X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#71913: 29.1; shr: shr-resize-image does not behave as expected
Resent-From: George Huebner <george@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 07:37:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.71913.B.17199921988823 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: report 71913
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: 71913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.17199921988823
(code B ref -1); Wed, 03 Jul 2024 07:37:02 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2024 07:36:38 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38531 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1sOuXc-0002I9-RG
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 03:36:37 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:55030)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <ghubs25@HIDDEN>) id 1sOtcx-0000n2-Au
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 02:38:04 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ghubs25@HIDDEN>) id 1sOtcv-0005v6-2c
for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 02:38:01 -0400
Received: from mail-il1-f181.google.com ([209.85.166.181])
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ghubs25@HIDDEN>) id 1sOtcs-0006I1-9t
for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 02:38:00 -0400
Received: by mail-il1-f181.google.com with SMTP id
e9e14a558f8ab-375af3538f2so23754945ab.3
for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 23:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1719988676; x=1720593476;
h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:x-gm-message-state
:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=pk+PX4Md0NNmxDOGYDSaZ8RhXaIvkY9RZa0DRFbLYYE=;
b=LIsrTruxBLhvBBysozMBk2NcWmBF4KZ0BcCS+wWIGc+Ik7ll3eoc0rc0XxocoO09Mx
+V2wuFhQEfZ4G1o5ulEbh0tg6DyCKS9nuJvSsAab5St3JjjGw5lv5sTyJfO3zdGYrbPz
BEMfEsytMhqKty+fyi5O/qB2UBQkecdclRHHU2Xj2PG9FVgTjbnz9Q0yCbQkIqAo8V3q
F09ckXzw6E2guvEYH8k7SEqLvd1ZQSuP0AEDMhMVp0jNzHNOa27IC1W+/MOOfL0hLdIK
Rp34koty+Oyd1vTCO9ZanH3D2ngGvBvcYYs116rCARXHP3Se/JIRBXFRtFlRyK6bNg/g
02HA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy/IEtVJQRNZTEeY7KUuGz/nbOwSqZqTk2CR1uBhnl/D73zmerW
2F1CFgpqMwkHyD9qXXY5Ya6ClW8+8twGoRcLRXJGS4gqLhrpaaimmRldlg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFWaImq+l0z/lP3kWYEa5KqKPPuVxE2atZrRLm4cH4SvaJ5hWzqoFRlzjNQ8D2DE7uqNtAjOw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:20c9:b0:380:f340:ad66 with SMTP id
e9e14a558f8ab-380f34ffb7fmr30671175ab.26.1719988675637;
Tue, 02 Jul 2024 23:37:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (s-29-93.flex.volo.net. [76.191.29.93])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
e9e14a558f8ab-3826c45308esm817755ab.83.2024.07.02.23.37.55
for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Tue, 02 Jul 2024 23:37:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: George Huebner <george@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 01:37:52 -0500
Message-ID: <m2a5izyo8v.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.166.181; envelope-from=ghubs25@HIDDEN;
helo=mail-il1-f181.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -15
X-Spam_score: -1.6
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25,
FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 03:36:33 -0400
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-)
I noticed an issue with =shr-max-image-proportion= wherein images
would be correctly resized on initial load, but would then appear
much larger.
I suspected this was an issue with caching, and sure enough,
either disabling the cache with ~(setq shr-ignore-cache t)~ or
manually deleting images from the cache results in images
displaying correctly.
This unanswered
[[https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/esa3x5/image_scaling_in_elfeed_entry_window/][Reddit
post]] seems to corroborate this behaviour.
It looks like it might be because of the codepath taken in
~shr-tag-img~ wherein a cache miss results in the creation of a
placeholder image; I had some trouble with edebug though, so
that's just an educated guess.
Here's a minimal reproducible example (credit to Sacha Chua):
#+begin_src elisp :eval no
;; run this (image is very large), run again many times without
killing *test* (image is correct size), kill *test* and run
again (image is large again)
;; won't observe this behaviour if you disable cache
;; (setq shr-ignore-cache t)
(setq shr-max-image-proportion 0.5)
(with-current-buffer (get-buffer-create "*test*")
(erase-buffer)
(insert "<img
src=\"https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/83/The_GNU_logo.png\">")
(shr-insert-document (libxml-parse-html-region (point-min)
(point-max)))
(display-buffer (current-buffer)))
#+end_src elisp
I also observed this behaviour on Emacs master (667ca66), but I
daily drive 29.1.
