GNU logs - #8432, boring messages

Message sent to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#8432: 24.0.50; Eldoc highlighting is confused by dolist and dotimes
Resent-From: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 08:52:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.8432.B.13020798977657 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 8432 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 10:51:13 +0200
Message-ID: <87zko3vk3i.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org

1. emacs -Q
2. In *scratch* insert the following sexp:
   (dolist (e '(a b c))
     (message "Done")
     (message "Done")
     (message "Done"))
3. M-x turn-on-eldoc-mode
4. Putting point on (really, right after) the space after "dolist" makes
   the echo area display this:  
   dolist: ((VAR LIST [RESULT]) BODY...)
5. Move point one character to the right, onto (really, right after) the
   left parenthesis before "e".
   => Now "VAR" is highlighted in the echo area.  Move point one more
   character to the right and "VAR" is no longer highlighted (though
   point is now really on/after the argument VAR of dolist).  There is
   no highlighting as point moves further rightwards, until it is at the
   end of the line, right after the closing parenthesis of the argument
   list: now "VAR" is highlighted again.
6. Move point to column 0 of the first "message" sexp.
   => Now "LIST" is highlighted in the echo area.
7. Move point to column 0 of the second "message" sexp.
   => Now "[RESULT]" is highlighted in the echo area.
8. Move point to column 0 of the third "message" sexp.
   => Now "BODY" is highlighted in the echo area.

The same (mis)highlighting pattern arises with dotimes.


In GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (i686-suse-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.20.1)
 of 2011-04-03 on escher
Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.10800000
configured using `configure  '--without-toolkit-scroll-bars' 'CFLAGS=-g -O2 -fno-optimize-sibling-calls''

Important settings:
  value of $LC_ALL: nil
  value of $LC_COLLATE: nil
  value of $LC_CTYPE: nil
  value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil
  value of $LC_MONETARY: nil
  value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil
  value of $LC_TIME: nil
  value of $LANG: en_US.UTF-8
  value of $XMODIFIERS: @im=local
  locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix
  default enable-multibyte-characters: t

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#8432: Acknowledgement (24.0.50; Eldoc highlighting is
 confused by dolist and dotimes)
Message-ID: <handler.8432.B.13020798977657.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <87zko3vk3i.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 8432
X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
Reply-To: 8432 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 08:52:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with GNU.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 8432 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
8432: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D8432
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#8432: 24.0.50; Eldoc highlighting is confused by dolist and dotimes
Resent-From: Alex <agrambot@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:16:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.8432.B8432.147338016017555 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@HIDDEN>
Cc: 8432 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Alex <agrambot@HIDDEN>
References: <87zko3vk3i.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 18:15:50 -0600
In-Reply-To: <87zko3vk3i.fsf@HIDDEN> (Stephen Berman's message of
 "Wed, 06 Apr 2011 10:51:13 +0200")
Message-ID: <87vay653nt.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
 
 Content preview:  found 8432 25.1 quit Stephen Berman writes: > 1. emacs -Q
   > 2. In *scratch* insert the following sexp: > (dolist (e '(a b c)) > (message
    "Done") > (message "Done") > (message "Done")) > 3. M-x turn-on-eldoc-mode
    > 4. Putting point on (really, right after) the space after "dolist" makes
    > the echo area display this: > dolist: ((VAR LIST [RESULT]) BODY...) > 5.
    Move point one character to the right, onto (really, right after) the > left
    parenthesis before "e". > => Now "VAR" is highlighted in the echo area. Move
    point one more > character to the right and "VAR" is no longer highlighted
    (though > point is now really on/after the argument VAR of dolist). There
    is > no highlighting as point moves further rightwards, until it is at the
    > end of the line, right after the closing parenthesis of the argument >
   list: now "VAR" is highlighted again. > 6. Move point to column 0 of the first
    "message" sexp. > => Now "LIST" is highlighted in the echo area. > 7. Move
    point to column 0 of the second "message" sexp. > => Now "[RESULT]" is highlighted
    in the echo area. > 8. Move point to column 0 of the third "message" sexp.
    > => Now "BODY" is highlighted in the echo area. > > The same (mis)highlighting
    pattern arises with dotimes. [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (1.7 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  2.4 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM     RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source
                             [209.85.218.52 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
                             trust
                             [209.85.218.52 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3      RBL: Good reputation (+3)
                             [209.85.218.52 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (agrambot[at]gmail.com)
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid

found 8432 25.1
quit

Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@HIDDEN> writes:

