GNU logs - #71625, boring messages

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#71625: build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed
Resent-From: danclm@HIDDEN
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 07:56:03 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.71625.B.171869733631842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 71625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 23:41:34 +0200 (CEST)
From: danclm@HIDDEN
Message-ID: <O-c8U5x--3-9@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.3.6.162; envelope-from=danclm@HIDDEN;
 helo=w1.tutanota.de
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 03:55:34 -0400
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)

Hi Guix,=20
I'm getting this bug when attempting to guix pull (it persists with an olde=
r generation):

build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv=
 failed
hint: This usually indicates a bug in one of the channels you are pulling f=
rom, or some incompatibility among them.=C2=A0 You can check the build log
and report the issue to the channel developers.

The channels you are pulling from are: guix.

View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/5m/zanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-gui=
x-package-cache.drv.gz'.
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/r7v8j9pgaw3sc3wjmchd99arjp527w73-profil=
e.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
guix pull: error: build of `/gnu/store/r7v8j9pgaw3sc3wjmchd99arjp527w73-pro=
file.drv' failed
(repl-version 0 1 1)
Generating package cache for '/gnu/store/gxhl3fny25a9d1rmpl9fr9h8brd1ng4m-p=
rofile'...

Backtrace:
In gnu/packages.scm:
=C2=A0=C2=A0 439:11 19 (generate-package-cache _)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
=C2=A0=C2=A0 460:18 18 (fold #<procedure expand-cache expr> _ _)
In gnu/packages.scm:
=C2=A0=C2=A0 399:37 17 (expand-cache . _)
In guix/packages.scm:
=C2=A0 1411:17 16 (supported-package? #<package acpi-call-linux-module@1?> =
?)
In guix/memoization.scm:
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 101:0 15 (_ #<hash-table 7fffe4f30ea0 1780/3517> #<packa=
ge acpi?> ?)
In guix/packages.scm:
=C2=A0 1381:14 14 (_)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
=C2=A0=C2=A0 460:18 13 (fold #<procedure 7ffff4aa6de0 at guix/packages.scm:=
13?> ?)
In guix/packages.scm:
=C2=A0 1385:44 12 (_ _ ("x86_64-linux" "i686-linux"))
In guix/memoization.scm:
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 101:0 11 (_ #<hash-table 7fffe4f30ea0 1780/3517> #<packa=
ge dwar?> ?)
In guix/packages.scm:
=C2=A0 1381:14 10 (_)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
=C2=A0=C2=A0 460:18=C2=A0 9 (fold #<procedure 7ffff4aa7d20 at guix/packages=
.scm:13?> ?)
In guix/packages.scm:
=C2=A0 1385:44=C2=A0 8 (_ _ ("x86_64-linux" "i686-linux"))
In guix/memoization.scm:
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 101:0=C2=A0 7 (_ #<hash-table 7fffe4f30ea0 1780/3517> #<=
package libb?> ?)
In guix/packages.scm:
=C2=A0 1389:39=C2=A0 6 (_)
=C2=A0 1651:16=C2=A0 5 (package->bag _ _ _ #:graft? _)
=C2=A0 1755:47=C2=A0 4 (thunk)
In gnu/packages/linux.scm:
=C2=A0 9981:25=C2=A0 3 (native-inputs #<package libbpf@HIDDEN gnu/packages/l=
inu?>)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
=C2=A0 1685:16=C2=A0 2 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
=C2=A0 1780:13=C2=A0 1 (_ #<&compound-exception components: (#<&undefined-v=
ari?>)
In unknown file:
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0 (backtrace #=
<undefined>)

(exception unbound-variable (value #f) (value "Unbound variable: ~S") (valu=
e (linux-libre-headers-6.8)) (value #f))
Thank you,
Best regards

--=20

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: danclm@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#71625: Acknowledgement (build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv
 failed)
Message-ID: <handler.71625.B.171869733631842.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <O-c8U5x--3-9@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 71625
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix
Reply-To: 71625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 07:56:03 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-guix@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 71625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
71625: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D71625
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#71625: build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed
Resent-From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 16:20:04 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.71625.B71625.172598515217350 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: danclm@HIDDEN
Cc: 71625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <O-c8U5x--3-9@HIDDEN> (danclm@HIDDEN's message of
 "Mon, 17 Jun 2024 23:41:34 +0200 (CEST)")
References: <O-c8U5x--3-9@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 15:26:24 +0200
Message-ID: <87r09rej27.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Hi,

Sorry for the late reply.

On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 at 23:41, danclm@HIDDEN wrote:

> (exception unbound-variable (value #f) (value "Unbound variable: ~S") (va=
lue (linux-libre-headers-6.8)) (value #f))

It means you have one channel that does not define this
=E2=80=99linux-libre-headers-6.8=E2=80=99 symbol (one package I guess).

Well, if you are still able to reproduce the bug, could you provide the
information:

 1. Do you have only the main Guix channel?  Or do you have extra
    channels?

 2. Could you provide the revision you are targetting?


Cheers,
simon

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#71625: build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed
Resent-From: danclm@HIDDEN
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 04:23:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.71625.B71625.17274109513517 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Cc: 71625 <71625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 20:40:06 +0200 (CEST)
From: danclm@HIDDEN
Message-ID: <O7jYtZy--B-9@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87r09rej27.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <O-c8U5x--3-9@HIDDEN> <87r09rej27.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Hi Simon,=C2=A0
do not worry and thanks for your reply.

I can't reproduce the bug now as I changed my config/repo and deleted the o=
lder generations. I also don't remember how I fixed the issue. I use only t=
he main Guix channel, no extra channels.
--
Sep 10, 2024, 18:17 by zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN:

> Hi,
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 at 23:41, danclm@HIDDEN wrote:
>
>> (exception unbound-variable (value #f) (value "Unbound variable: ~S") (v=
alue (linux-libre-headers-6.8)) (value #f))
>>
>
> It means you have one channel that does not define this
> =E2=80=99linux-libre-headers-6.8=E2=80=99 symbol (one package I guess).
>
> Well, if you are still able to reproduce the bug, could you provide the
> information:
>
> 1. Do you have only the main Guix channel?  Or do you have extra
> channels?
>
> 2. Could you provide the revision you are targetting?
>
>
> Cheers,
> simon
>

Last modified: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:45:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.