In GNU Emacs 29.1 (build 1, aarch64-apple-darwin23.4.0, Carbon
Version
170 AppKit 2487.5)
Windowing system distributor 'Apple Inc.', version 14.4.0
System Description: macOS 14.4
Configured using:
'configure
--prefix=/nix/store/ismv7jzf3hcqziq5bpjfs54zd4qfjjn7-emacs-mac-macport-29.1
--disable-build-details --with-modules --without-gif
--without-jpeg
--without-png --without-tiff --without-x --without-xpm
'--enable-mac-app=$$out/Applications' --with-gnutls --with-mac
--with-xml2 --without-ns --with-compress-install
--with-toolkit-scroll-bars --with-native-compilation
--without-imagemagick --with-mailutils --without-small-ja-dic
--with-tree-sitter --without-xinput2 --without-xwidgets
--without-dbus
--without-selinux --with-xwidgets'
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System) To: George Huebner <george@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#71913: Acknowledgement (29.1; shr: shr-resize-image does not behave as expected) Message-ID: <handler.71913.B.17199921988823.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> References: <m2a5izyo8v.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 71913 X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs Reply-To: 71913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 07:37:02 +0000 Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 71913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 71913: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D71913 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#71913: 29.1; shr: shr-resize-image does not behave as expected
Resent-From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 15:50:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.71913.B71913.172002179020120 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71913
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: George Huebner <george@HIDDEN>, 71913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 71913-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B71913.172002179020120
(code B ref 71913); Wed, 03 Jul 2024 15:50:01 +0000
Received: (at 71913) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2024 15:49:50 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40183 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1sP2Ew-0005ES-Fg
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 11:49:50 -0400
Received: from mail-il1-f177.google.com ([209.85.166.177]:54620)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <jporterbugs@HIDDEN>) id 1sP2Eu-0005EK-SJ
for 71913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 11:49:49 -0400
Received: by mail-il1-f177.google.com with SMTP id
e9e14a558f8ab-380deeb250eso6962085ab.1
for <71913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 08:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1720021726; x=1720626526; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language
:references:to:subject:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=GHiox3OcBt2KxBWb2mxvG0TDBNhJBzrn5/cs7lgxaew=;
b=Lz4Qc+kW3BD+9vwqXS7ipOBtTDYIr3v1Dqhvfa+RpGg9GwqvfpgAUu3qt+tU760RVD
0MzL3pI/mbj2iTHyNOjMWaxOt+gqDfgGqqvZQfYbyQziwAK88MM45IF6TeEWFdgJhDAH
x3pjlkMr3QhE1CPm2FF1FTjfaAndbTiatRxZqGGhft3vWBGP/PhUXx8jGtY1AZFOzkD5
0KDjRLtcuxJW2cu72H8XeEdVi8oPcnbBwQwuUKKiKZAvE2mazDG4Ef6iZx0tVB7ImQDe
HodPzUAadn8bxbR2p/tWZtUmqJ3gnEvHcaEN+hzySsf58kq0i5L1kFt/Oes/+xhDV/bs
Amxg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720021726; x=1720626526;
h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language
:references:to:subject:mime-version:date:message-id
:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=GHiox3OcBt2KxBWb2mxvG0TDBNhJBzrn5/cs7lgxaew=;
b=jxUucq6fo776lgoLmlldmi2FgJcx14YmmGSHW73jPjzCPfB0uh9Kc/rahU60kSkn8f
Pud9EeBaiMAS49gY4ZagX25p7/siixFq4rnM7Ambl6RbRYxIitV0u+u6GbZ4w64FA5uy
r26z/yhmqTyc1pIr4PSX4cRrnIP/eOuPN3wxnd2tNJMJE6cYIvnOxTzpPgAk8k9RTGTa
7W7YtLw14leyre3Yd4QzI3Nr+yKbKfCVzsM+oLbUCfBUg5cew737TUI8gXRBei3PYie5
4QVc41CpdcaTThNDGztJETQGe1NevXSBDul6ONXpAdyBtrch2r5+w97W2o1hOTn3XalB
Z5pQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1;
AJvYcCVRqm8nTaPJJq4oCk5bFwRvg4j69h9SweaV8Pcz1iU9VcZFhzWoldcJAQeVAj2YieWGPAE2sK89OBS1T6jIQ/TOBy+U6Ow=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YytOnhWDD8XemBnbOrInf/ZSZTcJPjGyJ1ZuFL63Z2D9xGr5VIH
d6X3ivRCwnKRIh73ayI+0UdetorfSo5P1TzzyjLx0ld9oE8OhM+g4dfVNA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGEbdSkOHUZnX0cESVleZEXRIpIwY6UR47mBxylIe851qmwLFcyjYyMqVAlBhJWpEDNFgF2vg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1649:b0:382:325c:f7b3 with SMTP id
e9e14a558f8ab-382325cfa93mr23101965ab.4.1720021726266;
Wed, 03 Jul 2024 08:48:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (syn-023-240-098-037.res.spectrum.com.
[23.240.98.37]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
41be03b00d2f7-72c6c9e1634sm8344528a12.58.2024.07.03.08.48.45
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
Wed, 03 Jul 2024 08:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <630ff886-efa1-f122-3344-4dce503d0c0c@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 08:48:46 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <m2a5izyo8v.fsf@HIDDEN>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <m2a5izyo8v.fsf@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
On 7/2/2024 11:37 PM, George Huebner wrote:
> I noticed an issue with =shr-max-image-proportion= wherein images would
> be correctly resized on initial load, but would then appear much larger.