> 1. emacs -Q
> 2. In *scratch* insert the following sexp:
>    (dolist (e '(a b c))
>      (message "Done")
>      (message "Done")
>      (message "Done"))
> 3. M-x turn-on-eldoc-mode
> 4. Putting point on (really, right after) the space after "dolist" makes
>    the echo area display this:  
>    dolist: ((VAR LIST [RESULT]) BODY...)
> 5. Move point one character to the right, onto (really, right after) the
>    left parenthesis before "e".
>    => Now "VAR" is highlighted in the echo area.  Move point one more
>    character to the right and "VAR" is no longer highlighted (though
>    point is now really on/after the argument VAR of dolist).  There is
>    no highlighting as point moves further rightwards, until it is at the
>    end of the line, right after the closing parenthesis of the argument
>    list: now "VAR" is highlighted again.
> 6. Move point to column 0 of the first "message" sexp.
>    => Now "LIST" is highlighted in the echo area.
> 7. Move point to column 0 of the second "message" sexp.
>    => Now "[RESULT]" is highlighted in the echo area.
> 8. Move point to column 0 of the third "message" sexp.
>    => Now "BODY" is highlighted in the echo area.
>
> The same (mis)highlighting pattern arises with dotimes.

I can reproduce this in Emacs 25.1.

