GNU logs - #72588, boring messages

Message sent to bug-gzip@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#72588: performance bug regarding CRC32 algorithm implementation
Resent-From: Daniel Ruf <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gzip@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 06:53:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.72588.B.172344555832582 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 72588 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Daniel Ruf <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 08:51:50 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001da80f061f76ee41"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::52d;
 envelope-from=ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN; helo=mail-ed1-x52d.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)

--0000000000001da80f061f76ee41
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

During my research regarding faster gzip implementations I found
https://medium.com/@techhara/speeding-up-system-gzip-by-60-75edbc8ac0e8

Is the article correct and the implementation should be updated, or is the
benchmark flawed?

--0000000000001da80f061f76ee41
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto">During my research regarding faster gzip implementations =
I found=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://medium.com/@techhara/speeding-up-system-gzi=
p-by-60-75edbc8ac0e8">https://medium.com/@techhara/speeding-up-system-gzip-=
by-60-75edbc8ac0e8</a><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Is the =
article correct and the implementation should be updated, or is the benchma=
rk flawed?</div></div>

--0000000000001da80f061f76ee41--

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Daniel Ruf <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#72588: Acknowledgement (performance bug regarding CRC32
 algorithm implementation)
Message-ID: <handler.72588.B.172344555832582.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 72588
X-Gnu-PR-Package: gzip
Reply-To: 72588 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 06:53:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-gzip@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 72588 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
72588: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D72588
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-gzip@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#72588: performance bug regarding CRC32 algorithm implementation
Resent-From: p.z.l <p.z.l@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gzip@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 12:21:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.72588.B.17238108145094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 72588 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp"
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: GWP-Draft
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 09:36:39 +0200
Priority: normal
From: p.z.l <p.z.l@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <f39e34139a224e3cbe1d9617e87fc647@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <<CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN>>
References: <CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN>
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=193.222.135.158; envelope-from=p.z.l@HIDDEN;
 helo=mx-out.tlen.pl
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001,
 SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:20:11 -0400
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)

--2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Is the article correct and the implementation should be updated, or is the =
 benchmark flawed?   I&#39;ll go classic - it&#39;s not a bug it&#39;s a fe=
ature.   lists.gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gzip/2023-11/=
msg00000.html=0D

--2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<div><br></div><div class=3D"nh_extra"><blockquote class=3D"nh_quote" style=
=3D"border-left: 2px solid #999; padding-left: 8px; margin: 0;"><div id=3D"=
gwp7d01f648"><div>Is the article correct and the implementation should be u=
pdated, or is the<br></div><div>benchmark flawed?<br></div></div></blockquo=
te></div><div><br></div><div>I'll go classic - it's not a bug it's a featur=
e.<br></div><div><br></div><div><a href=3D"https://lists.gnu.org/archive/ht=
ml/bug-gzip/2023-11/msg00000.html">https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-g=
zip/2023-11/msg00000.html</a><br></div>
--2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp--

Message sent to bug-gzip@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#72588: performance bug regarding CRC32 algorithm implementation
Resent-From: p.z.l <p.z.l@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gzip@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 12:21:03 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.72588.B72588.17238108145085 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 72588 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp"
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: GWP-Draft
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 09:36:39 +0200
Priority: normal
From: p.z.l <p.z.l@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <f39e34139a224e3cbe1d9617e87fc647@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <<CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN>>
References: <CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN>
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

--2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Is the article correct and the implementation should be updated, or is the =
 benchmark flawed?   I&#39;ll go classic - it&#39;s not a bug it&#39;s a fe=
ature.   lists.gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gzip/2023-11/=
msg00000.html=0D

--2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<div><br></div><div class=3D"nh_extra"><blockquote class=3D"nh_quote" style=
=3D"border-left: 2px solid #999; padding-left: 8px; margin: 0;"><div id=3D"=
gwp7d01f648"><div>Is the article correct and the implementation should be u=
pdated, or is the<br></div><div>benchmark flawed?<br></div></div></blockquo=
te></div><div><br></div><div>I'll go classic - it's not a bug it's a featur=
e.<br></div><div><br></div><div><a href=3D"https://lists.gnu.org/archive/ht=
ml/bug-gzip/2023-11/msg00000.html">https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-g=
zip/2023-11/msg00000.html</a><br></div>
--2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp--

Message sent:

MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#72588: closed (performance bug regarding CRC32 algorithm
 implementation)
CC: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Message-ID: <handler.72588.D72588.17392603346659.ackdone <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <7aedeee9-84b3-4178-af4e-7103f9bdc649@HIDDEN>
 <CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: closed 72588
X-Gnu-PR-Package: gzip
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 07:53:02 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1739260382-6734-0"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1739260382-6734-0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:52:02 -0800
with message-id <7aedeee9-84b3-4178-af4e-7103f9bdc649@HIDDEN>
and subject line Fwd: Re: performance bug regarding CRC32 algorithm impleme=
ntation
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #72588,
regarding performance bug regarding CRC32 algorithm implementation
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@HIDDEN)


--=20
72588: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D72588
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

------------=_1739260382-6734-0
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Aug 2024 06:52:38 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42299 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1sdOv0-0008TR-IS
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 02:52:38 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:56810)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>) id 1sdOuz-0008TJ-PU
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 02:52:38 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>)
 id 1sdOuT-0005tD-NV
 for bug-gzip@HIDDEN; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 02:52:05 -0400
Received: from mail-ed1-x52d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52d])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>)
 id 1sdOuR-00085r-V4
 for bug-gzip@HIDDEN; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 02:52:05 -0400
Received: by mail-ed1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id
 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5a10835487fso5345677a12.1
 for <bug-gzip@HIDDEN>; Sun, 11 Aug 2024 23:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=googlemail.com; s=20230601; t=1723445522; x=1724050322; darn=gnu.org;
 h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject
 :date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=ZOO8f3TC5alKR7ZvBSxBZyAL4IW56OYRKE92J78DkEI=;
 b=Nhto9rRxmPQ7XmRoZl158GawCAJXmiLRq3FhOZcFu4TRPNZy3sJdUUzHeqBQGAttk2
 qX/9E7oAO5QqVwV/MRCqhK9nJ5gdlnDmZEKcJkIP9e1PNVIh4wAVOkCN+I4E/txFzMjh
 HZFTeuTrav5clSlg/fYt0COB2FtuaWFIlXE4XUq5bgjtxwFC+2oczFmxlZlQ0tdWSEF9
 1nZhbhQebpL3dcuxVVAwLWDxQU+AgLeU3jx+cHST1/A/SeH1zsL6hy5Duk7baq0Ra6KQ
 K9D4JYhYRVn/iwJTCuwBy5v+UAZxFZ2ugRTICShBsFV2xQgYvYEEBGRziIDe2MiuxFEz
 XtpQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1723445522; x=1724050322;
 h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state
 :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=ZOO8f3TC5alKR7ZvBSxBZyAL4IW56OYRKE92J78DkEI=;
 b=dqptH+MA53/bPXsdfsEJxYzcoKIy8CCIZLndzaFMFQWkktPd3tHNrLf3dh+fIvhZPI
 eGm6U8bQXDzUZl3Mg/xvH28uUCJcoY7WXosmURKxcSBOTlKfslmNktpnbAIA7igHTbzI
 iOzQT4h7VzQmHjdpB4QP4f1+wOETakeoac/7orbNr/r3SWX1faTLLd1qxHrBkazs24DR
 U0H79FDZVknK+jvLMWfT7Uzr1a4hXA1CdfPCGmJIqtGQoXaUabRiEHzltTdqhiDd1gIO
 qAmAqW8isvqGD1QeFuIYGTMNeF4+twhuPW6E0Y8BipniRa+gUNBqjD5xXKE/ZLhcSG2i
 wkbQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxZGLzQ/2bgB8FMKf3VwCW9aOnu1bgGSt9LLkmqZG1TtmdZd4rm
 qYmJFR9yitQTbRyfYMnebTKlS1vbwkOXSJ2fZYrpg915jU4paCLJ5H9AyfEZwI8nnfB01gVhIoA
 xr/zKTplwrs51P+R/IYSRwbMGwGuv0Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGdZkkJTyFqolhONpOvCDTjNfmxlNPKM1XF0B8o1xHZhorTYwEUqGjoJGP+q5PRt1IQ81RRtd1i7X2AKduF6YI=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7d90:b0:a7a:8e0f:aaf0 with SMTP id
 a640c23a62f3a-a80aa5dd5c6mr624010566b.36.1723445521784; Sun, 11 Aug 2024
 23:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Daniel Ruf <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 08:51:50 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN>
Subject: performance bug regarding CRC32 algorithm implementation
To: bug-gzip@HIDDEN
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001da80f061f76ee41"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::52d;
 envelope-from=ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN; helo=mail-ed1-x52d.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)

--0000000000001da80f061f76ee41
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

During my research regarding faster gzip implementations I found
https://medium.com/@techhara/speeding-up-system-gzip-by-60-75edbc8ac0e8

Is the article correct and the implementation should be updated, or is the
benchmark flawed?

