Received: (at 68223) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2024 20:05:53 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 02 15:05:53 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51408 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rKl1M-0007nz-U2 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2024 15:05:53 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::234]:45160) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>) id 1rKl1K-0007nk-Kv for 68223 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2024 15:05:51 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-x234.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3bbce1202ebso4094104b6e.2 for <68223 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 02 Jan 2024 12:05:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1704225942; x=1704830742; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=9QwbJ2HYUsUNy8Fehn1+42WIf4hv5c84sBMMQcdz5fQ=; b=cc+2wTSKfSuCEi2yEa1QwFew/vVpSWGcPb/N3stL6bSHLkHbUuyBcL0evm6HBi++2o eMD5OcnE56hb9Q9PmKxhkHqt0bBBdqhtkEepJtG9EEEEF/qvOh8Agq3K3CTOXkdhAvoR fA+T8bYLZVRplKnS5KD7ZC+kmKcb/Try+uykelRtD5Uv1SDucNZC+kRN0SQuIMqdSe3H 9dNSdZljtGbfBSBDX6z2I+lE2S6Vu7R3+IqUNVhdaQMqQe5XdQRYfpeq/AFulrhn9Aqp IJmpks8qSo7IL7jMJ60V9a8OE8+qpXf67ToAvgoNHaGRO5pBUpeu0dpZ7Q8LTz3GzMoR p0/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704225942; x=1704830742; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9QwbJ2HYUsUNy8Fehn1+42WIf4hv5c84sBMMQcdz5fQ=; b=svB2lVTvpQGZnPyqwOlRNT806XfEkoBI0Cg8+XnVfgXneMEhMwOh6Ry+cAOWGA9OVn QP2cUOxcL62n8yQTOdmakWCdQtkXi23aIpG2DUGoC9+16Trtm4Alm0xtGkiyViaDJqbe mgajbyfE/KFF/ukKY2vt6qttIU7TO72N8WZ7w8QrIjjKxb1apcgXlskzu3+X3nkFZazM QlI88LzDp6xKD0CX8YSVFqnsCpz2WomJxWQNdl1fh1ges6PCLQVr5igXM2g+2qa2PKso etpJocOoew07b4IRgs1tWzPMWRhJW8Yek915SMtiH9X5lFz7ZWTRHVBp7XsXbwj19ANc 7/Og== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzT1TB+8Fxs4i84h3Ici7FJCVDZftAX6R4dxSTvPz/NWjvqLsYA bEqW681JUtTg7skvU13c+5jrmUAneIs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGyp1fXB9X9vS84lEPD4Te3tZ72wAYy8hM4nhPZdaMERA0kuFh/mEtNEjvp9Hg3WSyDFfxebw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:18a3:b0:3bc:1e75:5654 with SMTP id bi35-20020a05680818a300b003bc1e755654mr861261oib.103.1704225941909; Tue, 02 Jan 2024 12:05:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd (dsl-10-132-1.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.132.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d1-20020a056214184100b00680c9238d06sm156891qvy.81.2024.01.02.12.05.41 for <68223 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 02 Jan 2024 12:05:41 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN> To: 68223 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#68223: [cuirass] Bogus (ancient) notifications sent In-Reply-To: <87zfxnmrkv.fsf@HIDDEN> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Tue, 02 Jan 2024 15:02:40 -0500") References: <299@HIDDEN> <87zfxnmrkv.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 15:05:40 -0500 Message-ID: <87v88bmrfv.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 68223 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN> writes: > Hello, > > Following the qt-team branch builds, I just received today: > > From: cuirass@HIDDEN (Cuirass) > Subject: Build sound-juicer.aarch64-linux on qt-team is broken. > Newsgroups: qt-team > Date: Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000 (54 years, 1 day, 6 hours ago) > Attachment: [3. text/html]... > > <p>The build <b>sound-juicer.aarch64-linux</b> for specification <b>qt-te= am</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information about this build <a > href=3D"https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2187490/details">here</a>.</p> > > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2187490/details > > It's dated from 1970. Prior to these I got some that were 10 weeks old. > I'm not sure what these were triggered by, but that seems a bug. > Ricardo hypothesized that "maybe it finally got around to building these > queued up jobs=E2=80=A6?", which sounds like a potential explanation. More context: these 1970 dated notifications occurred following restarting the builds for which I had originally received 10 weeks dated notifications. They are still marked pending as "Scheduled", so I'm not sure why a notification was sent. --=20 Thanks, Maxim
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#68223