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Sep 2016 00:15:59 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 08 20:15:59 2016
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53987 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1bi9U7-0004Yx-Gb
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2016 20:15:59 -0400
Received: from mail-oi0-f52.google.com ([209.85.218.52]:34943)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <agrambot@HIDDEN>)
 id 1bi9U6-0004Ye-0x; Thu, 08 Sep 2016 20:15:58 -0400
Received: by mail-oi0-f52.google.com with SMTP id s131so99539599oie.2;
 Thu, 08 Sep 2016 17:15:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id
 :user-agent:mime-version;
 bh=9H5pBcqa0adLgYFabnw2hM3U7qxhbArppVtrzxIp484=;
 b=Z0rEDqWbm2f44Tz1MG4axDxjvPY4ixjF03rYuCTks8jtnEsnm7TjenLF8HO/jG52h3
 NiWgRHztKgZ+rAfyMY9LC7LUaiOEDeEKhIpYU5wGPt3JkdBbO/tkViOoEhkmBnwyc9iG
 ft9knxXYqaviSb62jll82LjY25CoTcDLcek/iFZsXCnAwv/Hqh2xJSBsYERTLwbzMowu
 Z2tlPySHx/wXQeg6zYbkISDgI7WbpF6RPTNPzMjvtq1epUbYIBGoorOoVGUZltNFk2oo
 LL39VUOlvIHyfNB5kTcRXOeMg+ZWYblSLIN0lSPlfu/vx9KhKPFJPTLe1cdRZqY/RG8m
 UAeA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
 :message-id:user-agent:mime-version;
 bh=9H5pBcqa0adLgYFabnw2hM3U7qxhbArppVtrzxIp484=;
 b=AF+PTzCoxzwjx3+TlgIZg2PR2mKtAqvsyNfNbAODxvdKBGZB4gGiHvo4RK58zAr5UE
 p9oMFj+DL9VeEEHhwLPzwPP/eCuRt5/vwpu5ooQng/D61uxfRjYqw/NVZX5Jv+yMjiCo
 QjOhXf6hUsP8xWuxm0btCgr+Dg5FlSfwDKRdVUf1tCAQgR+aC6SpuQXEQmveGOKNybnV
 1noq1tGlmnlCbmsXXDrk3l9+DWArQl8LIywLaAmIC8RBtrcyNLYcmVnUzoOqefo1lybl
 t6oDWVXwrYO/R0KX3pcP3y4kxdvNM8+l/BpnvAVro+AMJzt0zB9RGRzw/hCi9JuO/0rC
 P6Sw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwM6TsNyamE3HaHqrpFl0YT7bB/P6fWo2jHFtbpjIiU9xVVngkyviGtmcfueuy625Q==
X-Received: by 10.202.223.195 with SMTP id w186mr936635oig.173.1473380152362; 
 Thu, 08 Sep 2016 17:15:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lylat (S01061859339e9903.ss.shawcable.net. [174.2.107.88])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e131sm567847iof.19.2016.09.08.17.15.51
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256);
 Thu, 08 Sep 2016 17:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: Alex <agrambot@HIDDEN>
To: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#8432: 24.0.50;
 Eldoc highlighting is confused by dolist and dotimes
References: <87zko3vk3i.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 18:15:50 -0600
In-Reply-To: <87zko3vk3i.fsf@HIDDEN> (Stephen Berman's message of
 "Wed, 06 Apr 2011 10:51:13 +0200")
Message-ID: <87vay653nt.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  found 8432 25.1 quit Stephen Berman writes: > 1. emacs -Q
 > 2. In *scratch* insert the following sexp: > (dolist (e '(a b c)) > (message
 "Done") > (message "Done") > (message "Done")) > 3. M-x turn-on-eldoc-mode
 > 4. Putting point on (really, right after) the space after "dolist" makes
 > the echo area display this: > dolist: ((VAR LIST [RESULT]) BODY...) > 5.
 Move point one character to the right, onto (really, right after) the > left
 parenthesis before "e". > => Now "VAR" is highlighted in the echo area. Move
 point one more > character to the right and "VAR" is no longer highlighted
 (though > point is now really on/after the argument VAR of dolist). There
 is > no highlighting as point moves further rightwards, until it is at the
 > end of the line, right after the closing parenthesis of the argument >
 list: now "VAR" is highlighted again. > 6. Move point to column 0 of the first
 "message" sexp. > => Now "LIST" is highlighted in the echo area. > 7. Move
 point to column 0 of the second "message" sexp. > => Now "[RESULT]" is
 highlighted
 in the echo area. > 8. Move point to column 0 of the third "message" sexp.
 > => Now "BODY" is highlighted in the echo area. > > The same
 (mis)highlighting pattern arises with dotimes. [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (1.7 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 2.4 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM     RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source
 [209.85.218.52 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
 (agrambot[at]gmail.com)
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
 trust [209.85.218.52 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3      RBL: Good reputation (+3)
 [209.85.218.52 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
Cc: 8432 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  found 8432 25.1 quit Stephen Berman writes: > 1. emacs -Q
   > 2. In *scratch* insert the following sexp: > (dolist (e '(a b c)) > (message
    "Done") > (message "Done") > (message "Done")) > 3. M-x turn-on-eldoc-mode
    > 4. Putting point on (really, right after) the space after "dolist" makes
    > the echo area display this: > dolist: ((VAR LIST [RESULT]) BODY...) > 5.
    Move point one character to the right, onto (really, right after) the > left
    parenthesis before "e". > => Now "VAR" is highlighted in the echo area. Move
    point one more > character to the right and "VAR" is no longer highlighted
    (though > point is now really on/after the argument VAR of dolist). There
    is > no highlighting as point moves further rightwards, until it is at the
    > end of the line, right after the closing parenthesis of the argument >
   list: now "VAR" is highlighted again. > 6. Move point to column 0 of the first
    "message" sexp. > => Now "LIST" is highlighted in the echo area. > 7. Move
    point to column 0 of the second "message" sexp. > => Now "[RESULT]" is highlighted
    in the echo area. > 8. Move point to column 0 of the third "message" sexp.
    > => Now "BODY" is highlighted in the echo area. > > The same (mis)highlighting
    pattern arises with dotimes. [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (1.7 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  2.4 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM     RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source
                             [209.85.218.52 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
                             trust
                             [209.85.218.52 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3      RBL: Good reputation (+3)
                             [209.85.218.52 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (agrambot[at]gmail.com)
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid

found 8432 25.1
quit

Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@HIDDEN> writes:

> 1. emacs -Q
> 2. In *scratch* insert the following sexp:
>    (dolist (e '(a b c))
>      (message "Done")
>      (message "Done")
>      (message "Done"))
> 3. M-x turn-on-eldoc-mode
> 4. Putting point on (really, right after) the space after "dolist" makes
>    the echo area display this:  
>    dolist: ((VAR LIST [RESULT]) BODY...)
> 5. Move point one character to the right, onto (really, right after) the
>    left parenthesis before "e".
>    => Now "VAR" is highlighted in the echo area.  Move point one more
>    character to the right and "VAR" is no longer highlighted (though
>    point is now really on/after the argument VAR of dolist).  There is
>    no highlighting as point moves further rightwards, until it is at the
>    end of the line, right after the closing parenthesis of the argument
>    list: now "VAR" is highlighted again.
> 6. Move point to column 0 of the first "message" sexp.
>    => Now "LIST" is highlighted in the echo area.
> 7. Move point to column 0 of the second "message" sexp.
>    => Now "[RESULT]" is highlighted in the echo area.
> 8. Move point to column 0 of the third "message" sexp.
>    => Now "BODY" is highlighted in the echo area.
>
> The same (mis)highlighting pattern arises with dotimes.

I can reproduce this in Emacs 25.1.

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Oct 2016 22:24:06 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 18 18:24:06 2016
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38483 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1bwcnm-0001Nq-0l
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 18:24:06 -0400
Received: from mail-it0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:38684)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <npostavs@HIDDEN>) id 1bwcnk-0001NK-DT
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 18:24:04 -0400
Received: by mail-it0-f41.google.com with SMTP id 66so12113004itl.1
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id
 :user-agent:mime-version;
 bh=LQchO/FRb+tec0ixNyrIj+L1duiqBPVvWCn6YFl+/JU=;
 b=vQGcI6lOJBqBNXZpzFGkE5dhgWprBrnePVkpDIKrvTocNOg6f4FdztkucnyQp1yibJ
 5m+Wkg3xobwaUv6qGDrirT/PRnWsvVngUca+w8/+iOhhOViW4bAdVUNeNYXAkZIakkG+
 +HffyXT1zW54b1PsqyKyTcopbF95mertXtIcsTpYKQsmuKNv1PNrH3ApbuMC9GWE+9d/
 WkHCFlqWG3IESSPXag4O/hHo0G5RrHG5iU9ivktAqTg/4UN5dPBgOhIX5VdvfZsEhoTs
 V58k5f6zg4Bx24FOkLpSBmlbF5ZDKCA5iLYALBcDmUysZlUfhbXAfA2YLC0W5mP/KCpU
 6Jyw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:subject:references:date
 :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version;
 bh=LQchO/FRb+tec0ixNyrIj+L1duiqBPVvWCn6YFl+/JU=;
 b=Om4hrxVrqUXZqCkJUjom7kXuzpLxKyDWT3pBO7PHtILqXkODqEdf3P5FiTWT6zco0W
 UPnLSPPIP6P0XnxMIUNptT/ltDvFatbN974pavwYxO6r5NZGiVhdES3Myc/RLGRT31qE
 K/sYhetv/8g/N0d6iimkhrEUOcoYM71JLfqoItKGaRPsvUSrFivbtx23vht2dqtyeB/E
 XGnHmyTGsMM09S6nsRSnZFn32A7qmWJ4Z7NjW6cbW1+rRoPJKdAlsN8OvPa5T5199tiR
 BbrURpUw7lVoKgc4DNMASS916sSfztL0TDV0KjW3M80R7zcraGO2Xj2z7DoCHtg3pybd
 UuZg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RlniQLR+rUMq7nN1GPelX79h13idvOOiUh6OIAJ/3gh/kzQfBBua88E+XHwg+ETRw==
X-Received: by 10.36.201.198 with SMTP id h189mr17552214itg.75.1476829438662; 
 Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zony ([45.2.7.130])
 by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t141sm2372466ita.0.2016.10.18.15.23.58
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256);
 Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: npostavs@HIDDEN
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#24732: 26.0.50;
 Incorrect eldoc for cl-flet (and possibly other CL macros)
References: <wvr4oa2h2yai.fsf@HIDDEN> <87inspbb2l.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 18:24:23 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87inspbb2l.fsf@HIDDEN> (Stephen Berman's message of "Tue, 18
 Oct 2016 23:29:22 +0200")
Message-ID: <87bmyhuwh4.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)

forcemerge 8432 24732
quit

Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@HIDDEN> writes:

> On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 22:32:37 +0200 Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@HIDDEN> wrote:
>
>> M-x load-library RET cl-lib RET
>> In *scratch*, enter:
>> (cl-flet ((f (x) x)) (f 1))
>> Move point to the opening parenthesis of the (f 1) form.
>> In the minibuffer you'll see
>> cl-flet: (((FUNC ARGLIST BODY...) ...) FORM...)
>> with ARGLIST in bold, but FORM should be bold because point is in FORM.
>
> Probably the same problem as reported in bug#8432.