[snip]
> Here's a minimal reproducible example (credit to Sacha Chua):
> #+begin_src elisp :eval no
> ;; run this (image is very large), run again many times without
> killing *test* (image is correct size), kill *test* and run again
> (image is large again)
> ;; won't observe this behaviour if you disable cache
> ;; (setq shr-ignore-cache t)
> (setq shr-max-image-proportion 0.5)
> (with-current-buffer (get-buffer-create "*test*")
> (erase-buffer)
> (insert "<img
> src=\"https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/83/The_GNU_logo.png\">")
> (shr-insert-document (libxml-parse-html-region (point-min) (point-max)))
> (display-buffer (current-buffer)))
> #+end_src elisp
The bug here is really in your steps to reproduce, which I suppose is
roughly what Elfeed is doing too (though I haven't looked at that code
to be totally sure).
SHR scales images with respect to the size of the buffer's window.
However, by rendering the HTML document with SHR *before* displaying the
buffer in a window, it's impossible for Emacs to do that: there's no
such window yet! If you swap the 'display-buffer' and
'shr-insert-document' lines though, all should work properly.
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#71913: 29.1; shr: shr-resize-image does not behave as expected
Resent-From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2024 18:13:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.71913.B71913.172020317125121 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71913
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: George Huebner <george@HIDDEN>
Cc: 71913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 71913-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B71913.172020317125121
(code B ref 71913); Fri, 05 Jul 2024 18:13:02 +0000
Received: (at 71913) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jul 2024 18:12:51 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44945 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1sPnQR-0006X6-5K
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 14:12:51 -0400
Received: from mail-qv1-f53.google.com ([209.85.219.53]:48279)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <jporterbugs@HIDDEN>) id 1sPnQO-0006Wl-Sg
for 71913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 14:12:49 -0400
Received: by mail-qv1-f53.google.com with SMTP id
6a1803df08f44-6b5e4466931so8482156d6.0
for <71913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 11:12:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1720203100; x=1720807900; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from
:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date
:message-id:reply-to;
bh=xv1UYudtRt2OuxcUnft3vUeNZn0zQZ9TbbtgmYPDB7c=;
b=F8h9ofDa7aZjC41q9k2QXkjsFEp1HHSSaRVOxROwXwr2iNouLnD/LEcRZsx7fD4CM+
TlWA1U2TKC07W4OfnokKCdmnLwQANnpZBneh1L6m18pXyI+60MTK+7axbKTtyXPAGlQV
iEGmd5lFSFZxrMgkLYZVpvaXN+d59QxapIU4u/WeGw3xr2FWSt5H5kSmTh18aTW7EBDg
t70R2nv/m+FNzZnriDqOIOrk9ASzdwI6NgSrUlF3xUgYValDepsZGF2vw5ehISrhLB+4
ZJufJuTFy5mL8NIZBAtF8UBPh8eX9z1uHXNkMYoPcj7196ga8K9pqCCuuFUXsQB7finS
MzSg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720203100; x=1720807900;
h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from
:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=xv1UYudtRt2OuxcUnft3vUeNZn0zQZ9TbbtgmYPDB7c=;
b=G/Obe484GlCozHdRPXJ8udug764UIHhQ7vUQP4ijZCa+wyPgH/yb1ex+UmWtGJe1QF
+k1KqRdM9QCn3HMkRGf1cpi27mvAtJyvNShddqYrnzlTjal0biZ251a0y91pVVyfa7u3
xjTqlTdNQ7Avevc9cSt6D3UWZqlSbwtcfXgy00cMn1706jcEFo/szIrXicYGc9r4Q0NO
8PiVNBPeTo8txdjfmSyBLdtxYP8KwnlyZnIkc5BOPApKWZjjeykPiT+0HM6t1oxmBU/e
ybcJTMO2VhP3AMMlp/9Zs1S/poUxzZKLuRj3xSVbvHPvnOFfIQmRvVVze3v90a/1sXZ4
pgwA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx+sZjyKOo+oTiToev9Ur2QgwQQM9llLVBp2y1kqAhZko4sJOc+
pg79AXHGmvplsE4Kqd+yGclWwZR1pPu2KfLWL7g0vcAs4kGfSzjT41geBzV3osFC2A0ZVtxlEcK
iPEDSqY+fOtA1BfcJehyeoARaPXECycQp
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHTIzFetld/Q/g1AHx7J2xPKnk/OltO4iQAVaKbtjC21s/L9TRL6+XsBF1XGaWjFoHY8pQzHcQGXC4Yl5mC45Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2686:b0:6b5:101d:201 with SMTP id
6a1803df08f44-6b5ed006f2fmr64645396d6.39.1720203100037; Fri, 05 Jul 2024
11:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <m2a5izyo8v.fsf@HIDDEN>
<630ff886-efa1-f122-3344-4dce503d0c0c@HIDDEN>
<m25xtmz0fj.fsf@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <m25xtmz0fj.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 11:11:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CANh=_JFKyagKwzmFUW7h4dUWCp69kT+F8RrL1QS9TyM5q8LjJA@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
(Cc'ing the bug list to follow up there too.)
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 1:26=E2=80=AFPM George Huebner <george@HIDDEN> wro=
te:
>
> You're quite right... I understood ~(not (get-buffer-window
> (current-buffer) t))~ (in shr-rescale-image) was preventing
> rescaling in undisplayed buffers, but in retrospect this is the
> responsibility of the caller, as you say.
