])
 by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19A41140120;
 Tue,  4 Feb 2025 20:52:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163])
 by phl-compute-05.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Feb 2025 20:52:32 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name;
 h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from
 :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1738720352; x=
 1738806752; bh=VQifu9Q6dlk1WiuAcpKZDh84BzV6YXdgM3ZquXhRV6U=; b=L
 Df5UboCSi47eyMSnQxj+2p01+vYwmkqJUHmy0whkGDD0y2WsW0OTJYlB3nDMP3y3
 Jeiu7uahc4pUL+15gy6T90YguJvT/uIPn01mcE3AgUSTSan5IpIJQNcvz9WLd6UA
 uLerAMy7Myoh6jqKXC6NpHUpMsmYeDa9PuVZMPlkg4=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date
 :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to
 :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=
 1738720352; x=1738806752; bh=VQifu9Q6dlk1WiuAcpKZDh84BzV6YXdgM3Z
 quXhRV6U=; b=DQCPoAldH44cBulPaigv/dx/7Zw87DyW6t4zjZfDcs2vfLpcYHg
 jjJqKUc1bn2VwgdDq5hiA5i3UTG+XRC0nuhkS6pKrgMDkI8NBZ55Fb9tjqF4P67m
 Zjx9VEl72aufCOr3kuzNH+WiqBUAZLCbIN9KyD0N2/tb7BNvaEUZpUTNbRG9kvdp
 3FpTT/HMpF0eJ8dRM5JefUoCLhcuFUUj/cFYGxtNrqmkl5cmPbGuPRCYmgumZKAM
 EbM+wJi6UmaYzIdwCTGhA+RmXpKnP+oHNMBfuZrrLZEbgVmPkl/Io2h+R+SdWyR0
 XPl2HC+nZrTVeJPNAie6Cw2Fn+5Rd8qYnoQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:X8SiZ9tYJLs6Pk6c5HCMHT4EGxD9KqhSbH1dwQ_NfoiFe7pm0wyShQ>
 <xme:X8SiZ2ezKHIzsH4cSPBJmF3EZk_x7X0dcbckY8KHkLCycagODM0ooUb09CIn1R55e
 N2WJ3a72fd953UeVA>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:X8SiZwxF19hBJsmKLUV7SujDpv_o__ejapztmtpx8w6tKg_HDwI-nVxvenpVEfS9nAUVunloV7a9DbSEnt3uz3u4>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgddvvdduhecutefuodetggdotefrod
 ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdp
 uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivg
 hnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddv
 necuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnh
 grmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeiteduheefkeeufeelgeduhfejgfelheefleeu
 hfeffffgueduleehvdejleeiteenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmh
 epmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvpdhnsggprhgtphht
 thhopeefpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopegsuhhgqdhguhhigiesgh
 hnuhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehluhguohesghhnuhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopeej
 hedtkedtseguvggssghughhsrdhgnhhurdhorhhg
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:YMSiZ0OapA-mqArOJO5FVyqfzcCx-qA2ganZy0o5qABSEDhWA4v4zw>
 <xmx:YMSiZ9-ktRfFRdsB5p8__efm-wkih2GoyKI0hcX5Yki56gFdeisUOg>
 <xmx:YMSiZ0Up8ioTmIOZIO8JdUv3vrBYmgBmLcn_K9Q_yBYI2sp6IfgEyw>
 <xmx:YMSiZ-chaS6r5vxHTTkO41951f59kUuznelqRqzu-9zBwCRAsljwZQ>
 <xmx:YMSiZ4aSeqiszPD4hUxFsf8kQGKNWuxG9S1of5c774rDmX0bY8TG73yy>
Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue,
 4 Feb 2025 20:52:31 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 20:52:30 -0500
From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
To: Simon Josefsson via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75080: guix pull fails on arm64 due to cmake DEB self-tests
Message-ID: <Z6LEXtdQ4fLauQQL@HIDDEN>
References: <874j2sqiwx.fsf@HIDDEN> <875xmlnr69.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <874j19nvse.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <874j19nvse.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75080
Cc: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, 75080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 12:18:41AM +0100, Simon Josefsson via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote:
> Looking more carefully at the errors, I notice this part:
> 
>    actual-err>    cpack-cfg> set(DPKG_EXECUTABLE "/usr/bin/dpkg")
>    actual-err>    cpack-cfg> set(READELF_EXECUTABLE "/gnu/store/pqai4n95zn5wdw430gslb00sb967jdg8-binutils-2.41/bin/readelf")
> 
> So for some reason building cmake-bootstrap in guix in Debian picks up
> Debian's /usr/bin/dpkg, doesn't it?!
> 
> I suppose that Guix's build servers aren't running Debian, so it won't
> find any /usr/bin/dpkg.

