GNU logs - #68223, boring messages

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#68223: [cuirass] Bogus (ancient) notifications sent
Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 20:03:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.68223.B.170422578029569 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 68223 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <299@HIDDEN> (cuirass@HIDDEN's message of "Thu, 01 Jan
 1970 01:00:00 +0000")
References: <299@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 15:02:40 -0500
Message-ID: <87zfxnmrkv.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::82c;
 envelope-from=maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN; helo=mail-qt1-x82c.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)

Hello,

Following the qt-team branch builds, I just received today:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
From: cuirass@HIDDEN (Cuirass)
Subject: Build sound-juicer.aarch64-linux on qt-team is broken.
Newsgroups: qt-team
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000 (54 years, 1 day, 6 hours ago)
Attachment: [3. text/html]...

<p>The build <b>sound-juicer.aarch64-linux</b> for specification <b>qt-team=
</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information about this build <a
href=3D"https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2187490/details">here</a>.</p>

https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2187490/details
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

It's dated from 1970.  Prior to these I got some that were 10 weeks old.
I'm not sure what these were triggered by, but that seems a bug.
Ricardo hypothesized that "maybe it finally got around to building these
queued up jobs=E2=80=A6?", which sounds like a potential explanation.

--=20
Thanks,
Maxim

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#68223: Acknowledgement ([cuirass] Bogus (ancient)
 notifications sent)
Message-ID: <handler.68223.B.170422578029569.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <87zfxnmrkv.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 68223
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix
Reply-To: 68223 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 20:03:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-guix@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 68223 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
68223: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D68223
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#68223: [cuirass] Bogus (ancient) notifications sent
Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 20:06:03 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.68223.B68223.170422595330012 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 68223 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87zfxnmrkv.fsf@HIDDEN> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Tue, 02
 Jan 2024 15:02:40 -0500")
References: <299@HIDDEN> <87zfxnmrkv.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 15:05:40 -0500
Message-ID: <87v88bmrfv.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Hi,

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Following the qt-team branch builds, I just received today:
>
> From: cuirass@HIDDEN (Cuirass)
> Subject: Build sound-juicer.aarch64-linux on qt-team is broken.
> Newsgroups: qt-team
> Date: Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000 (54 years, 1 day, 6 hours ago)
> Attachment: [3. text/html]...
>
> <p>The build <b>sound-juicer.aarch64-linux</b> for specification <b>qt-te=
am</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information about this build <a
> href=3D"https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2187490/details">here</a>.</p>
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2187490/details
>
> It's dated from 1970.  Prior to these I got some that were 10 weeks old.
> I'm not sure what these were triggered by, but that seems a bug.
> Ricardo hypothesized that "maybe it finally got around to building these
> queued up jobs=E2=80=A6?", which sounds like a potential explanation.

More context: these 1970 dated notifications occurred following
restarting the builds for which I had originally received 10 weeks dated
notifications.  They are still marked pending as "Scheduled", so I'm not
sure why a notification was sent.

--=20
Thanks,
Maxim

Last modified: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 12:30:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.