GNU bug report logs - #76100
Sorting by date doesn't work properly

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: mumi; Reported by: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>; dated Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:52:01 UTC; Maintainer for mumi is bug-mumi@HIDDEN.

Message received at 76100 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 76100) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2025 00:06:49 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 09 19:06:49 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46930 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1thHK4-0008GK-SB
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2025 19:06:49 -0500
Received: from mugam.systemreboot.net ([139.59.75.54]:59392)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <arunisaac@HIDDEN>)
 id 1thHK0-0008G3-Pf
 for 76100 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2025 19:06:47 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=systemreboot.net;
 s=default; t=1739145997;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=2rhF1ERj65s/EMJr+6vCQTbFHdzZrl56Gz52BxSV1xw=;
 b=bIItjtxe/quyhYxP5UdG1UYuQ2PUa96YJWezb55aSxTS8PSSjAzCmpZU6GrdMTpDcmodvq
 FzqH8Ol8bZ8AVa1wAVMi0bgkqiYdEGLP5GABFirAi0YPXhzPWfl6S+VUUF9lmw3kZTVuCY
 uAMuZ2m9QIMq/DngfzWpYMDOUlEI4WORwpV8IO6xnH+QtQNRzAyToq1x12HptWcEbaubr9
 +oPSbSwkqwmNQtuk0iHNQ5s+inE903Ey2v7wRFgO4m6FaNg/8G8OSF9ighnTnC2xeNh0I8
 /lcuKDUuAAG+h6xCEHcScLYjVSjNf0BvT4pXaKtvifldGe2eDTSwl2cjQ1AT6g==
Received: from localhost (<unknown> [192.168.2.1])
 by mugam.systemreboot.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id d8376b25
 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); 
 Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:06:36 +0000 (UTC)
From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@HIDDEN>
To: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>, 76100 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#76100: Sorting by date doesn't work properly
In-Reply-To: <87seor9leq.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87seor9leq.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:06:30 +0000
Message-ID: <875xlill2x.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76100
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)


Hi Felix,

I tried your search term:
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/search?query=lechner

And, sorting by the "Date submitted" header seems to sort in
increasing/decreasing chronological order of the date as expected. Am I
missing something? Could you elaborate?

It's possible I am up too late and my eyes are playing tricks on me.
But, as far as I can tell, the sort order seems to be correct.

Regards,
Arun




Information forwarded to bug-mumi@HIDDEN:
bug#76100; Package mumi. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2025 14:51:25 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 06 09:51:25 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55139 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tg3Dx-0006iO-Ho
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 09:51:25 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:33102)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tg3Dv-0006i6-2D
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 09:51:23 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tg3Dp-0007Nu-6u
 for bug-mumi@HIDDEN; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 09:51:17 -0500
Received: from sail-ipv4.us-core.com ([208.82.101.137])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tg3Dn-0000tX-JP
 for bug-mumi@HIDDEN; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 09:51:16 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=2017; bh=R0wjeJ85DovAfX0
 oWzV3PvAYbHLeXhotdXrzoiCQHi8=; h=date:subject:to:from;
 d=lease-up.com; 
 b=astynv8zWGl5U+iSzpkmahQga190W53syI+E67Zg21x+8QhvmywSQD38MyGfE2C94IYZ
 h3cU8pD57QrE9c/zSDAAtA5lZTLxhZvzDTHPsSGYvOB2FNlXUdbzJcKJg0QNs6GCa/ywI5
 y9C5R25Rmmd2npkyY9lPthlcJd2aXNVL4=
Received: by sail-ipv4.us-core.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 871d653f
 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO) for <bug-mumi@HIDDEN>;
 Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:51:10 +0000 (UTC)
From: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>
To: bug-mumi@HIDDEN
Subject: Sorting by date doesn't work properly
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 29.4
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2025 06:51:09 -0800
Message-ID: <87seor9leq.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=208.82.101.137;
 envelope-from=felix.lechner@HIDDEN; helo=sail-ipv4.us-core.com
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001,
 SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)

Hi,

When I enter a search term like 'lechner' in the search box and then
active the "date submitted" header to sort the filings, the dates are
listed in some order (perhaps by year) but not entirely in chronological
order.

Kind regards
Felix Lechner




Acknowledgement sent to Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-mumi@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-mumi@HIDDEN:
bug#76100; Package mumi. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:15:01 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.