>
> Apologies for the fruitless bug report, this thread can be closed.
On the contrary, I think it makes sense to do *something* here. At
minimum, Elfeed should probably get a fix, since I've noticed this
issue there too (but never bothered to figure out why). Now that you
found minimal steps to reproduce, hopefully we can fix Elfeed.
It might also be good to at least document this limitation, or even
enhance 'shr-max-image-proportion' to support absolute pixel sizes,
which would be immune to this issue.
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#71913: 29.1; shr: shr-resize-image does not behave as expected
Resent-From: George Huebner <george@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 04:31:04 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.71913.B71913.172067222615786 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71913
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@HIDDEN>
Cc: 71913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 71913-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B71913.172067222615786
(code B ref 71913); Thu, 11 Jul 2024 04:31:04 +0000
Received: (at 71913) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2024 04:30:26 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50636 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1sRlRo-00046V-Ph
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 00:30:26 -0400
Received: from mail-qk1-f180.google.com ([209.85.222.180]:58501)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <ghubs25@HIDDEN>) id 1sRcaV-0000Xs-Bk
for 71913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:02:48 -0400
Received: by mail-qk1-f180.google.com with SMTP id
af79cd13be357-79f178351d4so8436585a.0
for <71913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 12:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720638155; x=1721242955;
h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to
:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=36EsRuJj5C8ZISkHsXV1YAg719u/65sh8+b5ErH12sg=;
b=R2hCA2QFMVAxDMPPgjUYhWnh2gbq7WSowheRPLk8fG1l4OTPc8A1L7NXy0TTDawUUi
rsNcylxDio+EzNh/fkzat/O+nA5SeHZdXMWlEG9xY6WpTu0ILRJ9EzNLMU+o7YrrmGnM
0KozrH81hEoRCBHCaSlIqU9mMt+/ug2TGAY/zAdE3OWvUK8oZsqB1GbIcTZUTgZUHvtV
C8Euqwvdrne2W/J38Y6+TmIU1EUgFNdBsF+Up35TpqabvkNioilxi2LQEK7/NBC7rSKk
rozN5HQT8Vr9cxzGOztCY+k+6WZubNZw1eRnqa9DRHMTROFhjkztKIERfBiDdDMRY96r
62Mg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxNtrc7yKmfdibS+6HWaMEzRz+RFm+WRV8jycybfihgls/T03sg
ook0RbnVj+JDtqva4I7wvdQ0q3D6wo8i6TrEaKvpISTdypwjZ6c65n4VpA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG/BPSg4nJ16zhxvEl3Ln3/LvXQQBvSO4/Hyi6Tyh46+0D0+itictKWNqPoOJK5TP2UGEdesA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:848:b0:79f:556:5f31 with SMTP id
af79cd13be357-79f19a7d6fbmr770644085a.37.1720638155266;
Wed, 10 Jul 2024 12:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (mobile-130-126-255-14.near.illinois.edu.
[130.126.255.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
d75a77b69052e-447f9b26b96sm22748561cf.11.2024.07.10.12.02.34
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Wed, 10 Jul 2024 12:02:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: George Huebner <george@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <CANh=_JFKyagKwzmFUW7h4dUWCp69kT+F8RrL1QS9TyM5q8LjJA@HIDDEN>
(Jim Porter's message of "Fri, 5 Jul 2024 11:11:29 -0700")
References: <m2a5izyo8v.fsf@HIDDEN>
<630ff886-efa1-f122-3344-4dce503d0c0c@HIDDEN> <m25xtmz0fj.fsf@HIDDEN>
<CANh=_JFKyagKwzmFUW7h4dUWCp69kT+F8RrL1QS9TyM5q8LjJA@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 14:02:33 -0500
Message-ID: <m2y169ul2u.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 00:30:24 -0400
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Aha: after patching Elfeed to render after buffer display (which
seems to fix the display of raster images), I actually did find
behaviour that I believe should be addressed in shr, not in
Elfeed; let me know what you think.
If an image is a SVG, `shr-put-image` will not respect
`shr-max-image-proportion`, because it will pass it directly to
`create-image`, instead of resizing it:
#+begin_src elisp
;; in `shr-put-image`
((eq content-type 'image/svg+xml)
(when (image-type-available-p 'svg)
(create-image data 'svg t :ascent shr-image-ascent)))
(t
(ignore-errors (shr-rescale-image data content-type
(plist-get flags
:width)
(plist-get flags
:height)))))))
#+end_src
As I understand it, this decision was likely made because the
dimensions of SVGs is weird; they aren't inherently required to
have a size, but the SVG itself can define a viewbox with
accompanying width and height (full disclosure: I have no idea
what I'm talking about).
Using `shr-rescale-image` instead seems to do the trick (and
respects SVGs that should display smaller than
`shr-max-image-proportion`), but please do let me know if I'm
ignoring an edge case or there's a better way to address this.
