Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Mar 2025 11:25:38 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Mar 29 07:25:37 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57254 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tyUJl-0002Um-LV for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2025 07:25:37 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:35580) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tyUJi-0002UN-4X for 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2025 07:25:35 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A12EB2; Sat, 29 Mar 2025 12:25:28 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id SIDUgdYxc4Qo; Sat, 29 Mar 2025 12:25:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net [91.160.117.201]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73545297; Sat, 29 Mar 2025 12:25:27 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#75518: Request for merging "core-packages-team" branch In-Reply-To: <877c4b4dz3.fsf@HIDDEN> (Janneke Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Wed, 26 Mar 2025 23:35:44 +0100") References: <87plj8sc1f.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z7xN_gHoOyanBAOd@jurong> <87y0xvquki.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <87h64fwemr.fsf@HIDDEN> <87cyf2qotk.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z8a_vuMcEdUWZqBb@jurong> <87sensc1st.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z8cuXWvxs7oQyI5u@jurong> <87ecz7tufs.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z-RqoW1y0IKuRC7P@jurong> <877c4b4dz3.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 12:25:27 +0100 Message-ID: <87o6xkf594.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 3A12EB2 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [6.90 / 15.00]; SPAM_FLAG(5.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_SPAM(3.00)[1.000]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS(2.00)[m:andreas@HIDDEN,s:andreas.enge@HIDDEN]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[] X-Spam-Level: ****** X-Rspamd-Action: add header X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++ X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Spam: Yes X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 Cc: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>, Zheng Junjie <z572@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Hi, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> skribis: > Right, I have collapsed the two squashes and the fixup, thus fixing the > two overly long commit messages with their XXX. Also I've rebased onto > latest master, which involved resolving some 25 odd conflicts and also > skipping a few commits. The previous core-packages-team branch is saved > as core-packages-team-old. Thank you! I=E2=80=99ve reopened this issue. I don=E2=80=99t know if that=E2=80=99ll = be enough to update the list at <https://qa.guix.gnu.org>. Ludo=E2=80=99.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs@HIDDEN>
to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2025 22:36:06 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 26 18:36:06 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44822 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1txZLy-00008w-4Q for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 18:36:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34154) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <janneke@HIDDEN>) id 1txZLu-000086-3g for 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 18:36:03 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <janneke@HIDDEN>) id 1txZLm-0003GT-TK; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 18:35:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=7oIJ6nmTQLFbw9Y7eaCUesIaUvZuvaXcVO1YgNlmwRw=; b=Dh5n+9wvaOGTOi6vwLmO kuf0NjKLgGZaIjXvtVJ5Ee9IIHmbL6Qs88zApYSYpdDajFAYFAJ5SqHLpmdCTi3TyitcRkmKGg2qa m5Pok9s25w0wFgTxPhs9RtNmaOQKZd/IVW4lqLNmA+VmySOEJPrTfN7JB2s0C3pYeZJuiiKcWwA4y TE5Eii3eg8sf3QTeM/7CHTKq/kOCCRw6n8QyWKHdExtpuh1zieT4Cpw9imWpkheOBpuqQRe1RROO/ lBhEHw7pBLo8e1qUwDxOxN5/e7jK3XVb1VwOtqtZLcOH3hiv5R3TKok+WkH1OPOH9gp+NfVoxWm3f JyTfZJfqaGOiyA==; From: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> To: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: core-packages-team updated In-Reply-To: <Z-RqoW1y0IKuRC7P@jurong> (Andreas Enge's message of "Wed, 26 Mar 2025 21:59:13 +0100") Organization: AvatarAcademy.nl References: <87plj8sc1f.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z7xN_gHoOyanBAOd@jurong> <87y0xvquki.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <87h64fwemr.fsf@HIDDEN> <87cyf2qotk.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z8a_vuMcEdUWZqBb@jurong> <87sensc1st.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z8cuXWvxs7oQyI5u@jurong> <87ecz7tufs.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z-RqoW1y0IKuRC7P@jurong> X-Url: http://AvatarAcademy.nl Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 23:35:44 +0100 Message-ID: <877c4b4dz3.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, Zheng Junjie <z572@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Andreas Enge writes: Hello, > I have added the newest release for mpfr on top of the branch. > Again I could build up to mpc. Thanks! > Before we merge, we still need to modify some commits having an > "XXX" in the commit message. Right, I have collapsed the two squashes and the fixup, thus fixing the two overly long commit messages with their XXX. Also I've rebased onto latest master, which involved resolving some 25 odd conflicts and also skipping a few commits. The previous core-packages-team branch is saved as core-packages-team-old. Greetings, Janneke --=20 Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> | GNU LilyPond https://LilyPond.org Freelance IT https://www.JoyOfSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE https://AvatarAcade= my.com
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2025 20:59:26 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 26 16:59:26 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44551 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1txXqQ-0006AU-4P for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:59:26 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:43850) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1txXqN-0006A2-F6 for 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:59:23 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89EC5D5D; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 21:59:17 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id XehU1MM_xMwV; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 21:59:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (176-179-191-150.abo.bbox.fr [176.179.191.150]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E423D132; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 21:59:15 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 21:59:13 +0100 From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: core-packages-team updated Message-ID: <Z-RqoW1y0IKuRC7P@jurong> References: <87plj8sc1f.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z7xN_gHoOyanBAOd@jurong> <87y0xvquki.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <87h64fwemr.fsf@HIDDEN> <87cyf2qotk.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z8a_vuMcEdUWZqBb@jurong> <87sensc1st.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z8cuXWvxs7oQyI5u@jurong> <87ecz7tufs.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ecz7tufs.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 89EC5D5D X-Spamd-Result: default: False [5.40 / 15.00]; SPAM_FLAG(5.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_SPAM(3.00)[0.999]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[] X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Rspamd-Action: greylist X-Spamd-Bar: +++++ X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 Cc: Zheng Junjie <z572@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello all, I have added the newest release for mpfr on top of the branch. Again I could build up to mpc. Before we merge, we still need to modify some commits having an "XXX" in the commit message. Andreas
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Mar 2025 22:04:03 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Mar 22 18:04:03 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46076 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1tw6wk-000141-MK
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 18:04:03 -0400
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:36260)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tw6wi-00012m-So
for 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 18:04:01 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00989D03;
Sat, 22 Mar 2025 23:03:54 +0100 (CET)
Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr;
none
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 2qCb4L0fwyTb; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 23:03:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ribbon (91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net [91.160.117.201])
by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F2C21AD;
Sat, 22 Mar 2025 23:03:52 +0100 (CET)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75518: Request for merging "core-packages-team" branch
In-Reply-To: <87ecz7tufs.fsf@HIDDEN> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?=
=?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Sat, 08 Mar 2025 16:26:31 +0100")
References: <87plj8sc1f.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z7xN_gHoOyanBAOd@jurong>
<87y0xvquki.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <87h64fwemr.fsf@HIDDEN>
<87cyf2qotk.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z8a_vuMcEdUWZqBb@jurong>
<87sensc1st.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z8cuXWvxs7oQyI5u@jurong>
<87ecz7tufs.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 23:03:51 +0100
Message-ID: <8734f467ug.fsf_-_@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 00989D03
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [6.89 / 15.00]; SPAM_FLAG(5.00)[];
BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_SPAM(2.99)[0.998];
FORGED_RECIPIENTS(2.00)[m:andreas@HIDDEN,s:andreas.enge@HIDDEN];
MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4];
MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2];
RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];
FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[];
TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[];
MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]
X-Spam-Level: ******
X-Rspamd-Action: add header
X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++
X-Rspamd-Server: hera
X-Spam: Yes
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518
Cc: Zheng Junjie <z572@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
Hello,
An update: I came up with Gash patches that fix the problem we were
seeing in <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/75658>.
Once a Gash release is tagged with these patches, we can move forward
with the =E2=80=98core-packages-team=E2=80=99 branch.
In the meantime, we can keep updating the branch and fixing issues.
Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2025 11:35:28 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 12 07:35:28 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47619 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tsKMy-000235-72 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 07:35:28 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:36848) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1tsKMv-00022m-FI for 75518-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 07:35:26 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72DB1CA; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 12:35:17 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ep7ehyL6IYsX; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 12:35:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (176-179-191-150.abo.bbox.fr [176.179.191.150]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B44C107; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 12:35:16 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 12:35:14 +0100 From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> To: 75518-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Close Message-ID: <Z9Fxcs3K1Jep-LPa@jurong> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A72DB1CA X-Spamd-Result: default: False [5.40 / 15.00]; SPAM_FLAG(5.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM(3.00)[1.000]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[] X-Spamd-Bar: +++++ X-Rspamd-Action: greylist X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) As the only way I see of "giving way", I am closing this issue for now; we can reopen it once the branch is ready to be merged (or open a new issue). Andreas
