Received: (at 72588-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2025 07:52:14 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 11 02:52:14 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54196 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1thl41-0001jK-PQ for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 02:52:14 -0500 Received: from mail.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.66]:34734) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <eggert@HIDDEN>) id 1thl3y-0001iu-Lf for 72588-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 02:52:11 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2CE13C011BE0; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:52:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10032) with ESMTP id 1c2Er8_S2tDO; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:52:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8A83C00FA94; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:52:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.cs.ucla.edu 9C8A83C00FA94 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cs.ucla.edu; s=9D0B346E-2AEB-11ED-9476-E14B719DCE6C; t=1739260324; bh=JMBaaGSsSMFJfB1LKWhDGVmNYdU2CerkWV00DZwqvJg=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:To:From; b=iCl89rHuSZTdkWhxaOriY0nIobeub2pbl/MRn7yaJz4DHzOiGgvOdblTrDaC44zYF 84KowwWogb5/pMPRxQknzLNzRw5GWGnYzBLitlaTrsxmXa2DIEyWNUDV4ZNOcaaMYx bJkO1Do1LH2x852gIb8Sx7JoJEmIGW+jy+n2gQ4ILPoqC3R/rwZ6rtXNwjzo4mdbev CMZ0L2oPfU4rNv19kFZq5lJp35aTzC8mxKRHegZvWcqtidlL1WBdoQd3NJIgEr5Tst exk3j2xuFHjwtbpI8JHuHemRcc9SkgAyjGm4vvt05qXqHKSLTxuodHyra77mCBuqEL FoheZdtWamGkg== X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at mail.cs.ucla.edu Received: from mail.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10026) with ESMTP id yYCLQtEveEkC; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:52:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.254.12] (unknown [47.154.28.214]) by mail.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F6383C011BE0; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:52:04 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------PaUri0nPZGZsYqhE2zw6yjfE" Message-ID: <7aedeee9-84b3-4178-af4e-7103f9bdc649@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:52:02 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird References: <f6004703-a3b6-4b13-b349-f940795fce3e@HIDDEN> Subject: Fwd: Re: performance bug regarding CRC32 algorithm implementation Content-Language: en-US To: Daniel Ruf <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN> From: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN> Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department In-Reply-To: <f6004703-a3b6-4b13-b349-f940795fce3e@HIDDEN> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <f6004703-a3b6-4b13-b349-f940795fce3e@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 72588-done Cc: 72588-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------PaUri0nPZGZsYqhE2zw6yjfE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit [Resending because my earlier email had the wrong bug number.] Due to work by Sam Russell and others it looks like gzip now has faster CRC32 code on Savannah master, so closing this old bug report. See: https://bugs.gnu.org/74927 https://bugs.gnu.org/74192 --------------PaUri0nPZGZsYqhE2zw6yjfE Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="Re: performance bug regarding CRC32 algorithm implementation.eml" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename*0="Re: performance bug regarding CRC32 algorithm implementation"; filename*1=".eml" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <f6004703-a3b6-4b13-b349-f940795fce3e@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:49:13 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: Daniel Ruf <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN> Cc: 75288-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org From: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: performance bug regarding CRC32 algorithm implementation Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Due to work by Sam Russell and others it looks like gzip now has faster CRC32 code on Savannah master, so closing this old bug report. See: https://bugs.gnu.org/74927 https://bugs.gnu.org/74192 --------------PaUri0nPZGZsYqhE2zw6yjfE--
Daniel Ruf <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>:Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN>:Received: (at 72588) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2024 12:20:14 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 16 08:20:13 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51827 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1sevwC-0001Jw-Ti for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:20:13 -0400 Received: from mx-out.tlen.pl ([193.222.135.158]:34936) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <p.z.l@HIDDEN>) id 1serWX-00024N-QD for 72588 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 03:37:26 -0400 Received: (wp-smtpd smtp.tlen.pl 18181 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2024 09:36:39 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=o2.pl; s=1024a; t=1723793799; bh=8sittpmX2n0ncFeoUSZIk3VhwHRz24+bQMPXAP7ek2s=; h=Subject:From:To; b=o0szju57d1/OVr3xj3mpueR8xYPuyKzb7AH6bDCnrk6N0u7+3252DRde4SvriFQ3c vtNfSfHeCwMWQJZiAr1UhVHWsao7I8Vy+YBCX21WE0ZKSnnx6jw/6BnIm/A1KwvieD bjGVP2F5Joq/CEaaqr70WglYCe6Ts9SESFyBeqoU= Received: from localhost.localdomain (HELO localhost) ([46.134.106.54]) (envelope-sender <p.z.l@HIDDEN>) by smtp.tlen.pl (WP-SMTPD) with SMTP for <bug-gzip@HIDDEN>; 16 Aug 2024 09:36:39 +0200 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp" MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: GWP-Draft X-FactoryStamp: H--- Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 09:36:39 +0200 X-Draft-Variant: reply X-Draft-Parentmailid: 530c05b6c03856606a7f9911 X-Draft-Contenttype: text/html Priority: normal Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_bug=2372588=3A_performance_bug_regarding_CRC32_algorithm_implementation?