It would be really surprising if '/usr/bin/dpkg' could be found or
accessed from within the package build environment, unless the build
isolation has been disabled.

Are you able to confirm if that is what's happening?
Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#75080; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2025 01:52:46 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 04 20:52:46 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47371 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tfUas-0007iV-0X
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2025 20:52:46 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:50796)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1tfUaq-0007iA-Nm
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2025 20:52:45 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1tfUak-00035S-Oh
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Tue, 04 Feb 2025 20:52:38 -0500
Received: from fhigh-a7-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.158])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tfUai-0003mp-JZ; Tue, 04 Feb 2025 20:52:38 -0500
Received: from phl-compute-05.internal (phl-compute-05.phl.internal
 [10.202.2.45])
 by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19A41140120;
 Tue,  4 Feb 2025 20:52:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163])
 by phl-compute-05.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Feb 2025 20:52:32 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name;
 h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from
 :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1738720352; x=
 1738806752; bh=VQifu9Q6dlk1WiuAcpKZDh84BzV6YXdgM3ZquXhRV6U=; b=L
 Df5UboCSi47eyMSnQxj+2p01+vYwmkqJUHmy0whkGDD0y2WsW0OTJYlB3nDMP3y3
 Jeiu7uahc4pUL+15gy6T90YguJvT/uIPn01mcE3AgUSTSan5IpIJQNcvz9WLd6UA
 uLerAMy7Myoh6jqKXC6NpHUpMsmYeDa9PuVZMPlkg4=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date
 :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to
 :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=
 1738720352; x=1738806752; bh=VQifu9Q6dlk1WiuAcpKZDh84BzV6YXdgM3Z
 quXhRV6U=; b=DQCPoAldH44cBulPaigv/dx/7Zw87DyW6t4zjZfDcs2vfLpcYHg
 jjJqKUc1bn2VwgdDq5hiA5i3UTG+XRC0nuhkS6pKrgMDkI8NBZ55Fb9tjqF4P67m
 Zjx9VEl72aufCOr3kuzNH+WiqBUAZLCbIN9KyD0N2/tb7BNvaEUZpUTNbRG9kvdp
 3FpTT/HMpF0eJ8dRM5JefUoCLhcuFUUj/cFYGxtNrqmkl5cmPbGuPRCYmgumZKAM
 EbM+wJi6UmaYzIdwCTGhA+RmXpKnP+oHNMBfuZrrLZEbgVmPkl/Io2h+R+SdWyR0
 XPl2HC+nZrTVeJPNAie6Cw2Fn+5Rd8qYnoQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:X8SiZ9tYJLs6Pk6c5HCMHT4EGxD9KqhSbH1dwQ_NfoiFe7pm0wyShQ>
 <xme:X8SiZ2ezKHIzsH4cSPBJmF3EZk_x7X0dcbckY8KHkLCycagODM0ooUb09CIn1R55e
 N2WJ3a72fd953UeVA>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:X8SiZwxF19hBJsmKLUV7SujDpv_o__ejapztmtpx8w6tKg_HDwI-nVxvenpVEfS9nAUVunloV7a9DbSEnt3uz3u4>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgddvvdduhecutefuodetggdotefrod
 ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdp
 uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivg
 hnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddv
 necuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnh
 grmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeiteduheefkeeufeelgeduhfejgfelheefleeu
 hfeffffgueduleehvdejleeiteenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmh
 epmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvpdhnsggprhgtphht
 thhopeefpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopegsuhhgqdhguhhigiesgh
 hnuhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehluhguohesghhnuhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopeej
 hedtkedtseguvggssghughhsrdhgnhhurdhorhhg
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:YMSiZ0OapA-mqArOJO5FVyqfzcCx-qA2ganZy0o5qABSEDhWA4v4zw>
 <xmx:YMSiZ9-ktRfFRdsB5p8__efm-wkih2GoyKI0hcX5Yki56gFdeisUOg>
 <xmx:YMSiZ0Up8ioTmIOZIO8JdUv3vrBYmgBmLcn_K9Q_yBYI2sp6IfgEyw>
 <xmx:YMSiZ-chaS6r5vxHTTkO41951f59kUuznelqRqzu-9zBwCRAsljwZQ>
 <xmx:YMSiZ4aSeqiszPD4hUxFsf8kQGKNWuxG9S1of5c774rDmX0bY8TG73yy>
Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue,
 4 Feb 2025 20:52:31 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 20:52:30 -0500
From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
To: Simon Josefsson via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75080: guix pull fails on arm64 due to cmake DEB self-tests
Message-ID: <Z6LEXtdQ4fLauQQL@HIDDEN>
References: <874j2sqiwx.fsf@HIDDEN> <875xmlnr69.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <874j19nvse.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <874j19nvse.fsf@HIDDEN>
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=103.168.172.158; envelope-from=leo@HIDDEN;
 helo=fhigh-a7-smtp.messagingengine.com
X-Spam_score_int: -27
X-Spam_score: -2.8
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
Cc: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, 75080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)