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN>:Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>:Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2025 15:26:43 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Mar 08 10:26:43 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56167 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tqw4Z-00042M-Fe for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2025 10:26:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56636) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tqw4W-000425-9G for 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2025 10:26:41 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tqw4P-00027W-85; Sat, 08 Mar 2025 10:26:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=UbZzEjQcMo2Mb42C10PUqk66Dzs7B59QMMXdskzU7ec=; b=Hmz0tVa/ajHnERmnMYWy ESMvnDXr6XbfEzXxK1LJ6kVMHEbCoV2n7qR3zOtUZusnz0Ka2DYNYVzNRF6m2Skv4O6afqRkjgOzF hbr+pISvD7ITWUeUjhBGYq3SEKQbAjKBBuxdOeBU5m6LklmDATbA78IHTX4jQCss71Z3Osi0cAsq6 zc69K1kxkjD+oONhBscI84kzM0dQG+T84yX1eXQNBtMFLz+wa43hPAeHtXGGZXIgw/UBce3fxLtw6 3CfpmGOSVlj34BjI5mfJMOAD6QroBRlCPXOP2cApdweaRWk1ZkMUeVAOb03/KbOnxxwGqLiKrrxec gEfwuMnIQ1j0/Q==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: core-packages-team updated In-Reply-To: <Z8cuXWvxs7oQyI5u@jurong> (Andreas Enge's message of "Tue, 4 Mar 2025 17:46:21 +0100") References: <87plj8sc1f.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z7xN_gHoOyanBAOd@jurong> <87y0xvquki.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <87h64fwemr.fsf@HIDDEN> <87cyf2qotk.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z8a_vuMcEdUWZqBb@jurong> <87sensc1st.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z8cuXWvxs7oQyI5u@jurong> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Octidi 18 =?utf-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 233 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour du Mouron X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2025 16:26:31 +0100 Message-ID: <87ecz7tufs.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 Cc: Zheng Junjie <z572@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> skribis: > Am Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 03:23:30PM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s: >> I would love to look into it but I=E2=80=99ve been failing to do so for = weeks, >> due to other commitments. I think we cannot merge with such a bug >> looming though, because it would come to haunt us. > > Is there actually any indication that the problem is new, and not > already present in the current code on the master branch? I don=E2=80=99t know. > Should we close this issue 75518, or how do we let the following 9 (!) > branches get ahead of us? We can let at least the next one. Sorry again for not being more available! Ludo=E2=80=99.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Mar 2025 16:46:37 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 04 11:46:37 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60634 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tpVPh-0000lu-4k for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2025 11:46:37 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:36504) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1tpVPf-0000lY-9Y for 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2025 11:46:36 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0124C6; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 17:46:29 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id pGAW7bhS63Tq; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 17:46:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (176-179-191-150.abo.bbox.fr [176.179.191.150]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E9F341C4; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 17:46:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 17:46:21 +0100 From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: core-packages-team updated Message-ID: <Z8cuXWvxs7oQyI5u@jurong> References: <87plj8sc1f.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z7xN_gHoOyanBAOd@jurong> <87y0xvquki.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <87h64fwemr.fsf@HIDDEN> <87cyf2qotk.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z8a_vuMcEdUWZqBb@jurong> <87sensc1st.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87sensc1st.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 2C0124C6 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [5.40 / 15.00]; SPAM_FLAG(5.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_SPAM(3.00)[0.999]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[] X-Spamd-Bar: +++++ X-Rspamd-Action: greylist X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 Cc: Zheng Junjie <z572@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Am Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 03:23:30PM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > I would love to look into it but I’ve been failing to do so for weeks, > due to other commitments. I think we cannot merge with such a bug > looming though, because it would come to haunt us. Is there actually any indication that the problem is new, and not already present in the current code on the master branch? Should we close this issue 75518, or how do we let the following 9 (!) branches get ahead of us? Andreas
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Mar 2025 14:23:51 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 04 09:23:51 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56555 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tpTBX-00066T-2O for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2025 09:23:51 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49920) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tpTBQ-000664-0d for 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2025 09:23:45 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tpTBH-0004xL-JC; Tue, 04 Mar 2025 09:23:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=GzEpIbBuR3vuVLJ5A9qOGKU+OWKVH6GhKBy2t8ecmj4=; b=HJ2Pio/YZmT2DDcoVZtr BRXBdPy3G04HiRzZGx6Dr8b7M1FWotmCJ/iL4JJ18BotfBaNNIeHg1ASA5zj45i07VGwturBTttpD DR8NZJ5C+Gr/W9z7hQGl/sgNIJFSv3MFS6WArQ7f/g0ggurVF9gmKBjFGXGNFsilDkTmnq0IX74V1 VErqOE5gmU01wsae3LL3tk98D44ruK3JAa9J/r6YRXdSm6+WrOnr0LTzv7NaB1PHEtb8TY6c5jHBx EViFgdZ+3CvPF1HOuV4N5AP17SWIU/ThUsM5mdFtTCZUOvsr4S3jiY3ThB2gtPDu0Dq8isx2KGjgv 2OIfs1yvuAe9OQ==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: core-packages-team updated In-Reply-To: <Z8a_vuMcEdUWZqBb@jurong> (Andreas Enge's message of "Tue, 4 Mar 2025 09:54:22 +0100") References: <87plj8sc1f.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z7xN_gHoOyanBAOd@jurong> <87y0xvquki.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <87h64fwemr.fsf@HIDDEN> <87cyf2qotk.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z8a_vuMcEdUWZqBb@jurong> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Quartidi 14 =?utf-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 233 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour du =?utf-8?Q?V=C3=A9lar?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 15:23:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87sensc1st.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 Cc: Zheng Junjie <z572@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> skribis: > it is our turn now to be merged. Should we do so once the branch is > built, or somehow pass it (which might mean we would need to close this > bug first)? Not having seen it in my builds, I am not going to look at > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/75658 I would love to look into it but I=E2=80=99ve been failing to do so for wee= ks, due to other commitments. I think we cannot merge with such a bug looming though, because it would come to haunt us. I=E2=80=99ll see if I can get some time to investigate but I think we need = more eyeballs. First step is to get a small reproducer and see whether it=E2=80= =99s limited to Guile 2.0 (which is used here) or not. Ludo=E2=80=99.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Mar 2025 08:54:40 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 04 03:54:40 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55211 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tpO2x-0007jH-Rs for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2025 03:54:40 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:57692) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1tpO2u-0007ix-4z for 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2025 03:54:37 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386A02BB; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 09:54:29 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id NIj-aIOe3rdm; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 09:54:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (176-179-191-150.abo.bbox.fr [176.179.191.150]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C18761; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 09:54:25 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 09:54:22 +0100 From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> To: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: core-packages-team updated Message-ID: <Z8a_vuMcEdUWZqBb@jurong> References: <87plj8sc1f.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z7xN_gHoOyanBAOd@jurong> <87y0xvquki.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <87h64fwemr.fsf@HIDDEN> <87cyf2qotk.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87cyf2qotk.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 386A02BB X-Spamd-Result: default: False [5.40 / 15.00]; SPAM_FLAG(5.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_SPAM(3.00)[0.999]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[] X-Spamd-Bar: +++++ X-Rspamd-Action: greylist X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 Cc: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, Zheng Junjie <z572@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello! it is our turn now to be merged. Should we do so once the branch is built, or somehow pass it (which might mean we would need to close this bug first)? Not having seen it in my builds, I am not going to look at https://issues.guix.gnu.org/75658 Andreas
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2025 14:59:41 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 03 09:59:41 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49737 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tp7Ge-0001lf-UX for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2025 09:59:41 -0500 Received: from mail.z572.online ([88.99.160.180]:40234) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zhengjunjie@HIDDEN>) id 1tp7Ga-0001lV-9T for 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2025 09:59:38 -0500 Received: from m (mail1.85362086.com [107.174.64.25]) by mail.z572.online (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id a10e786c (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for <75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 2025 15:05:12 +0000 (UTC) From: Z572 <zhengjunjie@HIDDEN> To: 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: some new commits for core-packages-team User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 30.0.92 Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 22:59:22 +0800 Message-ID: <87senukvn9.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hi, i push some commits to core-packages-team. 002291d6e3d gnu: pciutils: Use new style. 217b2e2add4 gnu: pciutils: Update to 3.13.0. d15c58bb821 gnu: hwdata: Update to 0.392. c000135ea60 gnu: linux-libre-headers: Update to 6.12.17. 091c0287523 gnu: libiconv: Update to 1.18. 2ca7789abdd gnu: diffutils: Update to 3.11. 588528c0f3a gnu: tar: Update to 1.35. 86bd1d058d0 gnu: findutils: Update to 4.10.0. 3ba2d9f5457 gnu: util-linux: Update to 2.40.4. i trying build hello from riscv64-linux, some package's new versions need <asm/hwprobe.h>, is include on linux 6.4 (as i known). so i update linux-libre-headers to the latest LTS. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfr6klGDOXiwIdX/bO1qpk+Gi3/AFAmfFw8oACgkQO1qpk+Gi 3/CyQQ//ZR6fBC5qvXIGqa8S85LqEPyC/oSMjmlGMWVsRbcszgEIUcLq3zUwTp3t Eq67LWvDjhqHuDfwSxO3Be6p0c3j2iXM4QaeSTBRQ8k5+UPKLH5pw3WV8NOfwMTW jFsAnR2iLft075y2Ku8LMwb3YC51ZMV8m3U/Q39K4x7RzeVQGFEjfd+lKoEGVLp9 vV0aVHOFP71VTk/c0biJaWPJ0ZliJO+o4eCgVldgkpH44dt0kyF635iBAyib7jfU 43hHpCu/q3FdpGrRmg4b8FGL9kK4vPtFf8HeyUwV7GiSc4u6l+mr+W6tUXKJwU3f cnpBPyrp1bX2C8MxugMMX1ZH2MKkuPjqf9mEagEpeTzcQIbxqQ/+oDFEZjaGGCIs 3LOSk/0qQ0jc/vx5zbCZwzVrEDVXm3qVKFZmMoAPu4P1tVcGUMmmcb99KLoxlyBN 6fTt2LEAe5joPL11HpnKXGUBommamuWmHdcRnGnVxblC1xv9y/udJ7XvkkWJVpbq gTRK3MmrY6R5P13kZBJUJbvX5+Gs+HUMw+1+BY3E9XrVhGjdWaZ/dVDconbv5moy qHLyqMTqwig4XVU6AEnB9ZsUYtHJeBfoli1lnS92Llsavpr3e039RGT6Lzj7DoJL ddJbNBIoWjzL2Ubv2wA7VS9sSM2wXg+bNmdB2EwuUQKj1Tm/gW4= =UvIV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2025 21:06:47 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 02 16:06:47 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36808 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1toqWN-00079G-99 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2025 16:06:47 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x443.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::443]:52265) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1toqWK-00078o-G5; Sun, 02 Mar 2025 16:06:45 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x443.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-390fdaf2897so1051509f8f.0; Sun, 02 Mar 2025 13:06:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1740949598; x=1741554398; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rkYgYjh7HPqyfwYJ79pOuviu8UXX/p7Zbff08uIBwoM=; b=EiYcsEX0zS7HXpmG7a6+4aBdiwOYEdIQl77lIWPzO9yMluzyeujeudhQ2NR5M6jFYh 3Q/Zb0Rd+PesMMBDRAri9uoOCIHB4LnHTrjTF6+rX8VCx+gY/e9VjLzkZY6Crj5NCByp xW824ZLnO/1gUIkfNdIIfgpb5NO9FqIAH6r0EGKJFznupmKOnJM8Md6Aio7aEX8Y5oyg SwOCekbd20a1A0flde/CiqS30LAYizuQJBEcu6u7fXOBD/TzNT5CQhu/LWvjctFo+XHe GC0tXm273Ieok2tDYddgIjeHCsFRHEYc4s9YNxJ2bA3ETNOHU6MqsEetM/65HTcCOpLi Zn+A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1740949598; x=1741554398; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rkYgYjh7HPqyfwYJ79pOuviu8UXX/p7Zbff08uIBwoM=; b=KxcS5JGGD5+XHY1Q8ChoH2LMWsYgFQqPFcBRJH8VkPkwOTjGGvNYD9Z+Imx3MCcHlZ NHC1op6RXQbW+Vgn9+JskUiHYE7vabpeGEwpBsSANiorXXrQa1EGPl03FozFsi9OBdXN xPcEjMid8WtqbzPcyF7A7bEaOE6xHskMakALe2SEKMvN4CpuOBtQX0XzYwGbbwV3cJms SJ1+ya+nJhku+acJkbBhxL+Kw72U7r+b3QcnJ91NIUd/AFkglotafRzu/VV1pO+cmyAZ Xxfy3mh2U21nrcJL5tpuIlzfkqxFhz6+mJLFfrmWRQRjDDnr/Nrt03tJ2Jm7E2ixRY8f 8RUg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVBDFTxnWRQXuOzkpDlufC38HAPBwOJJdlnHDxT+kjJITJ7bvQN2dJZA09GVDwvb+YznLuHLSw0kRyCvQ==@debbugs.gnu.org, AJvYcCWCFRKMNLIkXAM+8CN6+3zw4ywX0xJx6ltIeeN/9RboKnpX4JPdXeW6bZE6d5voXIQ2qdJzDg==@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyFCQCcTKahJxwko4Ekkxn1Sk9VNwpTLHuYyNpTLRvVzDDaPzer ULtb4z/FBtzK4C/uAXWI0j6KHuN2GNO1HDKjOIFrOzEdttniUEgf X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuW2cLcPAH76dxCB6G4HV7yMzt8kYe+8MNbVPSyNiFydtmjEuhXz1ckhIkzRBk SrlsmhlYArn7Ha6KwcWFNYBr8uIDzZydvFkDt8xkLACa6qzIocY6oUTUkbOSSqgRE0aWeiPsn4e e/hp6TvnToe5MmvTFZmL7dL6CKJcNHtLiFHz7IugwERU/Udf7H5WGu9I+f5864yaFBOLGv7yYsW N5La7N6ou+jLM15jar1IdEI1fUhO9CI6Zv978YRL9rJARihf18L8mQ+TcY6Aao2mG5CXb/jtjAT 2Ve+tn6FTMjwgGKSsq6a2JOAvuDrwVgxcuENC50Bnq8M2uAjC7CXQoi3s5rj4zctSQ4Eqbtr/6j eKF7vxn2DE4AEEdfSeb+D X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHQkXYA+6TpqacqXB6xGjc/WIGodccIZKZOm/O21fMSCQXZPGm5st+Xnx/Kn8i2y/mmokML9Q== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:64a6:0:b0:38f:3e1c:211d with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-390ec7cd248mr10892565f8f.14.1740949597913; Sun, 02 Mar 2025 13:06:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-114-32.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.114.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-390e4795978sm12072462f8f.3.2025.03.02.13.06.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 02 Mar 2025 13:06:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6d2998f6fe4c4b88e3a0b742ae347b08cf4c7dfb.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#75676: Request for merging "gnome-team" branch From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> To: Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2025 22:07:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87ikox3uci.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> References: <78a22de5587d8f2b63d0d427a68df0e073a2acbb.camel@HIDDEN> <8734gr6ost.fsf@HIDDEN> <3d4c2e1068521e1338e4b101d7ad4c50d3ac34db.camel@HIDDEN> <87ikox3uci.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 Cc: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 75676-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Am Mittwoch, dem 26.02.2025 um 10:53 +0100 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s: > What=E2=80=99s the status of the branch? >=20 > There seems to be a growing list of branches waiting to be merged > after this one: >=20 > =C2=A0 https://qa.guix.gnu.org/ The wait is over!