= From: =?UTF-8?Q?p=2Ez=2El?= <p.z.l@HIDDEN> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_Ruf_via_=22GNU_gzip_discussion_and_bug_reports=2E?= <bug-gzip@HIDDEN>, =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_Ruf?= <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>, =?UTF-8?Q?72588=40debbugs=2Egnu=2Eorg?= <72588 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Message-ID: <f39e34139a224e3cbe1d9617e87fc647@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <<CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN>> References: <CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN> X-WP-MailID: dfbc3e8a8fe1aeba0ae89ab442cfff09 X-WP-AV: skaner antywirusowy Poczty o2 X-WP-SPAM: NO 0000010 [0YP0] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 72588 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:20:11 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Is the article correct and the implementation should be updated, or is the = benchmark flawed? I'll go classic - it's not a bug it's a fe= ature. lists.gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gzip/2023-11/= msg00000.html=0D --2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 <div><br></div><div class=3D"nh_extra"><blockquote class=3D"nh_quote" style= =3D"border-left: 2px solid #999; padding-left: 8px; margin: 0;"><div id=3D"= gwp7d01f648"><div>Is the article correct and the implementation should be u= pdated, or is the<br></div><div>benchmark flawed?<br></div></div></blockquo= te></div><div><br></div><div>I'll go classic - it's not a bug it's a featur= e.<br></div><div><br></div><div><a href=3D"https://lists.gnu.org/archive/ht= ml/bug-gzip/2023-11/msg00000.html">https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-g= zip/2023-11/msg00000.html</a><br></div> --2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp--
bug-gzip@HIDDEN:bug#72588; Package gzip.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2024 12:20:14 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 16 08:20:14 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51829 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1sevwD-0001K3-U1 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:20:14 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:45658) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <p.z.l@HIDDEN>) id 1serWZ-00024a-6X for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 03:37:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <p.z.l@HIDDEN>) id 1serVx-0001Gl-MX for bug-gzip@HIDDEN; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 03:36:49 -0400 Received: from mx-out.tlen.pl ([193.222.135.158]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <p.z.l@HIDDEN>) id 1serVv-0005mf-7t for bug-gzip@HIDDEN; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 03:36:49 -0400 Received: (wp-smtpd smtp.tlen.pl 18181 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2024 09:36:39 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=o2.pl; s=1024a; t=1723793799; bh=8sittpmX2n0ncFeoUSZIk3VhwHRz24+bQMPXAP7ek2s=; h=Subject:From:To; b=o0szju57d1/OVr3xj3mpueR8xYPuyKzb7AH6bDCnrk6N0u7+3252DRde4SvriFQ3c vtNfSfHeCwMWQJZiAr1UhVHWsao7I8Vy+YBCX21WE0ZKSnnx6jw/6BnIm/A1KwvieD bjGVP2F5Joq/CEaaqr70WglYCe6Ts9SESFyBeqoU= Received: from localhost.localdomain (HELO localhost) ([46.134.106.54]) (envelope-sender <p.z.l@HIDDEN>) by smtp.tlen.pl (WP-SMTPD) with SMTP for <bug-gzip@HIDDEN>; 16 Aug 2024 09:36:39 +0200 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp" MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: GWP-Draft X-FactoryStamp: H--- Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 09:36:39 +0200 X-Draft-Variant: reply X-Draft-Parentmailid: 530c05b6c03856606a7f9911 X-Draft-Contenttype: text/html Priority: normal Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_bug=2372588=3A_performance_bug_regarding_CRC32_algorithm_implementation?= From: =?UTF-8?Q?p=2Ez=2El?= <p.z.l@HIDDEN> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_Ruf_via_=22GNU_gzip_discussion_and_bug_reports=2E?= <bug-gzip@HIDDEN>, =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_Ruf?= <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>, =?UTF-8?Q?72588=40debbugs=2Egnu=2Eorg?