On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 12:18:41AM +0100, Simon Josefsson via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote:
> Looking more carefully at the errors, I notice this part:
> 
>    actual-err>    cpack-cfg> set(DPKG_EXECUTABLE "/usr/bin/dpkg")
>    actual-err>    cpack-cfg> set(READELF_EXECUTABLE "/gnu/store/pqai4n95zn5wdw430gslb00sb967jdg8-binutils-2.41/bin/readelf")
> 
> So for some reason building cmake-bootstrap in guix in Debian picks up
> Debian's /usr/bin/dpkg, doesn't it?!
> 
> I suppose that Guix's build servers aren't running Debian, so it won't
> find any /usr/bin/dpkg.

It would be really surprising if '/usr/bin/dpkg' could be found or
accessed from within the package build environment, unless the build
isolation has been disabled.

Are you able to confirm if that is what's happening?
Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#75080; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 75080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 75080) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2025 23:18:55 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 04 18:18:55 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47211 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tfSBz-0000d8-CT
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2025 18:18:55 -0500
Received: from uggla.sjd.se ([2001:9b1:8633::107]:34420)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <simon@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tfSBw-0000cu-7A
 for 75080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2025 18:18:53 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=josefsson.org; s=ed2303; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:
 References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:
 Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description;
 bh=iHBUMnHNsYZoY1ypWWXkCudgSSbdf92H7oFWkhrOgyw=; t=1738711129; x=1739920729; 
 b=hSihXwnt3oNeIEiuPGsNF9MbXyUjnVXpM3VisB1VBbKCAabDNPETgbTgSZ+b6ZCTUA27vwkOJy5
 N7tqENTM0AA==;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=josefsson.org; s=rsa2303; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:
 References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:
 Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description;
 bh=iHBUMnHNsYZoY1ypWWXkCudgSSbdf92H7oFWkhrOgyw=; t=1738711129; x=1739920729; 
 b=tuj343PuhSVyGb6L2NKMu2xzEqnMGEvZRn+og03alVlEZBEGB5ff/3AmJcexFFvR3bDBbsGdXO6
 85uc9Hyp9XfXpxUmc7sR4UbCFotxBrh8dZn2DZ1Gu/QMgcS+KMsU3WMi2VPThmidEHYXy8oxcOJjL
 mIKkQrLqR9n+PmHqUmmMaQ751RokMYfVkKGLGT0801zH5fwyMXhxS29obE8iqMFzjGaNSmxQQVn9U
 xFw8p+tQbkOMtx8odZreMVwZ3HizKHapnmY68edwtFRUaM7vURYtjFqy+P04EPQDT19sVGgMndPbu
 aogxgb3s26/Q0tAxZhMvFcS4/eZWYnOsQ2Y6kerzOUWmewEwewgT/PDL4/10QcTs4k6/3U2Op8/oI
 q6YRukZ8X9iufl5HHgWN/J8i8m8y8KnwMvnvcP7L1xQrO5Q+326IdZKsx8zcJoFYevhVTdfUB;
Received: from h-178-174-130-130.a498.priv.bahnhof.se ([178.174.130.130]:33172
 helo=kaka) by uggla.sjd.se with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95)
 (envelope-from <simon@HIDDEN>) id 1tfSBq-0083yP-4A;
 Tue, 04 Feb 2025 23:18:46 +0000
From: Simon Josefsson <simon@HIDDEN>
To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75080: guix pull fails on arm64 due to cmake DEB self-tests