#+begin_src elisp
(setq shr-put-image-function (lambda (spec alt &optional flags)
(if (display-graphic-p)
(let* ((size (cdr (assq 'size flags)))
(data (if (consp spec)
(car spec)
spec))
(content-type (and (consp spec)
(cadr spec)))
(start (point))
(image (cond
((eq size 'original)
(create-image data nil t :ascent 100
:format content-type))
;; BEGIN fix
((eq content-type 'image/svg+xml)
(when (image-type-available-p 'svg)
; (create-image data 'svg t :ascent 100)))
(shr-rescale-image data 'svg (plist-get
flags :width) (plist-get flags :height))))
;; END fix
((eq size 'full)
(ignore-errors
(shr-rescale-image data content-type
(plist-get flags
:width)
(plist-get flags
:height))))
(t
(ignore-errors
(shr-rescale-image data content-type
(plist-get flags
:width)
(plist-get flags
:height)))))))
(when image
;; When inserting big-ish pictures, put them at the
;; beginning of the line.
(when (and (> (current-column) 0)
(> (car (image-size image t)) 400))
(insert "\n"))
(let ((image-pos (point)))
(if (eq size 'original)
(insert-sliced-image image (or alt "*") nil 20 1)
(insert-image image (or alt "*")))
(put-text-property start (point) 'image-size size)
(when (and shr-image-animate
(cdr (image-multi-frame-p image)))
(image-animate image nil 60 image-pos))))
image)
(insert (or alt "")))))
#+end_src elisp
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/x-patch
Content-Disposition: inline; filename=elfeed-shr.patch
Content-Description: Elfeed: render after display
From 8f911a56beaf52f0df18537d0f9abae8373d7133 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: George Huebner <george@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 01:57:15 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] elfeed-show: render after switching to entry buffer
shr can't respect `shr-max-image-proportion` because it isn't rendered
in a window; call `elfeed-search-show-entry` first to fix this.
See https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=71913
---
elfeed-show.el | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/elfeed-show.el b/elfeed-show.el
index 4915cae..e16b4bf 100644
--- a/elfeed-show.el
+++ b/elfeed-show.el
@@ -214,9 +214,9 @@ The result depends on the value of `elfeed-show-unique-buffers'."
(let ((buff (get-buffer-create (elfeed-show--buffer-name entry))))
(with-current-buffer buff
(elfeed-show-mode)
- (setq elfeed-show-entry entry)
- (elfeed-show-refresh))
- (funcall elfeed-show-entry-switch buff)))
+ (setq elfeed-show-entry entry))
+ (funcall elfeed-show-entry-switch buff)
+ (elfeed-show-refresh)))
(defun elfeed-show-next ()
"Show the next item in the elfeed-search buffer."
--
2.44.1
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 13:11:29 EST Jim Porter wrote:
> (Cc'ing the bug list to follow up there too.)
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 1:26=E2=80=AFPM George Huebner <george@HIDDEN>=20
> wrote:
>>
>> You're quite right... I understood ~(not (get-buffer-window
>> (current-buffer) t))~ (in shr-rescale-image) was preventing
>> rescaling in undisplayed buffers, but in retrospect this is the
>> responsibility of the caller, as you say.
>>
>> Apologies for the fruitless bug report, this thread can be=20
>> closed.
>
> On the contrary, I think it makes sense to do *something*=20
> here. At
> minimum, Elfeed should probably get a fix, since I've noticed=20
> this
> issue there too (but never bothered to figure out why). Now that=20
> you
> found minimal steps to reproduce, hopefully we can fix Elfeed.
>
> It might also be good to at least document this limitation, or=20
> even
> enhance 'shr-max-image-proportion' to support absolute pixel=20
> sizes,
> which would be immune to this issue.
