GNU bug report logs - #71625
build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: guix; Reported by: danclm@HIDDEN; dated Tue, 18 Jun 2024 07:56:03 UTC; Maintainer for guix is bug-guix@HIDDEN.

Message received at 71625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 71625) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2024 04:22:31 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 27 00:22:31 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41658 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1su2Uw-0000uc-30
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:22:31 -0400
Received: from mail.w13.tutanota.de ([185.205.69.213]:54888)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <danclm@HIDDEN>) id 1sttPr-0004wP-TD
 for 71625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 14:40:41 -0400
Received: from tutadb.w10.tutanota.de (w10.api.tuta.com [IPv6:fd:ac::d:10])
 by mail.w13.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF9525E34FE;
 Thu, 26 Sep 2024 20:40:06 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1727376006; 
 s=s1; d=tutanota.com;
 h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:References:Sender;
 bh=EPZ646XUdaypARMM8jiazqeCMNK+WTZceMs+MQl6kFI=;
 b=MiLuIQA5lX3ohObUd8bj5/rw/hfuZpx8N3gMFHVbcXmeX6wLMzwDHbYjt5wicgKs
 Crtg8hbqVOmIW8QKXEll0c2X2dlPN5gdnEgYvqDxJdL6wgihvspSzsrP9MF8KS26xNX
 ly15cRWGlY3Ukpp9CRJ9O+bTmXTFQBrvb33Rbg/mG72lizLJSkOagz4T9k0oCxHSG08
 XBPHaxtY71rR+86lgekO6243MwpSzRf5jidgyrERV/PfjwLwZYiZ5eIGwXlL31g8Dpr
 1FCs1+EfxbhPC+idheQY5X3/wxYK/jKvVtWy8Rks9jm2sRrsEZpd2DVLjMBVynS30dp
 KFtvuLDueQ==
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 20:40:06 +0200 (CEST)
From: danclm@HIDDEN
To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <O7jYtZy--B-9@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87r09rej27.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <O-c8U5x--3-9@HIDDEN> <87r09rej27.fsf@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#71625: build of
 /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 71625
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:22:29 -0400
Cc: 71625 <71625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hi Simon,=C2=A0
do not worry and thanks for your reply.

I can't reproduce the bug now as I changed my config/repo and deleted the o=
lder generations. I also don't remember how I fixed the issue. I use only t=
he main Guix channel, no extra channels.
--
Sep 10, 2024, 18:17 by zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN:

> Hi,
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 at 23:41, danclm@HIDDEN wrote:
>
>> (exception unbound-variable (value #f) (value "Unbound variable: ~S") (v=
alue (linux-libre-headers-6.8)) (value #f))
>>
>
> It means you have one channel that does not define this
> =E2=80=99linux-libre-headers-6.8=E2=80=99 symbol (one package I guess).
>
> Well, if you are still able to reproduce the bug, could you provide the
> information:
>
> 1. Do you have only the main Guix channel?  Or do you have extra
> channels?
>
> 2. Could you provide the revision you are targetting?
>
>
> Cheers,
> simon
>