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2025 23:12:12 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 28 18:12:12 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54620 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1to9We-0005JQ-Ib for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:12:12 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x342.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::342]:54752) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1to9Wb-0005In-2M; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:12:11 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-x342.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4399deda38cso17645665e9.1; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 15:12:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1740784323; x=1741389123; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jPkgwqfQGfyqUOvKfZznenAYoaXha5xtlahpjlo1lRA=; b=lcsMGzipILEi7uCzmOJ+xyqJF49npdk69mq9XU+b3jKLKFxICWkQuTE49pzPGL6Lau CJePoYk+uQOjcQwJUEr0u6eRXDyTfuo7xNspCNvWQvrZNZiqgRWE9gji4TdS3fuqm+Hy dMpmq3j/CKhSiwQ2vp0NCQDAXpKNP8kPy9Owflmu+ybDRLWdahxh7uXFjP+077d9YEtO F2fxLm1NQgSDfEo4ZNTFVyAQDzdx/YBy1pqLFM7LoRB1kQ/8sk1v4+7a1ogUfkXIt4KF Q+GZN7d1yp62mxjsup4eJKx8XRhAnWu494uTftvanyNBRBq6RWgVjk3ZUut/bZaRpopk Wgdw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1740784323; x=1741389123; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jPkgwqfQGfyqUOvKfZznenAYoaXha5xtlahpjlo1lRA=; b=nc9iyZ7yk3dDBYi8KWijo8ePrCanQaAC7b9AcS8jJrG42mFZ1rTWDZkEKZ7/mKHgQV Y/CPOrBCTay4bOFHAnbjCDGnRdrfh5xYtA1+iPxaf5Dz3PcgvI+fUdfIxL5DTLdJpx6w ggeqnmDiF9t85PNQm01cEXGtSbP/FgSTPMWBc5K57qq43tdLPMPWcve9LdgTg3p8J1N9 gWbUhBp2PkEBZdLCizsEe64INyMQPElxBFLwcALPcXFNksqnyarQ9r6hUYjDQuHs70kB 1FaZ553uts6Jfx9s+1/dZMiAz/GrA8rtLEk2KQF7+WBI3+WbgWXq/wdH324k4hyUTq3R Z+mA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU66QicfhAtaEFnhjoQLLktLUDtNLsbeQqQOXBIizneiNkwTsWNh3LleUr69ZOVBV6Xh6VWiQ==@debbugs.gnu.org, AJvYcCWBScv8oV5u+0QePjSpIs4FL117I6iEPFhpFrIJ/BoKurANNYalKN+8gzwE/ad7hNOecgBjZ/w=@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwYPXRr3/3r9nZok+JMcb3kmdJ2MffLzgCrTnRCH0RpumkargRJ 81LoaPlVo6uLQWQojCLTFQNcxjeB5jnwO3AxZAxl184KzLoXxw95 X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuy1nTXR3mLZXLwowY3iqxhrqbwmyXZdO9piglzg22NfRMY7iedxm85g/4EjcM j0lToYITCbxpjEF2ojbp78paJr1f01kw15MPJhO4x4VbRbRBOfNiu7iW60f/1g0Bs0l4HKybE5m eBB0I4JRAOtaCpKRLiKITfmLBrEqY5RE+Qwg1OUX21sSGR/eoIn4o+c7RdfuKxAU320VHuyD57d EItxj/v1Cn4g20CRTNhY+gdD+ZJHz/e3gwPotYHZoZRs5Zm5Z3o+eeTxtR0FrDkL3mhZBWhlc1k 2IsG5z9DFbofJwHCtoTZRBUMx6xXRJo443OLswBH3cKithHGcfFNTyV+2+GvdYI/l5jfQrBnGPP 0EA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGXQiwOqV6SFp9lDjOKoseC0XPnas8UygHbyLXwDM08u0oKOuk/CXjjokFTmJ7i6Ns/n4DFiQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3b0a:b0:439:a5e6:73ff with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43ba67048c8mr51291805e9.17.1740784322660; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 15:12:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-114-32.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.114.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-43aba53942fsm102082895e9.24.2025.02.28.15.12.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 28 Feb 2025 15:12:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <b3bb7835049fb0fd07487cac5a6adaed03bca03a.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#75676: Request for merging "gnome-team" branch From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> To: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2025 00:12:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <Z8I94NU5_fwOU867@jurong> References: <78a22de5587d8f2b63d0d427a68df0e073a2acbb.camel@HIDDEN> <8734gr6ost.fsf@HIDDEN> <3d4c2e1068521e1338e4b101d7ad4c50d3ac34db.camel@HIDDEN> <87ikox3uci.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <e88fe59657fe9f6d6a6e1610b28379160a47a2ba.camel@HIDDEN> <Z8I94NU5_fwOU867@jurong> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 Cc: Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 75676 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Am Freitag, dem 28.02.2025 um 23:51 +0100 schrieb Andreas Enge: > Am Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 09:04:44PM +0100 schrieb Liliana Marie > Prikler: > > if possible I'd like to know that the branch is good to go for > > ARM/RISC-V users too. >=20 > PS: Given our lack of build power for these two architectures, I do > not think we can afford waiting for them and thereby delaying the > next topic branches. Currently we have 10 of them queued up! > https://qa.guix.gnu.org/ I am waiting for human feedback more so than machine feedback. =20 I've rebased on 3c6bcbad213ad88e7574da14ed005a8b764e2d7e now, which should yield a comparison soon. Cheers
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2025 22:51:31 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 28 17:51:31 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54480 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1to9Cd-0003FS-7f
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:51:31 -0500
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:35580)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>)
id 1to9CZ-0003EO-St; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:51:28 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E75A21A5;
Fri, 28 Feb 2025 23:51:21 +0100 (CET)
Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr;
none
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP
id M5Pv5hM1EW2C; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 23:51:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from jurong (176-179-191-150.abo.bbox.fr [176.179.191.150])
by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 517C2183;
Fri, 28 Feb 2025 23:51:17 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 23:51:12 +0100
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75676: Request for merging "gnome-team" branch
Message-ID: <Z8I94NU5_fwOU867@jurong>
References: <78a22de5587d8f2b63d0d427a68df0e073a2acbb.camel@HIDDEN>
<8734gr6ost.fsf@HIDDEN>
<3d4c2e1068521e1338e4b101d7ad4c50d3ac34db.camel@HIDDEN>
<87ikox3uci.fsf_-_@HIDDEN>
<e88fe59657fe9f6d6a6e1610b28379160a47a2ba.camel@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e88fe59657fe9f6d6a6e1610b28379160a47a2ba.camel@HIDDEN>
X-Rspamd-Server: hera
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: E75A21A5
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [8.40 / 15.00]; SPAM_FLAG(5.00)[];
NEURAL_SPAM(3.00)[1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[];
MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5];
FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[];
TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];
FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[];
RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]
X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++++
X-Rspamd-Action: add header
X-Spam-Level: ********
X-Spam: Yes
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518
Cc: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
75676 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Am Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 09:04:44PM +0100 schrieb Liliana Marie Prikler:
> if possible I'd like to know that the
> branch is good to go for ARM/RISC-V users too.
PS: Given our lack of build power for these two architectures, I do not
think we can afford waiting for them and thereby delaying the next
topic branches. Currently we have 10 of them queued up!
https://qa.guix.gnu.org/
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2025 22:47:01 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 28 17:47:01 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54444 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1to98H-0002nP-0k for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:47:01 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:35088) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1to98E-0002mi-9z; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:46:59 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD1336D; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 23:46:51 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id VEaQ-4Ag_S62; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 23:46:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (176-179-191-150.abo.bbox.fr [176.179.191.150]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F0F4115; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 23:46:49 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 23:46:48 +0100 From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#75676: Request for merging "gnome-team" branch Message-ID: <Z8I82ClyR78g3lNN@jurong> References: <78a22de5587d8f2b63d0d427a68df0e073a2acbb.camel@HIDDEN> <8734gr6ost.fsf@HIDDEN> <3d4c2e1068521e1338e4b101d7ad4c50d3ac34db.camel@HIDDEN> <87ikox3uci.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <e88fe59657fe9f6d6a6e1610b28379160a47a2ba.camel@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <e88fe59657fe9f6d6a6e1610b28379160a47a2ba.camel@HIDDEN> X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8FD1336D X-Spamd-Result: default: False [8.40 / 15.00]; SPAM_FLAG(5.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM(3.00)[1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++++ X-Rspamd-Action: add header X-Spam-Level: ******** X-Spam: Yes X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 Cc: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 75676 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello Liliana, Am Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 09:04:44PM +0100 schrieb Liliana Marie Prikler: > I do need a rebase you may already be aware of it, but I am just understanding that https://data.qa.guix.gnu.org/repository/1/branch/master has a list of commits on master handled by the data service. You may want to choose the upmost commit that has a green tick for rebasing. Andreas
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2025 20:03:57 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 28 15:03:56 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53303 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1to6aS-00050g-FW for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 15:03:56 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x342.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::342]:55802) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1to6aQ-0004zx-3q; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 15:03:54 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-x342.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43b5859d1f1so15884525e9.3; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:03:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1740773028; x=1741377828; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qEdwPbWG1zQpsj7duFHzMh+vjsSTtOXCYEQaCbcmTPQ=; b=UHb+pbg7gb84CZEDE2jx6ADGFXW+I4cLClo7+ZYhklc+Juf/rzlnoUlBOpFxpf3kj1 na+RuDxz4IuLkJHXL6WfNlpR4c9yf/Wi/9b5Kp9qlcJfzXlklUM2aYyQEugjZrr+geSR JRG1nu4cOUp3iBPzVsyxyCSmqCYYQ4w0ASNsK6gj8yeygoBBuvcrE2SlUMRD//d1DbnZ zOKvxH8NELWYpXcEdppRHHg2gYzqpoV+8LKLlN5W2k6YrQ6funErg6YlhGd70Z5AWqG0 C18KyCUw51jU0fsS9rukYAxdaCt5r6dNePdto0gGDQOVxcsuV6xVYL5L7Sscv/JxlRmk 92OQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1740773028; x=1741377828; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qEdwPbWG1zQpsj7duFHzMh+vjsSTtOXCYEQaCbcmTPQ=; b=rLRqKg5E2wGyae0QvwRVTatWCgU9Oi4bV1YtuALDFvk0r4M0kmPpudgwnCvEgSiy4z IhJ62hbrz9KILPfUchCsRabmht1LOODkT8On4f4Bt0YfcE7zzhabJOjZTwX4IM6WiGi1 TjIfl2qYMYK8RiaTAl/b5qu7CagiabulFzpw7EvXb0LpXz3ZZ7SrhXltP7FLl4yS1B+C 7Mwr3lOLHxsdRTghp6xeMGLITYjFLRu3pWQjh0TwH3pZpJ/Rh9/zFk3/s1soBy7FdC67 lo62rAy3JNHNrq6ofymBPugPKvMYE6gzQMRYL0HXqpzUiMe4Il1ZMZ7rfIV3lCeVXEjp TwVA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWUXvwYfxeSgX+8L5VILbZ+9w8o9vmLWtXg2AJeErUnkPqD5HmbWo+jdLZ73GVWdKYZk3sAPQ==@debbugs.gnu.org, AJvYcCXybL3LB81gTF+DyeicR8sg7uRuk6MjMltYcSNhJlZcbPP7s1W5Pc/NALIJNrBE4PCCXLVZx+I=@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyAPlW4RJ31lk8CPrifTEeg6zQOvl6BopzYrKTnVOWpJO7btjBq E2IQXR5KDrOICKnqADIw9shxiiQmtqZM/Wk9KZKlUwXZVO5uUZUv X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuRB2DXxL1RsHUdIum8+swFVLFqSFw6UgXGRJa4qVuE1BJynemlE4RGBpcgxpV uAO9Xx002e6w0UuG4EhoMSKJ518P7UC+X4WWRhFy+42Rhrk+T0DbtbBeEIF973NZQhie3HdRfJX 8z3Mc7t+IX1pD4D6LFk7r5BPQ/B8meJnvX2JMNdGmGORX2yBZkgxQI5UHqAx8DQkAopb8eE3V7B NuePzGp8pvpYPrnqkiGlTJHSu0gMZ6I/HpNTgMMYjCUJa9NbqyijHIll9L5iMvHSGZjdWmabtNb s/5oXPg65Jnk4rIT6NplISzxH+Zh8ksak0u5YRXZMSXYf3uZkG2/mRMxrWs8LO7MzslmByxXkUn BQA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG4/O6M++aUkiuP9buPGSVG5sdorNrmpL5VabWYs06n83ijwOHx5XS9fs+NMqLiesi1GD22uA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4f89:b0:439:9a28:9e8d with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43ba6703767mr41190305e9.12.1740773027742; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:03:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-114-32.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.114.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-43aba532ba6sm98436185e9.12.2025.02.28.12.03.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:03:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <e88fe59657fe9f6d6a6e1610b28379160a47a2ba.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#75676: Request for merging "gnome-team" branch From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> To: Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 21:04:44 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87ikox3uci.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> References: <78a22de5587d8f2b63d0d427a68df0e073a2acbb.camel@HIDDEN> <8734gr6ost.fsf@HIDDEN> <3d4c2e1068521e1338e4b101d7ad4c50d3ac34db.camel@HIDDEN> <87ikox3uci.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 Cc: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 75676 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Am Mittwoch, dem 26.02.2025 um 10:53 +0100 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s: > Hi Liliana, >=20 > Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> skribis: >=20 > > It's a tough call.=C2=A0 QA looks red for gnome-team on everything but > > x86_64 [1] and I will be away for a few days starting tomorrow with > > no access to my commit machine.=C2=A0 We could still merge today and fi= x > > the breakages later, but I fully understand if that's not what we > > want. >=20 > What=E2=80=99s the status of the branch? >=20 > There seems to be a growing list of branches waiting to be merged > after this one: >=20 > =C2=A0 https://qa.guix.gnu.org/ Substitutes look good atm =E2=80=93 I particularly like that we have 49% ar= mhf packages over on bordeaux =E2=80=93 but there's no comparison to the merge base, I do need a rebase and if possible I'd like to know that the branch is good to go for ARM/RISC-V users too. Cheers
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2025 11:41:29 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 28 06:41:29 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46087 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1tnykC-0004al-W1
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 06:41:29 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59826)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <janneke@HIDDEN>) id 1tnyk8-0004aU-QK
for 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 06:41:26 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <janneke@HIDDEN>)
id 1tnyk2-0004y7-2Q; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 06:41:18 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:
From; bh=5eAE9lllcgW73D4JTve1UUAmtZmn6UxRd4fmwBUpyFk=; b=nwRYH0J8sgAsVhOLszJ6
t22IZSffjSJ89XMdTQw2Wk9deg7SS+xXuNNQwjIicSmyaf3fhPJ+4S0ywfGfyX2+AlysLdbMJiRuE
zjBNNqP3Nk8NTW1HHAYdP2yGaenG3Hr5FrpnXrIwePseq7VgNRxB3crWEyV8vRgcVPCbWzoTbwTjY
s1RhI1gWB8v4myGda/NXv2QLMiODofooyeHOggsA6tgzsRbgqJxAE/OY0CDlB7m+iIoPOZee4gVEf
D+YtGqn5eaySauazcN/xdjZq0wivWh++6yCW8+9ZzYrM714bOdMcnxdmJuF6RCNt/1a74LYmteDKF
8ICLz+bgCgjvhw==;
From: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: core-packages-team updated
In-Reply-To: <87h64fwemr.fsf@HIDDEN> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?=
=?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:12:28 +0100")
Organization: AvatarAcademy.nl
References: <87plj8sc1f.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z7xN_gHoOyanBAOd@jurong>
<87y0xvquki.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <87h64fwemr.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Url: http://AvatarAcademy.nl
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:41:11 +0100
Message-ID: <87cyf2qotk.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518
Cc: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>, Zheng Junjie <z572@HIDDEN>,
75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)
Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes:
> Hi!