In-Reply-To: <875xmlnr69.fsf@HIDDEN> ("Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=
 =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22's?= message of "Sat, 11
 Jan 2025 19:25:50 +0100")
References: <874j2sqiwx.fsf@HIDDEN> <875xmlnr69.fsf@HIDDEN>
OpenPGP: id=B1D2BD1375BECB784CF4F8C4D73CF638C53C06BE;
 url=https://josefsson.org/key-20190320.txt
X-Hashcash: 1:23:250204:ludo@HIDDEN::7LxFkhy9I8OcBUv4:e7Uy
X-Hashcash: 1:23:250204:75080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org::iZmsSa8l6m4nnJyK:yPyH
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2025 00:18:41 +0100
Message-ID: <874j19nvse.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75080
Cc: 75080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ludovic Court=E8s <ludo@HIDDEN> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Simon Josefsson <simon@HIDDEN> skribis:
>
>> I get a build failure regarding "cmake-bootstrap" shown here:
>>
>> https://gitlab.com/debdistutils/guix/container/-/jobs/8717616613
>>
>> I cannot reproduce this on my own arm64 machine running Trisquel.
>>
>> It seems only cmake's DEB related self-tests fail:
>
> Looks like the problem is gone with a current-ish commit since
> substitutes are available from both build farms:
>
> $ guix weather cmake-minimal -s aarch64-linux
...
> Could you confirm?

Maybe the substitutes are now gone, because I just tried again and the
error looks the same:

https://gitlab.com/debdistutils/guix/container/-/jobs/9042454855

If it got the binary substitutes, I suppose things would be fine.

Looking more carefully at the errors, I notice this part:

   actual-err>    cpack-cfg> set(DPKG_EXECUTABLE "/usr/bin/dpkg")
   actual-err>    cpack-cfg> set(READELF_EXECUTABLE "/gnu/store/pqai4n95zn5=
wdw430gslb00sb967jdg8-binutils-2.41/bin/readelf")

So for some reason building cmake-bootstrap in guix in Debian picks up
Debian's /usr/bin/dpkg, doesn't it?!

I suppose that Guix's build servers aren't running Debian, so it won't
find any /usr/bin/dpkg.

Maybe this has something to do with why it is only all the DEB-related
cmake self-tests that fails here.

(However it doesn't explain why I couldn't reproduce the same problem on
my own arm64 machine that is running Trisquel.  Maybe substitutes just
happened to be available when I tried it?)

The GitLab run above is in a minimal debian 12 container, and the
commands are essentially these:

  - apt-get update
  - apt-get install -y buildah ca-certificates eatmydata
  - time eatmydata buildah build -t ...

https://gitlab.com/debdistutils/guix/container/-/blob/101642fd8dd576ae9346d=
90bc1eb4d5ba4fcd80e/.gitlab-ci.yml#L36

With the Containerfile running essentially this:

set -x && \
cat /etc/os-release && \
locale -a && \
apt-get update && \
apt-get install -y guix netbase && \
(env LC_ALL=3DC.UTF-8 guix-daemon --disable-chroot --build-users-group=3D_g=
uixbuild --discover=3Dno &) && \
set && \
(guix pull --url=3Dhttps://gitlab.com/debdistutils/guix/mirror.git \
 || { cp -v /var/log/guix/drvs/*/*.drv.gz .; gzip -d *.gz; tail -v -n1000 *=
.drv; false; })

https://gitlab.com/debdistutils/guix/container/-/blob/main/debian-with-guix=
/Containerfile