--=-=-=--
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#71913: 29.1; shr: shr-resize-image does not behave as expected
Resent-From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 23:54:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.71913.B71913.172074198330201 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71913
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: George Huebner <george@HIDDEN>
Cc: 71913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 71913-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B71913.172074198330201
(code B ref 71913); Thu, 11 Jul 2024 23:54:01 +0000
Received: (at 71913) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2024 23:53:03 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52865 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1sS3aw-0007r3-NP
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 19:53:03 -0400
Received: from mail-oi1-f175.google.com ([209.85.167.175]:48295)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <jporterbugs@HIDDEN>) id 1sS3av-0007qW-CK
for 71913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 19:53:01 -0400
Received: by mail-oi1-f175.google.com with SMTP id
5614622812f47-3d9dd3c1e59so819765b6e.0
for <71913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 16:53:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1720741916; x=1721346716; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
h=in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to:content-language:subject
:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
:reply-to; bh=f7NCWfFdz03xxYBHaQJmCr4rOcOPVat3rt5Twbrs1Fg=;
b=leAN79pg47jRlS7ncchSU9D+I1K6nrnFG4YcWWWOWcSlXlAUfJ2/aLC5PnahnqSOuk
Ii3eiKYoHDB6P6F+iqhhgBVSmb8PQdyj12wXKj/OWFXDtF/t7gn4eVWGS59uSrSBHwxp
PUWHtTXq11fFF780E9FWyYm9xqZAHdmBNBN2vYpDdUXNbor/rhox5J+n4kqJi3Qrrx6n
++8g7+g6SQO1suSXrM8B0ARKOMXJxA6EroiIBe2DS8ic89qwbq6rOe6rcSAEmEXL4w3D
BmWwgdevEXXGqIWi/+ikMUJCnkrNSSUJR3x4VfWcElj/bjv/VQH1f3lJPC+IPHLSGKid
1+cA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720741916; x=1721346716;
h=in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to:content-language:subject
:mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject
:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=f7NCWfFdz03xxYBHaQJmCr4rOcOPVat3rt5Twbrs1Fg=;
b=Aot4fgfCWwLfexS9zsOjvDg+UF0sraqv1Rg7E3gArnxVE8SF93WHpJHxmbTWopxrj0
cvXoz+xbSab2sfQ3TIeaShkCiLKU3OuM1KNDRtlkEwhd9GlvtsJBVLrwDAdfR9SgS56y
PhnwOqCmeRAm7suy2EG3wckpq793DAxozf/7owJcHi9TlW7uNIWGYB6JkzEX77wwEUxA
eS/7N7IMDDVQVnkYl02ncIPCCTpoRNG8ytEvBEaBj5rO71Vc09FJjzJ4mdXqkf2TA7SE
rS8RCixslCBhrQIZrs6QC8T/f+c3wOg0aMNRIf67JXC6996ETlWlXu+Qm62Iv6G7rHT5
De7g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyyrAP9tGXa/eqLgPeLrXq6hffFIDMNAxqtr8kws+T7ZphZZt1b
fM/Cbp7Br4GQ4OtO5HGvFfxoxefCqASwv0Au+WhcQcbvirLHR60HnqOlFA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF4ZR5v+WNP4eEn6XjDfAMcdfhIH8iryyRNVveM+fUXQIoNPVdxKH27oywQZY38zQTjBkaW+g==
X-Received: by 2002:aca:1a1a:0:b0:3d9:c14b:eea6 with SMTP id
5614622812f47-3d9c14bf1camr7228332b6e.8.1720741915688;
Thu, 11 Jul 2024 16:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (syn-023-240-098-037.res.spectrum.com.
[23.240.98.37]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
41be03b00d2f7-77d603fa567sm4939091a12.35.2024.07.11.16.51.54
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
Thu, 11 Jul 2024 16:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------iouCoNOL5L3leXbWV2Imh1Dk"
Message-ID: <a4a59311-ee79-6ee5-f20d-087a23f8f6fb@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 16:51:53 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: en-US
References: <m2a5izyo8v.fsf@HIDDEN>
<630ff886-efa1-f122-3344-4dce503d0c0c@HIDDEN> <m25xtmz0fj.fsf@HIDDEN>
<CANh=_JFKyagKwzmFUW7h4dUWCp69kT+F8RrL1QS9TyM5q8LjJA@HIDDEN>
<m2y169ul2u.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <m2y169ul2u.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------iouCoNOL5L3leXbWV2Imh1Dk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 7/10/2024 12:02 PM, George Huebner wrote:
> As I understand it, this decision was likely made because the dimensions
> of SVGs is weird; they aren't inherently required to have a size, but
> the SVG itself can define a viewbox with accompanying width and height
> (full disclosure: I have no idea what I'm talking about).
I think this was just a mistake. I tried getting rid of the special case
for SVG and everything works just fine in builds with or without SVG
support. (In builds without SVG support, you just get the empty string
where an SVG would be, before and after this patch.)
--------------iouCoNOL5L3leXbWV2Imh1Dk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
name="0001-Treat-SVG-images-like-other-image-types-in-shr-put-i.patch"
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename*0="0001-Treat-SVG-images-like-other-image-types-in-shr-put-i.pa";
filename*1="tch"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64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--------------iouCoNOL5L3leXbWV2Imh1Dk--
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#71913: 29.1; shr: shr-resize-image does not behave as expected
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 05:59:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.71913.B71913.17207639382139 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71913
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@HIDDEN>
Cc: george@HIDDEN, 71913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 71913-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B71913.17207639382139
(code B ref 71913); Fri, 12 Jul 2024 05:59:01 +0000
Received: (at 71913) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2024 05:58:58 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53008 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1sS9J3-0000YQ-TF
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 01:58:58 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33646)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1sS9J1-0000YB-Iq
for 71913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 01:58:56 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
id 1sS9Iv-0002uT-NF; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 01:58:49 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
mime-version; bh=webEypETvvpwHuo9SIJ1LNo5B0+4wMohBvWAxV30Okg=; b=VneQVktC7NU3
Xd7woVA4byuHz23wE+g+5JnpHNOOiQZkblR+Kkin3wih3K3Nrg0kqxvv3pU2xxNJ8286QYbvnZLt6
ZXZyu9O3Hx0YePxAb/Od4IE8OPcHylzbLfVpqwYuavncXc9KjqSv0cHnktIazDVfoZtDbaGXh782E
M1hHygkw6TDjBrLNNbymA4KdLdCLCtn1wkkKdStsxGby/mw/7VJ7hkriPDHnUprzXZA2Zmdz7FdfX
r9gN1hrJqWkZWVTHcxYgbn+1WJQJANMDO6qgW8v1Q3U2TfL6MBTvv/1+9hzeY244k8yOkpb7YsxTM
DhPqNXtrh5n6cpTmBblnHQ==;
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 08:58:44 +0300
Message-Id: <86zfqnkv6z.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <a4a59311-ee79-6ee5-f20d-087a23f8f6fb@HIDDEN> (message from
Jim Porter on Thu, 11 Jul 2024 16:51:53 -0700)
References: <m2a5izyo8v.fsf@HIDDEN>
<630ff886-efa1-f122-3344-4dce503d0c0c@HIDDEN> <m25xtmz0fj.fsf@HIDDEN>
<CANh=_JFKyagKwzmFUW7h4dUWCp69kT+F8RrL1QS9TyM5q8LjJA@HIDDEN>
<m2y169ul2u.fsf@HIDDEN> <a4a59311-ee79-6ee5-f20d-087a23f8f6fb@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)
> Cc: 71913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 16:51:53 -0700
> From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@HIDDEN>
>
> On 7/10/2024 12:02 PM, George Huebner wrote:
> > As I understand it, this decision was likely made because the dimensions
> > of SVGs is weird; they aren't inherently required to have a size, but
> > the SVG itself can define a viewbox with accompanying width and height
> > (full disclosure: I have no idea what I'm talking about).
