Received: (at 77184) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2025 00:11:58 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Mar 22 20:11:58 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46258 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tw8wX-0006RL-Gu for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 20:11:58 -0400 Received: from smtp.domeneshop.no ([2a01:5b40:0:3006::1]:51940) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <noe@HIDDEN>) id 1tw8wT-0006Pd-80; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 20:11:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xn--no-cja.eu; s=ds202502; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID: To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=o/NJgsVMqDSgJ+052YrnKL5o1W40i2ppxRxQcRK1Rak=; b=Q/MLOMoDupESen/zF76jOpFyaR Ni2ZSgBVwoiuXrkpG7RoGf+5ny0vvuUmxzvHrmFJS+Nn6nSH0EKyx6wO9PswSAsyklcqRwN4U7iSQ ENL7A288wAGAsmyO6buLjlLuFKL7wSVZ/mXLGI8QFZAtljYlyNW4YXkn+en8Xo3z+o+lOhzYaMyBP SGferigXd7EQ2p5w/5FvMo7lka7a0L6X7177s3tHIbn5TFdWiV7CS1E81FqgAWNeOZxSr4Gp5Renm hQ8Gjd1PBBNSh3Q1dXFosOEumCsvpDocBXQycaaP+V0ReGLD2/g3Y7Xp7UZiZE9UN2JPe+FEecZ3k zNRNN5kA==; Received: from smtp by smtp.domeneshop.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) id 1tw8wM-00B3Td-Ca; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 01:11:46 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?No=C3=A9_Lopez?= <noe@HIDDEN> To: 77184 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, control <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: libsixel: Update to 1.10.5. In-Reply-To: <983c33f6912697ac9d4cca22a902525396f09a95.1742658548.git.z572@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 01:11:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87frj4ehc2.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 77184 Cc: Zheng Junjie <z572@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain user guix usertag 77184 + reviewed-looks-good thanks Thanks for the patch, it looks good and seems to work with mpv. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQHGBAEBCAAwFiEEXVTPJVeyOOiNwYCiLSIyQQq3QEMFAmffUb0SHG5vZUB4bi0t bm8tY2phLmV1AAoJEC0iMkEKt0BDPK8L/33UtWhLFxtiH3dThk8c75JUN9XEnAY5 AHz6v++xDzjV2UBJtBukIusADoAmmVfXV3eMtDwENWv0JMnaZbHmm86USOJtnCXr ZmReD1J9YD60BtIdObu8iTsVcpaE0pFIOeg9Y8FMgQd4mkSnCKG9mI/d5iXr8pHQ r5Thl5i3854J/cXHV9MZxGcsRtzSd/vKHrvEiqu3U/Lk2sSfvR8L+4YQu6SD4G4m 8ADNbm5Dr2zHxmAmLct6XLyv6kVyq2C6F8XOz1GS0Zkon/NhuX5Ol+yq+HdAqBv6 y0ityJRP6FIWqaAkZt9nzmBCDIKFQhD/Bw4vc2uITsL8mtJXWr+84OijP/53PcHy ON0y6TPzbOO49aU/5sTI0D3MNYq9ITLeXOPSzjEL57K2n/yXFtw5c7ZagJYt3c9Q +0h9CZfnY5Db4Vqf3DO3i9SJ1mTF6nsBbeDv1ALeT+KPiJ4xHOGVfGYS9ZTpUh4D RdgGQSyxeHveCSeh446zggioKRyaZxP9vg== =GEho -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#77184; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Mar 2025 15:49:30 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Mar 22 11:49:30 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44786 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1tw16H-0008Me-Mj
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 11:49:29 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:38810)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <z572@HIDDEN>) id 1tw16F-0008MR-Cd
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 11:49:27 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <z572@HIDDEN>) id 1tw168-0005QO-LS
for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 11:49:21 -0400
Received: from mail.z572.online ([88.99.160.180])
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <z572@HIDDEN>) id 1tw166-00040u-SM
for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 11:49:20 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=z572.online; s=me;
t=1742658918;
h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:
content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=mvyiNvY2RPNXVGp6k0LJJ7Dg7x9qE3wV74E3TX0zUL0=;
b=R2iPZGJnHtgy0GMr2Bx97sctvAIJfg5dINK3izpN13XzIMCM3KePusRoDHRGJ9tHdc7V7g
1nJHRyyeh1XttOvcaOuKzNPH5+MwNYDl7Rs/UJ4Qm8nvBdkoNNpsgN0nXC4fVyxO+gZWW8
Krj/Ysjr2b/4gkPs2Dq4Y6SsA7gUtqs=
Received: from m.tailaa68d.ts.net (mail1.85362086.com [107.174.64.25])
by mail.z572.online (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id f2ed9ee6
(TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for <guix-patches@HIDDEN>;
Sat, 22 Mar 2025 15:55:17 +0000 (UTC)
From: Zheng Junjie <z572@HIDDEN>
To: guix-patches@HIDDEN
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: libsixel: Update to 1.10.5.