/Simon

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=okui
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#75080; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 75080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 75080) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jan 2025 18:26:46 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 11 13:26:46 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44770 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tWgC5-0004S6-IU
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2025 13:26:46 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57964)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tWgC1-0004Ri-O3
 for 75080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2025 13:26:43 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tWgBu-0002T0-H2; Sat, 11 Jan 2025 13:26:34 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:
 From; bh=+G0m2s9AIY1H9dQJ8Dct0xjLYK0Y/4YeXY3vTjRbCCM=; b=RCAZdct3fJSfSVARuE+i
 PJAMpvvzdLB1GqNPO3tgqMfYA+DlOUawr+yopZD29x6fsJQYye8A2xmj/amWGgt1nIpv+PP2WisKR
 CadIzhu8OHqPyJizrKIe6WknAvTxb9SeQoNOPqz67DksbE7dZHrRHV3CD7IMFc3a+AQfKt1iRRWYg
 BtIpcC95vFRLnsfc5BRlPsVztYPl1ipjbMM5Gulg6lJxaXL9v4QULe387TLEnl5jYgGJz3ed9AN8w
 PgoTMm3ca4+BCK1JLc/QzxWSVnyghINeqanUcqeqBSmUx3HKrNAlrbDyu4Zh8ivXzK7Z98uskOYTa
 MYbP6gtiyXmhpg==;
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: Simon Josefsson <simon@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75080: guix pull fails on arm64 due to cmake DEB self-tests
In-Reply-To: <874j2sqiwx.fsf@HIDDEN> (Simon Josefsson's message of "Wed, 
 25 Dec 2024 09:13:50 +0100")
References: <874j2sqiwx.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 19:25:50 +0100
Message-ID: <875xmlnr69.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75080
Cc: 75080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hi,

Simon Josefsson <simon@HIDDEN> skribis:

> I get a build failure regarding "cmake-bootstrap" shown here:
>
> https://gitlab.com/debdistutils/guix/container/-/jobs/8717616613
>
> I cannot reproduce this on my own arm64 machine running Trisquel.
>
> It seems only cmake's DEB related self-tests fail:

Looks like the problem is gone with a current-ish commit since
substitutes are available from both build farms:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix weather cmake-minimal -s aarch64-linux
computing 1 package derivations for aarch64-linux...
looking for 1 store items on https://ci.guix.gnu.org...
https://ci.guix.gnu.org =E2=98=80
  100.0% substitutes available (1 out of 1)
  at least 10.6 MiB of nars (compressed)
  27.7 MiB on disk (uncompressed)
  2.815 seconds per request (2.8 seconds in total)
  0.4 requests per second

  at least 1,000 queued builds
      aarch64-linux: 993 (99.3%)
      x86_64-linux: 4 (.4%)
      powerpc64le-linux: 2 (.2%)
      i686-linux: 1 (.1%)
  build rate: 545.79 builds per hour
      x86_64-linux: 545.79 builds per hour
looking for 1 store items on https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org...
https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org =E2=98=80
  100.0% substitutes available (1 out of 1)
  4.5 MiB of nars (compressed)
  27.7 MiB on disk (uncompressed)
  0.150 seconds per request (0.2 seconds in total)
  6.7 requests per second
  (continuous integration information unavailable)
looking for 1 store items on https://guix.bordeaux.inria.fr...
https://guix.bordeaux.inria.fr =E2=9B=88
  0.0% substitutes available (0 out of 1)
  unknown substitute sizes
  0.0 MiB on disk (uncompressed)
  0.169 seconds per request (0.2 seconds in total)
  5.9 requests per second

  0.0% (0 out of 1) of the missing items are queued
  0 queued builds
  build rate: 17.09 builds per hour
      x86_64-linux: 17.09 builds per hour
$ guix describe
Generation 331  Jan 05 2025 22:28:17    (current)
  shepherd 6d52686
    repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/shepherd.git
    branch: main
    commit: 6d526862375a426c13a52c7343c0ee9215367a00
  guile f6359a4
    repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guile.git
    branch: main
    commit: f6359a4715d023761454f1bf945633ce4cca98fc
  guix 613c8b8
    repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
    commit: 613c8b81702f08ee36f20d15ee8f8c42a37acfef
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Could you confirm?