= <72588 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Message-ID: <f39e34139a224e3cbe1d9617e87fc647@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <<CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN>> References: <CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN> X-WP-MailID: dfbc3e8a8fe1aeba0ae89ab442cfff09 X-WP-AV: skaner antywirusowy Poczty o2 X-WP-SPAM: NO 0000010 [0YP0] Received-SPF: pass client-ip=193.222.135.158; envelope-from=p.z.l@HIDDEN; helo=mx-out.tlen.pl X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:20:11 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) --2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Is the article correct and the implementation should be updated, or is the = benchmark flawed? I'll go classic - it's not a bug it's a fe= ature. lists.gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gzip/2023-11/= msg00000.html=0D --2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 <div><br></div><div class=3D"nh_extra"><blockquote class=3D"nh_quote" style= =3D"border-left: 2px solid #999; padding-left: 8px; margin: 0;"><div id=3D"= gwp7d01f648"><div>Is the article correct and the implementation should be u= pdated, or is the<br></div><div>benchmark flawed?<br></div></div></blockquo= te></div><div><br></div><div>I'll go classic - it's not a bug it's a featur= e.<br></div><div><br></div><div><a href=3D"https://lists.gnu.org/archive/ht= ml/bug-gzip/2023-11/msg00000.html">https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-g= zip/2023-11/msg00000.html</a><br></div> --2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp--
bug-gzip@HIDDEN:bug#72588; Package gzip.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Aug 2024 06:52:38 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 12 02:52:38 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42299 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1sdOv0-0008TR-IS for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 02:52:38 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:56810) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>) id 1sdOuz-0008TJ-PU for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 02:52:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>) id 1sdOuT-0005tD-NV for bug-gzip@HIDDEN; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 02:52:05 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x52d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52d]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>) id 1sdOuR-00085r-V4 for bug-gzip@HIDDEN; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 02:52:05 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5a10835487fso5345677a12.1 for <bug-gzip@HIDDEN>; Sun, 11 Aug 2024 23:52:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20230601; t=1723445522; x=1724050322; darn=gnu.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZOO8f3TC5alKR7ZvBSxBZyAL4IW56OYRKE92J78DkEI=; b=Nhto9rRxmPQ7XmRoZl158GawCAJXmiLRq3FhOZcFu4TRPNZy3sJdUUzHeqBQGAttk2 qX/9E7oAO5QqVwV/MRCqhK9nJ5gdlnDmZEKcJkIP9e1PNVIh4wAVOkCN+I4E/txFzMjh HZFTeuTrav5clSlg/fYt0COB2FtuaWFIlXE4XUq5bgjtxwFC+2oczFmxlZlQ0tdWSEF9 1nZhbhQebpL3dcuxVVAwLWDxQU+AgLeU3jx+cHST1/A/SeH1zsL6hy5Duk7baq0Ra6KQ K9D4JYhYRVn/iwJTCuwBy5v+UAZxFZ2ugRTICShBsFV2xQgYvYEEBGRziIDe2MiuxFEz XtpQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1723445522; x=1724050322; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZOO8f3TC5alKR7ZvBSxBZyAL4IW56OYRKE92J78DkEI=; b=dqptH+MA53/bPXsdfsEJxYzcoKIy8CCIZLndzaFMFQWkktPd3tHNrLf3dh+fIvhZPI eGm6U8bQXDzUZl3Mg/xvH28uUCJcoY7WXosmURKxcSBOTlKfslmNktpnbAIA7igHTbzI iOzQT4h7VzQmHjdpB4QP4f1+wOETakeoac/7orbNr/r3SWX1faTLLd1qxHrBkazs24DR U0H79FDZVknK+jvLMWfT7Uzr1a4hXA1CdfPCGmJIqtGQoXaUabRiEHzltTdqhiDd1gIO qAmAqW8isvqGD1QeFuIYGTMNeF4+twhuPW6E0Y8BipniRa+gUNBqjD5xXKE/ZLhcSG2i wkbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxZGLzQ/2bgB8FMKf3VwCW9aOnu1bgGSt9LLkmqZG1TtmdZd4rm qYmJFR9yitQTbRyfYMnebTKlS1vbwkOXSJ2fZYrpg915jU4paCLJ5H9AyfEZwI8nnfB01gVhIoA xr/zKTplwrs51P+R/IYSRwbMGwGuv0Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGdZkkJTyFqolhONpOvCDTjNfmxlNPKM1XF0B8o1xHZhorTYwEUqGjoJGP+q5PRt1IQ81RRtd1i7X2AKduF6YI= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7d90:b0:a7a:8e0f:aaf0 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a80aa5dd5c6mr624010566b.36.1723445521784; Sun, 11 Aug 2024 23:52:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Daniel Ruf <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 08:51:50 +0200 Message-ID: <CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN> Subject: performance bug regarding CRC32 algorithm implementation To: bug-gzip@HIDDEN Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001da80f061f76ee41" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::52d; envelope-from=ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN; helo=mail-ed1-x52d.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --0000000000001da80f061f76ee41 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" During my research regarding faster gzip implementations I found https://medium.com/@techhara/speeding-up-system-gzip-by-60-75edbc8ac0e8 Is the article correct and the implementation should be updated, or is the benchmark flawed? --0000000000001da80f061f76ee41 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"auto">During my research regarding faster gzip implementations = I found=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://medium.com/@techhara/speeding-up-system-gzi= p-by-60-75edbc8ac0e8">https://medium.com/@techhara/speeding-up-system-gzip-= by-60-75edbc8ac0e8</a><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Is the = article correct and the implementation should be updated, or is the benchma= rk flawed?</div></div> --0000000000001da80f061f76ee41--
Daniel Ruf <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>:bug-gzip@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-gzip@HIDDEN:bug#72588; Package gzip.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.