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 23:49:08 +0800
Message-ID: <983c33f6912697ac9d4cca22a902525396f09a95.1742658548.git.z572@HIDDEN>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.49.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=88.99.160.180; envelope-from=z572@HIDDEN;
helo=mail.z572.online
X-Spam_score_int: 19
X-Spam_score: 1.9
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: (1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.499,
FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP=2, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.474,
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001,
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 4.9 (++++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: * gnu/packages/image.scm (libsixel): Update to 1.10.5.
Change-Id:
I34520979d62c006bafcba62d07a17b427929f07e --- gnu/packages/image.scm | 4
++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+),
2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/image.scm
b/gnu/packages/image.scm index 166b2d93a0a..89e7ef83e60 100644 ---
a/gnu/packages/image.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/image.scm @@ -2910,7 +2910,7 @@ (define-public spng (
[...] Content analysis details: (4.9 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [2001:470:142:0:0:0:0:17 listed in] [list.dnswl.org]
1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
1.5 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: z572.online (online)]
2.0 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP From abused NTLD
0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: * gnu/packages/image.scm (libsixel): Update to 1.10.5. Change-Id:
I34520979d62c006bafcba62d07a17b427929f07e --- gnu/packages/image.scm | 4
++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/image.scm
b/gnu/packages/image.scm index 166b2d93a0a..89e7ef83e60 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/image.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/image.scm @@ -2910,7 +2910,7 @@ (define-public spng (
[...]
Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust
[2001:470:142:0:0:0:0:17 listed in]
[list.dnswl.org]
1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
1.5 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: z572.online (online)]
0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD
-1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
manager
* gnu/packages/image.scm (libsixel): Update to 1.10.5.
Change-Id: I34520979d62c006bafcba62d07a17b427929f07e
---
gnu/packages/image.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/image.scm b/gnu/packages/image.scm
index 166b2d93a0a..89e7ef83e60 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/image.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/image.scm
@@ -2910,7 +2910,7 @@ (define-public spng
(define-public libsixel
(package
(name "libsixel")
- (version "1.10.3")
+ (version "1.10.5")
(source
(origin
(method git-fetch)
@@ -2919,7 +2919,7 @@ (define-public libsixel
(commit (string-append "v" version))))
(file-name (git-file-name name version))
(sha256
- (base32 "1nny4295ipy4ajcxmmh04c796hcds0y7z7rv3qd17mj70y8j0r2d"))))
+ (base32 "1j85p8s5cy7vz1ph9vsvcmxdrr8yi57pgv8vz1xp6dr715jc3g51"))))
(build-system meson-build-system)
(arguments
(list
base-commit: cf87c55d8a1d67621277ead305e8e77c2ddb64c5
prerequisite-patch-id: 1942022db74ec81607b95d53ed533f60a113c425
--
2.49.0
Zheng Junjie <z572@HIDDEN>:guix-patches@HIDDEN.
Full text available.guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#77184; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.