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#8432: 24.0.50; Eldoc highlighting is confused by dolist and dotimes
Resent-From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 10:27:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.8432.B8432.159757359931222 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8432
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Alex <agrambot@HIDDEN>
Cc: 8432 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 8432-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B8432.159757359931222
          (code B ref 8432); Sun, 16 Aug 2020 10:27:02 +0000
Received: (at 8432) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2020 10:26:39 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56933 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1k7Fs7-00087W-FH
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 06:26:39 -0400
Received: from mail-yb1-f173.google.com ([209.85.219.173]:42549)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <stefankangas@HIDDEN>) id 1k7Fs2-000871-Tp
 for 8432 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 06:26:37 -0400
Received: by mail-yb1-f173.google.com with SMTP id a34so7763147ybj.9
 for <8432 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 03:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent
 :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=QJbywXE7/uPsi5torQmD0Yxy7Z+r3o1PmaJec2PrU7M=;
 b=gaWsdq4D3UNhMw87Rxi6AaZ0/XpXwJuI2TXxhr+5eJh1TzNz/buDXsgO2rgOCHXXEQ
 4Pfh1/lfVlEViYs4sBszDx8BXf2t7PqMfhY3JQ1ucUliBmevzcoQO8QIHtU8VoSpIlZW
 k0kk3XuiyazjWl3aJAjx/9KzDd+JwLwlEKAhOa8KdxFgg/UG9Jh8tWdXDzlEOgdvDWTA
 GDu0oVQ13dTO3DeDdKhKDD/Q5/dhbUPPqLfFdb+uGPyFQoUCmoX+02QA94MnIOr9kpIw
 mtd3iuA0vq50/WWBJWZ3AwqZ3g5dByMCePPQ69TzNuNQ3GQi3ms13J6U4LuHbVPXiLsh
 MxTw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533wdeLub/QJmvRcalwAl57PU4JniYpZHRQJge8+RIJUy2EjwkHb
 GSJ/4Ym80zMkXstz/ImQ/Wsb1233LKYfyGWX098=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwxNP7/SnwXWRB+rTE9E7uAkqDqU6igz7ceLT0cfnlYwwXNkX1zp+BiFE1Jk+lqMTh1AWe0lzntffn95fJA7wo=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:b290:: with SMTP id k16mr13741484ybj.389.1597573589356; 
 Sun, 16 Aug 2020 03:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with
 HTTPREST; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 03:26:29 -0700
From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87vay653nt.fsf@HIDDEN> (Alex's message of "Thu, 08 Sep 2016
 18:15:50 -0600")
References: <87zko3vk3i.fsf@HIDDEN> <87vay653nt.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 03:26:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CADwFkm=Z26Dx2erdr-nxvDU9z-W=i4qX9Sbyq=wxqqquiHHa1w@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)

found 8432 28.0.50
thanks

Alex <agrambot@HIDDEN> writes:

> found 8432 25.1
> quit
>
> Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>> 1. emacs -Q
>> 2. In *scratch* insert the following sexp:
>>    (dolist (e '(a b c))
>>      (message "Done")
>>      (message "Done")
>>      (message "Done"))
>> 3. M-x turn-on-eldoc-mode
>> 4. Putting point on (really, right after) the space after "dolist" makes
>>    the echo area display this:
>>    dolist: ((VAR LIST [RESULT]) BODY...)
>> 5. Move point one character to the right, onto (really, right after) the
>>    left parenthesis before "e".
>>    => Now "VAR" is highlighted in the echo area.  Move point one more
>>    character to the right and "VAR" is no longer highlighted (though
>>    point is now really on/after the argument VAR of dolist).  There is
>>    no highlighting as point moves further rightwards, until it is at the
>>    end of the line, right after the closing parenthesis of the argument
>>    list: now "VAR" is highlighted again.
>> 6. Move point to column 0 of the first "message" sexp.
>>    => Now "LIST" is highlighted in the echo area.
>> 7. Move point to column 0 of the second "message" sexp.
>>    => Now "[RESULT]" is highlighted in the echo area.
>> 8. Move point to column 0 of the third "message" sexp.
>>    => Now "BODY" is highlighted in the echo area.
>>
>> The same (mis)highlighting pattern arises with dotimes.
>
> I can reproduce this in Emacs 25.1.