>
> I think this was just a mistake. I tried getting rid of the special case
> for SVG and everything works just fine in builds with or without SVG
> support. (In builds without SVG support, you just get the empty string
> where an SVG would be, before and after this patch.)
What version of librsvg did you test this with? Please test also with
librsvg 2.40.x, as that was the last version which didn't need a Rust
compiler to build, and so some people (including yours truly) stay
with those old versions to this day.
Thanks.
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#71913: 29.1; shr: shr-resize-image does not behave as expected
Resent-From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 04:13:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.71913.B71913.17208439653065 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71913
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Cc: george@HIDDEN, 71913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 71913-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B71913.17208439653065
(code B ref 71913); Sat, 13 Jul 2024 04:13:01 +0000
Received: (at 71913) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2024 04:12:45 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54965 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1sSU7o-0000nN-UB
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2024 00:12:45 -0400
Received: from mail-oo1-f49.google.com ([209.85.161.49]:54320)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <jporterbugs@HIDDEN>) id 1sSU7n-0000n8-2E
for 71913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2024 00:12:44 -0400
Received: by mail-oo1-f49.google.com with SMTP id
006d021491bc7-5cdf7edddc5so247333eaf.0
for <71913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 21:12:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1720843896; x=1721448696; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to
:content-language:subject:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=zRLsjD66xeS6N3MwScLapLERQGYW5iOWLqx74wariJc=;
b=Oy9WtjPmfogn4pcmCzeBEAwxLFzpMz32cy5jIyu6uGUXBBArobhRrzdTs2EMekcUcs
bwAXKrJVKzPf9XuGkB7tSA6oE4CyB5+W/YOavNRu9pI+bnHTwyMCG0XCC2bG1uEld17Z
p04WNFl6y8xejPiRcWxcin/9lKDsAhoEnRYFgkXExaAHUzU5rQXxGy1WMNwTsXIU/kV+
0rMwg1Rg/G9u87dhCnaGvnmOyE3QH63GxHJ9tlFfSnibtu07Qji/P3ddOvPE4kUtdiT6
RtBC4VHgrcm9OQdCPi3VV+622scCoJjavswLcNjQkLYPkrfUU7CrrGuXR4KBPKDkDR7V
CQtQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720843896; x=1721448696;
h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to
:content-language:subject:mime-version:date:message-id
:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=zRLsjD66xeS6N3MwScLapLERQGYW5iOWLqx74wariJc=;
b=NGSKrIT8KfGAGvtbO6B2bXxfLScWR2kfvW3XPYkdVjZ44qYvEjJb46ipxf4HasqX+G
ahDPsyHphqeil+Qk6GX8RiJfI/GEcn27Q5cuDspfmvQRZSCHhSYZuxGgkgzEmkP2tAIE
4bcaTDMJm9mwmWMjYSRD4TOQDuiK5ifLU5MQpUA2PxDpS2PIGwC6aZQDAhwL3MwRcBXy
8qFJE5dme+5ENllIo3sDcuyPN9CGjitYSgjDm6TVD4q+3SrNO0eQ5NOlQlldz9lF8i4w
54sBoJvzTCx/LKUFIIhVk7n1GQ0ZQ2R/n8RO3SZ0yZgLoRe2ewEz7vYgdE61Z1Qo6WFU
eDLw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1;
AJvYcCXqqpo2HQL0H0S6F8jzAJ5CmmNe65DtT158sUbbRAcXIh4T+TxF/ItQCOIXHPqMaS5C5lNq5x74xJXD4O7ePVrGjpopwz8=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxD4J6aSEEDCNaEf0QnR039s7ee4Zg1uSgF/Ua2uHNadzISUtkj
D//FRs/Xh2I0t54xwQvEk4A/jzBvaestLMbywdunoAp9fCXC3HHf
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHCVGWvIjTc7EMrZf6UVgqB2DPKEeiBkly7QFlfPOp67yyCQ2oJNoOlxETBm6Az6uulS0qSQQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6358:705c:b0:1a2:598a:452e with SMTP id
e5c5f4694b2df-1aade085043mr945792455d.1.1720843896440;
Fri, 12 Jul 2024 21:11:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (syn-023-240-098-037.res.spectrum.com.