Ludo=E2=80=99.
Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#75080; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Dec 2024 08:13:58 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 25 03:13:58 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36066 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tQMWk-0005xP-2C
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2024 03:13:58 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:52024)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <simon@HIDDEN>) id 1tQMWi-0005xD-5p
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2024 03:13:57 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <simon@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tQMWc-0000Zj-E9
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 25 Dec 2024 03:13:54 -0500
Received: from uggla.sjd.se ([2001:9b1:8633::107])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <simon@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tQMWZ-0003jY-AD
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 25 Dec 2024 03:13:50 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=josefsson.org; s=ed2303; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:
 Subject:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
 Content-Description; bh=Go1zWowk4N1R1D/iZ7lcx8XtSl1vNbMq3GjyOkblMLY=;
 t=1735114415; x=1736324015; b=xTyVKWajMnWyI9p3q1f0MlgHc4CDdvp6Od/4pzmeE5BRGHL
 subiEglPhi8tqZ3MB8yLJCtDSe1nzGPJNpEQsCQ==;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=josefsson.org; s=rsa2303; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:
 Subject:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
 Content-Description; bh=Go1zWowk4N1R1D/iZ7lcx8XtSl1vNbMq3GjyOkblMLY=;
 t=1735114415; x=1736324015; b=Za0xlwP9+UYfu8QjiZkX5ryy3DL2WdYxXFD9piXwkmkB8jK
 B+2WoviOSAs0y7CBHP5t9DiPvjeV6Zbpmy6Z2NSzQvPMfaAHV3Fcoaj4Nw7ZBDrLTauI16WxDmr8b
 aBOz3FPWOlVcmXm22vPvO1H4LPokkxznf4zoo1od3KB66A7QJv/xOeyPQoeur6RSqOOkfU7nj541j
 5FdXa8asonoc01QUZROdr4WVHXZvhQR4YGwkAFd1CSEMwImjPGb0OdAB/1Px+rtYpL4Z9Zs66FQQj
 cPRoLT/SO6eegYV3pPBi6TqTh2jCCRq+bhsxKbOeOHAeIVZRIahvHv+17L5xIl+zmhHlnlIhhcMAg
 n/maDwCJH2HWToEAqRndlAZpkXu//xm7uM69VHRYxq3EQugmA508aV15a6jDhdVfAKd4CBWWZM/E7
 kXU+VzN90pIQwfwGw1gCN5bu;
Received: from h-178-174-130-130.a498.priv.bahnhof.se ([178.174.130.130]:52046
 helo=kaka) by uggla.sjd.se with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95)
 (envelope-from <simon@HIDDEN>) id 1tQMWL-006sZs-On
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 25 Dec 2024 08:13:33 +0000
X-Hashcash: 1:23:241225:bug-guix@HIDDEN::YyUl8MD3Ldji9Qgd:0DJhI
From: Simon Josefsson <simon@HIDDEN>
To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Subject: guix pull fails on arm64 due to cmake DEB self-tests
OpenPGP: id=B1D2BD1375BECB784CF4F8C4D73CF638C53C06BE;
 url=https://josefsson.org/key-20190320.txt
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2024 09:13:50 +0100
Message-ID: <874j2sqiwx.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:9b1:8633::107;
 envelope-from=simon@HIDDEN; helo=uggla.sjd.se
X-Spam_score_int: -43
X-Spam_score: -4.4
X-Spam_bar: ----
X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi!

I'm running the following commands on a arm64 GitLab shared runner node:

export LC_ALL=3DC.UTF-8
apt-get update
apt-get install -y guix podman ca-certificates
(guix-daemon --disable-chroot --build-users-group=3D_guixbuild &
guix pull --url=3Dhttps://gitlab.com/debdistutils/guix/mirror.git \
 || (ls -la /var/log/guix/drvs/*/*.drv.gz; zcat /var/log/guix/drvs/qz/9fsb0=
935lpyssgg9428w9rvsypbfgv-cmake-bootstrap-3.24.2.drv.gz)

I get a build failure regarding "cmake-bootstrap" shown here:

https://gitlab.com/debdistutils/guix/container/-/jobs/8717616613

I cannot reproduce this on my own arm64 machine running Trisquel.