>
> Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> skribis:
>
>>> commit feb56748faa07c457654187e3cd154b26f7e6b2a
>>
>> and this would be on Ludo :)
>>
>>> Is this not usually handled on guix-devel, or maybe by comments in the
>>> code, with the commit message limited to what is actually changed
>>> (the lines starting with "*") and sometimes one or two sentences about
>>> the rationale?
>>
>> Yes, usually I would agree. A too long message could be a sign of need
>> for documentation (code or manual) or a missing test...
>
> I agree too. The common way is to describe the problem in detail in the
> bug report or cover letter, and then simply refer to it in the commit
> message. We could do that here.
I've pushed two empty squash! commits with sanitized commit messages for
these two, so that we won't forget and it's easy to fix.
Thanks Andreas for reviewing!
Greetings,
Janneke
--=20
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> | GNU LilyPond https://LilyPond.org
Freelance IT https://www.JoyOfSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE https://AvatarAcade=
my.com
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2025 16:13:22 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 27 11:13:21 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36564 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tngVl-0006jw-Er for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 11:13:21 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53718) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tngVe-0006jV-Rv for 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 11:13:19 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tngVX-00016b-LM; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 11:13:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=n9IIu+IDuS7b0UxBClQDAp54zUzfG2iyWP/0361n7ls=; b=V/xM4+H9WjsWzvC64rQU v1VcwrQqB+0OhAkEGWL7Cg3RCOB5oZPWenkYJzEj18nuP2mzBBSG6zM8b3E746gy/cM5pacOzcIfB z7W3z63ieeWCkI5lpsL/2mhKbci3CG9aoOKtERZevcMnazqOtzl0A9/hf+RYEXw07nzDcXlLHbT2i 1Ee1kDdYZGMON/ud12GzAMbovUGemZaQIxuhi6ukR8VD5smEIyQf4Ff+urizdXv4bSqt/E0Q6SR+e B66Ml9KayPtyjZ6q5KgVLOqn0DYnARAeE7wbwus6KEhVjHpRVJub1KDS14Vl9dbnTznhK2vrkrVqt I/8J2ZJ4VpCKIQ==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: core-packages-team updated In-Reply-To: <87y0xvquki.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> (Janneke Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Mon, 24 Feb 2025 15:35:41 +0100") References: <87plj8sc1f.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z7xN_gHoOyanBAOd@jurong> <87y0xvquki.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Nonidi 9 =?utf-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 233 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour du Marsault X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:12:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87h64fwemr.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 Cc: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>, Zheng Junjie <z572@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi! Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> skribis: >> commit feb56748faa07c457654187e3cd154b26f7e6b2a > > and this would be on Ludo :) > >> Is this not usually handled on guix-devel, or maybe by comments in the >> code, with the commit message limited to what is actually changed >> (the lines starting with "*") and sometimes one or two sentences about >> the rationale? > > Yes, usually I would agree. A too long message could be a sign of need > for documentation (code or manual) or a missing test... I agree too. The common way is to describe the problem in detail in the bug report or cover letter, and then simply refer to it in the commit message. We could do that here. Ludo=E2=80=99.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2025 09:56:01 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 26 04:56:01 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51060 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tnE92-0001uS-85 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 04:56:01 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59996) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tnE6w-0001ka-L8; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 04:53:51 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tnE6p-0007aL-IE; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 04:53:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=r0CPNvGLvr0OvaFN8Mo/sWbjPQeyHwff1+ETSawzt1Q=; b=dB8VvekwohC1axX3ZfRN 7VQuGvz+eosc29/v8GdNLyLhU0rxrjb0PAkqX4QSXyNAjF1D2LCXhg/WyV5vMKKdmp2QbJOTA2/+E zDf4+LRDJBHR7KxGRRbTLwt3/7+8K3oNHR4WwI3rmf+S4oRsEyLL8XPN4sJYADu4zZtGg6jUshS0z hv8G7Kn35KmLZuqYdn9pHFdNnhVBeYNr14BK5Df1cE6GCK2wq3KjZie8KHdyVvbbzlJKFWps9N5sv D50xpH91slQkklVu6ONIiF+/gqIiS3sjC882k/ShnNfICH/R2AuFRqXHwsS55jW/WRxU47Wu662y5 bjpFE5MqjJQBZg==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#75676: Request for merging "gnome-team" branch In-Reply-To: <3d4c2e1068521e1338e4b101d7ad4c50d3ac34db.camel@HIDDEN> (Liliana Marie Prikler's message of "Thu, 06 Feb 2025 18:56:00 +0100") References: <78a22de5587d8f2b63d0d427a68df0e073a2acbb.camel@HIDDEN> <8734gr6ost.fsf@HIDDEN> <3d4c2e1068521e1338e4b101d7ad4c50d3ac34db.camel@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 10:53:33 +0100 Message-ID: <87ikox3uci.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 Cc: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 75676 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Liliana, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> skribis: > It's a tough call. QA looks red for gnome-team on everything but > x86_64 [1] and I will be away for a few days starting tomorrow with no > access to my commit machine. We could still merge today and fix the > breakages later, but I fully understand if that's not what we want. What=E2=80=99s the status of the branch? There seems to be a growing list of branches waiting to be merged after this one: https://qa.guix.gnu.org/ Ludo=E2=80=99.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2025 17:39:21 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 25 12:39:21 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48295 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1tmyts-0000mb-UQ
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 12:39:21 -0500
Received: from mail.z572.online ([88.99.160.180]:52148)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <z572@HIDDEN>) id 1tmytp-0000mP-Ue
for 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 12:39:19 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=z572.online; s=me;
t=1740505487;
h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
bh=1angWIEnolLuTIQ0YsGaj2lWPn1Wa39lpyDpZIYg82I=;
b=jlKcoyDueKMDl/kK9TaonwFT7JFDPVGtD74B+lWdH89Vg1wZ5SjNmJeRClr7Jr+8XVApR7
yFFmPB1sw2DQcjKmxV1bunzLhTJa42aJPrMUNkS/9TcEo2UD/EYd+Am2Jn2uw/drDup29m
SZjH6td+KNySrJqyjCqw+iKFFTDBo1o=
Received: from m (<unknown> [221.219.242.202])
by mail.z572.online (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id ef373bca
(TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO);
Tue, 25 Feb 2025 17:44:45 +0000 (UTC)
From: Z572 <z572@HIDDEN>
To: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#75518] core-packages-team updated
In-Reply-To: <87plj8sc1f.fsf@HIDDEN> (Janneke Nieuwenhuizen's message of
"Sun, 23 Feb 2025 20:20:44 +0100")
References: <87jzb0dp41.fsf@HIDDEN> <87plj8sc1f.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 30.0.92
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 01:38:57 +0800
Message-ID: <87ldttrkjy.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> writes: > Hi! > >
I've just updated core-packages-team. > > I merged my glibc-2.40 patches that
raced with Zheng's amazing > glibc-2.41 work (it would be nice to align such
changes on IRC?), > squashed squash [...]
Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
0.8 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: z572.online (online)]
0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The
query to Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
for more information.
[88.99.160.180 listed in sa-accredit.habeas.com]
0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The
query to Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
for more information.
[88.99.160.180 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518
Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> writes: > Hi! > >
I've just updated core-packages-team. > > I merged my glibc-2.40 patches that
raced with Zheng's amazing > glibc-2.41 work (it would be nice to align such
changes on IRC?), > squashed squash [...]
Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The
query to Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
for more information.
[88.99.160.180 listed in sa-trusted.bondedsender.org]
0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The
query to Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
for more information.
[88.99.160.180 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
0.8 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: z572.online (online)]
0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD
1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD
-1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
manager
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> writes:
> Hi!
>
> I've just updated core-packages-team.
>
> I merged my glibc-2.40 patches that raced with Zheng's amazing
> glibc-2.41 work (it would be nice to align such changes on IRC?),
> squashed squash! and fixup! commits, incorporated yelninei's feedback
> about native i586-gnu builds from IRC, and rebased on latest master.
>
> Greetings,
> Janneke
Thanks!