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2024 20:03:00 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 02 15:03:00 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51374 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rKkyZ-0007gm-W9 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2024 15:03:00 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:45118) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>) id 1rKkyT-0007g8-Vs for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2024 15:02:55 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>) id 1rKkyL-0002XI-FW for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Tue, 02 Jan 2024 15:02:45 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-x82c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::82c]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>) id 1rKkyJ-00028B-S3 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Tue, 02 Jan 2024 15:02:45 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-x82c.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-42836658198so166701cf.0 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Tue, 02 Jan 2024 12:02:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1704225762; x=1704830562; darn=gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=xAys8y8+Fn0J5FD8jT+pjhxWC+zO07pwH8YIl/FPe1I=; b=D1Xh/N0lqNH66cdhA1frHh5HjgKG5SoyTqHhXEWBhOkq8mjWGcxi+NZE4WpMCUFiMW 79UhMj8+khcO30joc+Kz3uuYupkcfqaL7dOxmw7weyeud4rh6X22UQx6uKBXxlXIRgGi +QGOKnAu7LZXawuKjQLYJFZsQCtZKQ7Rltb+1Z+R2ZoMefGW7KE8WiDS8+psvoXFl5bK OMgXu9vvqyEHOsfqJDYiz3G1zfpqVEsyFDYBDmiTUEKQl/1fNsvW3pHzOiJIXKDm3m/Y WW/ql/ni59buwoIQdyvcLZOvtBfUT98t8iCqwgr4Fl21xN4OvZpOWloDjUcK/jVZO3BJ 1XZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704225762; x=1704830562; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xAys8y8+Fn0J5FD8jT+pjhxWC+zO07pwH8YIl/FPe1I=; b=DXj4t5jaGm2r+Ct7WTghm4KN8sRmeVS1GsMWDbBuTWIKchw1ZazyfYFV89fymQsx2Y GZoo0xVJl+/jpD+65CFlCp96s4oa/BHw34pa90eX+f6uKumZ8pjh8G3kELNCznmZQgIs FfDzNtg2M8zI/0q1WrwKzh9/UhHZxby2MNoG8Ty7VfjYmYahykY7/v25T5NcVkmLgxxW t4AaN0cmF3GIcv8qShMGoXoYVMdPCs+NLcVzId3nfT2GpgqwX8NlkrQF8+VP9S4TgyZy xsX6swDN6RffinNV8uGZmsM6ZrVuxkxOsu9kA3A+8DFQi31Ot4PsOGdI2Uf/vpj8pnbT ibfA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwGUsaVXT9Xt2sqo+rEteIiI4ffx3n7VnSbp0fDsoHtLc7GXidq mx8yGR5fWzbJ4P7MMUMPSgch68tOJBk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHImBazIyxZBuadeoTOa1z2k5Nx/bvgf5vG00djvDoD1LOCwDMV3kdSnJWsrN8vDTug6Jqv2A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1115:b0:428:330f:bd60 with SMTP id e21-20020a05622a111500b00428330fbd60mr882495qty.52.1704225762178; Tue, 02 Jan 2024 12:02:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd (dsl-10-132-1.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.132.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ks22-20020ac86216000000b00423f2acc614sm13270394qtb.87.2024.01.02.12.02.41 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 02 Jan 2024 12:02:41 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN> To: bug-guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN> Subject: [cuirass] Bogus (ancient) notifications sent In-Reply-To: <299@HIDDEN> (cuirass@HIDDEN's message of "Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000") References: <299@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 15:02:40 -0500 Message-ID: <87zfxnmrkv.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::82c; envelope-from=maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN; helo=mail-qt1-x82c.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Hello, Following the qt-team branch builds, I just received today: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- From: cuirass@HIDDEN (Cuirass) Subject: Build sound-juicer.aarch64-linux on qt-team is broken. Newsgroups: qt-team Date: Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000 (54 years, 1 day, 6 hours ago) Attachment: [3. text/html]... <p>The build <b>sound-juicer.aarch64-linux</b> for specification <b>qt-team= </b> is broken. You can find the detailed information about this build <a href=3D"https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2187490/details">here</a>.</p> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2187490/details --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- It's dated from 1970. Prior to these I got some that were 10 weeks old. I'm not sure what these were triggered by, but that seems a bug. Ricardo hypothesized that "maybe it finally got around to building these queued up jobs=E2=80=A6?", which sounds like a potential explanation. --=20 Thanks, Maxim
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
:bug-guix@HIDDEN
.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#68223
; Package guix
.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.