It seems only cmake's DEB related self-tests fail:

The following tests FAILED:
	561 - RunCMake.CPack_DEB.CUSTOM_NAMES (Failed)
	562 - RunCMake.CPack_DEB.DEBUGINFO (Failed)
	563 - RunCMake.CPack_DEB.DEFAULT_PERMISSIONS (Failed)
	564 - RunCMake.CPack_DEB.DEPENDENCIES (Failed)
	565 - RunCMake.CPack_DEB.EMPTY_DIR (Failed)
	566 - RunCMake.CPack_DEB.VERSION (Failed)
	567 - RunCMake.CPack_DEB.EXTRA (Failed)
	568 - RunCMake.CPack_DEB.GENERATE_SHLIBS (Failed)
	569 - RunCMake.CPack_DEB.GENERATE_SHLIBS_LDCONFIG (Failed)
	571 - RunCMake.CPack_DEB.MINIMAL (Failed)
	572 - RunCMake.CPack_DEB.PER_COMPONENT_FIELDS (Failed)
	573 - RunCMake.CPack_DEB.TIMESTAMPS (Failed)
	574 - RunCMake.CPack_DEB.MD5SUMS (Failed)
	575 - RunCMake.CPack_DEB.DEB_PACKAGE_VERSION_BACK_COMPATIBILITY (Failed)
	576 - RunCMake.CPack_DEB.DEB_DESCRIPTION (Failed)
	577 - RunCMake.CPack_DEB.PROJECT_META (Failed)
Errors while running CTest

That make me believe that the minimal nature of the container has some
impact.  Maybe some missing environment variable or tool or something?
That is usually present during normal builds but not this build.

The first failure starts here:

https://gitlab.com/debdistutils/guix/container/-/jobs/8717616613#L1746

with output cited below.  I don't spot any obvious problem.  I suspect
something odd is happening when running 'dpkg'.

Any ideas how to debug this further?