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#71625; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 71625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 71625) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2024 16:19:12 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 10 12:19:12 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36669 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1so3aC-0004Vl-Cm
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 12:19:12 -0400
Received: from mail-wm1-f44.google.com ([209.85.128.44]:43260)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1so3a8-0004Uw-75
 for 71625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 12:19:08 -0400
Received: by mail-wm1-f44.google.com with SMTP id
 5b1f17b1804b1-42cb58d810eso15102145e9.0
 for <71625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 09:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1725985077; x=1726589877; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date
 :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date
 :message-id:reply-to;
 bh=FyFTx3X6JrBw9oQxJhiujFji97cmse/Bp0I+epa9r6Q=;
 b=OXyXn00UITk7CDgO4/76vCfT5SlSc9pHrYS73gDdE0WCgSyUa3G4M7jqnvCAay19aX
 Y6wrFuyDwSO6PWphQKmTVYeZSlJFWDHQdakl8NBNr14L4mU0DKU7RK01BeW+H45JQFFf
 KD8nSu2bkhLb8sDBptcNULIvEyO4dZGNhkxWMVlfbu8BRfL0JTF97m8B3MSDPrVJIEuz
 Jb6v+wfrgNxJviai1yLCS2H/Cvy1wtY7a9YzrTwl52X3/wGbdTMboMNBryp93UJXPe57
 V/qPVeB/K88Nwv6WhTXLX7qVSaSgeo2nS9xHOK61w59Vq6O+7paWXArEaBK52aZ1qyFV
 a4bQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1725985077; x=1726589877;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date
 :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from
 :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=FyFTx3X6JrBw9oQxJhiujFji97cmse/Bp0I+epa9r6Q=;
 b=ag7qxxSeWhz5oOMlGBFT8bTtnIs4zOSlGr7uvMkpZ957aNf8fdEK96a1Tkc6Synwyh
 c3BRI6FQmBFHlBi4mn5SXXkp7by8AXmagvhx0WG1AZjJVTnI1mbZ2BRj0LCIPPBIlqSt
 TNvQa0Y3lUrcD8ZiFgZYz4N009bcvf7iy2z435f+8c8Q7OLtbE6JspEYUZsDXRq1HZGH
 I7sBMl7FlZhxkcpI0V6pJ/TzQOLDnJmjB30iahwhbgmoA7PfwuSt7Fl1klk2SvkHJ6+E
 LTHdHzCO4YK4X9wrtC6GR+rm42YQUoylNsuc/Y2DKhmiRKfP22EpYeJehHTejkKZghrr
 /iGw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz0EPSlgHx8Mg2b6LfRaPVuiZxqMzxT0SelyXYKvvv2QTi0k2Ke
 vL9hTsW4UfuiGNw6kc89bpOedKrh5qT7yKTwFhVi+LwSApB02GtlD0PZdQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGs59YQO42ZQ6bO6zmGwyLOE/n2zlENs59BVOqEBYJ7i+DLUBhh81Thgw6gVS7BL9+imeuvhg==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:e448:0:b0:374:c878:21f7 with SMTP id
 ffacd0b85a97d-378a8a11f62mr2154144f8f.10.1725985077421; 
 Tue, 10 Sep 2024 09:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lili (roam-nat-fw-prg-194-254-61-43.net.univ-paris-diderot.fr.
 [194.254.61.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 ffacd0b85a97d-378956ddbbbsm9205583f8f.93.2024.09.10.09.17.56
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Tue, 10 Sep 2024 09:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
To: danclm@HIDDEN
Subject: Re: bug#71625: build of
 /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed
In-Reply-To: <O-c8U5x--3-9@HIDDEN> (danclm@HIDDEN's message of
 "Mon, 17 Jun 2024 23:41:34 +0200 (CEST)")
References: <O-c8U5x--3-9@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 15:26:24 +0200
Message-ID: <87r09rej27.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 71625
Cc: 71625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hi,

Sorry for the late reply.

On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 at 23:41, danclm@HIDDEN wrote:

> (exception unbound-variable (value #f) (value "Unbound variable: ~S") (va=
lue (linux-libre-headers-6.8)) (value #f))

It means you have one channel that does not define this
=E2=80=99linux-libre-headers-6.8=E2=80=99 symbol (one package I guess).

Well, if you are still able to reproduce the bug, could you provide the
information:

 1. Do you have only the main Guix channel?  Or do you have extra
    channels?

 2. Could you provide the revision you are targetting?


Cheers,
simon




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#71625; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2024 07:55:36 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 18 03:55:36 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41388 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1sJTgl-0008HQ-Ve
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 03:55:36 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:47878)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <danclm@HIDDEN>) id 1sJK6h-0005ao-9E
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 17:41:43 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <danclm@HIDDEN>)
 id 1sJK6e-0000cn-Nm
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 17:41:40 -0400
Received: from w1.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.162])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <danclm@HIDDEN>)
 id 1sJK6c-00085Q-Rz
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 17:41:40 -0400
Received: from tutadb.w10.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.10])
 by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29226FBFC24
 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 21:41:34 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1718660494; 
 s=s1; d=tutanota.com;
 h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:Sender;
 bh=M26NrbkBc3VlL94/22wqPjPABrvmcB4Sk49F64VznL0=;
 b=xcCNnv9ZJWL/XDTbPsoNqq6yHMSaSbItzEuNwDeHRb+BTL2n9FNYAwQYecTdtM7R
 epQuXhTR22XH4XykIxPht5PqyfVyQrmAEvWBI71sE77ysqQh56SDjYxkDDTNvFwydfv
 5l3q8WXlJJzT2ZF59/h/uWYTwfkJ8RX2EvxvReKCZPFPTrJQ0NsX0e24qge3xqmZSet
 ROPgipnDrd1Ks8HxmXcvJoFIK/TDMGHVHJ1S8Ck7/yZU4LmdSrkRPPonZpb1gHONtq4
 TJXpfhvwj4P6mhnozT9+7epkap/wwoD+k+bltrokMj6EQ1cNgvDIw+NP9SvwqiKGxL+
 GhO0vHeuCw==
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 23:41:34 +0200 (CEST)
From: danclm@HIDDEN
To: Bug Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <O-c8U5x--3-9@HIDDEN>
Subject: build of
 /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.3.6.162; envelope-from=danclm@HIDDEN;
 helo=w1.tutanota.de
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 03:55:34 -0400
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)