I found rebase have a little problem, accidental introduction of >>>>>>>
fixed as 3d37134ad6e6edac0a95ee1761ce0cfcad4bc7c9,
and adjust binutils-mingw-w64-timestamp.patch on
512d573b99d856433b7ffd2922433f54deef697a
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=F9qU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2025 14:36:00 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 24 09:36:00 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39123 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tmZYu-0000th-5j for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:36:00 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50760) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <janneke@HIDDEN>) id 1tmZYq-0000tR-PK for 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:35:57 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <janneke@HIDDEN>) id 1tmZYl-0006Bg-5T; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:35:51 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=Vh3q8ONwMNyXQivtWC+tm9fG3XQnSBfrIDbsJ95qptM=; b=X3oeo3Y/HdRahttBIvDJ G5BiKNYWgjeEZCNnpJdULLW/pzAgeGWJ+VS4w/XMVlr1V95joogIMqV5z+qLxpZWk7asTGZwjhhb1 4UejVs7jtWC6ohkV6H9ult0HXn51Db/BcnhfkcDOEqhYOyV81N6pgiMi9AGWuPY9Fp+WPFcZqAnhO h5IP854LhRib9vKyUymQTWWpnmPuD7l+u1YoAq+fooXAS/3pLMlR897GQRKqJAHnoDaENQMQESyKO 2HhyjKuJ8tMAPT0VG7LY4sAKihfO8lZXTsLPtcFxtMj8chsQDDfLuu7+VAY/HOroOISccNAPWXWbM jymandYvi/HpAA==; From: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> To: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: core-packages-team updated In-Reply-To: <Z7xN_gHoOyanBAOd@jurong> (Andreas Enge's message of "Mon, 24 Feb 2025 11:46:22 +0100") Organization: AvatarAcademy.nl References: <87plj8sc1f.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z7xN_gHoOyanBAOd@jurong> X-Url: http://AvatarAcademy.nl Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 15:35:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87y0xvquki.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, Zheng Junjie <z572@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Andreas Enge writes: Hello, [didn't i set a subject before?] > Am Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 08:20:44PM +0100 schrieb Janneke Nieuwenhuizen: >> I've just updated core-packages-team. > > Thanks for cleaning it all up! > I am a bit wary about some email-length commit messages such as > commit 3f0f24ec76002fefd0a20e9aea33ed646664f153 Yeah, I chatted with Tomas on IRC https://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2025-01-05.log#140930 and it's what they intended, so. > commit feb56748faa07c457654187e3cd154b26f7e6b2a and this would be on Ludo :) > Is this not usually handled on guix-devel, or maybe by comments in the > code, with the commit message limited to what is actually changed > (the lines starting with "*") and sometimes one or two sentences about > the rationale? Yes, usually I would agree. A too long message could be a sign of need for documentation (code or manual) or a missing test... > As before, "./pre-inst-env guix build mpc" works like a charm for me. > So I wonder if the non-deterministic failure Ludovic wanted to work on > may actually be deterministic and explained by a hidden variable. Thanks! Greetings, Janneke --=20 Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> | GNU LilyPond https://LilyPond.org Freelance IT https://www.JoyOfSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE https://AvatarAcade= my.com
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2025 10:46:34 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 24 05:46:34 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38647 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tmVys-0000uZ-2z for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 05:46:34 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:52344) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1tmVyp-0000uJ-55 for 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 05:46:32 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AEBA56B; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 11:46:25 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id slmQV7rk-JDh; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 11:46:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (176-179-191-150.abo.bbox.fr [176.179.191.150]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1064035B; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 11:46:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 11:46:22 +0100 From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> To: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: Message-ID: <Z7xN_gHoOyanBAOd@jurong> References: <87plj8sc1f.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87plj8sc1f.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0AEBA56B X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-9.60 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM(-3.00)[-1.000]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[] X-Spamd-Bar: --------- X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 Cc: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, Zheng Junjie <z572@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello! Am Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 08:20:44PM +0100 schrieb Janneke Nieuwenhuizen: > I've just updated core-packages-team. Thanks for cleaning it all up! I am a bit wary about some email-length commit messages such as commit 3f0f24ec76002fefd0a20e9aea33ed646664f153 commit feb56748faa07c457654187e3cd154b26f7e6b2a Is this not usually handled on guix-devel, or maybe by comments in the code, with the commit message limited to what is actually changed (the lines starting with "*") and sometimes one or two sentences about the rationale? As before, "./pre-inst-env guix build mpc" works like a charm for me. So I wonder if the non-deterministic failure Ludovic wanted to work on may actually be deterministic and explained by a hidden variable. Andreas
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2025 19:21:51 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 23 14:21:51 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36189 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tmHXy-0001li-Lp for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 14:21:50 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56660) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <janneke@HIDDEN>) id 1tmHXv-0001lR-So for 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 14:21:48 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <janneke@HIDDEN>) id 1tmHXh-0005CM-DS; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 14:21:36 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:To:From:in-reply-to:references: subject; bh=faEIYUl/w+xzTAZZOsGC90dmdmD64OC6ohnHfod8++g=; b=eNjdBIwkI7p8aV0gn b0XPXcJlXY/8GZAmDTBSC1/ltsGRSyOTxaqWNL4ILdPYuG8ENnmnv1rfr0AbW72imqcbwzoFzsevY SHpbTigMKSHtG8WJB0VYVp0EQvYdmSLcUoMEqXKIhlU4kq4DUEBc0cjtMUHqIQ5Uwmg0QOadp7Qlf kfKkQ8ahVXYDkMesCzFscdOD2N1v8Sp6XCvh6rOX+neXV8geSmBzQfx2urKPvlvu2NaBpZXkHAmlx opeFxgRzrfczAkUZAB/WjE2tX+MnLOy47xnqADa6qp/zM4QqpqFEcEcGtQOp73ckW4ELFVVmLEGuZ sO/tJE+F4KQAOsQ/w==; From: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> To: 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Organization: AvatarAcademy.nl X-Url: http://AvatarAcademy.nl Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 20:20:44 +0100 Message-ID: <87plj8sc1f.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, Zheng Junjie <z572@HIDDEN>, Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) Hi! I've just updated core-packages-team. I merged my glibc-2.40 patches that raced with Zheng's amazing glibc-2.41 work (it would be nice to align such changes on IRC?), squashed squash! and fixup! commits, incorporated yelninei's feedback about native i586-gnu builds from IRC, and rebased on latest master. Greetings, Janneke --=20 Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> | GNU LilyPond https://LilyPond.org Freelance IT https://www.JoyOfSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE https://AvatarAcade= my.com
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2025 09:40:06 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 21 04:40:06 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53541 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tlPVt-0007M0-3m for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:40:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33316) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tlPVp-0007KN-Th for 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:40:03 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tlPVj-0000al-MN; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:39:55 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=mytR++9aaJGegND4+J7RnFfPPLv6MKU1t+7DFiZPmyU=; b=lTvrCTc5SGib+W1KeUtU XSM58maJny7ZGy6mbROv2q8g6y8kErZNA7tlTCiC8tqroaNx3FleuJAJEM0NS7pRgPuWSkFqwqZtX jsf6peHGpG1e8H3FrYlZo+sHo7j4a+E04Kz6dcVzA5ZFoQHsuHvWVN1Ia4YG8Mz9pMn5RZ0xda8jD j9NRo2NyhVqmPSrI/QooEzgSiKzCTcd2Rd2z6NFf4ayBTCLvMGEM81D5ZVhALLsTHZtbCSlr1NWLt baTObNiGefTcsfXIzufyohb9P/h27O9Mcjnr8ra6/6buYvxwq5gzS6ftOquuXofahbl0RHiIAhiAN wk0a/2vLsL+U2w==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#75518] Builds In-Reply-To: <Z6jibawZRNMt4GGV@jurong> (Andreas Enge's message of "Sun, 9 Feb 2025 18:14:21 +0100") References: <Z6TlNUp8UzI0XU6k@jurong> <Z6ZBqbOm3rJXNCUD@jurong> <87seopr6eh.fsf@HIDDEN> <87cyfrtlqh.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z6jibawZRNMt4GGV@jurong> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Tridi 3 =?utf-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 233 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour du Violier X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:39:52 +0100 Message-ID: <87frk7eivr.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 Cc: Z572 <z572@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> skribis: > Well, I have once again built out this branch up to mpc, and still not > seen the issue. So from my point of view, it is unreproducible to the > point of apparently not occurring in my setting :) Like I wrote, the problem is non-deterministic and on top of that, it sometimes has no impact (some ac_cv_* variable gets the wrong value but that doesn=E2=80=99t affect the build result). I think it=E2=80=99s important to address it since it=E2=80=99s so low in t= he stack, but I haven=E2=80=99t been able to spend time on it lately. Ludo=E2=80=99.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2025 06:00:44 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 16 01:00:44 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59542 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tjXhr-0005lO-9Q for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Feb 2025 01:00:43 -0500 Received: from mail.w13.tutanota.de ([185.205.69.213]:41440) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <yelninei@HIDDEN>) id 1tjMCZ-0005cO-4c for 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2025 12:43:40 -0500 Received: from tutadb.w10.tutanota.de (w10.api.tuta.com [IPv6:fd:ac::d:10]) by mail.w13.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6091960F2A3E; Sat, 15 Feb 2025 18:43:32 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1739641412; s=s1; d=tutamail.com; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:Sender; bh=aFVBV6zFKc8qZlrcI5BnZoG4Zz1+GtJ8ZQRYswvcrlE=; b=HoVUePJtG2FTCXQ28y8SW/kMwbLNpw38uenGV3fyX8pgBLESXZFdFfhB1xyZ9ry3 gpiuKUwF6wzTM1tUXk9tjZ3rHvlwYWCzAL5klkz68qczSA/ToXW+1a/XEEYReXubHen 4A5ppl/yt/WKiC5iO2PGei1SDSJi1gcngmnxwxprPC/bfBsyL0IEPMsKcF4Ty8NhVdl IFnKPzapGq5kK9ooXzP/aCOKr0fAy1G6DDDXJOxTaMaYWlKmr5VjNnk7TJjKazctymr SnlCIMtB9wCSycJxq2wRZglvSL3eldGmx1y8d8r0H6jLbgUBTP5xRrME6OgpT/ysnDB pyJ8R0844w== Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 18:43:32 +0100 (CET) From: yelninei@HIDDEN To: 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: <OIvxipo--Z-9@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#75518] Issues on i586-gnu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 01:00:41 -0500 Cc: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hello, I was trying to build the branch with -s i586-gnu and offloading to a hurd = vm: - gcc-boot0 was failing because of libstdc++ The default libstdc++ (4.9) is too old and the currently used libstdc++ (14= ) is to new.=C2=A0 I had success with libstdc++-5 (which is already used for aarch64 and ppc64= )=C2=A0 - gnumach-headers-boot0 failed because of automake-1.17 The gnumach configure script adds a patch to Makefile.in at the end of conf= igure. However the patch is incompatible with automake-1.17. The normal gnumach pa= ckage got fixed to use automake-1.16.5. I downgraded automake-boot0 to 1.16.5 (i think this is fine because only th= e mach packages require automake) Alternatively there is an upstream patch to fix the build with automake-1.1= 7:https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/hurd/gnumach.git/commit/?id=3D71d7945e2= 98bc4077d4817eccd6c5cd7656942a2 After that i was able to build gcc-final in ~4h Then I had some failing gnulib tests in coreutils/grep/libunistring. All th= ese currently succeed on master on i586-gnu.=C2=A0 FAIL: test-once1 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D # Segfault FAIL test-once1 (exit status: 139) FAIL: test-pthread_sigmask1 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D test-pthread_sigmask1.c:69: assertion 'sigint_occurred =3D=3D 0' failed FAIL test-pthread_sigmask1 (exit status: 134) FAIL: test-symlink =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D test-symlink.h:70: assertion 'errno =3D=3D EEXIST || errno =3D=3D EINVAL ||= errno =3D=3D ENOENT' failed FAIL test-symlink (exit status: 134) FAIL: test-symlinkat =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D test-symlink.h:70: assertion 'errno =3D=3D EEXIST || errno =3D=3D EINVAL ||= errno =3D=3D ENOENT' failed FAIL test-symlinkat (exit status: 134) Hope this helps.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Feb 2025 14:02:52 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 13 09:02:52 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41451 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tiZno-0003zu-8A for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 09:02:52 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:38790) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1tiZnm-0003zd-Gv for 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 09:02:50 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA865B18; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 15:02:42 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id jYZOBRMB2SE1; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 15:02:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (i19-lef01-ix2-176-180-91-159.dsl.dyn.abo.bbox.fr [176.180.91.159]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 26FA218D; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 15:02:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 15:01:58 +0100 From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#75518] Builds Message-ID: <Z637VZgRwz3Ml02t@jurong> References: <Z6TlNUp8UzI0XU6k@jurong> <Z6ZBqbOm3rJXNCUD@jurong> <87seopr6eh.fsf@HIDDEN> <87cyfrtlqh.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z6jibawZRNMt4GGV@jurong> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <Z6jibawZRNMt4GGV@jurong> X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Spamd-Bar: +++++ X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: DA865B18 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [5.77 / 15.00]; SPAM_FLAG(5.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM(3.00)[1.000]; BAYES_HAM(-2.63)[98.35%]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[] X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Rspamd-Action: greylist X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 Cc: Z572 <z572@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Janneke, I agree with your comment in the latest commit that we should coordinate through this bug (rather than IRC, where one misses the action when one is not online). Andreas
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2025 17:14:33 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 09 12:14:33 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46075 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1thAt7-0005TA-2q for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2025 12:14:33 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:46898) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1thAt4-0005Su-CY for 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2025 12:14:30 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67C43E6; Sun, 9 Feb 2025 18:14:23 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id C2RHuhuFyd-w; Sun, 9 Feb 2025 18:14:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (176-179-191-150.abo.bbox.fr [176.179.191.150]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA1651A0; Sun, 9 Feb 2025 18:14:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2025 18:14:21 +0100 From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#75518] Builds Message-ID: <Z6jibawZRNMt4GGV@jurong> References: <Z6TlNUp8UzI0XU6k@jurong> <Z6ZBqbOm3rJXNCUD@jurong> <87seopr6eh.fsf@HIDDEN> <87cyfrtlqh.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87cyfrtlqh.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: E67C43E6 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-9.35 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM(-3.00)[-1.000]; BAYES_HAM(-2.75)[98.93%]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[] X-Spamd-Bar: --------- X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 Cc: Z572 <z572@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Am Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 12:12:54PM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > I’ve also been looking at the Gash issue, to no avail so far. But I > think it would be bad to ignore it as it could come to haunt us later. Well, I have once again built out this branch up to mpc, and still not seen the issue. So from my point of view, it is unreproducible to the point of apparently not occurring in my setting :) Andreas
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2025 11:13:06 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 09 06:13:06 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43328 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1th5FK-00041x-1Z for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2025 06:13:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42692) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1th5FH-00041N-4U for 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2025 06:13:04 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1th5FA-00040i-L9; Sun, 09 Feb 2025 06:12:56 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=5Qv4RmsSWEDOaXddrIJA0nK+qdhSDj6ZUfraEZVQB1E=; b=D8HlAoLbc6cxfVJoHcrT zvUoTPYhijgnL0+cS39YNQB4gMGFFkamO9qAiuNZJ1PaInKfQMv4JLVHxirOnFdA3DZCaYGwYY81v hbtA1BW8U2FXBC195FDxZZ4V+6siC5MxYTqfqQmx3MUCQg0s6+xSvQj5AAT7Aqoe2ZeUAv2NrNMqn ZtxQJh9F4sszof/gkCLNHlFRL8G0sdOpQCAOMx6Gr02Mc+Y37NfsBT8XJcExG1BS4I106IIpmKAdq w4bHa+Kq1RjkbzYkOMY73NRuexcAxf2y7U1w/NnM8nUK/pgQbBdm4yDH9I+JEkXQtaPBV1DAuhE19 bjL7oLx/XQXCmw==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Z572 <z572@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#75518] Builds In-Reply-To: <87seopr6eh.fsf@HIDDEN> (z572@HIDDEN's message of "Sat, 08 Feb 2025 01:50:14 +0800") References: <Z6TlNUp8UzI0XU6k@jurong> <Z6ZBqbOm3rJXNCUD@jurong> <87seopr6eh.fsf@HIDDEN> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Primidi 21 =?utf-8?Q?Pluvi=C3=B4se?= an 233 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour du Thlaspi X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2025 12:12:54 +0100 Message-ID: <87cyfrtlqh.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 Cc: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Hi, Z572 <z572@HIDDEN> skribis: > Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> writes: > >> Hello, >> >> just another data point, I managed to "guix build mpc" with >> Zheng Junjie's added commits, again without any gash problems. >> >> If we push, we should reorder the commits and un-DRAFT the ones marked >> as in the works. > > see https://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2025-02-06.log#160426 and > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/75676#1 > > During the irc discussions, we decided to let gnome-team merge first I=E2=80=99ve also been looking at the Gash issue, to no avail so far. But I think it would be bad to ignore it as it could come to haunt us later. Ludo=E2=80=99.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.
Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2025 13:05:41 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 08 08:05:41 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39120 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1tgkWj-0008Ux-FW
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2025 08:05:41 -0500
Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:44120)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>)
id 1tgkWg-0008Ul-QQ; Sat, 08 Feb 2025 08:05:40 -0500
Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a02:6b67:e390:8b00::1ce5])
by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D27127BBE2;
Sat, 8 Feb 2025 13:05:37 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from fang (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 8ef6f175;
Sat, 8 Feb 2025 13:05:36 +0000 (UTC)
From: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN>
To: control@HIDDEN
Subject: Re: [bug#75676] Request for merging "gnome-team" branch
In-Reply-To: <8734gr6ost.fsf@HIDDEN> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?=
=?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Thu, 06 Feb 2025 17:06:10 +0100")
References: <78a22de5587d8f2b63d0d427a68df0e073a2acbb.camel@HIDDEN>
<8734gr6ost.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2025 13:05:34 +0000
Message-ID: <87pljslh7l.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518
Cc: 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 75676 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
# block the core-packages-team merge by gnome-team
block 75518 by 75676
thanks
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=fsDA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2025 17:50:29 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 07 12:50:29 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36362 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1tgSUm-0004Cl-Kw
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2025 12:50:28 -0500
Received: from mail.z572.online ([88.99.160.180]:55188)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <z572@HIDDEN>) id 1tgSUi-0004CW-06
for 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2025 12:50:26 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=z572.online; s=me;
t=1738950933;
h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
bh=GXgE2NtGE4c6vF3Gj11CaDQBZt9b1sng09+m5fhdCsM=;
b=S+GO5y0nNOR6dPzXrfwsAL6q6L+fDKjt6OzAPBi+Nu0SCQSFQGA7BoJgmHqt3XuI8h+4EW
11xvXK+JJ+KvFVVW4RVxoUWkgCzCL2PQxjzpGG6ADJtazYzaBQaxpPmwWvB/ZyvqrVmT/k
SGO/swiDQjkoW+ebST8slqPzRnXDv+0=
Received: from m (mail1.85362086.com [107.174.64.25])
by mail.z572.online (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 629a1b8d
(TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO);
Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:55:32 +0000 (UTC)
From: Z572 <z572@HIDDEN>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#75518] Builds
In-Reply-To: <Z6ZBqbOm3rJXNCUD@jurong> (Andreas Enge's message of "Fri, 7 Feb
2025 18:23:53 +0100")
References: <Z6TlNUp8UzI0XU6k@jurong> <Z6ZBqbOm3rJXNCUD@jurong>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 30.0.92
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2025 01:50:14 +0800
Message-ID: <87seopr6eh.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> writes: > Hello,
> > just another
data point, I managed to "guix build mpc" with > Zheng Junjie's added commits,
again without any gash problems. > > If we push, we should reorder the commits
and un-DRAFT the [...]
Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
0.8 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: z572.online (online)]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The
query to Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
for more information.
[88.99.160.180 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The
query to Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
for more information.
[88.99.160.180 listed in sa-accredit.habeas.com]
0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518
Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> writes: > Hello, > > just another
data point, I managed to "guix build mpc" with > Zheng Junjie's added commits,
again without any gash problems. > > If we push, we should reorder the commits
and un-DRAFT the [...]
Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The
query to Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
for more information.
[88.99.160.180 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The
query to Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
for more information.
[88.99.160.180 listed in sa-trusted.bondedsender.org]
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
0.8 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: z572.online (online)]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD
1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD
-1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
manager
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> writes:
> Hello,
>
> just another data point, I managed to "guix build mpc" with
> Zheng Junjie's added commits, again without any gash problems.
>
> If we push, we should reorder the commits and un-DRAFT the ones marked
> as in the works.
see https://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2025-02-06.log#160426 and
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/75676#1
During the irc discussions, we decided to let gnome-team merge first
>
> Andreas
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=XZzb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2025 17:24:10 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 07 12:24:09 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36284 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tgS5J-0002s1-Hs for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2025 12:24:09 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:57668) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1tgS5E-0002qQ-PR for 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2025 12:24:07 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEADF30D; Fri, 7 Feb 2025 18:23:57 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id LAqdBSB8BAJ8; Fri, 7 Feb 2025 18:23:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (176-179-191-150.abo.bbox.fr [176.179.191.150]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F60D2B1; Fri, 7 Feb 2025 18:23:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 18:23:53 +0100 From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> To: 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN>, Zheng Junjie <z572@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: Builds Message-ID: <Z6ZBqbOm3rJXNCUD@jurong> References: <Z6TlNUp8UzI0XU6k@jurong> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <Z6TlNUp8UzI0XU6k@jurong> X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: CEADF30D X-Spamd-Bar: ----- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.42 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM(-3.00)[-0.999]; BAYES_HAM(-2.82)[99.23%]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[localhost:helo,localhost:rdns]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, just another data point, I managed to "guix build mpc" with Zheng Junjie's added commits, again without any gash problems. If we push, we should reorder the commits and un-DRAFT the ones marked as in the works. Andreas
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2025 17:55:47 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 06 12:55:47 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59395 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tg66M-0002rL-NH for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 12:55:47 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x344.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::344]:43280) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1tg66F-0002qm-9o; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 12:55:39 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-x344.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43626213fffso14383785e9.1; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 09:55:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1738864533; x=1739469333; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YBkzR4ZsTVYW62lJnW4ZE/aJnXzpcbULB50SzkoBj4U=; b=SghdPsUEptrAevFi/Z6f2uBzTWktq90XqB4DN2UtD6qL10lC3ao5S9fZBbwks1MnWI WNhT7MX6DcF741RSZqwiCcBGV3dtenG7oxNFFZGHSL7u8LYzomPpk0/haNTr8DO1lozV W7xUtXJAbVvluy9y5lvSF2Sz4E/NO3ZzEFRtTBH22Uei9lBMe+ImFVGeARQojgwzF2bB FurPza/bdJJoeVFAwGOqQgtFksJyJmt4ckuxQ3rf8eQAnxMd00/ofgE7ZuZdP+ZgdeEZ lhlix4+Dtvti6sXbCCCrr8Jp4+27QfX4wzGXU3iOQo5mvm9WUXDwUO4bumVq7smecZGg oZFA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1738864533; x=1739469333; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YBkzR4ZsTVYW62lJnW4ZE/aJnXzpcbULB50SzkoBj4U=; b=vj/E9k0UeswD9AWd0kYINhlFLk02lJIjiU+9F699Y6V45XUYVwa3EQ7Ee953+iitzT QZu/MxKOIwNcv/hzvbhiWStatWW18+/E7AzwCbzgoFBpO0T3+zWazFeeaYwx3sNxKR+s 03VnGx2tAp/iDYsb1pAuMB7rTz1GHkL5Aq9BajnKyWUf1V4laGwBJIq2QTLN6WKjmeby NK3ou8qSCcd8xCQLwY04CPmri9wzoETzuod2LKea4nzrZ80SlnPcasf4cjlSUUcilVJ8 djeI7EsOdtTH5NtiEs5bkXxXTa3EIr0tBjVYxK3+NQghKStzXg4o3Gzs2ScVHQm7CNYD lqyQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUh7eoB4vVII1O2BSW3DtXt2XLU/isYr4tmKCil00AaPZ0HVBR5cqx1wDKHMMgbJvGPIwcHVA==@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyp+fT7/igk5NmlzoE/y4DxqRrV378+UOvVhFtg7CDHTW0YUj9C qPyQtSFJTz2YKgLN/ChDieDPcl+KeEbTzS1AUecfXZWuA4l0bTJw X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncupb0pHpmPRJNmylXQPrpUtJA5xg9Lo/SwYM2E8hpVfB/3jmpcKAS7KzmIMCQ8 6gW9fF/cMc9jSVgViSyCitnnm5TvCBy+BVsY93Wan8WwbXp5KAC+2a9f49yWo2tYwx6oSIR8ySd Z4/aEynisqf7eghpCXbsR9x9K5eP2QtgiYbT7lidKAYfaFh+sOtc4OkpW4GcxULPdMeBGCRRCm+ bheUp/dBNP5iSPvcoWFMelbf1h7zEukg+xlLR/7jLaHsqFlN7d96oAbl0rOBU04VGxTT9ex9lwC yjMOtgrKXMbdBWjPZO7ZbCk77q7ywG8WhSGQt23KnD9vpT5t84DVI/+5WE68INu+RZo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGeB1jhB85/qGYqdpEj7wvdbFmP1gQ1LRitCXqMkp18y0GJtTyFTxKQyE9CGnRa3yJeiBrv2A== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:588f:0:b0:385:f892:c8be with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-38dbb302147mr3298568f8f.23.1738864532892; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 09:55:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-114-32.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.114.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-4391dcae5c7sm26066995e9.18.2025.02.06.09.55.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 Feb 2025 09:55:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3d4c2e1068521e1338e4b101d7ad4c50d3ac34db.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#75676: Request for merging "gnome-team" branch From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> To: Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2025 18:56:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8734gr6ost.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <78a22de5587d8f2b63d0d427a68df0e073a2acbb.camel@HIDDEN> <8734gr6ost.fsf@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 Cc: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 75676 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Ludo=E2=80=99 Am Donnerstag, dem 06.02.2025 um 17:06 +0100 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s: > Hi Liliana, >=20 > Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> skribis: >=20 > > with most of its packages bumped to 46 and 65% substitute > > availability (same as master), I think gnome-team is on a good > > track to be merged eventually.=C2=A0 At the same time 65% isn't *that* > > high and there are other branches to merge before that, so I'd like > > our collective intelligence to help contributing fixes for various > > bugs, non-x86 arches, the usual. >=20 > =E2=80=9Ccore-packages-team=E2=80=9D is officially next in queue, before = =E2=80=9Cgnome- > team=E2=80=9D: >=20 > =C2=A0 https://qa.guix.gnu.org/ >=20 > However, since that branch is not ready, I would suggest letting you > go first, as was just discussed on IRC, unless you=E2=80=99re not ready t= o > merge it in the coming days. It's a tough call. QA looks red for gnome-team on everything but x86_64 [1] and I will be away for a few days starting tomorrow with no access to my commit machine. We could still merge today and fix the breakages later, but I fully understand if that's not what we want. Cheers [1] https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/gnome-team
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2025 16:37:24 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 06 11:37:24 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59210 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tg4sV-0007O0-SC for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 11:37:24 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:41404) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1tg4sQ-0007Ng-Ez for 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 11:37:21 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90100C26; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:37:12 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id EwBL4saIU5Dt; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:37:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (sauterelle.math.u-bordeaux1.fr [147.210.16.128]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9FBFB574; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:37:11 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:37:09 +0100 From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> To: 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> Subject: Builds Message-ID: <Z6TlNUp8UzI0XU6k@jurong> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 90100C26 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.79 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM(-2.99)[-0.997]; BAYES_HAM(-2.20)[96.17%]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, I went up to "guix build mpc" in this branch, with success; and the resulting library is linked with glibc-2.40. So I did not see the non-deterministic gnash error: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/75658 and feel like we could merge after cleaning up the last two commits. Is there anything else I could check? Andreas
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2025 16:06:23 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 06 11:06:23 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59157 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tg4OU-0005wJ-Sx for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 11:06:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33250) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tg4OS-0005w2-F3; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 11:06:21 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tg4OM-0001gK-Em; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 11:06:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=NMAJkH58EDqY8xpBp3N7Ohk4SwwXkJodPrzjJrMi7JQ=; b=gdwo7opxlK2rSZCYlc0x XX3G69FrrTqv1ZIEhu3NtBRlc04F861l1kczgjTBIkCOzO7vDalT/+ez/OBw5z8v17kzcSwd8eSzJ VnPFwEcgmgWX3gSP2giULoOeDo5mMebZEkrPEQmrk0ZUDuUhdWQUaRn+IK7wezZ0TkUgYSmpiy1XN MAn8XRZ79rf1oUMmjGxnZER7i5662LAFUEgvITqgxjmyZa2aaauFOfeA/oYsSJngU7R8A0rVGcPik 9hIVXIngVz/mGzLnlIQLrBFkDRnN63MGEkxgh5PTg1E4rVl99pN6PRlJj7j3JFHpF5O+cApoJHlyQ u5oYmqagYbAIyg==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#75676: Request for merging "gnome-team" branch In-Reply-To: <78a22de5587d8f2b63d0d427a68df0e073a2acbb.camel@HIDDEN> (Liliana Marie Prikler's message of "Sun, 19 Jan 2025 22:09:23 +0100") References: <78a22de5587d8f2b63d0d427a68df0e073a2acbb.camel@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2025 17:06:10 +0100 Message-ID: <8734gr6ost.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 Cc: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 75676 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Liliana, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> skribis: > with most of its packages bumped to 46 and 65% substitute availability > (same as master), I think gnome-team is on a good track to be merged > eventually. At the same time 65% isn't *that* high and there are other > branches to merge before that, so I'd like our collective intelligence > to help contributing fixes for various bugs, non-x86 arches, the usual. =E2=80=9Ccore-packages-team=E2=80=9D is officially next in queue, before = =E2=80=9Cgnome-team=E2=80=9D: https://qa.guix.gnu.org/ However, since that branch is not ready, I would suggest letting you go first, as was just discussed on IRC, unless you=E2=80=99re not ready to mer= ge it in the coming days. Ludo=E2=80=99.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.
Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2025 09:18:05 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 31 04:18:05 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49975 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1tdnA5-0006PZ-9O
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2025 04:18:05 -0500
Received: from mail.envs.net ([5.199.136.28]:41738)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <iyzsong@HIDDEN>)
id 1tdn8o-0006MH-51; Fri, 31 Jan 2025 04:16:46 -0500
Received: from localhost (mail.envs.net [127.0.0.1])
by mail.envs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5DE38A3E53;
Fri, 31 Jan 2025 09:16:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.envs.net
Received: from mail.envs.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail.envs.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
with ESMTP id E8fyrLNiJ9wj; Fri, 31 Jan 2025 09:16:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (unknown [112.44.100.200])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest
SHA256) (No client certificate requested)
by mail.envs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA;
Fri, 31 Jan 2025 09:16:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [local])
by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id b5e68071;
Fri, 31 Jan 2025 09:20:18 +0000 (UTC)
From: =?utf-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?= <iyzsong@HIDDEN>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#75518] Request for merging "core-packages-team" branch
In-Reply-To: <87y0z6ml02.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=
=?utf-8?Q?=22's?= message of "Mon, 20 Jan 2025 00:39:25 +0100")
References: <87jzb0dp41.fsf@HIDDEN> <8734hgulpy.fsf@HIDDEN>
<878qr8awy6.fsf@HIDDEN> <87y0z6ml02.fsf_-_@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 17:20:18 +0800
Message-ID: <87frkzl4q5.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518
Cc: 74676 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 75517 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Hello, I just merged 'xorg-updates', now this is the next in the queue.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jan 2025 23:39:48 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 19 18:39:47 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48210 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tZetP-0006BS-JU for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2025 18:39:47 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39844) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tZetM-0006B8-Pd; Sun, 19 Jan 2025 18:39:45 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tZetH-0005qy-Am; Sun, 19 Jan 2025 18:39:39 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=c39h6m4U3je7+M635Li2/uCLqS3VNtXryczt6UDVSXI=; b=HACFPhWH6SNTumYcmMOB Xj4+g56eXHW4CXL+4gUNM/JfNZL2QNBpj1dfIMhLSazcYvHHuUqGf7M1krNjGu7E/cvOomwxkmC0Q vw4cvPNxzTHMfmdKRep2yVeVFi+tYUvlm0SEZsJTs7atlvCAieVAu6UEl90GSSAFqPFZ8oab2rnEl BN9Wksc4d5MnECyBP6q5FoDaydZU7b2j1QNUyptX41uAWAWNX3kGvXW1Pj3TeaIShkg7reLNAhJCw l4FZTAOWGtqRI0uXPZYUM3MUeqQK9xk8Rv8ZIDflGGCIOQuLUedDpJJK/2zpLT6xKTFhv7AJw+c0h SmsGSre4tay36w==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#75518: Request for merging "core-packages-team" branch In-Reply-To: <878qr8awy6.fsf@HIDDEN> (Janneke Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Sat, 18 Jan 2025 17:49:53 +0100") References: <87jzb0dp41.fsf@HIDDEN> <8734hgulpy.fsf@HIDDEN> <878qr8awy6.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 00:39:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87y0z6ml02.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 Cc: 74676 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 75517 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> skribis: > That would be lovely, especially if it builds :) It actually does! :-) I went a bit further and tried =E2=80=9Cguix build coreutils=E2=80=9D. It=E2=80=99s close to completion right now, but I=E2= =80=99m going to bed. I=E2=80=99m confident: unlike previous upgrades, there are no major depreca= tions like the removal of Sun RPC, libutil.so, libcrypt.so, etc. (there=E2=80=99s= not much left to remove :-)). So, pushed. The one thing that still needs to be tested is (cross-)compilation to GNU/Hurd. There are probably patches that can be dropped there. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jan 2025 16:50:35 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 18 11:50:35 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43539 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1tZC1q-0001Ce-LD
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2025 11:50:35 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54746)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <janneke@HIDDEN>)
id 1tZC1R-00016E-Cj; Sat, 18 Jan 2025 11:50:10 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <janneke@HIDDEN>)
id 1tZC1K-0000Nc-Ud; Sat, 18 Jan 2025 11:50:02 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:
From; bh=vQ5TdAsXANDeKm4ORY9hDnmjAfZiu/ynXOytg/DO2K4=; b=LydM6OwulDiyd6mUOmCZ
Ui4TVRDUBUBts8bQ7flYrmLSThZhsSWV7mETsS+mS3zJ85e0C0TgjlxhrlT+Xnr6RAqjgqesIjuD+
JQviNe8FU7LLeO53LWxuusKvUvM801aDmkGoW3ZZaBzRiyTTBuy/GtFNs4W4ezjmljGc6CvsyAgZq
L9mImYVpMrM79xKvpCPs3iN8+Ru3Vk8iDirYjplGWtnJNckjvvqnqHhP9jF/DAerXnmjX975cpcdq
rgog3ZA1EmH0CqNHJs8ZPNOJnmImrDunKCZxjtX/HO2O/HzwCrWWNZX0gr9w7j1ESXVWnzYvXm4YJ
BO8BfNBq75DyyQ==;
From: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75518: Request for merging "core-packages-team" branch
In-Reply-To: <8734hgulpy.fsf@HIDDEN> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?=
=?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Sat, 18 Jan 2025 17:32:09 +0100")
Organization: AvatarAcademy.nl
References: <87jzb0dp41.fsf@HIDDEN> <8734hgulpy.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Url: http://AvatarAcademy.nl
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 17:49:53 +0100
Message-ID: <878qr8awy6.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518
Cc: 74676 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 75517 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)
Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes:
Hi!
> Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> skribis:
>
>> Cuirass says we're at 81% success rate for i686-linux and x86_64-linux,
>> and possibly my #74676, meant as an old style "please help with the
>> gcc-14 transition", should have been named "Request for merging" already
>> anyway. Hard to keep up with all the changes but more formality is a
>> good thing I guess :)
>
> I=E2=80=99m testing the patch below to upgrade glibc to 2.40 (I=E2=80=99m=
at
> =E2=80=98gcc-mesboot-4.9.4=E2=80=99 so there are still quite a few hours =
before I get
> around to building glibc).
Oh, I didn't realise 2.40 was out already!
> I think we must upgrade glibc in this branch because (1) we want to get
> rid of this graft and more generally get the latest fixes, and (2) we
> cannot just ungraft since the graft uses =E2=80=98git-fetch=E2=80=99, whi=
ch cannot be
> relied on in =E2=80=98commencement.scm=E2=80=99 (we still assume that
> =E2=80=98builtin:git-download=E2=80=99 may be unavailable, and when it=E2=
=80=99s unavailable, we
> have a circular dependency).
>
> Thoughts?
That would be lovely, especially if it builds :)
Greetings,
Janneke
--=20
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> | GNU LilyPond https://LilyPond.org
Freelance IT https://www.JoyOfSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE https://AvatarAcade=
my.com
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jan 2025 16:32:55 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 18 11:32:55 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43506 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1tZBkk-0000KT-BM
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2025 11:32:55 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48540)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
id 1tZBkE-0000JL-Bx; Sat, 18 Jan 2025 11:32:23 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
id 1tZBk7-0006oq-0Y; Sat, 18 Jan 2025 11:32:16 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:
From; bh=6EVR7N/h+nyu9uYt6qGJ2E2l0bfCv9pfBibL+BDiw8s=; b=e0gcbfdKSVFp4ABUbwlS
ATEGZy8VNKeP4mhbJzqLXL0KrUuI1ZDmPmCNNmDKLwYgy7Stk7ypBdvM04wEz1wo/Zevft5NRgBPD
XMPCOqoZnzL+L599sKWdzjDTKVTfoo+9QUuciID0LqAgSKkPIlRO5wyKaD5jVPoUcAzY6t7e0gQp1
tt2Hanp34towRZsRCMEYRPn3vTXbSuRlhAMDrED6dAxYAasACHQyiknX77ulVu0OiQLvInqeWqSQS
PiWcU2ab/k2dsJb8Y3D0a1bANBS0YEmKwcoKdiHGMme+4raK+Lvo48mZYm5CUiizjTmtjcYssbyi0
Tw/Ndc8dBEAiIw==;
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75518: Request for merging "core-packages-team" branch
In-Reply-To: <87jzb0dp41.fsf@HIDDEN> (Janneke Nieuwenhuizen's message of
"Sun, 12 Jan 2025 16:32:46 +0100")
References: <87jzb0dp41.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 17:32:09 +0100
Message-ID: <8734hgulpy.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518
Cc: 74676 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 75517 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello!
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> skribis:
> Cuirass says we're at 81% success rate for i686-linux and x86_64-linux,
> and possibly my #74676, meant as an old style "please help with the
> gcc-14 transition", should have been named "Request for merging" already
> anyway. Hard to keep up with all the changes but more formality is a
> good thing I guess :)
I=E2=80=99m testing the patch below to upgrade glibc to 2.40 (I=E2=80=99m at
=E2=80=98gcc-mesboot-4.9.4=E2=80=99 so there are still quite a few hours be=
fore I get
around to building glibc).
I think we must upgrade glibc in this branch because (1) we want to get
rid of this graft and more generally get the latest fixes, and (2) we
cannot just ungraft since the graft uses =E2=80=98git-fetch=E2=80=99, which=
cannot be
relied on in =E2=80=98commencement.scm=E2=80=99 (we still assume that
=E2=80=98builtin:git-download=E2=80=99 may be unavailable, and when it=E2=
=80=99s unavailable, we
have a circular dependency).
Thoughts?
Ludo=E2=80=99.
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
diff --git a/gnu/local.mk b/gnu/local.mk
index f4d04c4abb..3b123cba1d 100644
--- a/gnu/local.mk
+++ b/gnu/local.mk
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
# GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
-# Copyright =C2=A9 2012-2024 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN>
+# Copyright =C2=A9 2012-2025 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN>
# Copyright =C2=A9 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2022, 2=
023, 2024 Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>
# Copyright =C2=A9 2016 Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@HIDDEN>
# Copyright =C2=A9 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 Ma=
rk H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
@@ -1437,6 +1437,7 @@ dist_patch_DATA =3D \
%D%/packages/patches/glibc-2.33-riscv64-miscompilation.patch \
%D%/packages/patches/glibc-2.39-git-updates.patch \
%D%/packages/patches/glibc-2.39-fmod-libm-a.patch \
+ %D%/packages/patches/glibc-2.40-dl-cache.patch \
%D%/packages/patches/glibc-CVE-2019-7309.patch \
%D%/packages/patches/glibc-CVE-2019-9169.patch \
%D%/packages/patches/glibc-CVE-2019-19126.patch \
diff --git a/gnu/packages/base.scm b/gnu/packages/base.scm
index fc48c9d844..95c237e140 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/base.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/base.scm
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
-;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2012-2024 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN>
+;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2012-2025 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN>
;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2014, 2019 Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>
;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2012 Nikita Karetnikov <nikita@HIDDEN>
;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2014, 2015, 2016, 2018 Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
@@ -879,10 +879,9 @@ (define* (make-ld-wrapper name #:key
(license gpl3+)))
=20
(define %glibc-patches
- (list "glibc-2.39-git-updates.patch"
- "glibc-ldd-powerpc.patch"
+ (list "glibc-ldd-powerpc.patch"
"glibc-2.38-ldd-x86_64.patch"
- "glibc-dl-cache.patch"
+ "glibc-2.40-dl-cache.patch"
"glibc-2.37-versioned-locpath.patch"
;; "glibc-allow-kernel-2.6.32.patch"
"glibc-reinstate-prlimit64-fallback.patch"
@@ -898,18 +897,17 @@ (define-public glibc
;; version 2.28, GNU/Hurd used a different glibc branch.