--0000000000001da80f061f76ee41
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto">During my research regarding faster gzip implementations =
I found=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://medium.com/@techhara/speeding-up-system-gzi=
p-by-60-75edbc8ac0e8">https://medium.com/@techhara/speeding-up-system-gzip-=
by-60-75edbc8ac0e8</a><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Is the =
article correct and the implementation should be updated, or is the benchma=
rk flawed?</div></div>

--0000000000001da80f061f76ee41--



------------=_1739260382-6734-0
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at 72588-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2025 07:52:14 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54196 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1thl41-0001jK-PQ
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 02:52:14 -0500
Received: from mail.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.66]:34734)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <eggert@HIDDEN>)
 id 1thl3y-0001iu-Lf
 for 72588-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 02:52:11 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2CE13C011BE0;
 Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:52:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10032) with ESMTP
 id 1c2Er8_S2tDO; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:52:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8A83C00FA94;
 Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:52:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.cs.ucla.edu 9C8A83C00FA94
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cs.ucla.edu;
 s=9D0B346E-2AEB-11ED-9476-E14B719DCE6C; t=1739260324;
 bh=JMBaaGSsSMFJfB1LKWhDGVmNYdU2CerkWV00DZwqvJg=;
 h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:To:From;
 b=iCl89rHuSZTdkWhxaOriY0nIobeub2pbl/MRn7yaJz4DHzOiGgvOdblTrDaC44zYF
 84KowwWogb5/pMPRxQknzLNzRw5GWGnYzBLitlaTrsxmXa2DIEyWNUDV4ZNOcaaMYx
 bJkO1Do1LH2x852gIb8Sx7JoJEmIGW+jy+n2gQ4ILPoqC3R/rwZ6rtXNwjzo4mdbev
 CMZ0L2oPfU4rNv19kFZq5lJp35aTzC8mxKRHegZvWcqtidlL1WBdoQd3NJIgEr5Tst
 exk3j2xuFHjwtbpI8JHuHemRcc9SkgAyjGm4vvt05qXqHKSLTxuodHyra77mCBuqEL
 FoheZdtWamGkg==
X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at mail.cs.ucla.edu
Received: from mail.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10026) with ESMTP
 id yYCLQtEveEkC; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:52:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.254.12] (unknown [47.154.28.214])
 by mail.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F6383C011BE0;
 Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:52:04 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------PaUri0nPZGZsYqhE2zw6yjfE"
Message-ID: <7aedeee9-84b3-4178-af4e-7103f9bdc649@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:52:02 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
References: <f6004703-a3b6-4b13-b349-f940795fce3e@HIDDEN>
Subject: Fwd: Re: performance bug regarding CRC32 algorithm implementation
Content-Language: en-US
To: Daniel Ruf <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>
From: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN>
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
In-Reply-To: <f6004703-a3b6-4b13-b349-f940795fce3e@HIDDEN>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <f6004703-a3b6-4b13-b349-f940795fce3e@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 72588-done
Cc: 72588-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------PaUri0nPZGZsYqhE2zw6yjfE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

[Resending because my earlier email had the wrong bug number.]

Due to work by Sam Russell and others it looks like gzip now has faster 
CRC32 code on Savannah master, so closing this old bug report. See:

https://bugs.gnu.org/74927
https://bugs.gnu.org/74192
--------------PaUri0nPZGZsYqhE2zw6yjfE
Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="Re: performance bug regarding CRC32
 algorithm implementation.eml"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename*0="Re: performance bug regarding
 CRC32 algorithm implementation"; filename*1=".eml"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Message-ID: <f6004703-a3b6-4b13-b349-f940795fce3e@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:49:13 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: Daniel Ruf <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>
Cc: 75288-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: performance bug regarding CRC32 algorithm implementation
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Due to work by Sam Russell and others it looks like gzip now has faster 
CRC32 code on Savannah master, so closing this old bug report. See:

https://bugs.gnu.org/74927
https://bugs.gnu.org/74192

--------------PaUri0nPZGZsYqhE2zw6yjfE--


------------=_1739260382-6734-0--

Message sent:

MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Daniel Ruf <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#72588: closed (Fwd: Re: performance bug regarding CRC32
 algorithm implementation)
Message-ID: <handler.72588.D72588.17392603346659.notifdone <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <7aedeee9-84b3-4178-af4e-7103f9bdc649@HIDDEN>
 <CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 72588
X-Gnu-PR-Package: gzip
Reply-To: 72588 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 07:53:02 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1739260382-6734-1"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1739260382-6734-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Your bug report

#72588: performance bug regarding CRC32 algorithm implementation

which was filed against the gzip package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 72588 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

--=20
72588: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D72588
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

------------=_1739260382-6734-1
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at 72588-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2025 07:52:14 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54196 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1thl41-0001jK-PQ
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 02:52:14 -0500
Received: from mail.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.66]:34734)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <eggert@HIDDEN>)
 id 1thl3y-0001iu-Lf
 for 72588-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 02:52:11 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2CE13C011BE0;
 Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:52:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10032) with ESMTP
 id 1c2Er8_S2tDO; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:52:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8A83C00FA94;
 Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:52:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.cs.ucla.edu 9C8A83C00FA94
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cs.ucla.edu;
 s=9D0B346E-2AEB-11ED-9476-E14B719DCE6C; t=1739260324;
 bh=JMBaaGSsSMFJfB1LKWhDGVmNYdU2CerkWV00DZwqvJg=;
 h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:To:From;
 b=iCl89rHuSZTdkWhxaOriY0nIobeub2pbl/MRn7yaJz4DHzOiGgvOdblTrDaC44zYF
 84KowwWogb5/pMPRxQknzLNzRw5GWGnYzBLitlaTrsxmXa2DIEyWNUDV4ZNOcaaMYx
 bJkO1Do1LH2x852gIb8Sx7JoJEmIGW+jy+n2gQ4ILPoqC3R/rwZ6rtXNwjzo4mdbev
 CMZ0L2oPfU4rNv19kFZq5lJp35aTzC8mxKRHegZvWcqtidlL1WBdoQd3NJIgEr5Tst
 exk3j2xuFHjwtbpI8JHuHemRcc9SkgAyjGm4vvt05qXqHKSLTxuodHyra77mCBuqEL
 FoheZdtWamGkg==
X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at mail.cs.ucla.edu
Received: from mail.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10026) with ESMTP
 id yYCLQtEveEkC; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:52:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.254.12] (unknown [47.154.28.214])
 by mail.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F6383C011BE0;
 Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:52:04 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------PaUri0nPZGZsYqhE2zw6yjfE"
Message-ID: <7aedeee9-84b3-4178-af4e-7103f9bdc649@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:52:02 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
References: <f6004703-a3b6-4b13-b349-f940795fce3e@HIDDEN>
Subject: Fwd: Re: performance bug regarding CRC32 algorithm implementation
Content-Language: en-US
To: Daniel Ruf <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>
From: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN>
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
In-Reply-To: <f6004703-a3b6-4b13-b349-f940795fce3e@HIDDEN>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <f6004703-a3b6-4b13-b349-f940795fce3e@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 72588-done
Cc: 72588-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------PaUri0nPZGZsYqhE2zw6yjfE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

[Resending because my earlier email had the wrong bug number.]

Due to work by Sam Russell and others it looks like gzip now has faster 
CRC32 code on Savannah master, so closing this old bug report. See:

https://bugs.gnu.org/74927
https://bugs.gnu.org/74192
--------------PaUri0nPZGZsYqhE2zw6yjfE
Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="Re: performance bug regarding CRC32
 algorithm implementation.eml"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename*0="Re: performance bug regarding
 CRC32 algorithm implementation"; filename*1=".eml"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Message-ID: <f6004703-a3b6-4b13-b349-f940795fce3e@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:49:13 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: Daniel Ruf <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>
Cc: 75288-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: performance bug regarding CRC32 algorithm implementation
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Due to work by Sam Russell and others it looks like gzip now has faster 
CRC32 code on Savannah master, so closing this old bug report. See:

https://bugs.gnu.org/74927
https://bugs.gnu.org/74192

--------------PaUri0nPZGZsYqhE2zw6yjfE--


------------=_1739260382-6734-1
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Aug 2024 06:52:38 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42299 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1sdOv0-0008TR-IS
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 02:52:38 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:56810)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>) id 1sdOuz-0008TJ-PU
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 02:52:38 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>)
 id 1sdOuT-0005tD-NV
 for bug-gzip@HIDDEN; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 02:52:05 -0400
Received: from mail-ed1-x52d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52d])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>)
 id 1sdOuR-00085r-V4
 for bug-gzip@HIDDEN; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 02:52:05 -0400
Received: by mail-ed1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id
 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5a10835487fso5345677a12.1
 for <bug-gzip@HIDDEN>; Sun, 11 Aug 2024 23:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=googlemail.com; s=20230601; t=1723445522; x=1724050322; darn=gnu.org;
 h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject
 :date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=ZOO8f3TC5alKR7ZvBSxBZyAL4IW56OYRKE92J78DkEI=;
 b=Nhto9rRxmPQ7XmRoZl158GawCAJXmiLRq3FhOZcFu4TRPNZy3sJdUUzHeqBQGAttk2
 qX/9E7oAO5QqVwV/MRCqhK9nJ5gdlnDmZEKcJkIP9e1PNVIh4wAVOkCN+I4E/txFzMjh
 HZFTeuTrav5clSlg/fYt0COB2FtuaWFIlXE4XUq5bgjtxwFC+2oczFmxlZlQ0tdWSEF9
 1nZhbhQebpL3dcuxVVAwLWDxQU+AgLeU3jx+cHST1/A/SeH1zsL6hy5Duk7baq0Ra6KQ
 K9D4JYhYRVn/iwJTCuwBy5v+UAZxFZ2ugRTICShBsFV2xQgYvYEEBGRziIDe2MiuxFEz
 XtpQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1723445522; x=1724050322;
 h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state
 :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=ZOO8f3TC5alKR7ZvBSxBZyAL4IW56OYRKE92J78DkEI=;
 b=dqptH+MA53/bPXsdfsEJxYzcoKIy8CCIZLndzaFMFQWkktPd3tHNrLf3dh+fIvhZPI
 eGm6U8bQXDzUZl3Mg/xvH28uUCJcoY7WXosmURKxcSBOTlKfslmNktpnbAIA7igHTbzI
 iOzQT4h7VzQmHjdpB4QP4f1+wOETakeoac/7orbNr/r3SWX1faTLLd1qxHrBkazs24DR
 U0H79FDZVknK+jvLMWfT7Uzr1a4hXA1CdfPCGmJIqtGQoXaUabRiEHzltTdqhiDd1gIO
 qAmAqW8isvqGD1QeFuIYGTMNeF4+twhuPW6E0Y8BipniRa+gUNBqjD5xXKE/ZLhcSG2i
 wkbQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxZGLzQ/2bgB8FMKf3VwCW9aOnu1bgGSt9LLkmqZG1TtmdZd4rm
 qYmJFR9yitQTbRyfYMnebTKlS1vbwkOXSJ2fZYrpg915jU4paCLJ5H9AyfEZwI8nnfB01gVhIoA
 xr/zKTplwrs51P+R/IYSRwbMGwGuv0Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGdZkkJTyFqolhONpOvCDTjNfmxlNPKM1XF0B8o1xHZhorTYwEUqGjoJGP+q5PRt1IQ81RRtd1i7X2AKduF6YI=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7d90:b0:a7a:8e0f:aaf0 with SMTP id
 a640c23a62f3a-a80aa5dd5c6mr624010566b.36.1723445521784; Sun, 11 Aug 2024
 23:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Daniel Ruf <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 08:51:50 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN>
Subject: performance bug regarding CRC32 algorithm implementation
To: bug-gzip@HIDDEN
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001da80f061f76ee41"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::52d;
 envelope-from=ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN; helo=mail-ed1-x52d.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)

--0000000000001da80f061f76ee41
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

During my research regarding faster gzip implementations I found
https://medium.com/@techhara/speeding-up-system-gzip-by-60-75edbc8ac0e8

Is the article correct and the implementation should be updated, or is the
benchmark flawed?

--0000000000001da80f061f76ee41
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto">During my research regarding faster gzip implementations =
I found=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://medium.com/@techhara/speeding-up-system-gzi=
p-by-60-75edbc8ac0e8">https://medium.com/@techhara/speeding-up-system-gzip-=
by-60-75edbc8ac0e8</a><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Is the =
article correct and the implementation should be updated, or is the benchma=
rk flawed?</div></div>

--0000000000001da80f061f76ee41--



------------=_1739260382-6734-1--

Last modified: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 08:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.