Hi Guix,=20
I'm getting this bug when attempting to guix pull (it persists with an olde=
r generation):

build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv=
 failed
hint: This usually indicates a bug in one of the channels you are pulling f=
rom, or some incompatibility among them.=C2=A0 You can check the build log
and report the issue to the channel developers.

The channels you are pulling from are: guix.

View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/5m/zanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-gui=
x-package-cache.drv.gz'.
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/r7v8j9pgaw3sc3wjmchd99arjp527w73-profil=
e.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
guix pull: error: build of `/gnu/store/r7v8j9pgaw3sc3wjmchd99arjp527w73-pro=
file.drv' failed
(repl-version 0 1 1)
Generating package cache for '/gnu/store/gxhl3fny25a9d1rmpl9fr9h8brd1ng4m-p=
rofile'...

Backtrace:
In gnu/packages.scm:
=C2=A0=C2=A0 439:11 19 (generate-package-cache _)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
=C2=A0=C2=A0 460:18 18 (fold #<procedure expand-cache expr> _ _)
In gnu/packages.scm:
=C2=A0=C2=A0 399:37 17 (expand-cache . _)
In guix/packages.scm:
=C2=A0 1411:17 16 (supported-package? #<package acpi-call-linux-module@1?> =
?)
In guix/memoization.scm:
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 101:0 15 (_ #<hash-table 7fffe4f30ea0 1780/3517> #<packa=
ge acpi?> ?)
In guix/packages.scm:
=C2=A0 1381:14 14 (_)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
=C2=A0=C2=A0 460:18 13 (fold #<procedure 7ffff4aa6de0 at guix/packages.scm:=
13?> ?)
In guix/packages.scm:
=C2=A0 1385:44 12 (_ _ ("x86_64-linux" "i686-linux"))
In guix/memoization.scm:
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 101:0 11 (_ #<hash-table 7fffe4f30ea0 1780/3517> #<packa=
ge dwar?> ?)
In guix/packages.scm:
=C2=A0 1381:14 10 (_)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
=C2=A0=C2=A0 460:18=C2=A0 9 (fold #<procedure 7ffff4aa7d20 at guix/packages=
.scm:13?> ?)
In guix/packages.scm:
=C2=A0 1385:44=C2=A0 8 (_ _ ("x86_64-linux" "i686-linux"))
In guix/memoization.scm:
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 101:0=C2=A0 7 (_ #<hash-table 7fffe4f30ea0 1780/3517> #<=
package libb?> ?)
In guix/packages.scm:
=C2=A0 1389:39=C2=A0 6 (_)
=C2=A0 1651:16=C2=A0 5 (package->bag _ _ _ #:graft? _)
=C2=A0 1755:47=C2=A0 4 (thunk)
In gnu/packages/linux.scm:
=C2=A0 9981:25=C2=A0 3 (native-inputs #<package libbpf@HIDDEN gnu/packages/l=
inu?>)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
=C2=A0 1685:16=C2=A0 2 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
=C2=A0 1780:13=C2=A0 1 (_ #<&compound-exception components: (#<&undefined-v=
ari?>)
In unknown file:
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0 (backtrace #=
<undefined>)

(exception unbound-variable (value #f) (value "Unbound variable: ~S") (valu=
e (linux-libre-headers-6.8)) (value #f))
Thank you,
Best regards

--=20





Acknowledgement sent to danclm@HIDDEN:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#71625; Package guix. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:45:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.