/Simon

549/622 Test #561: RunCMake.CPack_DEB.CUSTOM_NAMES ........................=
.....***Failed    0.88 sec
=2D- CUSTOM_NAMES-COMPONENT-type - PASSED
=2D- CUSTOM_NAMES-COMPONENT-type-Build - PASSED
CMake Error at RunCMake.cmake:216 (message):
  DEB/CUSTOM_NAMES-COMPONENT-type - FAILED:
  Result is [1], not [0].
  stderr does not match that expected.
  Command was:
   command> "/tmp/guix-build-cmake-bootstrap-3.24.2.drv-0/cmake-3.24.2/bin/=
cmake" "-DRunCMake_TEST=3DCUSTOM_NAMES-COMPONENT-type" "-DRunCMake_TEST_FIL=
E_PREFIX=3DCUSTOM_NAMES" "-DRunCMake_SUBTEST_SUFFIX=3D" "-DGENERATOR_TYPE=
=3DDEB" "-DPACKAGING_TYPE=3DCOMPONENT" "-Dsrc_dir=3D/tmp/guix-build-cmake-b=
ootstrap-3.24.2.drv-0/cmake-3.24.2/Tests/RunCMake/CPack" "-Dbin_dir=3D/tmp/=
guix-build-cmake-bootstrap-3.24.2.drv-0/cmake-3.24.2/Tests/RunCMake/DEB.CUS=
TOM_NAMES/CPack/CUSTOM_NAMES-build" "-Dconfig_file=3D/tmp/guix-build-cmake-=
bootstrap-3.24.2.drv-0/cmake-3.24.2/Tests/RunCMake/CPack/conf/DEB.CUSTOM_NA=
MES_config.cmake" "-P" "/tmp/guix-build-cmake-bootstrap-3.24.2.drv-0/cmake-=
3.24.2/Tests/RunCMake/CPack/VerifyResult.cmake"
  Actual stdout:
   actual-out>=20
  Expected stderr to match:
   expect-err> ^$
  Actual stderr:
   actual-err> CMake Error at /tmp/guix-build-cmake-bootstrap-3.24.2.drv-0/=
cmake-3.24.2/Tests/RunCMake/CPack/VerifyResult.cmake:84 (message):
   actual-err>   Unexpected file content for file 1!
   actual-err>=20
   actual-err>   The content was:
   actual-err>=20
   actual-err>    actual>=20
   actual-err>=20
   actual-err>   which does not match:
   actual-err>=20
   actual-err>    expect> /usr;/usr/foo;/usr/foo/CMakeLists.txt
   actual-err>=20
   actual-err>   CPack output:
   actual-err>=20
   actual-err>    cpack-out> CPack: Create package using DEB
   actual-err>    cpack-out> CPack: Install projects
   actual-err>    cpack-out> CPack: - Run preinstall target for: CUSTOM_NAM=
ES-COMPONENT-type
   actual-err>    cpack-out> CPack: - Install project: CUSTOM_NAMES-COMPONE=
NT-type [Debug]
   actual-err>    cpack-out> CPack: -   Install component: pkg_1
   actual-err>    cpack-out> CPack: -   Install component: pkg_2
   actual-err>    cpack-out> CPack: -   Install component: pkg_3
   actual-err>    cpack-out> CPack: Create package
   actual-err>    cpack-out> -- CPACK_DEBIAN_PACKAGE_DEPENDS not set, the p=
ackage will have no dependencies.
   actual-err>    cpack-out> -- CPACK_DEBIAN_PACKAGE_DEPENDS not set, the p=
ackage will have no dependencies.
   actual-err>    cpack-out> -- CPACK_DEBIAN_PACKAGE_DEPENDS not set, the p=
ackage will have no dependencies.
   actual-err>    cpack-out> CPack: - package: /tmp/guix-build-cmake-bootst=
rap-3.24.2.drv-0/cmake-3.24.2/Tests/RunCMake/DEB.CUSTOM_NAMES/CPack/CUSTOM_=
NAMES-build/custom_names-pkg_1_0.1.1_arm64.deb generated.
   actual-err>    cpack-out> CPack: - package: /tmp/guix-build-cmake-bootst=
rap-3.24.2.drv-0/cmake-3.24.2/Tests/RunCMake/DEB.CUSTOM_NAMES/CPack/CUSTOM_=
NAMES-build/second_0.1.1_arm64.deb generated.
   actual-err>    cpack-out> CPack: - package: /tmp/guix-build-cmake-bootst=
rap-3.24.2.drv-0/cmake-3.24.2/Tests/RunCMake/DEB.CUSTOM_NAMES/CPack/CUSTOM_=
NAMES-build/pkg_3_abc.deb generated.
   actual-err>    cpack-out>=20
   actual-err>=20
   actual-err>   CPack error:
   actual-err>=20
   actual-err>    cpack-err>=20
   actual-err>=20
   actual-err>   CPack result:
   actual-err>=20
   actual-err>    cpack-res>=20
   actual-err>=20
   actual-err>   CPack config file:
   actual-err>=20
   actual-err>    cpack-cfg> set(DPKG_EXECUTABLE "/usr/bin/dpkg")
   actual-err>    cpack-cfg> set(READELF_EXECUTABLE "/gnu/store/pqai4n95zn5=
wdw430gslb00sb967jdg8-binutils-2.41/bin/readelf")
Call Stack (most recent call first):
  RunCMake.cmake:230 (run_cmake)
  CPack/CPackTestHelpers.cmake:119 (run_cmake_command)
  CPack/CPackTestHelpers.cmake:137 (run_cpack_test_common_)
  CPack/RunCMakeTest.cmake:11 (run_cpack_test)
        Start 562: RunCMake.CPack_DEB.DEBUGINFO

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iIoEARYIADIWIQSjzJyHC50xCrrUzy9RcisI/kdFogUCZ2u+vhQcc2ltb25Aam9z
ZWZzc29uLm9yZwAKCRBRcisI/kdFosICAQDLlVz832hMsXc2MmOgLayXq1yX8Kp/
Ov9zqC8WPoN9qQD/TsaW9JIsSxw5eD+5DPN55qqYiB20KS0a4JH+qJL6TAk=
=C7A9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
Acknowledgement sent to Simon Josefsson <simon@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#75080; Package guix. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Sun, 9 Mar 2025 22:00:03 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.