Still reproducible on current master.

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2020 10:26:37 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 16 06:26:37 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56931 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1k7Fs5-00087I-0O
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 06:26:37 -0400
Received: from mail-yb1-f181.google.com ([209.85.219.181]:35004)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <stefankangas@HIDDEN>) id 1k7Fs2-000872-Tr
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 06:26:35 -0400
Received: by mail-yb1-f181.google.com with SMTP id y134so7790237yby.2
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 03:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent
 :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=QJbywXE7/uPsi5torQmD0Yxy7Z+r3o1PmaJec2PrU7M=;
 b=sgRdekicvE1bX1X2pffMUzGWRjrtbg4K/ajXjnNGz7uUAWQc3EWzuhS0/Jnr7XUhms
 muM13GyKXlYNSs1HXie/xUGNYt5b0NuLZ83vM0hF0U0aMPYjT4279IfSDqVjF+B7lvER
 RmetoHd9GpV2BWjBuXkJLHW/kyp0EJKJgPaCNARRIc28Dlksuan4pt8f08IlhX6Yjd1Y
 f3FQouppCQt8xkNGqOux4Q7xQJ0z9xTHlB+UWqM9E8/iFRaFuX/cX8Iyyhk03Gxh9gLj
 xCvyn+boi6oM3NkHdoX9RY+ZN/P6zXmbX58TJquQ3Nejc9JjCDzUrTRXk1c+OdTdg2Lh
 qsGg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533gTmw+484Ri91q+ptuQ9S/RDprPnHQ2cDjS7PdwAzNTp095hxC
 e69iE9BRL1V7E6bLiQrKadYt3t2qveQ33nUW79I=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwxNP7/SnwXWRB+rTE9E7uAkqDqU6igz7ceLT0cfnlYwwXNkX1zp+BiFE1Jk+lqMTh1AWe0lzntffn95fJA7wo=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:b290:: with SMTP id k16mr13741484ybj.389.1597573589356; 
 Sun, 16 Aug 2020 03:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with
 HTTPREST; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 03:26:29 -0700
From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87vay653nt.fsf@HIDDEN> (Alex's message of "Thu, 08 Sep 2016
 18:15:50 -0600")
References: <87zko3vk3i.fsf@HIDDEN> <87vay653nt.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 03:26:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CADwFkm=Z26Dx2erdr-nxvDU9z-W=i4qX9Sbyq=wxqqquiHHa1w@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#8432: 24.0.50;
 Eldoc highlighting is confused by dolist and dotimes
To: Alex <agrambot@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Bcc: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
Cc: 8432 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)

found 8432 28.0.50
thanks

Alex <agrambot@HIDDEN> writes:

> found 8432 25.1
> quit
>
> Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>> 1. emacs -Q
>> 2. In *scratch* insert the following sexp:
>>    (dolist (e '(a b c))
>>      (message "Done")
>>      (message "Done")
>>      (message "Done"))
>> 3. M-x turn-on-eldoc-mode
>> 4. Putting point on (really, right after) the space after "dolist" makes
>>    the echo area display this:
>>    dolist: ((VAR LIST [RESULT]) BODY...)
>> 5. Move point one character to the right, onto (really, right after) the
>>    left parenthesis before "e".
>>    => Now "VAR" is highlighted in the echo area.  Move point one more
>>    character to the right and "VAR" is no longer highlighted (though
>>    point is now really on/after the argument VAR of dolist).  There is
>>    no highlighting as point moves further rightwards, until it is at the
>>    end of the line, right after the closing parenthesis of the argument
>>    list: now "VAR" is highlighted again.
>> 6. Move point to column 0 of the first "message" sexp.
>>    => Now "LIST" is highlighted in the echo area.
>> 7. Move point to column 0 of the second "message" sexp.
>>    => Now "[RESULT]" is highlighted in the echo area.
>> 8. Move point to column 0 of the third "message" sexp.
>>    => Now "BODY" is highlighted in the echo area.
>>
>> The same (mis)highlighting pattern arises with dotimes.
>
> I can reproduce this in Emacs 25.1.

Still reproducible on current master.

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas

Last modified: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 10:30:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.