(package
(name "glibc")
- (version "2.39")
+ (version "2.40")
(source (origin
(method url-fetch)
(uri (string-append "mirror://gnu/glibc/glibc-" version ".tar.=
xz"))
(sha256
(base32
- "09nrwb0ksbah9k35jchd28xxp2hidilqdgz7b8v5f30pz1yd8yzp"))
+ "18h50b0zm8dkpzj81w033v99rbxiykk3v697yr4dfqwjbqbr1a0r"))
(patches (map search-patch %glibc-patches))))
(properties `((lint-hidden-cve . ("CVE-2024-2961"
"CVE-2024-33601" "CVE-2024-33602"
"CVE-2024-33600" "CVE-2024-33599"))))
- (replacement glibc/fixed)
(build-system gnu-build-system)
=20
;; Glibc's <limits.h> refers to <linux/limit.h>, for instance, so glibc
@@ -1187,28 +1185,6 @@ (define-public glibc
(license lgpl2.0+)
(home-page "https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/")))
=20
-(define glibc/fixed
- (package
- (inherit glibc)
- (name "glibc")
- (version (package-version glibc))
- (source (origin
- (method git-fetch)
- (uri (git-reference
- (url "git://sourceware.org/git/glibc.git")
- ;; This is the latest commit from the
- ;; 'release/2.39/master' branch, where CVEs and other
- ;; important bug fixes are cherry picked.
- (commit "2c882bf9c15d206aaf04766d1b8e3ae5b1002cc2")))
- (file-name (git-file-name name version))
- (sha256
- (base32
- "111yf24g0qcfcxywfzrilmjxysahlbkzxfimcz9rq8p00qzvvf51"))
- (patches (map search-patch
- (fold (cut delete <...>)
- %glibc-patches
- '("glibc-2.39-git-updates.patch"))))))))
-
;; Define a variation of glibc which uses the default /etc/ld.so.cache, us=
eful
;; in FHS containers.
(define-public glibc-for-fhs
@@ -1220,7 +1196,7 @@ (define-public glibc-for-fhs
;; directories, re-enabling the default /etc/ld.so.ca=
che
;; behavior.
(patches
- (delete (search-patch "glibc-dl-cache.patch")
+ (delete (search-patch "glibc-2.40-dl-cache.patch")
(origin-patches (package-source glibc)))))))=
))
=20
;; Below are old libc versions, which we use mostly to build locale data in
@@ -1444,7 +1420,6 @@ (define-public glibc-2.29
"glibc-ldd-x86_64.patch"
"glibc-CVE-2019-7309.patch"
"glibc-CVE-2019-9169.patch"
- "glibc-2.29-git-updates.patch"
"glibc-hidden-visibility-ldconfig.p=
atch"
"glibc-versioned-locpath.patch"
"glibc-allow-kernel-2.6.32.patch"
diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/glibc-2.40-dl-cache.patch b/gnu/packages/=
patches/glibc-2.40-dl-cache.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..d41faa5225
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gnu/packages/patches/glibc-2.40-dl-cache.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+Read the shared library cache relative to $ORIGIN instead of reading
+from /etc/ld.so.cache. Also arrange so that this cache takes
+precedence over RUNPATH.
+
+diff --git a/elf/dl-cache.c b/elf/dl-cache.c
+index 7c7dc587..19d1d79a 100644
+--- a/elf/dl-cache.c
++++ b/elf/dl-cache.c
+@@ -374,6 +374,52 @@ _dl_cache_libcmp (const char *p1, const char *p2)
+ return *p1 - *p2;
+ }
+=20
++/* Special value representing the lack of an ld.so cache. */
++static const char ld_so_cache_lacking[] =3D "/ld.so cache is lacking";
++
++/* Return the per-application ld.so cache, relative to $ORIGIN, or NULL if
++ that fails for some reason. Do not return the system-wide LD_SO_CACHE
++ since on a foreign distro it would contain invalid information. */
++static const char *
++ld_so_cache (void)
++{
++ static const char *loader_cache;
++
++ if (loader_cache =3D=3D NULL)
++ {
++ static const char store[] =3D @STORE_DIRECTORY@;
++ const char *origin =3D _dl_get_origin ();
++
++ /* Check whether ORIGIN is something like "/gnu/store/=E2=80=A6-foo=
/bin". */
++ if (origin !=3D (char *) -1 /* _dl_get_origin reported failure */
++ && strncmp (store, origin, strlen (store)) =3D=3D 0
++ && origin[sizeof store - 1] =3D=3D '/')
++ {
++ char *store_item_end =3D strchr (origin + sizeof store, '/');
++
++ if (store_item_end !=3D NULL)
++ {
++ static const char suffix[] =3D "/etc/ld.so.cache";
++ size_t store_item_len =3D store_item_end - origin;
++
++ /* Note: We can't use 'malloc' because it can be interposed.
++ Likewise, 'strncpy' is not available. */
++ char *cache =3D alloca (strlen (origin) + sizeof suffix);
++
++ strcpy (cache, origin);
++ strcpy (cache + store_item_len, suffix);
++
++ loader_cache =3D __strdup (cache) ?: ld_so_cache_lacking;
++ }
++ else
++ loader_cache =3D ld_so_cache_lacking;
++ }
++ else
++ loader_cache =3D ld_so_cache_lacking;
++ }
++
++ return loader_cache;
++}
+=20
+ /* Look up NAME in ld.so.cache and return the file name stored there, or =
null
+ if none is found. The cache is loaded if it was not already. If load=
ing
+@@ -387,12 +433,15 @@ _dl_load_cache_lookup (const char *name)
+ {
+ /* Print a message if the loading of libs is traced. */
+ if (__glibc_unlikely (GLRO(dl_debug_mask) & DL_DEBUG_LIBS))
+- _dl_debug_printf (" search cache=3D%s\n", LD_SO_CACHE);
++ _dl_debug_printf (" search cache=3D%s\n", ld_so_cache ());
++
++ if (__glibc_unlikely (ld_so_cache () =3D=3D ld_so_cache_lacking))
++ return NULL;
+=20
+ if (cache =3D=3D NULL)
+ {
+ /* Read the contents of the file. */
+- void *file =3D _dl_sysdep_read_whole_file (LD_SO_CACHE, &cachesize,
++ void *file =3D _dl_sysdep_read_whole_file (ld_so_cache (), &cachesi=
ze,
+ PROT_READ);
+=20
+ /* We can handle three different cache file formats here:
+diff --git a/elf/dl-load.c b/elf/dl-load.c
+index 8a89b710..b8802e74 100644
+--- a/elf/dl-load.c
++++ b/elf/dl-load.c
+@@ -2038,14 +2038,6 @@ _dl_map_object (struct link_map *loader, const char=
*name,
+ loader ?: GL(dl_ns)[LM_ID_BASE]._ns_loaded,
+ LA_SER_LIBPATH, &found_other_class);
+=20
+- /* Look at the RUNPATH information for this binary. */
+- if (fd =3D=3D -1 && loader !=3D NULL
+- && cache_rpath (loader, &loader->l_runpath_dirs,
+- DT_RUNPATH, "RUNPATH"))
+- fd =3D open_path (name, namelen, mode,
+- &loader->l_runpath_dirs, &realname, &fb, loader,
+- LA_SER_RUNPATH, &found_other_class);
+-
+ #ifdef USE_LDCONFIG
+ if (fd =3D=3D -1
+ && (__glibc_likely ((mode & __RTLD_SECURE) =3D=3D 0)
+@@ -2104,6 +2096,14 @@ _dl_map_object (struct link_map *loader, const char=
*name,
+ }
+ #endif
+=20
++ /* Look at the RUNPATH information for this binary. */
++ if (fd =3D=3D -1 && loader !=3D NULL
++ && cache_rpath (loader, &loader->l_runpath_dirs,
++ DT_RUNPATH, "RUNPATH"))
++ fd =3D open_path (name, namelen, mode,
++ &loader->l_runpath_dirs, &realname, &fb, loader,
++ LA_SER_RUNPATH, &found_other_class);
++
+ /* Finally, try the default path. */
+ if (fd =3D=3D -1
+ && ((l =3D loader ?: GL(dl_ns)[nsid]._ns_loaded) =3D=3D NULL
--=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 75518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jan 2025 15:37:41 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 12 10:37:41 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48801 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tX021-0002xu-7N for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:37:41 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58768) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <janneke@HIDDEN>) id 1tX01y-0002xc-SD; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:37:40 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <janneke@HIDDEN>) id 1tX01t-000420-0l; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:37:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=lVwKHzRtP6zWE8uZuG80Q/T7To6mvu2gA5gd30d2z6g=; b=CtHRMrVXigXTePyaU/8w 2gbWhMyvH/cUCoWAu4X8oRAgbJdylujAP3nCCc7+1QrJGJn7dURxV433A8s9O9e6Xf2u8krt2/fdA W+NjsevIBfAZ3iHKt5+don5Jd7kTYznTOlcRTvRb9sCNcAtTbzr0YTBtS0LvJvSVt8heYV+csYzaW 7rLNl6eB0Sc9mGQOMJtg2svNLT+zle+c8mtulZM1wXWzNm0iWkll94gSEXpnGpwWvFTTqtpwUPWWv B01OkoxhOU51661mt18Wj2jwHudZC2xfYQzat4Eo6mk6PBYCXv3OGWUqUpVYlCUnjVnLXsDIc9hIb wFp5de4KOVqVFA==; From: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> To: 75517-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#75517: Request for merging core-packages-team branch In-Reply-To: <87jzb0dp41.fsf@HIDDEN> (Janneke Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Sun, 12 Jan 2025 16:32:46 +0100") References: <87o70cdpvc.fsf@HIDDEN> <87jzb0dp41.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 16:37:27 +0100 Message-ID: <87ed18dow8.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75518 Cc: 74676 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Janneke Nieuwenhuizen writes: Closing this bug with wrong subject (missing double quotes around branch na= me). --=20 Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> | GNU LilyPond https://LilyPond.org Freelance IT https://www.JoyOfSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE https://AvatarAcade= my.com
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jan 2025 15:32:59 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 12 10:32:59 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48786 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tWzxT-0002k3-9T for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:32:59 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:40516) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <janneke@HIDDEN>) id 1tWzxR-0002jf-0I for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:32:57 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <janneke@HIDDEN>) id 1tWzxL-0001QE-6G for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:32:51 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <janneke@HIDDEN>) id 1tWzxK-0003aY-AY; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:32:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:Subject:To:From:in-reply-to: references; bh=Ov4++fQzVr5dEpoceeMfBdEOlB1Yk0f5B53QmYsjfVs=; b=rZ4UC1xJrB+FEt roLra8N5pLvmwqjRVRsskSs06gHhC4dyOTr/qmIG8yjwpInlB9Ilcoc12idxvBSPcKCwAznXIuTSZ U2h+7gMX63dlWGr+y4TcCycfCL0YKiEe3241QDQqhQGiSmv+DYpnvI3Y606OwS8w01PBBdugE6RqO xcQ0+aZz2sRjcQcaZmVKRL1Tktdxj0YwR9ITzlkcRyAS9cqvc/4cQ8NgX2C8RhKhQQXAgkd5RxTSl W2kPNBicOStFp+jFrM0YL3ce2Ns9EE9q/EVrsit+MzsFpK8Y9SCk1MhtxHWN/bwNBaS0kVUEFHLep Ydu8PtJzDwOGSg+C5CPg==; From: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> To: guix-patches@HIDDEN Subject: Request for merging "core-packages-team" branch Organization: AvatarAcademy.nl X-Url: http://AvatarAcademy.nl Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 16:32:46 +0100 Message-ID: <87jzb0dp41.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 74676 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 75517 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi! Cuirass says we're at 81% success rate for i686-linux and x86_64-linux, and possibly my #74676, meant as an old style "please help with the gcc-14 transition", should have been named "Request for merging" already anyway. Hard to keep up with all the changes but more formality is a good thing I guess :) Greetings, Janneke --=20 Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> | GNU LilyPond https://LilyPond.org Freelance IT https://www.JoyOfSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE https://AvatarAcade= my.com
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN>:guix-patches@HIDDEN.
Full text available.guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#75518; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.