[23.240.98.37]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
41be03b00d2f7-78e32e49ac4sm201113a12.12.2024.07.12.21.11.35
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
Fri, 12 Jul 2024 21:11:36 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <915d9119-1f82-0f0c-4c8b-e08e41315100@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 21:11:35 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: en-US
References: <m2a5izyo8v.fsf@HIDDEN>
<630ff886-efa1-f122-3344-4dce503d0c0c@HIDDEN> <m25xtmz0fj.fsf@HIDDEN>
<CANh=_JFKyagKwzmFUW7h4dUWCp69kT+F8RrL1QS9TyM5q8LjJA@HIDDEN>
<m2y169ul2u.fsf@HIDDEN> <a4a59311-ee79-6ee5-f20d-087a23f8f6fb@HIDDEN>
<86zfqnkv6z.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <86zfqnkv6z.fsf@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
On 7/11/2024 10:58 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> What version of librsvg did you test this with? Please test also with
> librsvg 2.40.x, as that was the last version which didn't need a Rust
> compiler to build, and so some people (including yours truly) stay
> with those old versions to this day.
I'm usually using 2.48.x since it's what my distro provides, but I've
now tested against 2.40.21 (after a slightly bumpy road getting
everything to build correctly) and the results are the same for both
versions of librsvg. (Out of an abundance of caution, I've also verified
with 'ldd' that the correct version of librsvg is in use during these
tests.)
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#71913: 29.1; shr: shr-resize-image does not behave as expected
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 06:21:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.71913.B71913.172085165026701 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71913
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@HIDDEN>
Cc: george@HIDDEN, 71913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 71913-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B71913.172085165026701
(code B ref 71913); Sat, 13 Jul 2024 06:21:01 +0000
Received: (at 71913) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2024 06:20:50 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55010 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1sSW7m-0006wa-De
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2024 02:20:50 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60022)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1sSW7k-0006wL-GU
for 71913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2024 02:20:49 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
id 1sSW7e-0000HI-9s; Sat, 13 Jul 2024 02:20:42 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
mime-version; bh=OrVZ/RJXv1DE4kV3rc5WYKH9lxW79H4gKnRmmagW6ac=; b=OSfUZoja0BtH
eRQkQYpUdP8ZCWgTy1JbpR5EveNIVM5hRXZYZpR6/8APTi0mcmQs+edbmGPmAwk6cBx3ZKZBov3xx
njS8RkpMyhNWJxV9faHwZCfoQ5kUp2GygEmQz0p0bqSwbQ45DpWaJXJnLy9bI6haNTUhye6+HzPa2
coo5UVrWGvEYTGMwE0OLWctQ/WoAaTHrdIMV7LLRJ324WS0ev/RH8OjMfUUcozcy9ortRoJansjC6
jiZPYqTMFOaoTkU0E0cyJOGp+i0lAXVaodt3d68DT/9pkMHIZx4zn8wPmLK78t/b68y1xakIy7H9I
EtEv9EzHSS3r0iKekPbv1g==;
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 09:20:39 +0300
Message-Id: <867cdplsnc.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <915d9119-1f82-0f0c-4c8b-e08e41315100@HIDDEN> (message from
Jim Porter on Fri, 12 Jul 2024 21:11:35 -0700)
References: <m2a5izyo8v.fsf@HIDDEN>
<630ff886-efa1-f122-3344-4dce503d0c0c@HIDDEN> <m25xtmz0fj.fsf@HIDDEN>
<CANh=_JFKyagKwzmFUW7h4dUWCp69kT+F8RrL1QS9TyM5q8LjJA@HIDDEN>
<m2y169ul2u.fsf@HIDDEN> <a4a59311-ee79-6ee5-f20d-087a23f8f6fb@HIDDEN>
<86zfqnkv6z.fsf@HIDDEN> <915d9119-1f82-0f0c-4c8b-e08e41315100@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)
> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 21:11:35 -0700
> Cc: george@HIDDEN, 71913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@HIDDEN>
>
> On 7/11/2024 10:58 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > What version of librsvg did you test this with? Please test also with
> > librsvg 2.40.x, as that was the last version which didn't need a Rust
> > compiler to build, and so some people (including yours truly) stay
> > with those old versions to this day.
>
> I'm usually using 2.48.x since it's what my distro provides, but I've
> now tested against 2.40.21 (after a slightly bumpy road getting
> everything to build correctly) and the results are the same for both
> versions of librsvg. (Out of an abundance of caution, I've also verified
> with 'ldd' that the correct version of librsvg is in use during these
> tests.)
Thanks. Then I have no objections for fixing this on the emacs-30
release branch.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.